EVE Search - GM caves to reimbursment demand

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Crime and Punishment

GM caves to reimbursment demand - Dangerous precedent set

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.08.11 14:14:00 - [1] More disturbing than some GM making bad decisions is the carebears request to have his killer banned from the game. "oh noes he messed with my pixels. please throw him out of the sandbox" Talk about butthurt.
Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.08.11 15:53:00 - [2] Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 Not only can you not do that but you can only abandon nearby wrecks. So if a mission runner has wrecks ALL OVER the place he's screwed. What the aggressor was doing was borderline exploit. The 15-minute aggression timer is supposed to last that much as long as that person isn't aggressing (ie docked). The existence of carebears is an aggressive action.
Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.08.11 16:38:00 - [3] Originally by: Richard Christy Originally by: Kiritsubo Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 Not only can you not do that but you can only abandon nearby wrecks. So if a mission runner has wrecks ALL OVER the place he's screwed. What the aggressor was doing was borderline exploit. The 15-minute aggression timer is supposed to last that much as long as that person isn't aggressing (ie docked). The existence of carebears is an aggressive action. Luckily, you're not forced to interact with them. They exist...
Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.08.11 16:47:00 - [4] Edited by: Kiritsubo on 11/08/2010 16:47:57 Originally by: Tortugan CCP has classified shooting wrecks in the past as an exploit. Either link a conflicting devblog or GTFO. NO U! U show me devblog that piloting Vagabond not eXploitz! Seriously, saying something is an exploit and then putting the onus on me to prove it isn't is asking me to prove the negative. You show me the Devblog addressing aggro extension as an exploit.
Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.08.11 17:13:00 - [5] Originally by: OneTimeAt BannedSpank Cry me a fcking river jesus christ literally babbies. Also lol Literally about ninjas.
Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.08.12 10:49:00 - [6] Originally by: OneTimeAt BannedSpank I don't get it. Can you circle the important part?
Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.08.12 14:09:00 - [7] Originally by: Skippermonkey Edited by: Skippermonkey on 12/08/2010 14:00:58 Originally by: Aiwha Piwates who wont risk real piracy want it to be a game mechanic. They QQ, blah blah blah... So you must be one of those "If i wanted pvp i'd go to losec/null" kinda guys eh? Listen to the lowbear, real men camp stations with carriers.
Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.08.12 15:15:00 - [8] Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 Edited by: MatrixSkye Mk2 on 12/08/2010 14:38:41 Originally by: Skippermonkey Edited by: Skippermonkey on 12/08/2010 14:34:07 Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 Originally by: Awesome Possum Lots of whiners in this thread. Yep. Starting with the OP and followed by you. Take your own advice and stop whining about this already. ...said the biggest carebear in this thread Matrix Skye's record on Battleclinic is truely puzzling Ninjas calling others carebears . You guys are too cute. We're all carebears now...
Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.08.12 15:39:00 - [9] Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 Originally by: Skippermonkey You get your knickers in a twist when somebody takes your space pixels and get all shooty Actually, the only one with his knickers in a twist and crying about someone else getting space pixels is YOU. What is it you say? Ah yes: HTFU It's been more than 4 hours, should I call my doctor?
Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.08.12 17:43:00 - [10] Originally by: Atomik Harmonik I, for one, would like to see CCP reimburse and give back Providence to CVA. The only reason CVA lost the main battle was because their fleet commander jumped the fleet out and then jumped it right back into the middle of a blob and none of their ships could target due to lag. Of course the other ships already had the grid loaded and could shoot with no return fire at all. Lag is not a game mechanic or feature. CVA pilots should have at least been given the opportunity to fight back, instead of being fish in a barrel. The whole Region should be reset and all ships replaced. After that fight, it was all downhill and now we no longer have a safe NRDS place in 0.0 to go. You'll need to expand your list of demands to properly intimdate the GMs. Ask for a recount, your old job back and a 6000 SUX. Wouldn't hurt to throw in 1 million ISK and the head of Alfredo Garcia.

Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.08.13 02:28:00 - [11] Edited by: Kiritsubo on 13/08/2010 02:33:10 Edited by: Kiritsubo on 13/08/2010 02:31:26 No bad tears or bad ***. *. *. *. *****. *** Galore's Flying Circus
Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.08.13 15:41:00 - [12] Originally by: SupaKudoRio Edited by: SupaKudoRio on 13/08/2010 14:38:26 Originally by: Skippermonkey Originally by: SupaKudoRio If this is considered an exploit, why wasn't the killer warned and/or banned? If it isn't an exploit, why was the CNR reimbursed? In a similarly stupid line of thought, why arent all jetcan miners banned for using a cargo capacity exploit!? huh huh ...!? ... because it was officially stated that abusing jetcans like that is not an exploit? CCP didn't expect it, but decided to keep it because it had a decent set of pros and cons. In the spirit of this thread, I'm going to need a link to a Dev Blog stating jet can mining is not an exploit. Otherwise you're a kiddie diddler.
Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.08.13 19:14:00 - [13] Originally by: Alara IonStorm Were you born this angry or did you need to take a special class Rabies; carebears are known carriers.
Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.08.16 13:03:00 - [14] Originally by: K'racker those posters who have 0.0 history, and in-game time enough to recall this being labelled an exploit, have stated so. there, such a mechanic can't simply be waited out. and there's a lot more isk at stake, when applied to undockable supercaps. So you can't point to specific evidence and we should take your word for it cause you are older? ...Mom? Is that you? Why did you leave us? The Dev response you linked was in regards to ships not despawning after logoffski. It is not relevant to the topic at hand.
Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.08.16 16:59:00 - [15] Originally by: Skippermonkey Originally by: K'racker Originally by: CCP Gangleri Posted - 2009.11.13 18:10:00 "We are aware of the issue of players extending the aggression between pilots by interacting with their wreck, this is being fixed." bolded the relevant part for you. Oh no no no, i bolded, enlarged and made purple the relevant part FOR YOU If it was important enough 'to be fixed' it would have happened already. It hasn't been 18 months yet.
Kiritsubo Ritual Suicide	Posted - 2010.11.05 12:47:00 - [16]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.