|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
   |
Posted - 2010.10.09 14:47:00 -
[1]
If the aim is to avoid PvP, I'd also add this one: Originally by: Kwisatz Hadereach
Smack in local accordingly. Narrow the local chat (not character list) down to its absolute minimum width and ignore the garbled mush of characters appearing there
Local is where tears are being cultivated and extracted ù ignore it, and their frustration will be epic.
ùùù
ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö
ù Karath Piki |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:55:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Tippia on 13/10/2010 17:57:17
Originally by: Kwisatz Hadereach
He's wrong and/or spreading misinformation. Many pirates will tell you leaving corp to avoid a wardec is a bannable offense, but its not. There's red quotes to that effect, but I CBA to search for them. Someone post them if you would please.
The bottom line is you can use that method to avoid all wardecs with minimal risk/hassle.
Here you go: Originally by: GM Nythanos
Hello,
For #1, Closing a corporation and opening a new one with the same members is allowed, and the people who declared war on your now closed corporation can declare a new war on your new corporation if they choose to do so.
For #2, Using alt corps to increase the cost of wars against your corporation or alliance is prohibited.
The two tend to get confused: you are not allowed to make yourself harder to wardec, but you are allowed to dodge the dec once it hits.
ùùù
ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö
ù Karath Piki |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2010.10.19 17:27:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Tippia on 19/10/2010 17:29:02
Originally by: Mr Missions
They are real life sociopaths who deserve prison sentences for their actions.
Yes there is. What does that have to do with the topic at hand, though?
Quote:
This kind of griefing should warrant their removal from the game not a pat on the back.
LMAO.
Quote:
I have had 2 nervous breakdowns due to the loss of my ships
LMAO
Quote:
while peacefully running missions and these gankbears come in and destroy all my hard work.
LMAO
Quote:
Enough is enough, please help show your community support for my game solutions at MAKING EVE BETTER FOR EVERYONE
LMAO
Dammit. You owe me four ass transplants for that! Evil real-life griefer. 
ùùù
ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö
ù Karath Piki |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2010.10.21 12:08:00 -
[4]
Originally by: DeMichael Crimson
Really?
Yes. Have you checked his other thread ù the one he linked to? If you can't spot the troll there (or for that matter in the post he followed up with) you have some learning to do.
You want sarcastic anti-PvE? Look no further than Mr Missions.
I just happen to find his blatant trolling hilarious.
ùùù
ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö
ù Karath Piki |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2010.10.21 13:35:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Tippia on 21/10/2010 13:41:31
Originally by: DeMichael Crimson
However, I do believe that a players mission area should be locked out to other players except Fleet members.
In spite of it breaking the game mechanics in several ways?
Quote:
And Gate Ganking in High Security Systems should not be allowed to happen at all.
In spite of it being very bad for the high-sec economy?
Quote:
On that note I also believe that doing PvP at High Security stations should also not be allowed to happen unless it's a Player Corporation war target.
In spite of it killing strategic interdiction dead?
ànot to mention that all of these suggestion go 100% against the very fabric and fibre of an open-world sandbox game. They kill what makes EVE EVE. Why would this be a good thing?
Quote:
I understand what Mr Missions is talking about and even though I believe he's over-reacting a bit to a bad situation
A bit? The (wo)man expresses no ability to distinguish between fantasy and reality and a complete lack of understanding of the fundamental concepts of EVE. He takes the "onoz, petty the poor highsec soloist" ball and runs with it to such an extreme that, I cannot believe for a second that he is serious in the slightest, because if he in, he needs professional help. As in, right now, before he hurts himself or the people around him (which is ironic, really, since that's what he believes others are doingà we'd have to chalk that up as some kind of "projection", I suppose).
ùùù
ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö
ù Karath Piki |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2010.10.21 15:06:00 -
[6]
Originally by: DeMichael Crimson
Keep thinking that.
Until anyone provides any kind of reasoning or proof otherwiseà
àyes, I think I will.
ùùù
ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö
ù Karath Piki |
|
|
| |
|