EVE Search - So why does Sansha invaded hisec still stay hisec?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

So why does Sansha invaded hisec still stay hisec?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Dhaul Agent-Orange Nabaal Syndicate	Posted - 2010.11.15 22:11:00 - [1] kestrel shoots an ibis: Send enough firepower to kill a thousand man supercarrier fleet Sansha invades an entire hisec constellation: Do nothing, but still protect the ibis pilots
Tippia Sunshine and Lollipops	Posted - 2010.11.15 22:16:00 - [2] They suffer from superman complex. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
Alara IonStorm Agent-Orange Nabaal Syndicate	Posted - 2010.11.15 22:32:00 - [3] Police only down on us because we're Capsuleers. *****es be racist dog. -- I am now on a Crusade to Fix the Omen! For Great Justice!
Culmen Caldari Blood Phage Syndicate	Posted - 2010.11.15 22:36:00 - [4] A good RP fluff explanation is that the CONCORDOKEN is actually a remote self-destruct command sent to a PC ship. and further more why do i even need a sig?
Barkaial Starfinder Minmatar The Kairos Syndicate Transmission Lost	Posted - 2010.11.15 23:13:00 - [5] +1 for temporary null sec in incursions systems.
Dhaul Agent-Orange Nabaal Syndicate	Posted - 2010.11.15 23:20:00 - [6] Originally by: Culmen Edited by: Culmen on 15/11/2010 22:46:43 A good RP fluff explanation is that the CONCORDOKEN is actually a remote self-destruct command sent to a PC ship. It would explain how a battleship can insta-pop a buffer tanked dreadnought. Ah so if I buy a nightmare I can gank people in hisec without getting instapopped?
Culmen Caldari Blood Phage Syndicate	Posted - 2010.11.15 23:35:00 - [7] Originally by: Dhaul Originally by: Culmen Edited by: Culmen on 15/11/2010 22:46:43 A good RP fluff explanation is that the CONCORDOKEN is actually a remote self-destruct command sent to a PC ship. It would explain how a battleship can insta-pop a buffer tanked dreadnought. Ah so if I buy a nightmare I can gank people in hisec without getting instapopped? Your nightmare might be pirate, but your pod's still plugged into local. The switch is probably on your pod. and further more why do i even need a sig?
Alara IonStorm Agent-Orange Nabaal Syndicate	Posted - 2010.11.15 23:39:00 - [8] Edited by: Alara IonStorm on 15/11/2010 23:38:59 Originally by: Dhaul Ah so if I buy a nightmare I can gank people in hisec without getting instapopped? You can still gank me with out being instapopped. -- I am now on a Crusade to Fix the Omen! For Great Justice!
Fulbert Gallente	Posted - 2010.11.15 23:39:00 - [9] Originally by: Barkaial Starfinder +1 for temporary null sec in incursions systems. Yes in deadspace definitely no at gates, stations, planets, belts, etc. -------------------------------- Fulbert. Miner - Industrialist
Black Dranzer	Posted - 2010.11.16 00:02:00 - [10] Originally by: Culmen Originally by: Dhaul Originally by: Culmen Edited by: Culmen on 15/11/2010 22:46:43 A good RP fluff explanation is that the CONCORDOKEN is actually a remote self-destruct command sent to a PC ship. It would explain how a battleship can insta-pop a buffer tanked dreadnought. Ah so if I buy a nightmare I can gank people in hisec without getting instapopped? Your nightmare might be pirate, but your pod's still plugged into local. The switch is probably on your pod. Dude. DUDE. Okay okay, wait, no, so dig this You have the option, right, to have your ship piloted WITHOUT a pod And it means that you can fight concord on your own terms instead of them instanuking you BUT If you DIE You die FOR GOOD, no clones, because you're not in your pod. -------------------------------------------------- Learning skills are an ultimatum, not a choice.
Venkul Mul Gallente	Posted - 2010.11.16 00:10:00 - [11] Originally by: Dhaul kestrel shoots an ibis: Send enough firepower to kill a thousand man supercarrier fleet Sansha invades an entire hisec constellation: Do nothing, but still protect the ibis pilots You really need easy targets so much?
egegergergsdgedgege	Posted - 2010.11.16 00:50:00 - [12] Originally by: Dhaul So why does Sansha invaded hisec still stay hisec? Because CCP does not care that much about back story.
Black Dranzer	Posted - 2010.11.16 01:01:00 - [13] Originally by: egegergergsdgedgege Originally by: Dhaul So why does Sansha invaded hisec still stay hisec? Because CCP does not care that much about back story. Could've fooled me. -------------------------------------------------- Learning skills are an ultimatum, not a choice.
Lord Evangelian Gallente LEAP Corp	Posted - 2010.11.16 02:36:00 - [14] Originally by: Black Dranzer Originally by: egegergergsdgedgege Originally by: Dhaul So why does Sansha invaded hisec still stay hisec? Because CCP does not care that much about back story. Could've fooled me. EVE ONLINE BACKSTORY ROCKS. People only knock it becuase it is not linked to there favourite TV show or movie. People pretend they are in s.trek or s.wars, but just play e.on. ...yeah! The White Mantle \| Inactive on Forum since 20:38 on Feb 9th 2009
Ghoest	Posted - 2010.11.16 03:16:00 - [15] Why do idiots asking questions on forums remain idiots afterwords? Wherever you went - Here you are.
Luminos	Posted - 2010.11.16 03:17:00 - [16] Originally by: Alara IonStorm *****es be racist dog. CONCORD hates Pod People.
B0FROST	Posted - 2010.11.16 06:15:00 - [17] Originally by: Dhaul kestrel shoots an ibis: Send enough firepower to kill a thousand man supercarrier fleet Sansha invades an entire hisec constellation: Do nothing, but still protect the ibis pilots Sansha paid the war dec fee of a quadrillion ISK and is now entitled to kill carebears in high-sec. Probably they asked Chribba for that loan
Kestrix	Posted - 2010.11.16 06:34:00 - [18] Sansha are not in any way actually invading Hi Sec! They will appear in a dead space complex waiting to be probed out and will sit there waiting like sheep for the slaughter. If we want to earn some ISK we can fight them, or not! And if we do ignore them they will simply de-spawn after a certain time peroid is up. All NPC's have a function, CONCORD is thier to provide a consequence to illigal actions taken by POD pilots nothing more! So no their will be no interaction bettween CONCORD and Sansha rats becasue their is no need for any they are both preforming thier alloted functions.
Herzog Wolfhammer Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2010.11.16 07:44:00 - [19] Though it would be a good RP angle to have a breakdown in Concord operations in Sansha theaters of operation, CCP intends that players participate in the Incursions and not get ganked trying. I can see it now: drop the system to low or null and the Sansha become permanent installations with the usual crowd there either farming them or hanging out at the station trolling fourchan while waiting for a target. It's the usual non-roleplay result brought to you by killmail addiction and boredom.
Darod Zyree Gallente Zyree Holding	Posted - 2010.11.16 08:29:00 - [20] Originally by: Barkaial Starfinder +1 for temporary null sec in incursions systems. This, so much this, CCP implement this! -Darod-
Vladimir Norkoff Income Redistribution Service	Posted - 2010.11.16 08:54:00 - [21] Originally by: Black Dranzer Originally by: egegergergsdgedgege Because CCP does not care that much about consistent back story. Could've fooled me. There. Fixed. Taxman IX: Risky Venture
Covert Kitty Amarr ISK Solutions SRS.	Posted - 2010.11.16 12:49:00 - [22] +1 for temporary null sec in incursions systems.
Guttripper Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2010.11.16 13:46:00 - [23] Originally by: Covert Kitty +1 for temporary null sec in incursions systems. Unfortunately, players would abuse this change. For example, let's say the system Perimeter gets the incursion and drops in security. Players would bubble the gates, hot drop carriers and titans, and wait for players not knowing Perimeter has changed to come into the system from the Gallente and Minmatar systems heading towards Jita. The incursion area would be camped to not allow players to fend it off just to keep the security status in the system. If the incursion is a timed event and eventually phases out, then the argument will rage that players that brought in null security ships only should be allowed to keep them in the system since CCP allows Chribba to keep his Veldnaught in Amarr. And unlike Chribba, I doubt many of those owners would not have an itchy trigger finger some Sunday afternoon even though the consequence would be removal of the ship... Give players an inch and they'll exploit it.
StalinGrad6 Gallente Black Mesa Mavericks	Posted - 2010.11.16 14:03:00 - [24] temp nullsec in incursion sysems? youre just a godless pirate scumbag arent you? -1000 for temp nullsec its a bad idea. BAD. too many pirates. if we come in there geared for pvp warfare, which we need to be, we wont stand a chance, and these pirate idiots will be too busy gatyecamping and station camping the sansha killers and the system/constellatuion will styay sieged for weeks. that will be a total disaster. ******************** A Question: If a Soldier is too scared to fight, how many people will he kill? The Answer: NONE. The Piont: Psychological Warfare. More powerful that a 3500mm cannon.
Shiro Kotaki Caldari State War Academy	Posted - 2010.11.16 14:37:00 - [25] +1 for temp highsec in 0.0 incursion systems. ============ Om niet verdacht te lijken liet hij overal zijn DNA achter ============
Ripperljohn Caldari Paladin Order	Posted - 2010.11.16 15:02:00 - [26] Originally by: Guttripper Originally by: Covert Kitty +1 for temporary null sec in incursions systems. Unfortunately, players would abuse this change. For example, let's say the system Perimeter gets the incursion and drops in security. Players would bubble the gates, hot drop carriers and titans, and wait for players not knowing Perimeter has changed to come into the system from the Gallente and Minmatar systems heading towards Jita. The incursion area would be camped to not allow players to fend it off just to keep the security status in the system. If the incursion is a timed event and eventually phases out, then the argument will rage that players that brought in null security ships only should be allowed to keep them in the system since CCP allows Chribba to keep his Veldnaught in Amarr. And unlike Chribba, I doubt many of those owners would not have an itchy trigger finger some Sunday afternoon even though the consequence would be removal of the ship... Give players an inch and they'll exploit it. I, too, cyno caps into a cynojammed system. mean piwates. -------------------------------------------------- "Look, we're basically on earth to ** and . So unless your job's to help people or **, it's not that important, so relax." -shi
Tippia Sunshine and Lollipops	Posted - 2010.11.16 15:10:00 - [27] Edited by: Tippia on 16/11/2010 15:10:46 Originally by: Ripperljohn I, too, cyno caps into a cynojammed system. mean piwates. Weeellà keep it going for long enough and dump a CSAA (or maybe just an XLSAA) on a moon. Nature finds a way, as the saying goesà ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
De'Veldrin Minmatar Green-Core The Obsidian Legion	Posted - 2010.11.16 15:17:00 - [28] Originally by: Dhaul So why does Sansha invaded hisec still stay hisec? Mostly just to **** you off, tbh. We like to watch the "I want easier kills" show occasionally. It's like the Osbournes, but without trying to figure out what Ozzy is saying. --Vel
Narisa Bithon Caldari	Posted - 2010.11.16 15:37:00 - [29] Originally by: Dhaul kestrel shoots an ibis: Send enough firepower to kill a thousand man supercarrier fleet Sansha invades an entire hisec constellation: Do nothing, but still protect the ibis pilots actually concord do respond to sansha invasions. But only cos the player run sansha carriers use smartbombs which trigger a concord response.
Abdiel Kavash Caldari Paladin Order Fidelas Constans	Posted - 2010.11.16 16:05:00 - [30] Originally by: Covert Kitty +1 for temporary null sec in incursions systems. +1 for camping all the gates so that nobody can complete the incursion, and claiming sov in Jita. Then we can finally get the dream Jump Bridge network we have always wanted! ___________

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.