Originally by: Janya Rykayn

---

I would just like to say that I think you did an excellent job here. Most real world stock analysis reports aren't nearly this thorough.

---

Originally by: Lucyna

---

Looks very good.

The overarching recommendation is clear. However, I'd like a little bit more prose and better formating (maybe put it in table form) in page 3. Namely, make it clear where to buy and to sell again. I'm sure it's buried in there somewhere, but it looks like a 1980s computer printout when it should look slick and be very easy to read.

This has a lot of potential! Were you saying that after you pull the raw data that the report almost writes itself? Is it that automated yet?

---

Originally by: Jion Tichy

---

Again, I'd be interested in whatever, but there would need to be a proven track record for the predictions. The track record would have to exceed the amount that I make in my own trading in order to be worthwhile.

---

Originally by: Persian Golf

---

Very interesting article, I'd be interested in the product after it has been proven a bit more.

---

Originally by: Lucyna

---

Oh my this is taking off rather quickly!

As for the layout, I'm really busy at work. I might (read probably will forget about it) get one out to you tonight if it'd be helpful.

In the mean time, I know you mentioned using historical data, but I'd like some analysis of how well your recommendations would have fared. Maybe look at the data up to 90 days old, give a recommendation, and see how it plays out. This might help first time investors worry less about the quality and accuracy of the reports.

Unfortunately, my operation isn't into investing in commodities, mostly exploiting item spreads at the moment. If I had it in my mind to invest, then the cost would most certainly be worth it.

Have you made contack with Block Uks? (spelling?) Seems like there might be a place on his site for your reports, maybe a joint venture? I'm just throwing that out there, I don't know how it'd work

---

Originally by: 49473

---

Originally by: Lucyna

---

Oh my this is taking off rather quickly!

As for the layout, I'm really busy at work. I might (read probably will forget about it) get one out to you tonight if it'd be helpful.

In the mean time, I know you mentioned using historical data, but I'd like some analysis of how well your recommendations would have fared. Maybe look at the data up to 90 days old, give a recommendation, and see how it plays out. This might help first time investors worry less about the quality and accuracy of the reports.

Unfortunately, my operation isn't into investing in commodities, mostly exploiting item spreads at the moment. If I had it in my mind to invest, then the cost would most certainly be worth it.

Have you made contack with Block Uks? (spelling?) Seems like there might be a place on his site for your reports, maybe a joint venture? I'm just throwing that out there, I don't know how it'd work

---

Yes a layout would be very helpful, and you can have a discount on a future purchase.

I will be putting together a proper analysis or just how accurate its been.

Remember there is always custom or premier analysis options if you need a particular kind of service that is relevant to your trading.

I was intending to contact Block, however not about a joint venture but about data collection from his site.

I am trying to strike the right balance between commercial and non-commercial. I intend to start public data collection for an IPO/Bond risk analysis project soon.

---

Originally by: Lucyna

---

Linkage

That's a zip of an xls and an xlsx or whatever the 2007 format is called.

See if that works for you.

---

Originally by: Lucyna

---

Linkage

That's a zip of an xls and an xlsx or whatever the 2007 format is called.

See if that works for you.

---

Originally by: 49473

---

Edited by: 49473 on 09/09/2010 18:49:47

Originally by: Lucyna

---

Linkage

That's a zip of an xls and an xlsx or whatever the 2007 format is called.

See if that works for you.

---

I have created an alternate summary page following your design nearly exactly; font changed.

Here
This also uses newest proper data.
Where it says historical data, which data am I meant to take according to your layout?

This version will be included as standard in reports, changes maybe maybe to colouring to match general scheme or vice versa.

I am currently creating a custom point and figure chart modified for Eve commodities.

Suggestions are welcome, especially suggestions for new services that could be added and improvements.

---

Originally by: Lucyna

---

Originally by: 49473

---

Edited by: 49473 on 09/09/2010 18:49:47

Originally by: Lucyna

---

Linkage

That's a zip of an xls and an xlsx or whatever the 2007 format is called.

See if that works for you.

---

I have created an alternate summary page following your design nearly exactly; font changed.

Here
This also uses newest proper data.
Where it says historical data, which data am I meant to take according to your layout?

This version will be included as standard in reports, changes maybe maybe to colouring to match general scheme or vice versa.

I am currently creating a custom point and figure chart modified for Eve commodities.

Suggestions are welcome, especially suggestions for new services that could be added and improvements.

---

It's looking better and better.

2 things:

1.) [completely asthetic] it looks a bit dirty. I think there are ways to create PDF's from Excel printouts that wouldn't look stretched (blurry and pixelated). Also, in those printouts, there wouldn't be the grey gridlines in the background, which don't look great. Again, purely asthetic. See this: Linkage

2.) [for clarification] the *'s I put in indicate the things you can explain. I don't think the explanation should be on this sheet, but on a separate page.

For instance, is the Indicator Force Total = Sub-Indicator Total * Indicator Total? What does the number 21 tell us? This will help people who really don't know how TA works to better understand where the numbers are coming from, what they mean, and what actions are appropriate to take regarding them.

Also, maybe put in a column for strength of the buy, or indicate whether or not the investment is a strong buy (if your models allow such information).

Also, for the historical prices, you could just look at the average prices 7 days ago, 30 days ago, 90 days ago. Nothing fancy, but that's what I wanted to convey. This gives the investor a snapshot on the same screen as the analysis.

Anyway, it's really coming together nicely!

---

Originally by: 49473

---

Yes my model actually would allow for a box where the probability of the analysis being correct can be shown.

---

Quote:

---

I'm not too knowledgeable about markets and their dynamics but as far as I know, when you have more and more people capitalizing on a "trend", the predicted outcome might be different than the real one or even be opposite

---

Originally by: Ortacu

---

I'm not too knowledgeable about markets and their dynamics but as far as I know, when you have more and more people capitalizing on a "trend", the predicted outcome might be different than the real one or even be opposite. Otherwise put, the more people get to know about a good deal, the less "good"/profitable it will turn out to be. That being said, what happens if 10 people will ask you for a report on the same product? Will there be a limit on that?

Also, this will have a much more obvious effect on the Market Alert Service. If 50 people get identical reports on 15 items and start trading on them, it's not of much use anyway. Who chooses which are those 15 items? Are they huge volume commodities (like minerals) which would require BIG capital/stocks to change a trend?

Of course if I started from a wrong premise, these worries are not really based on solid ground. Yet it would be nice if someone could shed some light

---

Originally by: SumiSo

---

I'm just learning about technical analysis thanks to the recent wealth of threads. It was my (from a quick web search) understanding that a fibonacci retracement draws lines between a low trough and a high peak, but your retracements seem to drop well below historical lows. Is this a misunderstanding on my part or yours?

---

Originally by: 49473

---

Originally by: Mini Tee

---

I think you didn't apply the fib retracements correctly. You're supposed to measure the last swing and add the retracements there.
Lets say the swing from 11k and 9k, then .382 of that swing which would be 9764.

Other than that it's a nice report, but I don't see any use in it, (no offense) because I don't see the point in fancy indicators.

Here is my take on Ferrogel, pointing out a possible bottom and to where it might retrace, though it would be a countertrend trade, and I would not take it.

---

I understand how traditional fib retracements are done, however for my purposes and because of previous testing I've found what you see actually more useful for eve commodities; as strange as it is.
In the next future reports, they will be done ôrightö as well as ôwrongö

I donÆt take offence, I find technical analysis enjoyable, and I think it provides a way for me to keep my trading interesting. I could adopt more traditional and less fancy trading methods, but I donÆt particularly want to because I find this works better for me and enjoy it.

---