Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mitherien
|
Posted - 2010.12.23 14:31:00 -
[1]
I would like to see a system put in place to create Tech II Blueprint Originals similar to the way Tech II Blueprint Copies are made. Invention
|
shady trader
|
Posted - 2010.12.23 14:36:00 -
[2]
Why create a new posted? There are hundreds of posts about creating tech BPO's via invention most with a lot more detail. Macrointel, the place were the nature order of the universe does not hold sway. Pirates and ore thief's are congratulated by carebears for the actions. |
Mimrezar
|
Posted - 2010.12.23 14:40:00 -
[3]
Originally by: shady trader Why create a new posted? There are hundreds of posts about creating tech BPO's via invention most with a lot more detail.
I must have missed them. I also didn't see it posted in the Commonly Proposed Ideas so I thought I would put it up for consideration. |
Lady Spank
Amarr Trillionaire High-Rollers Suicidal Bassoon Orkesta
|
Posted - 2010.12.23 14:46:00 -
[4]
No
|
Mitherien
|
Posted - 2010.12.23 15:00:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Lady Spank No
And why not? I would like to know why you disagree.
|
shady trader
|
Posted - 2010.12.23 16:35:00 -
[6]
Page 3 of this forum, was the lasted for this forum created 4 days ago.
There is also another in the science and industry forum created in the last 24 hours.
CCP only add to the commonly proposed ideas tread when players suggest it and the threads have been coming up for months. CCP have already stated that no new tech 2 BPO will be introduced there is little point have discussions about it.
Tech2 BPO via invention
CCP have stated that the idea of tech2 BPO was a bad idea but since the current owners are normally not the person who won them, its not fair to just take them away. Instead CCP have decided to play the long game and let them end up on inactive/banned accounts or have accidents during transport.
Want to know more about this, do a search (eve-search.com) you will find about a thousand posts either to reintroduce tech2 BPO via invention or to remove them completely. Macrointel, the place were the nature order of the universe does not hold sway. Pirates and ore thief's are congratulated by carebears for the actions. |
Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
|
Posted - 2010.12.23 17:02:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Mitherien And why not? I would like to know why you disagree.
Because current owners have trillions invested in the prints themselves, some with 5-10 year profitability horizons. Because adding BPO's at the present time would crash all relevant markets, make certain moon owners trillions and devalue existing BPO's. Because invention is already a very lucrative and to be honest one of the more fun carebear activities available.
Need more reasons? Read the countless threads already active on this exact topic (use Eve-Search because forum search is crap)
|
Marchocias
Snatch Victory
|
Posted - 2010.12.23 23:28:00 -
[8]
Personally I don't think T2 BPOs should be changed, they're an interesting historical artifact...
I'd like to see invention given a small change, with there being a chance of getting meta 1/2/3/4 named BPCs (maybe requiring some T2 components, less than a T2 blueprint). ---- I belong to Silent Ninja (Hopefully that should cover it). |
Torothanax
|
Posted - 2010.12.24 05:11:00 -
[9]
I don't see why not. Apperently learning skills were unfair. T2 bpo's are even less fair considering the way they were handed out. At least anyone could train learning skills.
Convert them all to BPC's or add a way to obtain t2 bpo's.
|
shady trader
|
Posted - 2010.12.24 10:46:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Marchocias Personally I don't think T2 BPOs should be changed, they're an interesting historical artifact...
I'd like to see invention given a small change, with there being a chance of getting meta 1/2/3/4 named BPCs (maybe requiring some T2 components, less than a T2 blueprint).
I dis agree, I think the only main change needed to invention is for the ability to get positive ME/PE prints. This could be a function of very slow to train skills or based on the ME of the tech 1 BPC.
I personally think the skills are a better way, this way full time inventors have advantage over someone's invention alt. Macrointel, the place were the nature order of the universe does not hold sway. Pirates and ore thief's are congratulated by carebears for the actions. |
|
Toric Gaul
|
Posted - 2010.12.25 22:40:00 -
[11]
Well something needs to change. Invention sucks ass vs BPOs. The price of t2 BPOs is a pretty good indicator of this. Fix it CCP.
|
Venkul Mul
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.12.25 23:10:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Toric Gaul Well something needs to change. Invention sucks ass vs BPOs. The price of t2 BPOs is a pretty good indicator of this. Fix it CCP.
5 years to get back the isk.
Invention don't sucks. Inventors competing with each other are reduced the margins to the minimum. Same as T1 production.
Removing T2 BPO will accomplish nothing.
|
Vertical
Amarr Relentless Enterprises Ore Federation
|
Posted - 2010.12.26 14:45:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Vertical on 26/12/2010 14:45:34
T2 bpos? Buy them if u have the cash and if not: SELL GTC's and you can buy them too.
Simple. Period. :
p.s. Nice whining btw wuahahaha!
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |