|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Ravcharas
GREY COUNCIL
Nulli Secunda
   |
Posted - 2011.01.15 16:06:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Mynxee
Edited by: Mynxee on 15/01/2011 14:32:07
*sigh* Very disappointed at CCP's heavy-handed (and in my and some other CSM delegates' opinion unnecessary) use of NDA to cut a substantial writeup of three hours of discussion about Incarna down to a grand total of 381 words.
My looking forward to Incarna is confined to two things; "meh", and "maybe they can get around to eve stuff now." CCP have done an amazingly poor job of communicating why I should be excited about Incarna.
I'm beginning to feel that the reason for that is that it's simply much ado about nothing.
This is also an issue with most anything CCP insists on NDA'ing. Exploits and botting and what have you. I get that there're things CCP wants to keep under wraps, but they cannot both have their cake and eat it. Support is built through communication.
|
Ravcharas
GREY COUNCIL
Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 17:56:00 -
[2]
Originally by: CCP Sreegs
Originally by: Ravcharas
This is also an issue with most anything CCP insists on NDA'ing. Exploits and botting and what have you. I get that there're things CCP wants to keep under wraps, but they cannot both have their cake and eat it. Support is built through communication.
Just out of honest curiosity, what positive outcome do you think would come from detailing specific counter-hacking/botting methodologies? What would you gain from this knowledge personally? I understand that you WANT to know things, but I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around how some knowledge being public information would be to anyone's benefit and I'd like to hear an alternative viewpoint.
I'm not saying the players need to now specific counter-hacking/botting methodologies. What I'm saying is that maybe you guys have erred on the safe side a little too often, especially concerning Incarna. Which is totally understandable, by the way, but no less annoying to see.
|
Ravcharas
GREY COUNCIL
Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 21:05:00 -
[3]
Originally by: CCP Sreegs
Originally by: Ravcharas
I'm not saying the players need to now specific counter-hacking/botting methodologies. What I'm saying is that maybe you guys have erred on the safe side a little too often, especially concerning Incarna. Which is totally understandable, by the way, but no less annoying to see.
My apologies then I thought you were referring specifically to the security-type redaction. I'm not in the Incarna department so I'll toss you a hi five and ride off into the sunset.
hi five, rock n roll all night, all right!
On a totally unrelated note though, I was a little bit disappointed in seeing no mention of the tech moon imbalance. Or am I just blind?
|
Ravcharas
GREY COUNCIL
Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2011.01.17 23:32:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Elzon1
CCP Presents 2009
I wonder if this isn't part of the disconnect between ccp and players. The treaties feature is said to be something they wanted in there but had to cut last minute.
When I hear that I'm thinking 'Oh, that probably means they'll scramble to make treaties happen asap after release. It must be almost finished already.'
But evidently that's not what happens. Did treaties have to get back in line waiting to be processed? Does ccp allow themselves no leeway in shortlisting features or iterations on features that should have made it into the latest expansion?
|
|
|
| |
|