| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Turix
Interstellar eXodus
BricK sQuAD.
   |
Posted - 2010.09.29 11:32:00 -
[1]
Even though the odds of winning of technically against you (hey its a lottery!) its damn addictive and for the mean time I'm positive on my ISK 
__________________________
|
Turix
Interstellar eXodus
BricK sQuAD.
|
Posted - 2010.09.29 13:16:00 -
[2]
Hmmm just a little suggestion about the implementation - maybe consider adding a bit (a bit more?) of AJAX into the mix? Its a huge winner as far as usability of a site like this I think, no more mindlessly spamming refresh to see when Blinks finish 
Also perhaps add another category of blinks for frigates and the like, since they seem to move alot quicker than the cruiser hulls that also take up the normal Blink spots. Something like Minor Blink.
Also maybe add the standard battle-cruisers to the Blink list, they are a high use item with a fair price (Blink around the price of a dictor?) that could move quickly.
Just some ideas I had - probably useless but heh 
__________________________
|
Turix
Interstellar eXodus
BricK sQuAD.
|
Posted - 2010.09.29 13:21:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Somerset Mahm
Originally by: Turix
Hmmm just a little suggestion about the implementation - maybe consider adding a bit (a bit more?) of AJAX into the mix? Its a huge winner as far as usability of a site like this I think, no more mindlessly spamming refresh to see when Blinks finish
Also perhaps add another category of blinks for frigates and the like, since they seem to move alot quicker than the cruiser hulls that also take up the normal Blink spots. Something like Minor Blink.
Also maybe add the standard battle-cruisers to the Blink list, they are a high use item with a fair price (Blink around the price of a dictor?) that could move quickly.
Just some ideas I had - probably useless but heh
Yep, it was mentioned a few pages back (not that I expect you to comb through :P) but I am working on it. Little complex simply because of the number of people that are using the site at any one time; I can't just leave connections open to push, so I have to pull.
Oh yeah AJAX always requires alot of thought to the implementation otherwise you can indeed end up hurting yourself more than helping, not to mention to possibility to leave a massive security hole if it is implemented incorrectly.
Perhaps have the browser do the lifting by requesting a new connection every x seconds and then closing it - rather than leaving it open? Not sure about the overhead of opening and closing sockets/connections using Ajax though - bit of a Java nut myself 
__________________________
|
| |
|