| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Pottsey
   |
Posted - 2004.12.21 19:04:00 -
[1]
öLesson two: how to tank hull being hugh hull hitpoints should be a hugh advantage after all it's your HULL, it is the main structure of the ship.ö
ItÆs the hull as in the hallways you craw walk down, the rooms you store your ammo and equipment in along with cables that transfer power though your ship. Taken hull damage should be a serious matter which is why you take module damage. You should never be tanking hull as in fixing it in battle as the main way to survive. Once your down to hull someone is hitting the inside of you ship and doing series damage to the internal workings of the ship. ThatÆs the same reason you donÆt have resistanceÆs on hull as your talking about the internal equipment and hallways.
Hull tanking should never be the main form of tanking for a ship. Its a fall back to give you time to warp out.
_________________________________________________
Gallente defensive innovation comes from unexpected source. |
Pottsey
|
Posted - 2004.12.21 19:04:00 -
[2]
öLesson two: how to tank hull being hugh hull hitpoints should be a hugh advantage after all it's your HULL, it is the main structure of the ship.ö
ItÆs the hull as in the hallways you craw walk down, the rooms you store your ammo and equipment in along with cables that transfer power though your ship. Taken hull damage should be a serious matter which is why you take module damage. You should never be tanking hull as in fixing it in battle as the main way to survive. Once your down to hull someone is hitting the inside of you ship and doing series damage to the internal workings of the ship. ThatÆs the same reason you donÆt have resistanceÆs on hull as your talking about the internal equipment and hallways.
Hull tanking should never be the main form of tanking for a ship. Its a fall back to give you time to warp out.
_________________________________________________
Gallente defensive innovation comes from unexpected source. |
Pottsey
|
Posted - 2004.12.21 19:55:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Pottsey on 21/12/2004 19:55:13
"Having 2 tanking methods is more then enough. Adding another for ccp to balance is asking for too much."
I dont meant to be picky but we have 3 useable tanking methods now this hull tanking would be a 4th method.
_________________________________________________
Gallente defensive innovation comes from unexpected source. |
Pottsey
|
Posted - 2004.12.21 19:55:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Pottsey on 21/12/2004 19:55:13
"Having 2 tanking methods is more then enough. Adding another for ccp to balance is asking for too much."
I dont meant to be picky but we have 3 useable tanking methods now this hull tanking would be a 4th method.
_________________________________________________
Gallente defensive innovation comes from unexpected source. |
Pottsey
|
Posted - 2004.12.21 21:20:00 -
[5]
ôIs passive shield tanking viable for amarrian ships?ö
I donÆt know never tried it and I donÆt recall anyone else trying it. It should be viable but not as good as the other passive tanked ships due to the slot layout.
_________________________________________________
Gallente defensive innovation comes from unexpected source. |
Pottsey
|
Posted - 2004.12.21 21:20:00 -
[6]
ôIs passive shield tanking viable for amarrian ships?ö
I donÆt know never tried it and I donÆt recall anyone else trying it. It should be viable but not as good as the other passive tanked ships due to the slot layout.
_________________________________________________
Gallente defensive innovation comes from unexpected source. |
| |
|