EVE Search - Have a happy warp in! - Brought to you by the Gallactic Collective

All Channels

Crime and Punishment

Have a happy warp in! - Brought to you by the Gallactic Collective

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Ran Khanon Amarr Swords Horses and Heavy Metal	Posted - 2010.10.08 13:49:00 - [1] If you don't fancy warping to our moon, please warp to our TCU! C'mon guys ... what's an honest spy gotta do? We also need to make a living and this is just inhumane and probably against the Geneva convention in at least 3 accounts. It was sheer luck that I warped to the only other moon at that planet before I spotted that atrocity on scan. Probing out ships from there and warping to them instead allowed me to take this picture and live to tell the tale. Bad form! Recruiting!
Nomad Vherokic	Posted - 2010.10.08 14:07:00 - [2] wasn't anchoring cans purely for the purpose of decloaking someone an exploit at some point?
Lady Spank Amarr Trillionaire High-Rollers Suicidal Bassoon Orkesta	Posted - 2010.10.08 14:10:00 - [3] Originally by: Nomad Vherokic wasn't anchoring cans purely for the purpose of decloaking someone an exploit at some point? Nevermind the TCU in a wormhole, lets complain about exploits. ~_~
Nomad Vherokic	Posted - 2010.10.08 14:12:00 - [4] Originally by: Lady Spank Originally by: Nomad Vherokic wasn't anchoring cans purely for the purpose of decloaking someone an exploit at some point? Nevermind the TCU in a wormhole, lets complain about exploits. But that wouldn't be fair to pick on someone's stupidity for sticking a TCU in a wormhole when there are exploits to be had... ;)
Ran Khanon Amarr Swords Horses and Heavy Metal	Posted - 2010.10.08 14:17:00 - [5] Originally by: Lady Spank Originally by: Nomad Vherokic wasn't anchoring cans purely for the purpose of decloaking someone an exploit at some point? Nevermind the TCU in a wormhole, lets complain about exploits. Also the bubbles weren't set up in the shape of a *****, man, cat, monkey or dog in which case I would have been highly amused instead. Recruiting!
Ran Khanon Amarr Swords Horses and Heavy Metal	Posted - 2010.10.08 14:22:00 - [6] Originally by: Nomad Vherokic Originally by: Lady Spank Originally by: Nomad Vherokic wasn't anchoring cans purely for the purpose of decloaking someone an exploit at some point? Nevermind the TCU in a wormhole, lets complain about exploits. But that wouldn't be fair to pick on someone's stupidity for sticking a TCU in a wormhole when there are exploits to be had... ;) Actually it has a purpose as bait as you see it on overview in the entire system. "Huh, TCU in a wurmhol? lolol, let's see what's up with thaaaaarrrghhhhhh ... " Recruiting!
Nomad Vherokic	Posted - 2010.10.08 14:23:00 - [7] Originally by: Ran Khanon Originally by: Lady Spank Originally by: Nomad Vherokic wasn't anchoring cans purely for the purpose of decloaking someone an exploit at some point? Nevermind the TCU in a wormhole, lets complain about exploits. Also the bubbles weren't set up in the shape of a *****, man, cat, monkey or dog in which case I would have been highly amused instead. These guys have fail all over them... I mean, do they not know that setting your bubbles up in the shape of a monkey is the most efficient way to spank people caught in them????
Niveon	Posted - 2010.10.08 15:39:00 - [8] So you're alt's Dark Pony and you're planning to be a spy huh?
Ran Khanon Amarr Swords Horses and Heavy Metal	Posted - 2010.10.08 15:47:00 - [9] Originally by: Niveon So you're alt's Dark Pony and you're planning to be a spy huh? WOT OF IT?Ö* * The term "Wot of it?" is used in license in this post and is a registered trademark and property of Spank Holdings Ltd. Recruiting!
Aasimartwo The Galactic Collective Sovereign Technologies	Posted - 2010.10.09 17:43:00 - [10] Originally by: Ran Khanon Also the bubbles weren't set up in the shape of a *****, man, cat, monkey or dog in which case I would have been highly amused instead. Apologies for this, I'll have it looked into immediately. If you have a specific request I can see what we can do.
Ran Khanon Amarr Swords Horses and Heavy Metal	Posted - 2010.10.09 19:06:00 - [11] Originally by: Aasimartwo Edited by: Aasimartwo on 09/10/2010 17:48:10 Originally by: Ran Khanon Also the bubbles weren't set up in the shape of a ****, man, cat, monkey or dog in which case I would have been highly amused instead. Apologies for this, I'll have it looked into immediately. If you have a specific request I can see what we can do. Edit: Also, this: Originally by:* Ran Khanon Actually it has a purpose as bait as you see it on overview in the entire system. "Huh, TCU in a wurmhol? lolol, let's see what's up with thaaaaarrrghhhhhh ... " So, how many Sisters Probe Launchers have you already farmed with that set up? :) Recruiting!
Evarus	Posted - 2010.10.09 22:24:00 - [12] Originally by: Niveon So you're alt's Dark Pony and you're planning to be a spy huh? Hey Niveon. I love your visage. Can I be the Dr Watson to your Sherlock?
Sidus Isaacs Gallente	Posted - 2010.10.09 23:36:00 - [13] Originally by: Ran Khanon If you don't fancy warping to our moon, please warp to our TCU! C'mon guys ... what's an honest spy gotta do? We also need to make a living and this is just inhumane and probably against the Geneva convention in at least 3 accounts. It was sheer luck that I warped to the only other moon at that planet before I spotted that atrocity on scan. Probing out ships from there and warping to them instead allowed me to take this picture and live to tell the tale. Bad form! Report it for exploits. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://desusig.crumplecorn.com/sigs.html
Nathan Jameson	Posted - 2010.10.10 05:24:00 - [14] Originally by: Sidus Isaacs Report it for exploits. How is this an exploit?
Lanais Suleia	Posted - 2010.10.10 22:29:00 - [15] Originally by: Nathan Jameson Originally by: Sidus Isaacs Report it for exploits. How is this an exploit? Originally by: Nomad Vherokic wasn't anchoring cans purely for the purpose of decloaking someone an exploit at some point? I believe it still is.
Aiwha Caldari 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda	Posted - 2010.10.11 00:38:00 - [16] Its not an exploit, its just against the rules as it contributes to lag. If a GM thinks its going to make the game lag they'll get you for it, but anchoring 1-2 cans to decloak is not an exploit. I like me Senior Recruiter
Dario Wall	Posted - 2010.10.11 01:13:00 - [17] Originally by: Aiwha Its not an exploit, its just against the rules as it contributes to lag. If a GM thinks its going to make the game lag they'll get you for it, but anchoring 1-2 cans to decloak is not an exploit. Check the screenshot, I'm pretty sure that is just a few more than "1-2 cans" anchored for uncloaking people. As for it being an exploit, yes it is. It was stated a while back that anchoring multiple containers was an exploit. I believe the generally accepted "rule of thumb" for it was something like six containers max.
Lanais Suleia	Posted - 2010.10.11 01:13:00 - [18] 1-2 no, how about 39+?
Amanda Eidolo The Python Cartel.	Posted - 2010.10.11 01:32:00 - [19] Originally by: Lanais Suleia 1-2 no, how about 39+? Wrong. Tard. -------- ¦
Dario Wall	Posted - 2010.10.11 02:03:00 - [20] Originally by: Amanda Eidolo Originally by: Lanais Suleia 1-2 no, how about 39+? Wrong. Tard. What? Count the containers on overview yourself if you want. I see at least 39 listed, no clue how many are in that little bit not shown. No need to call someone a tard for making a valid response to someone else in the topic. Unless of course you just enjoy making yourself look like the tard.
Amanda Eidolo The Python Cartel.	Posted - 2010.10.11 02:20:00 - [21] Originally by: Dario Wall Originally by: Amanda Eidolo Originally by: Lanais Suleia 1-2 no, how about 39+? Wrong. Tard. What? Count the containers on overview yourself if you want. I see at least 39 listed, no clue how many are in that little bit not shown. No need to call someone a tard for making a valid response to someone else in the topic. Unless of course you just enjoy making yourself look like the tard. Originally by: Lanais Suleia 1-2 no, how about 39+? Originally by: Lanais Suleia 1-2 no Originally by: Lanais Suleia 1-2 no -------- ¦
Dario Wall	Posted - 2010.10.11 02:27:00 - [22] Originally by: Amanda Eidolo ..... I think your Forum Comprehension skill may have gone down a level without you noticing. Go back and read Lanais' post you quoted again, then read the one two posts above that. You should be able to see the connection then.
Lykouleon Trust Doesn't Rust	Posted - 2010.10.11 02:29:00 - [23] I miss the good old days when people took pride in their can-anchoring and made giants dongs and/or swastikas... good times... Quote: Lord Makk > Be warned, Lykouleon is akin to the love-child of a Goon and a Maru'Kage, with just a touch of Butter Dog for bitterness
Dario Wall	Posted - 2010.10.11 02:29:00 - [24] Originally by: Lykouleon I miss the good old days when people took pride in their can-anchoring and made giants dongs and/or swastikas... good times... Remember those can art competitions that people use to do? Some people have way too much free time to make the things they did.
Amanda Eidolo The Python Cartel.	Posted - 2010.10.11 02:33:00 - [25] Originally by: Dario Wall Originally by: Amanda Eidolo ..... I think your Forum Comprehension skill may have gone down a level without you noticing. Go back and read Lanais' post you quoted again, then read the one two posts above that. You should be able to see the connection then. Let me break it down for you: 1 can, jettisoned or anchored with the intention of uncloaking someone is an exploit. Doing this with more than 1 can is also an exploit, even up to 39 or more. Therefore you should now be enlightened as to the reason for my amusement. -------- ¦
Dario Wall	Posted - 2010.10.11 02:35:00 - [26] Originally by: Amanda Eidolo Originally by: Dario Wall Originally by: Amanda Eidolo ..... I think your Forum Comprehension skill may have gone down a level without you noticing. Go back and read Lanais' post you quoted again, then read the one two posts above that. You should be able to see the connection then. Let me break it down for you: 1 can, jettisoned or anchored with the intention of uncloaking someone is an exploit. Doing this with more than 1 can is also an exploit, even up to 39 or more. Therefore you should now be enlightened as to the reason for my amusement. Link to where that was stated please. If you look around on the forums, you can find where CCP has said that a few cans anchored is not an exploit, but having an extreme amount such as in this case is considered to be against rules.
Amanda Eidolo The Python Cartel.	Posted - 2010.10.11 02:39:00 - [27] Originally by: Dario Wall Originally by: Amanda Eidolo Originally by: Dario Wall Originally by: Amanda Eidolo ..... I think your Forum Comprehension skill may have gone down a level without you noticing. Go back and read Lanais' post you quoted again, then read the one two posts above that. You should be able to see the connection then. Let me break it down for you: 1 can, jettisoned or anchored with the intention of uncloaking someone is an exploit. Doing this with more than 1 can is also an exploit, even up to 39 or more. Therefore you should now be enlightened as to the reason for my amusement. Link to where that was stated please. If you look around on the forums, you can find where CCP has said that a few cans anchored is not an exploit, but having an extreme amount such as in this case is considered to be against rules. No you. -------- ¦
Dario Wall	Posted - 2010.10.11 02:52:00 - [28] Originally by: Amanda Eidolo No you. Fair enough. Quick Google search found this topic which includes some pretty good replies from people who have petitioned it. Like I said earlier in this topic, the generally accepted idea is that a few cans is allowed. Having an extreme number that causes lag when loading the grid is where it becomes an exploit.
Amanda Eidolo The Python Cartel.	Posted - 2010.10.11 03:00:00 - [29] Originally by: Dario Wall Originally by: Amanda Eidolo No you. Fair enough. Quick Google search found this topic which includes some pretty good replies from people who have petitioned it. Like I said earlier in this topic, the generally accepted idea is that a few cans is allowed. Having an extreme number that causes lag when loading the grid is where it becomes an exploit. How spicy would you like your Chang's spicy sauce? -------- ¦
Barakkus	Posted - 2010.10.11 16:17:00 - [30] Using a can to uncloak someone isn't an exploit...anchoring tons of cans to cause lag is. Originally by: captain foivos Who would recruit someone named Barakkus? Wait a minute...

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.

1-2 no