|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ghoest
   |
Posted - 2010.08.15 14:05:00 -
[1]
Really dumb idea(but not new idea.)
The scan mechanics(both on board and probes) are too powerful/fast to make this reasonable.
If there was to be a massive nerf to scanning then I would be all for it.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|
Ghoest
|
Posted - 2010.08.15 18:26:00 -
[2]
For the pin heads who dont understand why the current scanners + no local would be different than wormholes(like Accura).
Skilled players can find if anyone is in a system in a couple seconds and they can find and warp to them in under a minute.
It is not a viable nor fun play style to have to run the scanner every 10 seconds when you are plexing or ratting in 0.0 Its a mind numbingly repetitive action that would prety much define bad game design.
Yet this is the only defense.
In Worm Holes its not so bad because players cant systematically go through them region by region.
If this were implemented it would completely destroy little draw is left to going 0.0 outside of a sovereign system.
What I said is obvious to everyone who actually thinks- including the devs. Thats why they have never removed local even though they would like too.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|
Ghoest
|
Posted - 2010.08.15 18:29:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Ghoest on 15/08/2010 18:32:29
I personally would love to see delayed local.
IF they made it such that on board scanners could not read anyone - unless they were shown in local. And if scanning down players took maybe 3-4 times longer.
People asking for this are sort of like the stupid pirates who dont understand that they will get more kills on carebears is low sec was safer.
You cant kill empty space.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|
Ghoest
|
Posted - 2010.08.16 01:36:00 -
[4]
Looking over Acuras recent threads I think she is annoyed/bored with the game in general and trying to see if she can get the the general populace ranting for bad ideas just to see what happens.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|
Ghoest
|
Posted - 2010.08.16 08:08:00 -
[5]
 Originally by: Super Whopper
I can't believe you guys are still responding to this thread. Let me explain Akita's motives.
- Akita wants CCP to remove local in 0.0 so they kill whatever's keft of EVE, they're doing that anyway so why not help them a little?
- Akita is a troll.
Its not surprising that people respond to a troll.
Its surprising that so many people enthusiastically agree with her suggestion which is obviously meant to wreck EVE some more.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|
Ghoest
|
Posted - 2010.08.16 22:21:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Emperor Cheney
Originally by: Ghoest
Originally by: Super Whopper
I can't believe you guys are still responding to this thread. Let me explain Akita's motives.
- Akita wants CCP to remove local in 0.0 so they kill whatever's keft of EVE, they're doing that anyway so why not help them a little?
- Akita is a troll.
Its not surprising that people respond to a troll.
Its surprising that so many people enthusiastically agree with her suggestion which is obviously meant to wreck EVE some more.
1) Akita has a long history of posting some of the most thoughtful pieces on these boards. Calling him/her (statistically, him) a troll just belies your lack of effective argument.
2) Googling your username + "battleclinic," I do not think you know how to play this game very well, if at all, and consequently your ideas on what would make this game better or worse are hard to take seriously.
I have a long history of reading posts on the forums.
Lately I think Acura is intentionally trying to cause issue over stuff she doesnt even belive herself.
I say this because Acura has a history of being smart.
I suspect she is bored or annoyed with the game as I said.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|
Ghoest
|
Posted - 2010.08.17 03:59:00 -
[7]
Wouldnt simply removing the on board scanner(along with adding delayed local) be a good move?
Make the game more hard core for both sides?
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|
Ghoest
|
Posted - 2010.08.18 03:46:00 -
[8]
Acura is out doing herself. By only selectively answering the people who point out how faulty her position is she is able to totally avoid the real reasons its bad idea9as she presented it) and act like shes making a case.
This is almost as cool as last week when she used the word "invalid" to describe arguments she disagreed with based on subjective reasons.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|
|
|
| |
|