|
| Author | Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |
![]() Matthew |
Posted - 2005.01.14 15:00:00 -
[1]
Actually, it would be more like ford making a car with secret compartments (assuming your smuggling plan is getting through undetected rather than blowing customs to bits).
Now, here we come to a different comparison. Here its important to note that shipbuilders of the 1800s differ from Ford Motor Company. Ford churn out masses of identical products and make money from economies of scale. Shipbuilding in the 1800's was very much a case of using bespoke designs - you ordered the ship, you pretty much had free reign on what you got them to put in it as long as you paid for it and it was physically possible. Kinda like getting some uber-mechanic to build you a custom car. I would argue the custom car model is better than the Ford model for T2 ships - think of Ford churning out the T1 model in bulk, and the rich/skilled getting a custom model from a specialist builder.
Building a car with concealed compartments is not illegal. Heck, you could even get it armor plated and it wouldn't be illegal. Just because something can be used to do something illegal, doesn't make that item illegal. Just because the smuggler ship has the capability to carry concealed illegal cargo, does not make the ship itself illegal. Just like the ability for a battleship to blow a customs ship apart doesn't make the battleship illegal. |
Matthew Caldari BloodStar Technologies |
Posted - 2005.01.14 15:00:00 -
[2]
Actually, it would be more like ford making a car with secret compartments (assuming your smuggling plan is getting through undetected rather than blowing customs to bits).
Now, here we come to a different comparison. Here its important to note that shipbuilders of the 1800s differ from Ford Motor Company. Ford churn out masses of identical products and make money from economies of scale. Shipbuilding in the 1800's was very much a case of using bespoke designs - you ordered the ship, you pretty much had free reign on what you got them to put in it as long as you paid for it and it was physically possible. Kinda like getting some uber-mechanic to build you a custom car. I would argue the custom car model is better than the Ford model for T2 ships - think of Ford churning out the T1 model in bulk, and the rich/skilled getting a custom model from a specialist builder.
Building a car with concealed compartments is not illegal. Heck, you could even get it armor plated and it wouldn't be illegal. Just because something can be used to do something illegal, doesn't make that item illegal. Just because the smuggler ship has the capability to carry concealed illegal cargo, does not make the ship itself illegal. Just like the ability for a battleship to blow a customs ship apart doesn't make the battleship illegal. ------- There is no magic Wand of Fixing, and it is not powered by forum whines. |
![]() Matthew |
Posted - 2005.01.17 13:21:00 -
[3]
That would be a very stupid PR guy, obviously. A clever PR guy is far more likely to promote it as a "secure private hauler" - citing the benefits of hiding your high-value cargo from suicide caracals, or low-sec gate camps. That it also lets you sneak things past customs will simply be an "undocumented feature". Sure, the customs guys may not be jumping for joy at this product, but marketed like that there's not much they could do. After all, I doubt the navy guys are very happy about us being able to buy top of the line battleships and weaponry, but they don't stop them being sold, and only punish the owners if they get caught using them illegaly. |
Matthew Caldari BloodStar Technologies |
Posted - 2005.01.17 13:21:00 -
[4]
That would be a very stupid PR guy, obviously. A clever PR guy is far more likely to promote it as a "secure private hauler" - citing the benefits of hiding your high-value cargo from suicide caracals, or low-sec gate camps. That it also lets you sneak things past customs will simply be an "undocumented feature". Sure, the customs guys may not be jumping for joy at this product, but marketed like that there's not much they could do. After all, I doubt the navy guys are very happy about us being able to buy top of the line battleships and weaponry, but they don't stop them being sold, and only punish the owners if they get caught using them illegaly. ------- There is no magic Wand of Fixing, and it is not powered by forum whines. |
| Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,06s, ref 20251115/0733 EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP. |
| COPYRIGHT NOTICE EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website. |