EVE Search - Let's tell CCP that we want them to work on sovereignty.

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Assembly Hall

Let's tell CCP that we want them to work on sovereignty.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
mazzilliu	Posted - 2010.10.21 14:19:00 - [1] CCP haven't iterated on Sovereignty since the latest version came out, and it still needs a lot of work! so please post here if you want to tell CCP that whatever sov system you're in favor of, you want CCP to look at sovereignty again and get it fixed!
Philip Ogtaulmolfi Milking Interstellar Incorporated.	Posted - 2010.10.21 14:31:00 - [2] +1 Perhaps this one? http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1402592
Double Dee Perkone	Posted - 2010.10.21 15:34:00 - [3] there is already a thread in assembly hall on a sov revamp here. http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1401938 then again, i guess it could have easily been missed for people who run late all the time. if you would like to discuss sov more my thread has already been established and this thread is not even properly put together. surprised coming from a csm delegate, was proper proposal structure too early in the day for you to make that meeting?
Anndy's Wife	Posted - 2010.10.21 16:13:00 - [4] Edited by: Anndy''s Wife on 21/10/2010 16:15:25 Originally by: Double Dee then again, i guess it could have easily been missed for people who run late all the time. Yea, only, your idea for Sov is just as terrible as the one we have in place. Also, your asking for an actual set of changes that you personally came up with, something that is NEVER actually going to happen. See, CCP have people they pay to come up with stuff, they don't actually need or WANT your personal ideas past "Sov Needs Work". They don't want your 250 word nerd essay, just a gentle nudge, as they have their own balancing think tank that will come up with the actual change themselves. To top it off, in your total ignorance of how the actual process works, your insulting the one person who is properly phrasing the topic to CCP, in a way that they care about. Unless you can name any single idea in the AH that was installed exactly as some half wit player had envisioned... oh, no you can't. Hmm, perhaps the proper structure is just too much for you to cope with. EDIT: Dear god the other guys thread is a hit point increase proposal, jesus what is WRONG with you people
Blackhorizon Habitual Euthanasia	Posted - 2010.10.21 16:21:00 - [5] +1
Azgil Sjet Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2010.10.21 16:30:00 - [6] Edited by: Azgil Sjet on 21/10/2010 16:32:38 +1
Rn Bonnet Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2010.10.21 16:41:00 - [7] Yes please
mazzilliu	Posted - 2010.10.21 16:42:00 - [8] Originally by: Philip Ogtaulmolfi +1 Perhaps this one? http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1402592 i am trying to deliberately make this proposal blind to any particular detailed sov proposal. there are way too many out there at the moment to endorse one without compromising the overall most important message that ccp need to look at sov in the first place.
TradeHat	Posted - 2010.10.21 17:01:00 - [9] Oh God PLEASE!
Hoxothul Shade. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2010.10.21 17:29:00 - [10] Oh god yes, please fix this ****!

wr3cks Reliables Inc Majesta Empire	Posted - 2010.10.21 17:54:00 - [11] Edited by: wr3cks on 21/10/2010 17:55:32 yes, is no fun
Didier Oriol Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2010.10.21 18:21:00 - [12] Sov needs to be worked on, thats for sure..
Arysyle Windell	Posted - 2010.10.21 18:22:00 - [13] +1 for CCP doing some work on the sov system
Honor Tanker	Posted - 2010.10.21 18:25:00 - [14] Chewing sov structures is IMPOSSIBLE for a small fleet to do in a reasonable amount of time now +1 for sov getting a workover Honor Tanking: Balls to the wall, or nothing at all!
Double Dee Perkone	Posted - 2010.10.21 19:08:00 - [15] Originally by: Anndy's Wife Yea, only, your idea for Sov is just as terrible as the one we have in place. you can thank the csm for the system we have now. they were directly involved and gave the current system the seal of approval. now you want them to have another shot at it? get a clue little girl.
De'Veldrin CareBears on Fire The Obsidian Legion	Posted - 2010.10.21 19:13:00 - [16] I think it's definitely time for a another visit of the sov system. --Vel
Logain Alseen Black Omega Security Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2010.10.21 19:16:00 - [17] word
M'aak'han	Posted - 2010.10.21 19:33:00 - [18] Originally by: Honor Tanker Chewing sov structures is IMPOSSIBLE for a small fleet to do in a reasonable amount of time now CCP stated that they wanted to give some weight to small gangs in 0.0 warfare. They implemented Dominion for... oh wai...Something's wrong here !
mazzilliu	Posted - 2010.10.22 00:00:00 - [19] Originally by: Double Dee Originally by: Anndy's Wife Yea, only, your idea for Sov is just as terrible as the one we have in place. you can thank the csm for the system we have now. they were directly involved and gave the current system the seal of approval. now you want them to have another shot at it? get a clue little girl. i was on the csm while the old system was in development. we had no real input.
Yuki Kulotsuki	Posted - 2010.10.22 00:34:00 - [20] Edited by: Yuki Kulotsuki on 22/10/2010 00:35:38 Weren't there supposed to be things like treaties and game mechanic enforced rental agreements? Or any changes to the sov system? I seem to remember a promise along those lines. Something about how they would continue to update and improve the new sov system. Originally by: CCP Lemur THIS IS GOD: ... IF YOU HAVE ANY MORE REQUESTS I'M AVAILABLE SUNDAY FROM 10:30 TO 12:00 TO RECEIVE YOUR PRAYERS.

mazzilliu	Posted - 2010.10.22 00:44:00 - [21] Originally by: Yuki Kulotsuki Edited by: Yuki Kulotsuki on 22/10/2010 00:35:38 Weren't there supposed to be things like treaties and game mechanic enforced rental agreements? Or any changes to the sov system? I seem to remember a promise along those lines. Something about how they would continue to update and improve the new sov system. Lots of stuff went wrong in the creation of the sov system.. so a lot of features got dropped. I think if CCP took another crack at it, these bad things aren't likely to happen again. we just have to convince them it's worth it to try.
Sebea Silentread Logistics	Posted - 2010.10.22 03:44:00 - [22] Oh yea, forgot to +1, 100s of millions of hitpoints are dumb.
Crazy KSK	Posted - 2010.10.22 07:12:00 - [23] ~o~
Grozdan Boyadijev	Posted - 2010.10.22 07:20:00 - [24] I support CCP at the very least iterating on ideas touched on when discussing sov changes in Dominion.
bartos100	Posted - 2010.10.22 07:29:00 - [25] sov mechanics really need a change atm huge blobs are the only way to do sov warfare :(
Mara Rinn	Posted - 2010.10.22 08:03:00 - [26] Originally by: Double Dee you can thank the csm for the system we have now. they were directly involved ... I'd love to see what documentation you have that can support this claim. -- [Aussie players: join ANZAC channel]
Double Dee Perkone	Posted - 2010.10.22 08:50:00 - [27] Originally by: Mara Rinn Originally by: Double Dee you can thank the csm for the system we have now. they were directly involved ... I'd love to see what documentation you have that can support this claim. at the fan fest prior to dominion. ccp openly says they worked with the csm on the new sov system. even the csm sat there with a smug look on their face proud of it.
Ervol Libra Pinky and the Brain corp	Posted - 2010.10.22 11:31:00 - [28] Originally by: Double Dee Originally by: Mara Rinn Originally by: Double Dee you can thank the csm for the system we have now. they were directly involved ... I'd love to see what documentation you have that can support this claim. at the fan fest prior to dominion. ccp openly says they worked with the csm on the new sov system. even the csm sat there with a smug look on their face proud of it. Nad that was probably their only involvement, sitting with a smile.
Double Dee Perkone	Posted - 2010.10.22 11:35:00 - [29] Originally by: Ervol Libra Originally by: Double Dee Originally by: Mara Rinn Originally by: Double Dee you can thank the csm for the system we have now. they were directly involved ... I'd love to see what documentation you have that can support this claim. at the fan fest prior to dominion. ccp openly says they worked with the csm on the new sov system. even the csm sat there with a smug look on their face proud of it. Nad that was probably their only involvement, sitting with a smile. so ccp and the csm lied to us. i guess i'm not really surprised.
Malcanis Vanishing Point. The Initiative.	Posted - 2010.10.22 12:11:00 - [30] Time to Iterate, CCP... Malcanis' Law: Whenever a mechanics change is proposed on behalf of "new players", that change is always to the overwhelming advantage of richer, older players.



Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.