EVE Search - EFT vs Pyfa from evefit.org

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

EFT vs Pyfa from evefit.org

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Ultim8Evil Black Serpent Technologies R.A.G.E	Posted - 2011.01.12 16:52:00 - [1] As far as I am aware, EFT has not yet been updated for Incursion (roflket fix, T2 ammo fix etc). I have been looking at Pyfa from evefit.org What does everyone think? Certainly looks better than EFT. Is anyone using it instead of EFT now? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Batolemaeus Caldari Free-Space-Ranger Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2011.01.12 17:32:00 - [2] Nope, using both. pyfa has a few problems with usability and the ui (obviously, due to being rather new), eft has a few other quirks.
Dhaul Agent-Orange Nabaal Syndicate	Posted - 2011.01.12 17:51:00 - [3] I use Pyfa primarily since I run Linux. It's great and easy to use. My only complaint with it is that it's not very easy to compare two fits side by side but otherwise it's fantastic.
Mona X Caldari Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2011.01.12 17:51:00 - [4] Originally by: Ultim8Evil As far as I am aware, EFT has not yet been updated for Incursion (roflket fix, T2 ammo fix etc). EFT was updated month ago. Join Eve-Online, meet interesting people, grief them.
Joss56 Gallente The Scope	Posted - 2011.01.12 17:54:00 - [5] Originally by: Batolemaeus Nope, using both. pyfa has a few problems with usability and the ui (obviously, due to being rather new), eft has a few other quirks. I would like to change from EFT to something else more realistic or easy to use and using API should i say. Pyfa is another fitting tool but i can't find any good reason to change atm, tryed to look for some informations but it seems that if you're not a user/tester or programmer you can't easly make your decision. This is my feeling atm but, i'm still searching for something realistic (using API) and EASY to use, untill then i'll keep EFT just because i already know it a little. ________________________________________________ "You do realise you live on a globe, right? And that there places outside the USA/UK?"
Sporked	Posted - 2011.01.12 19:55:00 - [6] Originally by: Ultim8Evil As far as I am aware, EFT has not yet been updated for Incursion (roflket fix, T2 ammo fix etc). I have been looking at Pyfa from evefit.org What does everyone think? Certainly looks better than EFT. Is anyone using it instead of EFT now? I'm still using EFT over Pyfa, mainly due to the fact that EFT won't allow you to add 8 turrets to a 5 turret hardpoint ship like Pyfa does. I also prefer not having to trawl through the modules section to find what I want as well as the slot colour coding for when I'm only half paying attention.
Worgen Fratmon Minmatar Instapop Industries	Posted - 2011.01.12 21:33:00 - [7] Originally by: Joss56 Originally by: Batolemaeus Nope, using both. pyfa has a few problems with usability and the ui (obviously, due to being rather new), eft has a few other quirks. I would like to change from EFT to something else more realistic or easy to use and using API should i say. Pyfa is another fitting tool but i can't find any good reason to change atm, tryed to look for some informations but it seems that if you're not a user/tester or programmer you can't easly make your decision. This is my feeling atm but, i'm still searching for something realistic (using API) and EASY to use, untill then i'll keep EFT just because i already know it a little. Please go into more detail on what you mean by "more realistic using API". Both programs (and I use both depending on my physical location) use API info and are "realistic" as in what you put on the ship (with correct skills and using game rules) will fit on the same ship in game. As noted by another poster, PyFA doesn't currently check to see if your fit is "legal" in game.
Zemme Le	Posted - 2011.01.12 21:36:00 - [8] I seem to be one of the few people who uses EveHQ. Why is that? What am I missing? EFT seems about the same, even slightly harder UI (for me at least).
Makenshi Drakonnen Gallente The Graduates Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2011.01.12 22:19:00 - [9] Originally by: Zemme Le I seem to be one of the few people who uses EveHQ. Why is that? What am I missing? EFT seems about the same, even slightly harder UI (for me at least). I use eveHQ as well, had some issues with it on my old machine which made me move back to evemon and EFT but those seem to have been fixed and its a realy nice program that rolls them obht in to 1 with a lot of other functionality as well.
Zindela Caldari School of Applied Knowledge	Posted - 2011.01.12 23:18:00 - [10] Originally by: Zemme Le I seem to be one of the few people who uses EveHQ. Why is that? What am I missing? EFT seems about the same, even slightly harder UI (for me at least). I occasionally use EVEHQ if the program is already loaded. For me, the difference between HQ and EFT is how long my machine takes to load the respective programs. If neither is open, I load EFT. if HQ is already open, I load HQ Fitter. Often I use both to cross check fits, to see if there's any real variation in the calculations. That said, I like the HQ fitter more, but not enough to be bothered to wait the longer load time than EFT ------------------- Originally by: CCP Oveur Guess what I'm wearing.
Serge Bastana Gallente GWA Corp	Posted - 2011.01.12 23:23:00 - [11] Originally by: Zemme Le I seem to be one of the few people who uses EveHQ. Why is that? What am I missing? EFT seems about the same, even slightly harder UI (for me at least). I prefer EveHQ, everything in one place, it even has POS monitoring and designing before you build. ------------------------------------------------ You either need a punch up the throat or a good shag. Nobody round here is offering the second one therefore your choices are limited!
Worgen Fratmon Minmatar Instapop Industries	Posted - 2011.01.12 23:23:00 - [12] Originally by: Zindela That said, I like the HQ fitter more, but not enough to be bothered to wait the longer load time than EFT QFT, EFT load alot faster than EveHQ. Evemon, with the need of .Net 4.0 crap takes nearly as long as EveHQ to load.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.