Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
MsMango
|
Posted - 2011.01.12 20:47:00 -
[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zumwalt_class_destroyer
20 Missile Slots 2 Railguns
Really fix this it is wayyy overpowered.
|
Zhim'Fufu
|
Posted - 2011.01.12 20:52:00 -
[2]
Looks jove to me.
|
Blacksquirrel
|
Posted - 2011.01.12 21:23:00 -
[3]
It's not fair it has way too many mid slots to do everything, a drone bay (Fire scout), and helos on board.
Plus sensor boosters, and cloak.
However dont fear because the program might be axed.
|
Rip Marley
Minmatar Brutor tribe
|
Posted - 2011.01.12 21:49:00 -
[4]
No railguns yet, the T1 version still uses projectiles. Also, it is all gank and no tank, although it is supposed to have a very low sig.
|
Main ForumAlt
|
Posted - 2011.01.12 21:53:00 -
[5]
It's balanced by the lack of warp-drive and inability to fit an afterburner or mwd.
|
Millsy1
|
Posted - 2011.01.12 22:14:00 -
[6]
how about the 15m/s top speed? And you can only orbit horizontally.
|
Cikness
|
Posted - 2011.01.12 23:16:00 -
[7]
This is a T5 destroyer, it should be OP For you naval history buffs: T1 4 piper T2 GEARING Class, FRAM was well fitted. T3 ADAMS T4 SPRUANCE (Gallante cause it has guns)/BURKE (Cause it's a missle ship)
|
Arianna Comnenus
|
Posted - 2011.01.12 23:32:00 -
[8]
Don't worry, if you perf that garbage tumblehome hull design it's gonna go down like a two dollar *****.
|
Bluejacket CT
Percussive Diplomacy
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 00:57:00 -
[9]
Stupid thread with stupid posts ~
|
Blacksquirrel
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 16:08:00 -
[10]
I hope you are aware of the irony of posting something stupid inside a stupid post in which you proclaimed was full of stupidness.
|
|
stoicfaux
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 16:38:00 -
[11]
3.3 billion isk per copy for a three run BPC?
Who the hell is going to PvP in that?
----- "Are you a sociopathic paranoid schizophrenic with accounting skills? We have the game for you! -- Eve, the game of Alts, Economics, Machiavelli, and PvP"
|
DeftCrow Redriver
Gallente Best Path Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 16:53:00 -
[12]
It seems like it can only hold a total of 80 missiles in its cargohold. 600+320 rail ammo in a separate ammo bay.
Given the lack of warp drives, it's just a prototype for testing new ballistic / gunnery systems for the next generation of destroyers. Nothing special.
|
Liang Nuren
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 17:28:00 -
[13]
Originally by: stoicfaux 3.3 billion isk per copy for a three run BPC?
Hey, look, its just supply and demand. The prices will come down and then it'll be the new Dramiel.
-Liang -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter - Blog got deleted when Evepress died - |
Capn Orgasmo
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 18:20:00 -
[14]
Originally by: stoicfaux 3.3 billion isk per copy for a three run BPC?
Who the hell is going to PvP in that?
You moron youre doing it wrong
3.3bill dollars != isk
Correct pricing is 386.265.000.000,00 isk
|
Theodoric Darkwind
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 19:42:00 -
[15]
No tank to speak of, but its nearly unprobable and has tons of extra medium slots filled with EWAR modules, and is at optimal range before it even pops up on overview.
|
Rip Marley
Minmatar Brutor tribe
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 20:19:00 -
[16]
Don't forget, this thing ingores the 250km hardcap on targeting too. Also, don't ever expect to get one 1 vs 1. It's almost always gonna have a small gang around it, probably with a supercarrier.
|
Maredtext
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 04:14:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Arianna Comnenus Don't worry, if you perf that garbage tumblehome hull design it's gonna go down like a two dollar *****.
It was shown to be seaworthy.
|
Shereza
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 06:46:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Capn Orgasmo
Originally by: stoicfaux 3.3 billion isk per copy for a three run BPC?
Who the hell is going to PvP in that?
You moron youre doing it wrong
3.3bill dollars != isk
Correct pricing is 386.265.000.000,00 isk
Wouldn't the correct pricing be closer to 66b? I believe $35 for 2 PLEXes worth of GTC nets you 700m for a $1 : 20m ratio.
|
|
CCP Spitfire
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 06:56:00 -
[19]
Moved from 'Ships and Modules'.
P.S. Nice ship btw...
Spitfire Community Representative CCP Hf, EVE Online |
|
ivar R'dhak
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 07:43:00 -
[20]
Meh, this thing isnŠt even in Blueprint research phase.
This fine German covert ops on the other hand is already happily sinking Carrier battle groups in every wargame the US dares to enter with it. ______________ Mal-ŠAppears we got here just in a nick of time. What does that make us?Š Zoe-`Big damn heroes, sir.` Mal-ŠAint we just.Š |
|
Zhim'Fufu
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 07:56:00 -
[21]
Originally by: ivar R'dhak Meh, this thing isnŠt even in Blueprint research phase.
This fine German covert ops on the other hand is already happily sinking Carrier battle groups in every wargame the US dares to enter with it.
Yes, and thanks for all the data so when actual hostilities commence we already have a nice sonar cross section.
|
Jhagiti Tyran
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 08:58:00 -
[22]
Originally by: ivar R'dhak Meh, this thing isnŠt even in Blueprint research phase.
This fine German covert ops on the other hand is already happily sinking Carrier battle groups in every wargame the US dares to enter with it.
Meh that might be a covert ops but the Royal Navy have Recon ships
|
Beivve
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 09:55:00 -
[23]
Visby class!
|
Indeterminacy
THORN Syndicate Controlled Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 15:32:00 -
[24]
Edited by: Indeterminacy on 14/01/2011 15:33:22 Sadly, as the Navy will acquire only 2-3 of these ships they will simply drive up costs (long term and short) and we'd probably be better off using the money for something else.
EDIT: For example, upgrading existing Burke class BMD to counter the Chinese anti-ship ballistic missile.
|
Vogue
Skynet Nexus
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 17:17:00 -
[25]
Yes the threat posed by the Chinese anti carrier ballistic missile is where its at. My amateur view is that submarine warfare is pivotal. USA has 71 submarines and China 65. Though a lot of China's armed forces is old soviet kit.
Missile spam ftw
.................................................. One man with courage is a majority
|
Rip Marley
Minmatar Power-Overwhelming
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 23:09:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Vogue Yes the threat posed by the Chinese anti carrier ballistic missile is where its at. My amateur view is that submarine warfare is pivotal. USA has 71 submarines and China 65. Though a lot of China's armed forces is old soviet kit.
Missile spam ftw
So the Caldari are Chinese?
Makes sense, there are billions of them and rely on missiles.
|
Vozch Fischtauder
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 15:09:00 -
[27]
and Iceland has this, uhh shuttle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%86gir_class_OPV
|
Louis deGuerre
Gallente Malevolence. Imperial 0rder
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 15:37:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Vozch Fischtauder and Iceland has this, uhh shuttle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%86gir_class_OPV
The vessels conduct EEZ patrol, Search and Rescue, Fishery inspections, general Law Enforcement and Counter-terrorism operations in Icelandic waters and the waters of the surrounding territories, such as Greenland and Jan Mayen.
Suddenly I had a vision of arabs invading Greenland and I lolled. Hard.
This is our new 'carrier', it's a pretty sweet toy.
----- Malevolence. is recruiting. Dive into the world of 0.0 !
|
Vogue
Skynet Nexus
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 15:47:00 -
[29]
The Tom Clancy fictional novel Red Storm Rising depicted the soviets taking over Iceland to use it as a base for long range bombers. A soviet Russian bomber wing decimated a US carrier group. Iceland would be pivotal for air operations in the Atlantic. But this is an old cold war era NATO v USSR scenario which is now defunct
.................................................. One man with courage is a majority
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |