Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
El Liptonez
Caldari Blackwater USA Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 18:40:00 -
[61]
Originally by: Blaster Worm snip
Hey.
U mad?
|
Morvrin
Caldari Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 18:48:00 -
[62]
catchy title...
|
Pallidum Treponema
Caldari Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 18:57:00 -
[63]
Edited by: Pallidum Treponema on 11/09/2010 18:58:05
Originally by: Blaster Worm During the fighting, during one of the fairly insignificant diplomatic incidents, INIT suddenly demanded that AAA hand over R64 moon in Immensea. This was highly ôirregularö response which resulted in INIT being reset by AAA and general agreement not to hotdrop supers and no sov warfare on each other. This was acceptable to AAA since INITÆs general help in fighting was not something we could count on by that point.
Hi. Former AAA head diplomat here. I'd like to correct this statement, as it is, to the best of my knowledge, incorrect. INIT was not reset during any fighting, as the quote seems to make out. INIT was, in fact, reset quite some time prior to the fighting in question, as AAA were growing bored and needed additional targets. There was no official agreement not to hotdrop supers, nor was there any official agreement on sov warfare. If there were any unofficial agreements, it's beyond my knowledge, and therefore certainly beyond the knowledge of our pilots. During the course of diplomatic correspondence, INIT were asked to remove towers they had in catch. INIT complied with this request. In return, they asked for two towers in INIT space to be removed, one of which was on an R64 moon. I was informed that AAA would not remove this tower, which I relayed to INIT.
To reiterate: INIT was reset prior to any major fighting. INIT was reset before any requests about towers were made. The reset was initiated by AAA, and not by INIT, who at the time had no issues with remaining blue. There was no official agreement not to hotdrop supers nor regarding sov warfare. Pallidum Treponema Former AAA Head Diplomat
Edit: Typo --
|
Flinx Evenstar
Minmatar Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:03:00 -
[64]
Originally by: SirMolle Excuse me?
Are you trying to give me bad conscience that we are NOT supporting you, after YOU reset us, and basically left us no choice but to leave the north?
And you have the stomache to go public claiming the same?
Up yours "friend", go diaf. F*ck off tbh.
+rep not empty quoting --- Witness epic fleet battles in Dominion
|
Phreeze
Amarr ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:05:00 -
[65]
I was gonna make my own thread for this campaign, but I don't think I can top this hilarity.
|
tomd741
Amarr The Minutemen Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:07:00 -
[66]
I lol at all the misinformation people post. Atlas moving to Stain Regardless, the future looks very excting and the deals made today will be the straw the breaks the camels back tomorrow.
We can argue all day about the truth. I go by what I see and I tend to believe what AAA says. No ones perfect and everyonemakes mistakes. But on the whole AAA have stood up among the more honorable in Eve.
So, compared to Atlas, PL, IT, Goons, and other assorted alliances I tend to believe AAA's version.
Like I said it's my personal view only.
|
Carbine Toth
Amarr GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:08:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Pallidum Treponema
Hi. Former AAA head diplomat here. I'd like to correct this statement, as it is, to the best of my knowledge, incorrect. INIT was not reset during any fighting, as the quote seems to make out. INIT was, in fact, reset quite some time prior to the fighting in question, as AAA were growing bored and needed additional targets. There was no official agreement not to hotdrop supers, nor was there any official agreement on sov warfare. If there were any unofficial agreements, it's beyond my knowledge, and therefore certainly beyond the knowledge of our pilots. During the course of diplomatic correspondence, INIT were asked to remove towers they had in catch. INIT complied with this request. In return, they asked for two towers in INIT space to be removed, one of which was on an R64 moon. I was informed that AAA would not remove this tower, which I relayed to INIT.
To reiterate: INIT was reset prior to any major fighting. INIT was reset before any requests about towers were made. The reset was initiated by AAA, and not by INIT, who at the time had no issues with remaining blue. There was no official agreement not to hotdrop supers nor regarding sov warfare. Pallidum Treponema Former AAA Head Diplomat
Edit: Typo
And I was like damn
|
NeoKarn
Caldari SPORADIC MOVEMENT The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:11:00 -
[68]
Originally by: Pallidum Treponema Edited by: Pallidum Treponema on 11/09/2010 18:58:05
Originally by: Blaster Worm During the fighting, during one of the fairly insignificant diplomatic incidents, INIT suddenly demanded that AAA hand over R64 moon in Immensea. This was highly ôirregularö response which resulted in INIT being reset by AAA and general agreement not to hotdrop supers and no sov warfare on each other. This was acceptable to AAA since INITÆs general help in fighting was not something we could count on by that point.
Hi. Former AAA head diplomat here. I'd like to correct this statement, as it is, to the best of my knowledge, incorrect. INIT was not reset during any fighting, as the quote seems to make out. INIT was, in fact, reset quite some time prior to the fighting in question, as AAA were growing bored and needed additional targets. There was no official agreement not to hotdrop supers, nor was there any official agreement on sov warfare. If there were any unofficial agreements, it's beyond my knowledge, and therefore certainly beyond the knowledge of our pilots. During the course of diplomatic correspondence, INIT were asked to remove towers they had in catch. INIT complied with this request. In return, they asked for two towers in INIT space to be removed, one of which was on an R64 moon. I was informed that AAA would not remove this tower, which I relayed to INIT.
To reiterate: INIT was reset prior to any major fighting. INIT was reset before any requests about towers were made. The reset was initiated by AAA, and not by INIT, who at the time had no issues with remaining blue. There was no official agreement not to hotdrop supers nor regarding sov warfare. Pallidum Treponema Former AAA Head Diplomat
So I'm not fighting for the side of Evil ?
What the hell will i do with this cat and big black chair ?
|
HarrietMiers
Minmatar Helljumpers Dead Terrorists
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:15:00 -
[69]
Originally by: SirMolle Excuse me?
Are you trying to give me bad conscience that we are NOT supporting you, after YOU reset us, and basically left us no choice but to leave the north?
And you have the stomache to go public claiming the same?
Up yours "friend", go diaf. F*ck off tbh.
Best Molle post ever imho.
+50 internets.
|
tomd741
Amarr The Minutemen Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:20:00 -
[70]
Edited by: tomd741 on 11/09/2010 19:20:43 When you throw a rock into a pack of dogs, the one that yelps is the one that got hit. Just saying.
|
|
boliano
Caldari Reaction Theory Talos Coalition
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:23:00 -
[71]
Originally by: CBBOMBERMAN This is a very interesting position for IT. From one side they were helped by AAA when they got disbanded but on the other side they were abandoned by AAA during the first delve invansion and again during the North War. Now they stand in a position where Atlas and other members from the south are joining IT and their pets. If they choose to help AAA they maybe going for a long war and may loose their newly aquired high end moons. It will also lead into system grid locking warfare(if you can call that war!?). If they dont do anything, there is probably high chance that some of these corps still join them and pets or go join the north.... What will IT do?
Ok who are these pets you all speak of?
|
tomd741
Amarr The Minutemen Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:24:00 -
[72]
lol
|
Mahyard Lymm
Gallente Dawn of a new Empire The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:25:00 -
[73]
Seriously, when was INIT. blue with -AAA-?
Was AAA blue when we moved? We weren't blue when they were hot dropping in Imensea this summer. Was it just while we were in Pure Blind?
Not so seriously, I wish I had seen this infamous FC chat where Bliss lobbied. All I ever hear is terse commands. Terse enough to make me wonder where all the love, dreams and talks of leaving it all to run away to Ibiza have gone.
Originally by: Blaster Worm Sister BlissÆs letter, written in the best tradition of GoebbelsÆs propaganda...
If Bliss gets to be Goebel, can I be Speer?
Mahyard "Speer" Lymm
|
HarrietMiers
Minmatar Helljumpers Dead Terrorists
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:26:00 -
[74]
Originally by: tomd741 We can argue all day about the truth. I go by what I see and I tend to believe what AAA says. No ones perfect and everyone makes mistakes. But on the whole AAA have stood up among the more honorable in Eve.
Holy christ. Never stop posting.
|
tomd741
Amarr The Minutemen Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:28:00 -
[75]
Well, since you insist
|
Razzor Death
Gallente Antares Shipyards Circle-Of-Two
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:34:00 -
[76]
No please don't
-------------------------------------------------- I'm posting in your thread and I didn't even read the OP v0v |
tomd741
Amarr The Minutemen Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:34:00 -
[77]
Ah man
|
Sandwich PvP
Caldari The Maverick Navy IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:36:00 -
[78]
Originally by: Anuqet
Originally by: tomd741 What IT fails to realize or are too arrogant to admit is that is AAA falls, they are next. Their smart play would be to help AAA. But, since when are they that smart? Well, tbh, they have been at times. Only time will tell.
Who would invade IT? IT and renters have enough numbers on their own to blob out a system preventing any hostiles from entering, they do not need AAA.
Confirming that we can only defend by crashing nodes. The only fight worth fighting is the one you should lose. |
tomd741
Amarr The Minutemen Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:40:00 -
[79]
Well...... I wasn't going to state the obvious .
The real question is who won't you have to defend against?
|
HarrietMiers
Minmatar Helljumpers Dead Terrorists
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:43:00 -
[80]
The more I think about it, the greater this thread gets.
All you managed to do was post an epic EPIC QQ thread and burn any bridges with IT you might have left.
Without them, -A- will be steam rolled in a matter of weeks. Best keep those super's in low-sec like Atlas did (smart move.)
Why, oh god WHY would you **** IT off right now?
Nice knowing you you -A-.
|
|
TheLordofAllandNothing
Caldari GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:44:00 -
[81]
This is the best thread to haunt this abortion of a forum in years.
|
tomd741
Amarr The Minutemen Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:47:00 -
[82]
Edited by: tomd741 on 11/09/2010 19:47:41 IT: How many times have you invaded NC territory? How many people have you made angry? How many people want you destroyed?
When do you think they will come? Atlas isn't around, AAA isn't a buffer anymore. If they fall, you will be next. Period. I for one don't want to see it because then we have a huge blue napfest all over again in 0.0. NC/Russians/Goons/PL/etc.
I like lots of conflict and pew. It's good for pvp and good for Eve. I really don't like IT but I hate massive napfest worse.
|
HarrietMiers
Minmatar Helljumpers Dead Terrorists
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:53:00 -
[83]
Originally by: tomd741 Edited by: tomd741 on 11/09/2010 19:47:41 IT: How many times have you invaded NC territory? How many people have you made angry? How many people want you destroyed?
When do you think they will come? Atlas isn't around, AAA isn't a buffer anymore. If they fall, you will be next. Period. I for one don't want to see it because then we have a huge blue napfest all over again in 0.0. NC/Russians/Goons/PL/etc.
I like lots of conflict and pew. It's good for pvp and good for Eve. I really don't like IT but I hate massive napfest worse.
u mad bro?
|
tomd741
Amarr The Minutemen Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:58:00 -
[84]
Edited by: tomd741 on 11/09/2010 19:58:59 No lol. I just like 0.0 to be fun. And I like AAA. What about you? You mad? I can recommend a way to relieve stress
|
Fire Hawk
Gallente Destructive Influence IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:59:00 -
[85]
You help us in j-l????????????? you were in 49- making sure you would keep some of the high ends in querious. Thanks for that bomber gang in y-2 btw, no go die quietly pls v0v ___ Fear the french touch.
|
Razzor Death
Gallente Antares Shipyards Circle-Of-Two
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 19:59:00 -
[86]
Originally by: tomd741 No lol. I just like 0.0 to be fun. What about you? You mad? I can recommend a way to relieve stress
Musical fist is that you ?
-------------------------------------------------- I'm posting in your thread and I didn't even read the OP v0v |
Panzram
Amarr ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 20:12:00 -
[87]
this is a very solid thread with excellent posting on every page so far. im very proud of all of you, esp blaster worm who imho has consistently produced quality -words- both on the russian forums and here. the walk-ons by molle and lady scarlet were fantastic. i have high hopes for the remainder of this thread.
|
Blackhorizon
Caldari Habitual Euthanasia Cry Havoc.
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 20:13:00 -
[88]
A terrible Blaster Worm post on CAOD or everu? Shocking.
Originally by: Crucifier
Actually, in 2006, aaa was the best pvp alliance
BoB was better (when TWD played).
|
HarrietMiers
Minmatar Helljumpers Dead Terrorists
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 20:13:00 -
[89]
Originally by: tomd741 Edited by: tomd741 on 11/09/2010 19:58:59 No lol. I just like 0.0 to be fun. And I like AAA. What about you? You mad? I can recommend a way to relieve stress
Are you coming on to me?
|
Rakshasa Taisab
Caldari Sane Industries Inc. Initiative Mercenaries
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 20:17:00 -
[90]
Originally by: Mahyard Lymm Not so seriously, I wish I had seen this infamous FC chat where Bliss lobbied. All I ever hear is terse commands. Terse enough to make me wonder where all the love, dreams and talks of leaving it all to run away to Ibiza have gone.
All the scheming and backstabbing is going on in other voice/text channels. Pretty much the same as how us grunts are grunting to pron and lolcats while in fleet.
Hope the fleets will be as entertaining as the forums.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |