| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Aelita
   |
Posted - 2004.12.25 18:14:00 -
[1]
CCP please it's time to do something with secure can plague. Secure cans close to any object up to 10 000 km should decay at next DT no matter if they are anchored or not.
Look how now belts looks in empire.
|
Aelita
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 18:14:00 -
[2]
CCP please it's time to do something with secure can plague. Secure cans close to any object up to 10 000 km should decay at next DT no matter if they are anchored or not.
Look how now belts looks in empire.
|
Vaughn Zoran
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 18:19:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Aelita
CCP please it's time to do something with secure can plague. Secure cans close to any object up to 10 000 km should decay at next DT no matter if they are anchored or not.
Look how now belts looks in empire.
Correct me if I'm wrong but haven't you ALWAYS been able to anchor in .7 and below?
I see nothing wrong here as it's intended and let me tell you if I had a can here and it was destroyed at downtime I would surely ***** and hold you responsible..
Now, that being said, the ones ABOVE .7 sec status; yes those should go as they were an exploit getting them there in the first places as I've been told..
|
Vaughn Zoran
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 18:19:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Aelita
CCP please it's time to do something with secure can plague. Secure cans close to any object up to 10 000 km should decay at next DT no matter if they are anchored or not.
Look how now belts looks in empire.
Correct me if I'm wrong but haven't you ALWAYS been able to anchor in .7 and below?
I see nothing wrong here as it's intended and let me tell you if I had a can here and it was destroyed at downtime I would surely ***** and hold you responsible..
Now, that being said, the ones ABOVE .7 sec status; yes those should go as they were an exploit getting them there in the first places as I've been told..
|
Buraken
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 18:28:00 -
[5]
I bet 95% of those are from miners that use macro programs
|
Buraken
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 18:28:00 -
[6]
I bet 95% of those are from miners that use macro programs
|
pshepherd
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 19:01:00 -
[7]
or miners who want to avoid ore thieves.... honestly, if they don't use cans and they lose their ore its their fault. And if they do use cans then their ruining the scenery 
|
pshepherd
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 19:01:00 -
[8]
or miners who want to avoid ore thieves.... honestly, if they don't use cans and they lose their ore its their fault. And if they do use cans then their ruining the scenery
|
Rattman
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 21:16:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Aelita
CCP please it's time to do something with secure can plague. Secure cans close to any object up to 10 000 km should decay at next DT no matter if they are anchored or not.
Look how now belts looks in empire.
Should just make a weekly rental based on the security rating of the system
I know I have can stuck all over the universe that I wont ever return to. If there was a way I could just remove them I would
All opinions, rambling or not, expressed here are my own and not that of my corp or alliance |
Rattman
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 21:16:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Aelita
CCP please it's time to do something with secure can plague. Secure cans close to any object up to 10 000 km should decay at next DT no matter if they are anchored or not.
Look how now belts looks in empire.
Should just make a weekly rental based on the security rating of the system
I know I have can stuck all over the universe that I wont ever return to. If there was a way I could just remove them I would
All opinions, rambling or not, expressed here are my own and not that of my corp or alliance |
Ulendar
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 21:17:00 -
[11]
They should just make tainers pop if they arent used after a sertain amount of time...
Originally by: cashman
It's time for Eris to get a clue. CCP should make a statement about this.
It's the exact same things as what Zombie did, you may not attack in "safe-areas" (empire/within sentry range) without loosing your ship.
|
Ulendar
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 21:17:00 -
[12]
They should just make tainers pop if they arent used after a sertain amount of time...
Originally by: cashman
It's time for Eris to get a clue. CCP should make a statement about this.
It's the exact same things as what Zombie did, you may not attack in "safe-areas" (empire/within sentry range) without loosing your ship.
|
Karch
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 22:07:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Ulendar
They should just make tainers pop if they arent used after a sertain amount of time...
good idea but i think the system is fine the way it is. when i jump into a belt full of cans, it causes maybe half a second of lag. nothing to worry about. just stop whining about it and either find another belt or deal with it.
---
Was it good for you? |
Karch
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 22:07:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Ulendar
They should just make tainers pop if they arent used after a sertain amount of time...
good idea but i think the system is fine the way it is. when i jump into a belt full of cans, it causes maybe half a second of lag. nothing to worry about. just stop whining about it and either find another belt or deal with it.
---
Was it good for you? |
Mirelath
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 23:34:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Karch
Originally by: Ulendar
They should just make tainers pop if they arent used after a sertain amount of time...
good idea but i think the system is fine the way it is. when i jump into a belt full of cans, it causes maybe half a second of lag. nothing to worry about. just stop whining about it and either find another belt or deal with it.
It's not so bad in a belt. My main problem is with all the spam/advert ones in 1.0/0.9 systems. They shouldn't even be there anyway, they're all abandoned, and they're very annoying to see everytime when undocking/passing through. Not to mention what newbies think when they undock from their newbie stations and see a load of recruitment cans promising great futures, free ships and easy money right outside their station...
It'd be nice if after 2 months of no use or something, they'd unanchor and then pop eventually.
|
Mirelath
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 23:34:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Karch
Originally by: Ulendar
They should just make tainers pop if they arent used after a sertain amount of time...
good idea but i think the system is fine the way it is. when i jump into a belt full of cans, it causes maybe half a second of lag. nothing to worry about. just stop whining about it and either find another belt or deal with it.
It's not so bad in a belt. My main problem is with all the spam/advert ones in 1.0/0.9 systems. They shouldn't even be there anyway, they're all abandoned, and they're very annoying to see everytime when undocking/passing through. Not to mention what newbies think when they undock from their newbie stations and see a load of recruitment cans promising great futures, free ships and easy money right outside their station...
It'd be nice if after 2 months of no use or something, they'd unanchor and then pop eventually.
|
Siddy
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 23:39:00 -
[17]
first you whine baut orethiefs, now this
-------------------------------------------
|
Siddy
|
Posted - 2004.12.25 23:39:00 -
[18]
first you whine baut orethiefs, now this
-------------------------------------------
|
Danton Marcellus
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 00:50:00 -
[19]
Fusing Containers
Convert Stations
|
Danton Marcellus
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 00:50:00 -
[20]
Fusing Containers
Convert Stations
|
kurg
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 01:03:00 -
[21]
I agree with the original poster, cans _has_ to decay or you have to have 'parking tickets' these should be incremental, something like:
system-sec-rating x days anchored / rating-towards-system-faction x some insane large factor
would work
also 'hacking'->stealing cans should be possible
even the paranoid has real enemies...
|
kurg
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 01:03:00 -
[22]
I agree with the original poster, cans _has_ to decay or you have to have 'parking tickets' these should be incremental, something like:
system-sec-rating x days anchored / rating-towards-system-faction x some insane large factor
would work
also 'hacking'->stealing cans should be possible
even the paranoid has real enemies...
|
Aelita
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 09:48:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Vaughn Zoran
Originally by: Aelita
CCP please it's time to do something with secure can plague. Secure cans close to any object up to 10 000 km should decay at next DT no matter if they are anchored or not.
Look how now belts looks in empire.
Correct me if I'm wrong but haven't you ALWAYS been able to anchor in .7 and below?
I see nothing wrong here as it's intended and let me tell you if I had a can here and it was destroyed at downtime I would surely ***** and hold you responsible..
Now, that being said, the ones ABOVE .7 sec status; yes those should go as they were an exploit getting them there in the first places as I've been told..
I'm not talking about exploit or possibility. If you look at my picture with all these cans EVE looks so ugly. Advertising around gates getting my nerves too. Why billboards still have space for rent text and CCP didn't implement rental service for legal advertisement. Secure cans anchored in space ruin EVE scenery and of course generating load for database.
I think EVE looks better before secure cans were added to game. At least DEVs can prevent existence of cans in visible range from any objects. It will prevent client from loading data about these cans. I doubt that a lot of cans make load time longer after jumping thru gate or to belt.
It's like pollution and no one like polluted neighborhood.
|
Aelita
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 09:48:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Vaughn Zoran
Originally by: Aelita
CCP please it's time to do something with secure can plague. Secure cans close to any object up to 10 000 km should decay at next DT no matter if they are anchored or not.
Look how now belts looks in empire.
Correct me if I'm wrong but haven't you ALWAYS been able to anchor in .7 and below?
I see nothing wrong here as it's intended and let me tell you if I had a can here and it was destroyed at downtime I would surely ***** and hold you responsible..
Now, that being said, the ones ABOVE .7 sec status; yes those should go as they were an exploit getting them there in the first places as I've been told..
I'm not talking about exploit or possibility. If you look at my picture with all these cans EVE looks so ugly. Advertising around gates getting my nerves too. Why billboards still have space for rent text and CCP didn't implement rental service for legal advertisement. Secure cans anchored in space ruin EVE scenery and of course generating load for database.
I think EVE looks better before secure cans were added to game. At least DEVs can prevent existence of cans in visible range from any objects. It will prevent client from loading data about these cans. I doubt that a lot of cans make load time longer after jumping thru gate or to belt.
It's like pollution and no one like polluted neighborhood.
|
Dufas
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 10:18:00 -
[25]
wow that is the worse desk top i ever seen not to mention the color 
|
Dufas
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 10:18:00 -
[26]
wow that is the worse desk top i ever seen not to mention the color
|
Chrisb6122
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 10:42:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Dufas
wow that is the worse desk top i ever seen not to mention the color
I would not say worst, I was more along the lines of "unique", each to there own  .
Magnet41 > i kill people ingame because i would take a bigger sec if i killed them in rl |
Chrisb6122
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 10:42:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Dufas
wow that is the worse desk top i ever seen not to mention the color
I would not say worst, I was more along the lines of "unique", each to there own .
Magnet41 > i kill people ingame because i would take a bigger sec if i killed them in rl |
S1EY
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 10:45:00 -
[29]
i throught ccp were bringing in a flagging system so that if some one takes out of a jettisoned can that is not theres unless in a gang then they would be flagged and could legally be destroyed . or have i heard wrong ? i think that would be a good idea there mining in my mega when a indy come and steals my ore lock him web him WS him and release the drones :)
|
S1EY
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 10:45:00 -
[30]
i throught ccp were bringing in a flagging system so that if some one takes out of a jettisoned can that is not theres unless in a gang then they would be flagged and could legally be destroyed . or have i heard wrong ? i think that would be a good idea there mining in my mega when a indy come and steals my ore lock him web him WS him and release the drones :)
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |