EVE Search - What are your expectations from an Tech Level 2 Industrial?

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 10 post(s)
Pottsey	Posted - 2005.01.06 19:48:00 - [1] Edited by: Pottsey on 06/01/2005 20:06:56 Covert Op indi no weapons. -Reasoning: helps moves ore though bloackes and I like the idea of a cloaked Covert op ship escorting a cloaked Covert Opp Indi - Special ability: Can use Covert Opp cloak. Hard to get a target lock on due to stealth. Add that to normal Covert Op ships as well please. - Skills:, Indy 5 and same as covert Op ships perhaps a little higher like Covert op ship lvl 3. - Cargo: 20% less then a Iteron Mk5 due to the covert op equipment. - Speed: same perhaps 10% faster than an indy - Slots: Similar to current indies of its race. In fact I would make a Iteron 5 with but with two high slots no turret. Perhaps instead of extra cargo hold per level make it 5% extra speed per level. _________________________________________________ Gallente defensive innovation comes from unexpected source.
Pottsey	Posted - 2005.01.06 19:52:00 - [2] Edited by: Pottsey on 06/01/2005 20:05:27 Fleet Support hauler Basically an amour plaited hauler for war zones. Should have lots of hit points and be able to take a pounding but not tank with boosters. Perhaps low cap so you cannot run boosters for hours on end. ShouldnÆt be able to passive tank either. Though enough hitpoints so your escort's get a chance to save you if your warp scramble. No boosters mean you cannot afk mine in deep space and if someone does warp scarbble you, your dead without escorts. Slow speed means they get chance to warp scramble you so escort are needed. Loging out might be a problem. - Reasoning: Help bring ammo and other needed resourceÆs to war zones. Escort still needed but its not going go down in 10 seconds in combat. - Special ability: Slower and tougher then a normal indi. - Skills:, Indy 5 unsure on rest - Cargo: 20% less then a Iteron Mk5 due to the extra amour plating and shield equipment. - Speed: 20% slower than an indy due to extra amour. - Slots: Similar to current indies of its race. With 1 point defence turret. Fleet Support hauler Version 2 Sorry cannot resist posting this next idea which is similar to above. Passive tanked Hauler. 10% boost to shield regen per level. 10% boost to shield cap per level. Natively high shield recharge and decent shield cap size. No weapons but due to the natively high recharge has a good chance of surviving being shot at giveing escorts time to respond. Perhaps make it 5% shield cap boost per level in groups. On top of Escort TacticÆs - Reasoning: Help bring ammo and other needed resourceÆs to war zones. Escort still needed but its not going go down in 10 seconds in combat. - Special ability: Slower and tougher then a normal indi. - Skills:, Indy 5, Escort Tactics 5 - Cargo: 20% less then a Iteron Mk5 due to the extra shield equipment. - Speed: 20% slower than an indy due to extra shield equipment. - Slots: Similar to current indies of its race. With 1 point defence turret or drones for Gallant but limited to 4 max. No mining drones. Little CPU so now powerfull weapons. _________________________________________________ Gallente defensive innovation comes from unexpected source.
Pottsey	Posted - 2005.01.06 20:08:00 - [3] Can you please make it so the freighter ship class needs the Industrial skill. _________________________________________________ Gallente defensive innovation comes from unexpected source.
Pottsey	Posted - 2005.01.06 20:17:00 - [4] Long Range Trader - Reasoning: Speed up hauler over long rangeÆs - Special ability: Normal indi but can use Jump Drive or perhaps mini Jump Drive. Either jump without gate or mini jump drive means you use gates but do two jumps at once skipping 1 system out between jumps. - Skills:, Indy 5 unsure on rest - Cargo: 20% less then a Iteron Mk5 due to the space needed for the jump drive. - Slots: Similar to current indies of its race. 2 high slots 1 jump drive module high slot. Perhaps make jump drive modules control how far you can jump. Better the module the further you go. _________________________________________________ Gallente defensive innovation comes from unexpected source.
Pottsey	Posted - 2005.01.22 16:48:00 - [5] The Viator I like itÆs a pretty nice ship. The Occator on the other hand needs more work, its meant to be a tough Indi but its weaker then a normal indi due less slots and it has less cargo space. It has more shields but the shield recharge is twice as long meaning the hitpoints per second are not that much better. It has 3 less mid slots and 1 less high slot. Due to the lack of mid slots you have to amour tank taking away from the cargo space which it already has less off. A Mk5 with a passive or active shield tank would get just as many hitpoints back per second, have more shield hitpoints and more cargo space. A lot of us Mk5 cargo pilots donÆt even have amour tank skills. We shield tank and fit cargo expanders into the low slots so we can take more cargo. So please make it so the new cargo ships can shield tank. Either take off the amour tank bonus or add a shield and amour tank bonus. Also double the shield recharge rate so itÆs as good as a normal indi. I donÆt see why a T2 ship would have less shield recharge, less high slots, less mid slots, less turret slots, less cargo space, less CPU and less speed. Less Cargo space I could live with if the advantages where better. _________________________________________________ Gallente defensive innovation comes from unexpected source.
Pottsey Gallente Enheduanni Foundation	Posted - 2005.01.22 16:48:00 - [6] The Viator I like itÆs a pretty nice ship. The Occator on the other hand needs more work, its meant to be a tough Indi but its weaker then a normal indi due less slots and it has less cargo space. It has more shields but the shield recharge is twice as long meaning the hitpoints per second are not that much better. It has 3 less mid slots and 1 less high slot. Due to the lack of mid slots you have to amour tank taking away from the cargo space which it already has less off. A Mk5 with a passive or active shield tank would get just as many hitpoints back per second, have more shield hitpoints and more cargo space. A lot of us Mk5 cargo pilots donÆt even have amour tank skills. We shield tank and fit cargo expanders into the low slots so we can take more cargo. So please make it so the new cargo ships can shield tank. Either take off the amour tank bonus or add a shield and amour tank bonus. Also double the shield recharge rate so itÆs as good as a normal indi. I donÆt see why a T2 ship would have less shield recharge, less high slots, less mid slots, less turret slots, less cargo space, less CPU and less speed. Less Cargo space I could live with if the advantages where better. Passive shield tanking guide click here

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.