| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jenney
   |
Posted - 2004.12.26 11:03:00 -
[31]
I would like them to let us anchore the new extra big ones with 1m m^3 10m m^3 and 100m m^3 so that we can mine in to them 
And then make all Anchored cans pop after a week or better still unanchor for a day so every one can loot it then let it pop
This should clean up the belts a bit cut down on ore stealing as the secure cans now are just a bit crap for mining in to and as you could move the cans the agent mission runners with loads cans could sell them 
|
Jenney
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 11:03:00 -
[32]
I would like them to let us anchore the new extra big ones with 1m m^3 10m m^3 and 100m m^3 so that we can mine in to them
And then make all Anchored cans pop after a week or better still unanchor for a day so every one can loot it then let it pop
This should clean up the belts a bit cut down on ore stealing as the secure cans now are just a bit crap for mining in to and as you could move the cans the agent mission runners with loads cans could sell them
|
Jiin
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 11:10:00 -
[33]
 Originally by: Dufas
wow that is the worse desk top i ever seen not to mention the color 
http://www.deviantart.com/view/12659995/
^ Mine. :)
---
Jiin
Proud member of the Neohazard Freelancers |
Jiin
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 11:10:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Dufas
wow that is the worse desk top i ever seen not to mention the color
http://www.deviantart.com/view/12659995/
^ Mine. :)
---
Jiin
Proud member of the Neohazard Freelancers |
Karch
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 12:07:00 -
[35]
whine whine whine whine whine! i swear if CCP fixed everything you moaning bastards whine about, you would find more to whine about.
secure cans advertising in 1.0-0.9: there are not many of them and yes since they patched it i think they should be removed if empty.
secure cans advertising in 0.8 and below: leave them where they are. you cant accidently fly into them since they are 100k away from gates and stations so quit complaining. sometimes a few advert cans have helped me by stuff.
secure cans at belts: ITS WHAT THEY ARE DESIGNED FOR!
secure cans being hackable: they would no longer be secure then, would they?
flagging jet can ore thieves: no, no, no and no. if you dont want to get your crap stolen, mine into a secure can and make sure your hauler is fast enough to pick it all up before it fills. if you prefer to jet can mine (like me) then by all means do it but when an ore thief comes along and steals your ****, DO NOT BY ANY MEANS come here and whine about it. the current system is balanced and ethical. leave it how it is!
making secure cans bigger: this will lead to super indies and i dont think it should be allowed. can you imagine an itty 5 transporting ships about? it would completely unbalance the game. do not let it happen CCP!
---
Was it good for you? |
Karch
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 12:07:00 -
[36]
whine whine whine whine whine! i swear if CCP fixed everything you moaning bastards whine about, you would find more to whine about.
secure cans advertising in 1.0-0.9: there are not many of them and yes since they patched it i think they should be removed if empty.
secure cans advertising in 0.8 and below: leave them where they are. you cant accidently fly into them since they are 100k away from gates and stations so quit complaining. sometimes a few advert cans have helped me by stuff.
secure cans at belts: ITS WHAT THEY ARE DESIGNED FOR!
secure cans being hackable: they would no longer be secure then, would they?
flagging jet can ore thieves: no, no, no and no. if you dont want to get your crap stolen, mine into a secure can and make sure your hauler is fast enough to pick it all up before it fills. if you prefer to jet can mine (like me) then by all means do it but when an ore thief comes along and steals your ****, DO NOT BY ANY MEANS come here and whine about it. the current system is balanced and ethical. leave it how it is!
making secure cans bigger: this will lead to super indies and i dont think it should be allowed. can you imagine an itty 5 transporting ships about? it would completely unbalance the game. do not let it happen CCP!
---
Was it good for you? |
Aelita
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 12:10:00 -
[37]
Karch are you child? You call whining that I point out true problem. Did you even look at my picture?
I doubt not so step out of this thread if you doesn't like it, that's all. Get life and play with other childrens.
|
Aelita
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 12:10:00 -
[38]
Karch are you child? You call whining that I point out true problem. Did you even look at my picture?
I doubt not so step out of this thread if you doesn't like it, that's all. Get life and play with other childrens.
|
whejl
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 12:42:00 -
[39]
I've posted earlier in some thread that it would be nice if you could use a hauler much in the same way as a countainer, to move stuff directly into it, may it be with passwords or same-corp only.
Real cans would stil be useful for ammo dumps and storages in remote areas.
Ore thieves will have to find a new profession, there is lots of potential in the griefing bussines anyway.
|
whejl
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 12:42:00 -
[40]
I've posted earlier in some thread that it would be nice if you could use a hauler much in the same way as a countainer, to move stuff directly into it, may it be with passwords or same-corp only.
Real cans would stil be useful for ammo dumps and storages in remote areas.
Ore thieves will have to find a new profession, there is lots of potential in the griefing bussines anyway.
|
MinorFreak
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 13:00:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Rattman
Originally by: Aelita
CCP please it's time to do something with secure can plague. Secure cans close to any object up to 10 000 km should decay at next DT no matter if they are anchored or not.
Look how now belts looks in empire.
Should just make a weekly rental based on the security rating of the system
I know I have can stuck all over the universe that I wont ever return to. If there was a way I could just remove them I would
totally agree with rattman. Those spam containers in .9-1.0 space have been there for a looooooooooong time. Just remove them FFS. how difficult is that?
As for containers <0.9 regions that have been there, inactive, set up by inactive corps and defunct player accounts? Can't CCP code a simple decay program like Ultima Online has had for decades?
______________________
Best darned links ingame and out (backup) |
MinorFreak
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 13:00:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Rattman
Originally by: Aelita
CCP please it's time to do something with secure can plague. Secure cans close to any object up to 10 000 km should decay at next DT no matter if they are anchored or not.
Look how now belts looks in empire.
Should just make a weekly rental based on the security rating of the system
I know I have can stuck all over the universe that I wont ever return to. If there was a way I could just remove them I would
totally agree with rattman. Those spam containers in .9-1.0 space have been there for a looooooooooong time. Just remove them FFS. how difficult is that?
As for containers <0.9 regions that have been there, inactive, set up by inactive corps and defunct player accounts? Can't CCP code a simple decay program like Ultima Online has had for decades?
______________________
Best darned links ingame and out (backup) |
Tuwile Naldai
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 14:40:00 -
[43]
Originally by: pshepherd
or miners who want to avoid ore thieves.... honestly, if they don't use cans and they lose their ore its their fault. And if they do use cans then their ruining the scenery 
lol, good point
|
Tuwile Naldai
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 14:40:00 -
[44]
Originally by: pshepherd
or miners who want to avoid ore thieves.... honestly, if they don't use cans and they lose their ore its their fault. And if they do use cans then their ruining the scenery
lol, good point
|
Aelita
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 18:20:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Tuwile Naldai
Originally by: pshepherd
or miners who want to avoid ore thieves.... honestly, if they don't use cans and they lose their ore its their fault. And if they do use cans then their ruining the scenery
lol, good point
It has flaw. Just go there and check owners of cans. Many of them is not in game anymore :(. It's pollution and as it is it will become even worse problem over time. Secure can isn't solution for miner anyway because it's small and can't be moved easily.
If you look at my picture someone who want place new can in belt anyway can't find place to anchor it. I just asking for solution to clean up EVE face again. Secure cans should have limited use and should be limited to grid where no object is placed. That way people will be able store stuff outside station but at least will not create visible mess around...
I believe in better solution and some openminded person will find it. Continuing in current practise will lead into ugly miserable EVE living :(
|
Aelita
|
Posted - 2004.12.26 18:20:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Tuwile Naldai
Originally by: pshepherd
or miners who want to avoid ore thieves.... honestly, if they don't use cans and they lose their ore its their fault. And if they do use cans then their ruining the scenery
lol, good point
It has flaw. Just go there and check owners of cans. Many of them is not in game anymore :(. It's pollution and as it is it will become even worse problem over time. Secure can isn't solution for miner anyway because it's small and can't be moved easily.
If you look at my picture someone who want place new can in belt anyway can't find place to anchor it. I just asking for solution to clean up EVE face again. Secure cans should have limited use and should be limited to grid where no object is placed. That way people will be able store stuff outside station but at least will not create visible mess around...
I believe in better solution and some openminded person will find it. Continuing in current practise will lead into ugly miserable EVE living :(
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |