| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Willbur
   |
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:18:00 -
[1]
Monday 11 October, at 19h47 EVE time, one of the most expensive mission battleship of the universe was ganked and destroyed by capsuler pirates in high secure space in Irjunen solar system (security status ranked 0.5).
Estimated loss is about 20 billion isks.
Kill Report
Of course, Concord came and neutralised all the 10 pirate's battleships from Inf1dels's, but their target was destroyed, and the pirates loots for about 6 billion isk modules.
How such a thing can be possible in high secure space ?
We are aware that, despite of his incredible firepower, Concord cannot neutralise 10 ships fast enough to prevent them from destroying one targeted ship.
What is unacceptable is that, for their forfeiture, these pirates will only be sanctioned by a symbolic standing loss regardless to inflicted damages.
However, what is much more unacceptable is that these pirates are perpetuating their crimes for more than a month causing many casualties among innocent mission runners.
Concord should ban them for a time to dissuade high sec pirates from acting. They have the power to do this, and they did it in the past :
Remember a few years ago, the incident where peoples killed over 90 capsuler's ships in one high secure system by tanking concord.
Concord took measures, but they also banned the criminals by locking their capsule during one complete month.
Concord should guaranty peace inside the empire.
So, why do they let pirates ruining their efforts by letting their best agents being destroyed ?
In a time where rumours of Sancha invasion runs across the stars, we can ask ourselves if a galaxy wide conspiracy is not growing.
It looks like if Sansha Nation was preparing the path by eliminating the most dangerous defenders of the empire.
Now, mission runners will stop building powerful ships, and this will reduce empire's defences against piracy.
Who is working for Sancha nation ? Inf1dels, or CONCORD ???
Let's prepare the fight to defend our beloved Empire !
ALL TOGETHER FOR THE EMPIRE !
Now, mission runners, you are warned. Never build powerful ships anymore, there is no hope for you !
|
Illwill Bill
Svea Rike
Controlled Chaos
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:22:00 -
[2]
Concordokken offers punishment, not protection. All is as it should be.
Also, NICE ONE Infidels!
 Originally by: CCP Navigator
Great story but you probably want this in CAOD so feel free to post there with your main.
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:28:00 -
[3]
What's a "Sancha"? Donna Quixote's handmaiden?
ùùù
ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö
ù Karath Piki |
Lady Spank
Amarr
Trillionaire High-Rollers Suicidal Bassoon Orkesta
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:28:00 -
[4]
What kind of idiot puts so much isk into such a poorly setup mission boat? 
High sec should NOT be a safe haven for morons to fly about with impunity.
I would like to see evidence that you are indeed one of empires 'best' agents. One of empires most naive and foolish yes. Best? no chance.
~_~
|
coolzero
Gallente
Dutch Federation Player Corp
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:29:00 -
[5]
Kronos kill
Total Module Loss:
13,274,192,098.00
Total Module Drop:
19,740,771,240.00
Ship Loss:
561,999,999.00
Total Loss at current prices:
33,576,963,337.00
Jack of all trades, master of none...
|
Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor Elite
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:30:00 -
[6]
Awesomeness... Until the role playing started
Left Disappointed.
|
Istvaan Shogaatsu
Caldari
Guiding Hand Social Club
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:32:00 -
[7]
There's too much money in Eve Online.
30 billion BS shot down a few days ago, now a 20 bil one... and so what? The people who owned those ships are probably going to grind the money back in no time at all. They're not gonna be that upset over the loss, really - and being upset over loss is what makes Eve PVP exciting. Hell, titan losses hardly matter anymore.
The money pool in Eve is growing exponentially. We need an economic depression, or a drought in asteroid respawns or something. This game was pretty harsh when people had to pull together to build a battleship - it is losing that edge.
|
Lady Spank
Amarr
Trillionaire High-Rollers Suicidal Bassoon Orkesta
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:35:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Istvaan Shogaatsu
There's too much money in Eve Online....This game was pretty harsh when people had to pull together to build a battleship - it is losing that edge.
Either give me your isk so you can get that feeling of having to grind up for your next ship or shut up and get back to your station spinning granddad 
~_~
|
Jandice Ymladris
Caldari
DRAMA Inc
Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:36:00 -
[9]
I see a few flaws:
1: is pointed above: Concord does not provide protection, it provides punishment on the offender.
2: Risk vs reward: fly a cheap missionship, nobody's going to bother suiciding you, fly a ship worth 1/3 of a Titan: get the attraction of every pirate & suicider in a 10 jump radius. All in order here, if a Supercarrier or Titan shows up somewhere all alone, it would also lure every capsuleer in to blast it to pieces.
3: You mission in Irjunen, of all places to mission.... I sometimes mission there, and I can tell this: it has a high suicideganker-rate. To me Irjunen is the Mos Eisley of Eve, ninjasalvagers are the least of your worries there.
--------------
Cleaning up wrecks others leave behind! Got to keep space clean! |
Sadayiel
Caldari
Silver Snake Enterprise
Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:39:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Istvaan Shogaatsu
There's too much money in Eve Online.
30 billion BS shot down a few days ago, now a 20 bil one... and so what? The people who owned those ships are probably going to grind the money back in no time at all. They're not gonna be that upset over the loss, really - and being upset over loss is what makes Eve PVP exciting. Hell, titan losses hardly matter anymore.
The money pool in Eve is growing exponentially. We need an economic depression, or a drought in asteroid respawns or something. This game was pretty harsh when people had to pull together to build a battleship - it is losing that edge.
QFT i remember doing 2x lvl 1 for days on my old cormorant to gather the 8m the moa was worth those days, now you can get like 20-30m just doing tutorial missions, and a bit more.
You know what the chain of command is?
It's the chain I go get and beat you with 'til you understand who's in ruttin' command here. |
|
|
|
CCP Navigator
C C P
C C P Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:41:00 -
[11]
Moved from General Discussion to Crime & Punishment
Navigator
Senior Community Representative
CCP Hf, EVE Online
|
|
Borun Tal
Minmatar
Southern Cross Empire
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:45:00 -
[12]
Cry moar.
Your entire post is fail. There's one rule to Eve: "Don't fly what you can't afford to lose."
YOU fail.
|
Captain Megadeath
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:47:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Istvaan Shogaatsu
We need an economic depression, or a drought in asteroid respawns or something. This game was pretty harsh when people had to pull together to build a battleship - it is losing that edge.
Let me get this straight, you "Bitter Vets" keep reminding every noob starting a mining career that the majority of minerals come from mission loot reprocessing or the Drone regions and yet now you want a "Roid Drought"?
OMFG lol
I can also understand the reasons why you want a server reboot to 2005/6 levels. Thats when the GHSC actually did something notorious. Plueese stop living in the past. Yer moaning like a nam vet. 
Originally by: Cat o'Ninetails
my name actually is short for catherine
Yeah, Katie Door perhaps...... lol
|
captain foivos
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:47:00 -
[14]
Originally by: CCP Navigator
Moved from General Discussion to Crime & Punishment
Nooooooooooooooooo
--
I, for one, welcome the chance to open a bar I can decorate with the corpses of those I have slain. All hail Incarna. |
Lirael Dyrim
Gallente
THE DISC
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:51:00 -
[15]
Why would you spend 20bill on a ship and then use a T2 magstab?
Anyway, epic lulz.
|
Ranger 1
Amarr
Dynaverse Corporation
Sodalitas XX
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:53:00 -
[16]
Quote:
Concord should guaranty peace inside the empire.
Apparently I missed that memo.
=====
If you go to Za'Ha'Dum I will gank you. |
Pehneis
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:54:00 -
[17]
|
Pellit1
Caldari
Vitai Lampada
Rough Necks
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:55:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Willbur
What is unacceptable is that, for their forfeiture, these pirates will only be sanctioned by a symbolic standing loss regardless to inflicted damages.
However, what is much more unacceptable is that these pirates are perpetuating their crimes for more than a month causing many casualties among innocent mission runners.
Concord should ban them for a time to dissuade high sec pirates from acting. They have the power to do this, and they did it in the past :
...
...
Concord should guaranty peace inside the empire.
No
-------------
Rough Necks Alliance
BOOST FALCONS. Nerf whiners.
|
Wildcatter
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:57:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Istvaan Shogaatsu
There's too much money in Eve Online.
30 billion BS shot down a few days ago, now a 20 bil one... and so what? The people who owned those ships are probably going to grind the money back in no time at all. They're not gonna be that upset over the loss, really - and being upset over loss is what makes Eve PVP exciting. Hell, titan losses hardly matter anymore.
The money pool in Eve is growing exponentially. We need an economic depression, or a drought in asteroid respawns or something. This game was pretty harsh when people had to pull together to build a battleship - it is losing that edge.
Seems to me that the suicide gankers are taking plenty of isk off the market....
|
Ran Khanon
Amarr
Swords Horses and Heavy Metal
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:57:00 -
[20]
Edited by: Ran Khanon on 13/10/2010 17:58:58
Originally by: Istvaan Shogaatsu
There's too much money in Eve Online.
30 billion BS shot down a few days ago, now a 20 bil one... and so what? The people who owned those ships are probably going to grind the money back in no time at all. They're not gonna be that upset over the loss, really - and being upset over loss is what makes Eve PVP exciting. Hell, titan losses hardly matter anymore.
The money pool in Eve is growing exponentially. We need an economic depression, or a drought in asteroid respawns or something. This game was pretty harsh when people had to pull together to build a battleship - it is losing that edge.
I can see where you are coming from. Your heist many years ago has been an inspiration to many people, including me. Sadly devaluation makes that it pales a little. You'd have to make a trillion isk ***per to make the headlines nowadays.
Recruiting! |
|
|
Jexxa
Trojan Trolls
Controlled Chaos
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:58:00 -
[21]
T2 rails on your Kronos? Really?!!
You cheap b@st*rd 
|
Balleo
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 17:58:00 -
[22]
Quote:
1: is pointed above: Concord does not provide protection, it provides punishment on the offender.
This can't be repeated enough. Want to stay safe? Don't undock.
|
BigSako
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 18:01:00 -
[23]
Ofcourse, highsec is not safe at all, and Concord is here for punishing criminals, but I dont see any punishment at all for criminals in this case.
Those guys maybe lost ships worth 200M isk, and got insurance back, but they got more in terms of loot and a very nice killmail.
One could demand on a higher standing loss and ISK punishment (remember: when you try to sneak drugs into highsec you lose ISK if you get caught).
How about insurance not paying ISK if you get killed by concord (new insurance terms)?
|
ForumWarrior
Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 18:06:00 -
[24]
How about people not flying around in ISK pi±atas that make the punishment negligible by comparison?
---
ôThere is a powerful tension in our relationship to technology. We are excited by egalitarianism and anonymity, but we constantly fight for our identity.ö |
Markett ear
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 18:15:00 -
[25]
I don't pity the guy his fit was awful ONE damage mod for all that money spent on cap rechargers and tank he could do just as much damage with an afk dual rep sentry domi. SO much fail here.
|
E'Arynn
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 18:17:00 -
[26]
At least the roll-play made it sound less whiny. I approve of that much.
Tell the GMs about it. I'm SURE they'll give you your ship back.... /sarcasm.
Dude, seriously. Concord is there to punish people. Not to prevent their actions.
---
I like to burn things. |
Borun Tal
Minmatar
Southern Cross Empire
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 18:18:00 -
[27]
Originally by: BigSako
One could demand on a higher standing loss and ISK punishment (remember: when you try to sneak drugs into highsec you lose ISK if you get caught).
One could, but one would get laughed at.
|
zcar300
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 18:21:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Sadayiel
now you can get like 20-30m just doing tutorial missions, and a bit more.
Your kidding right? I get 2, maybe 3, million per level 3 mission. That's selling the expensive loot and refining the rest.
Too much isk in EVE? Maybe for the vets. But for newer players like me It's still a struggle to build battleships.
|
Luke Hartelse
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 18:21:00 -
[29]
You want Ccp to change a Valid game mechanic? Suicide ganking is supposed to be done, you could say the same with Corp thieves the principal is exactly the same both of these are not illegal in the game and as said rightly concord are there to neutralise threats no lock them out instantly. Fr some this is a way of life what would you say if we took you missions away? Or made it so you couldn't make money??? think about it...
|
Khanaris Asgarth
Eternium Industries
|
Posted - 2010.10.13 18:23:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Lady Spank
What kind of idiot puts so much isk into such a poorly setup mission boat?
High sec should NOT be a safe haven for morons to fly about with impunity.
I would like to see evidence that you are indeed one of empires 'best' agents. One of empires most naive and foolish yes. Best? no chance.
SO true. Thanks OP for sharing!
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |