| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 137 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Evira Alivar
   |
Posted - 2011.06.26 13:54:00 -
[3271]
cosmetics only.
|
Nuit Aerin
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:01:00 -
[3272]
No
|
Y'lon
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:01:00 -
[3273]
No!
|
Fish 27
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:02:00 -
[3274]
NO.
and FFS, lose the CQ altogether.
|
CaldeteisX
Caldari
Aurora Polaris
The Babylon Consortium
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:09:00 -
[3275]
big freaking NO
|
Maluno
Amarr
Elsewhere.
The Imperial Senate
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:11:00 -
[3276]
No
Cosmetic-only sounds innocuous in theory, but given the contradictions quoted in the beginning of this thread, it seems too much like a platform for advantage-giving items for cash to be pushed into the game anyway.
 |
Lexx Thai
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:11:00 -
[3277]
Vote No
I can admit "COSMETIC ONLY" with more adequate price (i.e. lower). As it has been noticed already by someone here "cents, not dollars".
|
Kato Zigfried
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:14:00 -
[3278]
NO!
|
Athenais Villian
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:15:00 -
[3279]
NO!
|
Durring Hurrder
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:15:00 -
[3280]
No
|
Dephlan Gruss
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:18:00 -
[3281]
NO
|
Sniperpirate
Minmatar
Infinite Improbability Inc
-Mostly Harmless-
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:22:00 -
[3282]
no
---------------------
Memer Of The Xetic Alliance/Immensea Federation
The Good Ol Days ^^
Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes -Elmo Pug ([email protected])
http://www.magic-night.net/waaa.jpg |
Isengrimus
Amarr
Bane Heavy Industries
YARRR and CO
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:25:00 -
[3283]
Edited by: Isengrimus on 26/06/2011 14:28:38
Cosmetic ONLY.
EDIT: Why not no? Because I understand the argument CCP needs to earn extra bucks now. They are in hands of (as I understand) a Venture Capital Fund and venture capital funds are not sated with "steady flow of funds" (i.e. subscription) into their wallets. They want increase. They want EBITDA growth 15-20-25 per cent per annum. Subscriptions won't give it to them. Will MT for Monocles do? I do not know. But I would give it a try rather than see EvE closed as a "business without growth perspective".
|
Tkala
True Soldier Of Liberty
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:27:00 -
[3284]
COSMETIC ONLY
|
Karrick Salk
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:34:00 -
[3285]
Edited by: Karrick Salk on 26/06/2011 14:39:37
NO!
And I WILL unsub if this continues un-addressed by CCP. LISTEN to your loyal following CCP, or reap the whirlwind.
Karrick Salk
All your Asteroid Belts are belonging to me! |
Jearicko
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:43:00 -
[3286]
No.
This is my first forum post, and I speak from 4 paid accounts.
|
Emperor Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:47:00 -
[3287]
NO
|
Nyla Hunt
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:48:00 -
[3288]
No on all three my accounts :P
|
Gabriel Ravenor
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:48:00 -
[3289]
COSMETIC ONLY
|
Dograzor
The Black Rabbits
The Gurlstas Associates
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:51:00 -
[3290]
No.
-
"We don't gank, we just apply force in a disproportionate manner during an uneven tactical combat situation to maximize revenue and increase shareholder value" |
Reicine Ceer
Rodents of Unusual Size
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:51:00 -
[3291]
Vanity only.
--
You're a stark example of just what is wrong with the youth of today. I wish your parents had the presence of mind to have you recycled into a nutrient soup with which to feed the elderly. |
Dark Morr
OEG
Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:54:00 -
[3292]
No.
|
happi bunni
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 15:00:00 -
[3293]
NO
NON
NIE
NIET
HINDI
NEIN
umm thats all the languages i know :)
|
Tapani
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 15:01:00 -
[3294]
NO! |
Alasker
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 15:02:00 -
[3295]
First time posting in forums, No.
|
Junky Joker
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 15:03:00 -
[3296]
COSMETIC ONLY
Walk on station, avatars and cosmetic items is a good idea for roleplay etc. But introducing any other form of item that gives you some advantage for money is an offense for who already pays his subscription and for who makes his best to be a good player.
|
Darkaene
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 15:05:00 -
[3297]
Cosmetic Only
I would say this includes things like additional character slots, and perhaps a monthly upgrade that allows one additional character on an account to train skills during that month. This would not directly affect gameplay for various reasons but would be advantageous none the less for those who don't want to pay/play for multiple accounts simultaneously but want additional characters for different roles. Also for those who literally can't multi-client. It would give us the ability to customize our subscription.
I'd also say having an option to pay for a jump clone might be good (rather than paying for standings to allow one), if they just have to have more MT options. Naturally traditional acquisition remains in place as an alternative. But I don't see this as hugely impacting game-play. It can't kill my ship.
For the record I multi-client and I don't like the idea that CCP wants to double dip from my wallet with game affecting MT options. Since I'm already giving them double the monthly allowance. MT should always boil down to "That would be nifty" rather than "How the hell am I supposed to work around that?"
|
Cathleen Barghouss
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 15:14:00 -
[3298]
NO
|
Clean Head
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 15:14:00 -
[3299]
Yes
People have a right to do with their money what they want. Also, I hereby support an increase in the cost of monthly gaming time to 50.00 USD.
|
King Aires
Kwame's Executive Protection Detail
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 15:17:00 -
[3300]
No NO and Hell No
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 137 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |