| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 14:35:00 -
[1] - Quote
malcovas Henderson wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:If anything, I would think it fixes can flipping. No longer can people steal your can with potentially zero risk, even if they are picking on brand new characters.
Thank you CCP for bringing more risk/reward into the game. Zero Risk? Everyone in your corporation can attack them, they are the only ones who can tackle you so ECM Drones or backup ECM = near guaranteed escape if they have Logi and since they can't fire until you aggress them it means you can do so with a duel web so no kiting or dodging shots and you get to decide before the fight if it is a ship you can 100% beat or escape from. Can fights are pretty much 100% in favor of victim. Please tell me the zero risk part was ironic. Are you so dense to believe that? Canflippers have it so hardI was 14 days old and a total noob newb. It was even in a protected area, and I was so newb I didn't even know this. Now you tell me where the risk in this kill is?
I have a question for you. In this engagement, who fired the first shot? |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 14:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
Ned Black wrote:[quote=Alara IonStorm]
Thats a load of crock. Can flippers are after easy kills plain and simple.
If the victim of the flip falls for the trap then how many times does he come out on top? If the victim manages to kill 1/10 flippers he is pretty good. I say again, the flipper is hoping for an easy kill. If flipping cans would kill the flipper 9/10 instead of the other way around I kind of doubt people would be flipping very much at all.
Bullshit, its like you are saying all car dealers are assholes. Sure there are many assholes in that market but that doesnt mean "everybody" is an ass and carselling has to be removed. Same case here. |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 15:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
It seems that not all players understand canflipping. So here are the rules
Person A = miner Person B = pewpewguy
1. Person A mines into a secure can = Person B can do nothing except ganking > concord
2. Person A mines into a floatin can = Person B takes something out > now player A and his whole corp can shoot player B, but Player B can do nothing except if the miner takes the bait and shoots > then Player B is able to attack Player A. Btw. Player B's corp can do nothing the whole time except remoterepping what ofc. enable Player A to shoot at the remoterepping corpmate of Player B.
Pfew... not that simple. There are ways to be 100% safe:
1. Dont mine into a can. 2. Dont attack someone if he is red blinky because that usually means he is also able to shoot you.
So, to make this short:
A can flipper has to count on stupid decisions of the miner or there will be no fight at all for him.
There is no "ambush" of an innocent here: A miner has to take the first shot or has to steal something himself to get shot at.
If you steal something out of a can yourself then there will be a big fat warning window telling you something like "uh oh... watch out... u might get killed". If you ignore the window then then you deserve to be killed.
You should think about cans as a PVP-switch in other games. I can switch myself to "pvp" but that doesnt mean i can kill everybody from now on... it just means everybody is able to attack me and i can use self defence. Exactly the same here in eve.
|

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 15:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Equus wrote:First, griefing is not PvP, griefing is going after newbs, slow people and anyone who cannot defend themselves. This is not PvP, the griefers try and claim it is, but it's not. They all decry it's a cold universe, danger is everywhere! But they scan targets and go after the weak, they don't want a "real" fight, they want to "tears" and to **** someone off. So, while griefing can lead to PvP, if having that newb try and fight back can even be considered PvP, ganking, can flipping, and all other forms of griefing != PvP.
Let me correct you. You don't think griefing is pvp but it actually is. If you take your time to read my other posts then you will see that can flipping is not griefing at all because the "victim" has to attack first to be killed.
If i punch you in the face and you beat me up after that: would you say i deserved it or would you say i got griefed? |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 15:26:00 -
[5] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Vilnius Zar wrote:Equus wrote:Face it mechanics are broken, and while GCC flags may not be the answer to minor crimes, criminals should face more risk when performing their illicit deeds, Eve is a cold, unforgiving universe after all. If miners would actually be in active corporations with other people to interact with (preposterous idea, i know) and would have used 30 minutes in their years of playing EVE to figure out some really basic game mechanics then they'd be able to defend themselves. Just as fitting a tank means you avoid most ganks. Thing is ofcourse that we all know that the vast majority of miners refuses to do exactly this, a newbie not knowing stuff is perfectly fine but some moron who's been mining the last 3 years and STILL doesn't have the faintest clue on some basic game mechanics, that's just sad. Trust me. you run into those types all the time. Everybody in EvE can hire mercs for self defense, now there are mechanics to help cooperation between the various figures. However if you are a miner and hire mercs to defend you, they can do nothing even when their targets comes to kill the paying customer else it's :concord: A mechanism should exist so that I don't have to wait for the other guy (invariably in NPC or 3 alts corp, they being the same who demand others to be social!) to get flagged also to me so that I can shoot at them. As of now this mechanism only exists for those being in the same corp of the miner, it'd be cool the flag was extensible at least to the hired mercs. Then let's see who comes crying on the forums, eh? 
Hm? If you are mining with a corpmate sitting nearby in a combat ship and someone comes along and takes something out of your can then your corpmate can alpha him into oblivion. What more do you want? The miner never sees action in this case or even "danger" but he is able to participate if he "chooses" to. Why do we need to hire other people into that? Its allready pretty one sided, dont you think?
Do you want a way to shoot a guy that "might" harm your mining in predefence without the guy actually doing something? Are you serious? |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 15:41:00 -
[6] - Quote
MIrple wrote:I think the new Idea for Crime watch is a bad idea as other people have said it makes ganking freighters in hi sec and stealing there loot impossible. I don't mine in empire so I don't know how bad the can flipping is. I really don't care that is something I don't want to do. If the flagging systems would extend to the fleet that the person is in I think it would make both the flippers and flippies happy as that is fair IMO. If the purposed idea of Crime watch goes through the population of eve will get dumber as they will expect CCP to hold their hands from the beginning of the game to the end like some other MMO and the whine threads on the forum will get more ridiculous as people say well we got this lets try to get this now till all of Hi sec is pvp free in any form. At what point in this game do people take responsibility for there own actions of not knowing game mechanics or refusing to use them as it will hamper there isk/hr?
Flagging for the whole gang would not be fair at all like we have seen in the previous exploits around wardecs + missions for example > loftyscam.
CCPs Greyscale wrote: "The "lofty scam" has been neutered in Empyrean Age (gang membership now has no bearing on aggression rules) so this is no longer an issue (!)"
I dont see why we should fix what have been fixed. |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 15:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
Andski wrote:Kryss Darkdust wrote:Thats a silly notion. I have been playing this game for 6 years I have never seen or heard of a can flipper with 10 neutral logi alts chasing somebody. Creating some out of the blue unlikely scenario that rarely if ever happens is hardly a case for anything.
Its a simple fair mechanic in which the most prepared wins. The miner can have some friends standing by, thief dies The theif can bring more friends, miner and friends die. Other people can jump in to try to gank the thieves and their friends with even more friends...
You get the idea. Who ever shows up with the best plan and is most prepared wins. There is ample mechanics in place to allow for all manner of scenarios, plans, strategies and results.
How is this not in the spirit of Eve? Being able to take part in a fight without being a legal target isn't "in the spirit of Eve" and let's not pretend that it is, thanks.
If you would know what you are talking about then we would respect your thoughts... but actually you aren't. Read my posts above: The Miner always have to take the first shot and that makes him into a legal target. |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 15:53:00 -
[8] - Quote
Andski wrote:Butzewutze wrote:If you would know what you are talking about then we would respect your thoughts... but actually you aren't. Read my posts above: The Miner always have to take the first shot and that makes him into a legal target. Or maybe you could put my post into context rather than reading it selectively and replying with something that's completely unrelated to the subject matter.
I were relating to the "legal target" that you were talking about.
If you choose to shoot me while you are in your barge then you are a legal target for sure. |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 15:57:00 -
[9] - Quote
Andski wrote:Butzewutze wrote:I were relating to the "legal target" that you were talking about.
If you choose to shoot me while you are in your barge then you are a legal target for sure. i'll just stop you there and let you know that I was referring to RR in the context of fighting suspect-flagged players
Then i just misunderstood you. Sorry  |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 16:06:00 -
[10] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:baltec1 wrote:Gotta remember, these changes are to "protect the nubs" from the nasty people. . Not at all. If they wanted to protect the nubs, they could make concording for canflipping in high sec. This change is about adding some actual risk to being a douchebag. No longer can awful players choose the riskless "pvp" they desire, they will actually have to take a risk of being attackable by anyone, not just their chosen target. Like other players have said, can flippers are out for easy kills, they will dock the very moment they feel they might be in danger. Real pvpers get their kills outside high sec.
You somehow think that highsec should be a pvp-free zone. Do you understand that this doesnt fit into the design of eve at all? There is pvp everywhere and pvp is also legit everywhere, against any target.
Let me ask it this way: If i punch you in the face and you beat me up after that: Would you call me a nub and yourself a douchebag?
The same scenario happens here. No miner gets attacked or freely choosen and blown up by a flipper... the miner has to take the first shot. |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 16:14:00 -
[11] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:no, potentially zero risk is right. The can fiipper get to chooses his target, no the other way around, and he can easily pick a target that has no chance of retaliation. Its natural that theives would be attackable by anyone after they stole. To say can fights are 100% in favor of the victim is 100% moronic.
Where did the bad guy touch you? Show me with this doll...
Seriously, you are telling nonsense.
|

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 16:25:00 -
[12] - Quote
malcovas Henderson wrote:Butzewutze wrote:malcovas Henderson wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:If anything, I would think it fixes can flipping. No longer can people steal your can with potentially zero risk, even if they are picking on brand new characters.
Thank you CCP for bringing more risk/reward into the game. Zero Risk? Everyone in your corporation can attack them, they are the only ones who can tackle you so ECM Drones or backup ECM = near guaranteed escape if they have Logi and since they can't fire until you aggress them it means you can do so with a duel web so no kiting or dodging shots and you get to decide before the fight if it is a ship you can 100% beat or escape from. Can fights are pretty much 100% in favor of victim. Please tell me the zero risk part was ironic. Are you so dense to believe that? Canflippers have it so hardI was 14 days old and a total noob newb. It was even in a protected area, and I was so newb I didn't even know this. Now you tell me where the risk in this kill is? I have a question for you. In this engagement, who fired the first shot? The canflipper. I took back what I thought was my stuff. I didnt know what canflipping was. What it entailed. Yes I got the warning but there was nobody around. I was well, and truely suckered into a LM. I was a prime target. A noob newb. What these guys prey on. While you cannot fix stupid. THIS enables the new and vulnerable to have some active protection. Not just a week long wait for a petition.
So you actually stole yourself and got killed for it(kinda). You did not take the chance to defend yourself but you decided to steal back and ignore the other red blinking guy, ignore the scanner, ignore that the container has been changed its color AND ignore the big fat warning window. Why again should we make it easier for you? Because you are stupid?
Do we have to rebuild all the roads now because some people find death while ignoring the "deadend-sign"? |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 16:28:00 -
[13] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Butzewutze wrote: Hm? If you are mining with a corpmate sitting nearby in a combat ship and someone comes along and takes something out of your can then your corpmate can alpha him into oblivion. What more do you want?
... that the miner can legitimately hire me to kill stuff (before it fires). As of now it's frustrating to see the targets come close and have to wait for them to open fire or do something. Butzewutze wrote: The miner never sees action in this case or even "danger" but he is able to participate if he "chooses" to. Why do we need to hire other people into that? Its allready pretty one sided, dont you think?
Why, mercs exist and I don't recall them having to signup an EULA to play only when the targets have it fair. Butzewutze wrote: Do you want a way to shoot a guy that "might" harm your mining in predefence without the guy actually doing something? Are you serious?
Considering I proposed on the Ideas forum ways to make hi sec like 0.0 and remove concord and NPCs? Heh for what I care there shold be only few hi sec islands for newbies and the rest free for all. I understand "Pro hi sec PvPers" being scared even just at the vague mention of "free for all, no cheesy stupid NPCs in the middle".
Ah lol, then you have my support. I dont think canflipping has to exist but i respect this playstile and i dont think it has to be changed. Removing highsec at all or shrinking it to small islands would be even better as canflipping  |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 16:43:00 -
[14] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Butzewutze wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:baltec1 wrote:Gotta remember, these changes are to "protect the nubs" from the nasty people. . Not at all. If they wanted to protect the nubs, they could make concording for canflipping in high sec. This change is about adding some actual risk to being a douchebag. No longer can awful players choose the riskless "pvp" they desire, they will actually have to take a risk of being attackable by anyone, not just their chosen target. Like other players have said, can flippers are out for easy kills, they will dock the very moment they feel they might be in danger. Real pvpers get their kills outside high sec. You somehow think that highsec should be a pvp-free zone. Do you understand that this doesnt fit into the design of eve at all? There is pvp everywhere and pvp is also legit everywhere, against any target. Let me ask it this way: If i punch you in the face and you beat me up after that: Would you call me a nub and yourself a douchebag? The same scenario happens here. No miner gets attacked or freely choosen and blown up by a flipper... the miner has to take the first shot. Why would they call it high sec if people can have their way with you with zero risk? lol. Apparently you can't comprehend EVE design, much less simple logic. To say the miner is the aggressor is just....lol. More butthurt, irrational can flipper tears please.
See, thats the difference. You think about stealing as "aggression"... i would call it a minor act of crime. Shooting instead is clearly aggression and if you want to think about it that way then: "yes, i think the miner is the aggressor here".
|

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 16:49:00 -
[15] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:lol, wow you really are an idiot, aren't you?
Thanks for your participation in this discussion.
|

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 16:54:00 -
[16] - Quote
Jaison Savrin wrote:Butzewutze wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:lol, wow you really are an idiot, aren't you? Thanks for your participation in this discussion. No, that really is the only viable response to what you said. Stealing isn't aggression? Lol, you're and idiot aren't you?
Forumalt 4tw! 
|

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 16:56:00 -
[17] - Quote
MIrple wrote:Ok so can someone explain to me how with the new mechanics you can gank and loot a freighter after Crimewatch 2.0 with out losing your freighter?
You probably cant... or just very hard.
|

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 17:00:00 -
[18] - Quote
Jaison Savrin wrote:Butzewutze wrote:Forumalt 4tw!  Ummm, no. This is the only character I have ever posted on. I even posted earlier in this thread making a completely different point than Nerf is making. I just happen to agree that only an idiot would say stealing isn't an act of aggression. Also, who here is using a forum alt? This is my main. Get yourself over it.
I dont think stealing is an act of aggression that justify to actually kill the thief - like it is now.
AND
I dont think stealing is an act of aggression that justify to hunt the thief with the whole town and then kill him - like it will be then. |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 17:03:00 -
[19] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:It's only an easy kill if the victim (and his entire bloody corp) allow it to be. Doesn't help when flipping pirate has Falcon and at least two Scimis aligned and ready to warp in. Let's not forget that OGB Tengu.
Show me a killmail where a canflip lead to this engagement.
|

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 17:10:00 -
[20] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Butzewutze wrote:Show me a killmail where a canflip lead to this engagement. Boosting Tengu and logis don't show on killmails.
But falcons usually do. Whatever...
The point is... i dont think the usual canflipper has offgridboosting, falcons and multiple logis available.
|

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 17:15:00 -
[21] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Andski wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:Andski wrote:look at everyone talking about canflipping when another effect of crimewatch is making it safer to autopilot a freighter with your life's worth because high sec ganks should involve zero risk, right? Its amazing the amount of babies who come on the forums to cry when the game gets a little more challenging. tell me, what's the risk in shooting "suspects" when they can't engage your RR That's called justice. Learn the difference between crime and justice. I don't know what backwards world you are living in, but on planet earth people don't get punished for exacting justice, only crimes.
Buddy, this is a game. We are not in reallife. Justice isn't a crime... self administered justice on the other hand is.
But wait... lets change EVE to make it like in reallife: Someone takes your stuff and you can tell the police what happend... in 1 of 100 times you will get the thief with help of the police, he gets a fine but you won't get your stuff back. Or the thief decides to shot you right in the face, takes your stuff and your game will be over. I would support that. |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 17:45:00 -
[22] - Quote
malcovas Henderson wrote:Butzewutze wrote:
So you actually stole yourself and got killed for it(kinda). You did not take the chance to defend yourself but you decided to steal back and ignore the other red blinking guy, ignore the scanner, ignore that the container has been changed its color AND ignore the big fat warning window. Why again should we make it easier for you? Because you are stupid?
Do we have to rebuild all the roads now because some people find death while ignoring the "deadend-sign"?
I was 14 days old. OFC at that age I know EVERYTHING about the game. Silly me for doing an action that I surely knew was going to get me killed Do not try to justify this as my fault. The Canflipper preyed on me because of my lack of ingame knowledge. Logic says you cannot steal your own stuff. I applied that logic and took my stuff back. I lost out. I didn't cry a river of tears. I got even (eventually)
Yeah thats fine. But don't you think an addition to the tutorial that warns you about what might happen should be enough? Do you think that your lack of knowledge justifies a nerf of a playstyle of many other players? |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 17:51:00 -
[23] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Quaaid wrote:Opinions aside: - Can Flipping has risk associated with it. - Can Flipping can lead to a PvP encounter. - All else being equal, the Victim of a can flip has the upper hand. - Currently miner or mission runner can't do much to protect themselves against you. - Can flipping always leads to pvp encounter. And pirate always wins. - Pirate has the upper hand always.
Bl+¦dsinn. |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 18:02:00 -
[24] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Butzewutze wrote:Bl+¦dsinn. Show me killmail then. Quaaid wrote:You are proving my point. You offer opinion while speaking in fact. Two of your statements are factually incorrect off of context alone, and the other is highly subjective.
This makes you wrong on all sides, unless you would like to share some statistical data to the contrary. Killmail thing goes to you too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndWUlntJ58U
U know. there are actually people who want to fight canflippers and prepare for them. There are many hulk against X kills on youtube.
|

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 18:06:00 -
[25] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:If anything, I would think it fixes can flipping. No longer can people steal your can with potentially zero risk, even if they are picking on brand new characters.
Thank you CCP for bringing more risk/reward into the game. Zero Risk? Everyone in your corporation can attack them, they are the only ones who can tackle you so ECM Drones or backup ECM = near guaranteed escape if they have Logi and since they can't fire until you aggress them it means you can do so with a duel web so no kiting or dodging shots and you get to decide before the fight if it is a ship you can 100% beat or escape from. Can fights are pretty much 100% in favor of victim. Please tell me the zero risk part was ironic. Everyone in the corp cannot attack. Several other conditions must be true first: They got to be on-line. They got to be close enough to get there before the timer runs out. Its got to not be a NPC corp. What percent of can flips are won by the victim? My guess is less that 5%. Sure 5% is bigger than zero, so its not zero risk. But its awfully close. This guy gets it. This is the reality. Anyone who thinks the victim has all advantage and that there is much risk in can flipping is clearly a moron.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5JwBz89_cQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndWUlntJ58U http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWxa6fFRtEA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgNZKt2vK9c&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HcuBvxS3o_A http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGcCO7q9WxQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1U39_JqTEws |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 18:20:00 -
[26] - Quote
Thats what i find in 5 minutes. I'm sure there are many more. And btw. nothing has changed since then... the mechanics are the same. |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 18:24:00 -
[27] - Quote
Equus wrote:To all the people touting that all the miner/missioner has to do is go dock and ship up, how often does the flipper really wait for this to happen? I wager the majority, note, I didn't say all, of flippers in this situation will warp away, especially if a real combat ship comes back.
The fact is, while the miner/missioner has the ability and the right to shoot back, if they are like my industry alt, they are trained for fitting and flying industrial ships, and science and manufacturing. He really has nothing to ship up to.
So again to all you high-sec PvPer's, and for this instance I am really using that term loosely, how about this for a solution, as minor as the crime may be you did STEAL from a person, this is a crime, and should be punishable. I agree Joe Blow back at the station who never saw a thing shouldn't be able to shoot you, but how is this, everyone on grid who witnessed the event can shoot.
There is no GCC or any of that, but hired mercs, friends, and allies will have the ability to protect each other and shoot you, should they be on hand to witness the crime. Now a non-combat pilot can hire help and have friends to watch his back. Corps who specialize in industry can hire mercs to guard their mining operations, etc. etc. There is no reason that people should have to be in the same corporation to protect each other.
I would be fine with "everybody on grid" but not with the "hired mercs" part because that essentially means "all".
|

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 18:36:00 -
[28] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Adalynne Rohks wrote:-Can flipping very often leads to nothing. Most of the time the victim is too worried by the thought of combat, and runs off, or does nothing. Also, it's a pretty simple task to set up a bait can, have a pirate go for it, and blast him before he even realizes what happened. You could either have stealth help, or somebody ready to warp to you immediately after the aggro. of the universe. Do you know that cloaks mess up your targeting? Even force recons have targeting delay -> pirate warps away. If miner warps off and returns in pvp ship pirate usually warps away if he see combat ship in d-scan and switches to ship that can kill [insert ship here]. Lol, and I'm not worried about losing something if can flipper is around. I like to waste their time. I'm quite good at it.
Oh, the last time i checked bombers did not have a targeting delay after decloak. Covert op frigates and blackops dont have it aswell. |

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 18:45:00 -
[29] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Butzewutze wrote:Oh, the last time i checked bombers did not have a targeting delay after decloak.
Torps against frigate...
We were not talking about effectivity.
|

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 18:49:00 -
[30] - Quote
Vilnius Zar wrote:Equus wrote:To all the people touting that all the miner/missioner has to do is go dock and ship up, how often does the flipper really wait for this to happen? I wager the majority, note, I didn't say all, of flippers in this situation will warp away, especially if a real combat ship comes back.
The fact is, while the miner/missioner has the ability and the right to shoot back, if they are like my industry alt, they are trained for fitting and flying industrial ships, and science and manufacturing. He really has nothing to ship up to.
So again to all you high-sec PvPer's, and for this instance I am really using that term loosely, how about this for a solution, as minor as the crime may be you did STEAL from a person, this is a crime, and should be punishable. I agree Joe Blow back at the station who never saw a thing shouldn't be able to shoot you, but how is this, everyone on grid who witnessed the event can shoot.
There is no GCC or any of that, but hired mercs, friends, and allies will have the ability to protect each other and shoot you, should they be on hand to witness the crime. Now a non-combat pilot can hire help and have friends to watch his back. Corps who specialize in industry can hire mercs to guard their mining operations, etc. etc. There is no reason that people should have to be in the same corporation to protect each other. You're so wrong it's not even funny. There's ofcourse different kinds of can flippers so I can only speak for my (former) self. - I WANT you to have multiple corp members in local, preferably all over 6 months old, the older the better as that means they'll fly bigger and more expensive ships and get more cocky - I WANT you to have "security" in the belt, generally that means I'll get shot at - I don't CARE for your hauler or retriever kill, they mean nothing to me as they have no value and thus can't be ransomed - I WANT you to come back in something good because I know full well that, being a miner, you'll be **** at using it and that means easy target worth a lot of isk, resulting is nice ransoms - there's many ways miners can avoid being can flipped, even when they're jetcanning! All it takes is some basic understanding of the game mechanics, some ingenuity and some ******* EFFORT. It happen fairly often that I just can't even GET the jet can or can't entice the previous owner to do something stupid, when that happens I wish him good luck and go my merry way to find someone who IS a moron and will do moronic dumb **** - there's many ways a corp can protect themselves after being can flipped and kill the can flipper in a fight. (hint, most of the dumb carebears fly caldari, it's not very difficult to put a fitted blackbird in your Orca now is it) I have no problem in stating that it's easy kills most of the time because it is but then again, gatecampers also want easy kills, blobbers in 0.0 also want easy kills and pirates in low sec, guess what... they want easy kills. The difference is that miners/bears whine about how unfair it is and how CCP should do something about it, while people who actually understand EVE point at the options said miner has and go "you have the tools for the job, it's up to you to make it happen".
Quoted for frickin truth! When i did canflips then i usually hoped for something expensive and a fight like 1 against 5! 
You hit the nail on the head... its a like a 15 minute private war against another corp (if they decide to participate) and with that a playground for smallscale pvp.
|

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 18:54:00 -
[31] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Adalynne Rohks wrote:You seem to think that if the miner has to warp off to avoid combat, then the pirate wins. - Miner warps to station - Miner undocks in Caracal and warps back to belt/grav - Pirate uses d-scan and picks up Caracal on scan - Pirate warps to safespot/station and switches to Tengu You probably already know how that will continue. Miner is smart enough not to engage Tengu realizing that the thief out guns him. If lacking adequate Corp support Miner accepts that in this instance he has been outgunned and doesn't jettison his valuables until known thief leaves system. Adds thief to watch list for further notice.
Win!
|

Butzewutze
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 19:17:00 -
[32] - Quote
Adalynne Rohks wrote: I is confuzed
U nont getin et? Piwat is lawaz the betta!  |
| |
|