| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

HeliosGal
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 12:20:00 -
[1]
CCP to reinvigorate the game what is needed is a return time long past
50m per war dec max and unlimited war decs bring back the privateers
|

My Postman
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 12:53:00 -
[2]
You are a terrible poaster.
Also: IBTL or moved to elswhere where nobody reads it, which is a good thing.
|
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 12:53:00 -
[3]
plus engine trails and the north star!
Secure 3rd party service | my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar' |
|

Jack Gilligan
1st Cavalry Division Phalanx Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 12:59:00 -
[4]
I think a wardec should start cheap and stay cheap: IF the wardec corp/alliance is actually fighting the target where they live. IE: in the case of a 0.0 alliace or corp you must register kills IN 0.0 (not just in Jita, Rens, Amarr, etc) or the cost of maintenance increases exponentially and rapidly to the point of ridiculousness.
A war should be, well, a WAR, it should be fought to dislodge the target from wherever they actually are.
|

gfldex
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 13:01:00 -
[5]
To get in touch with CCP Games please contact your CSM delegate.
|

Spurty
Caldari V0LTA
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 13:05:00 -
[6]
This can't possibly back fire on privateers.
Hoppit!
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 16:27:00 -
[7]
/signed
Moar war = moar fun

------------------------------------
"A hungry man will tell you anything if you give him a cookie." |

Archbeholder
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 18:00:00 -
[8]
Originally by: HeliosGal CCP to reinvigorate the game what is needed is a return time long past
50m per war dec max and unlimited war decs bring back the privateers
Why bother with wardecs? Eve should be FFA.
|

Meeogi
Amarr
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 18:03:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Meeogi on 28/01/2011 18:03:40 Nah.... but definitely make flying a freighter ...and being in a noob corp illegal.
it's bull pooh
Wax on Wax off |

Aessoroz
Nohbdy.
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 18:20:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Jack Gilligan I think a wardec should start cheap and stay cheap: IF the wardec corp/alliance is actually fighting the target where they live. IE: in the case of a 0.0 alliace or corp you must register kills IN 0.0 (not just in Jita, Rens, Amarr, etc) or the cost of maintenance increases exponentially and rapidly to the point of ridiculousness.
A war should be, well, a WAR, it should be fought to dislodge the target from wherever they actually are.
Yea except sov mechanics don't need wardecs...
|

Tiffis
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 18:21:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Spurty This can't possibly back fire on privateers.
|

Liang Nuren
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 18:36:00 -
[12]
Originally by: HeliosGal CCP to reinvigorate the game what is needed is a return time long past
50m per war dec max and unlimited war decs bring back the privateers
Ex Privateer reporting in.
/signed
-Liang -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter
|

Irani Firecam
Fidelas Constans
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 18:38:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Archbeholder Eve should be FFA.
Just go to any nullsec system for some FFA action.
|

Wacktopia
Dark Side Of The Womb
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:45:00 -
[14]
Originally by: HeliosGal CCP to reinvigorate the game what is needed is a return time long past
50m per war dec max and unlimited war decs bring back the privateers
Masternerdguy alt detected?
|

Quirex Auricom
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 20:00:00 -
[15]
you know what would encourage more lowsec pvp?
bring back warp to 15 minimum so people have to slowboat and optimize your database so we can go back to the old days of insta-BM sets, just make them not suck..
The die hards will be able to sneak past with their instas, othes will have to slowbot.. more targets, more effective gate camps.. awesomesauce.. IMO
|

Aessoroz
Nohbdy.
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 20:33:00 -
[16]
Edited by: Aessoroz on 28/01/2011 20:38:17
Originally by: Quirex Auricom you know what would encourage more lowsec pvp?
bring back warp to 15 minimum so people have to slowboat and optimize your database so we can go back to the old days of insta-BM sets, just make them not suck..
The die hards will be able to sneak past with their instas, othes will have to slowbot.. more targets, more effective gate camps.. awesomesauce.. IMO
Uh, that wouldn't encourage lowsec pvp, that would just have more people avoid lowsec shortcuts.
If you want more pvp, encourage more hisec carebears to get into it and enjoy, have a system in game to make PVP not look like a evil death trap. Your system does not increase the pool of willing pvpers at all but will instead decrease the pool of lowsec travelers.
|

Boltorano
Fourth Circle Total Comfort
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 20:46:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Jack Gilligan I think a wardec should start cheap and stay cheap: IF the wardec corp/alliance is actually fighting the target where they live. IE: in the case of a 0.0 alliace or corp you must register kills IN 0.0 (not just in Jita, Rens, Amarr, etc) or the cost of maintenance increases exponentially and rapidly to the point of ridiculousness.
A war should be, well, a WAR, it should be fought to dislodge the target from wherever they actually are.
What about the concept of Total War? Why can't you hit the enemy in their soft spots?
|

Mutant Caldari
Caldari Percussive Diplomacy
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 20:48:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Quirex Auricom you know what would encourage more lowsec pvp?
bring back warp to 15 minimum so people have to slowboat and optimize your database so we can go back to the old days of insta-BM sets, just make them not suck..
The die hards will be able to sneak past with their instas, othes will have to slowbot.. more targets, more effective gate camps.. awesomesauce.. IMO
I definitely wouldn't complain about this happening 
As for the OP, /signed Yeah I am a pirate. What are you gonna do about it? Killboard link is not allowed to be used in a signature.Applebabe
|

Liang Nuren
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 20:51:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Boltorano
Originally by: Jack Gilligan I think a wardec should start cheap and stay cheap: IF the wardec corp/alliance is actually fighting the target where they live. IE: in the case of a 0.0 alliace or corp you must register kills IN 0.0 (not just in Jita, Rens, Amarr, etc) or the cost of maintenance increases exponentially and rapidly to the point of ridiculousness.
A war should be, well, a WAR, it should be fought to dislodge the target from wherever they actually are.
What about the concept of Total War? Why can't you hit the enemy in their soft spots?
Agreed - attacking their logistics chain is a very traditional way of dealing with an enemy force.
-Liang -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter
|

Aessoroz
Nohbdy.
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 20:57:00 -
[20]
Edited by: Aessoroz on 28/01/2011 20:57:32
Originally by: Liang Nuren
Originally by: Boltorano
Originally by: Jack Gilligan I think a wardec should start cheap and stay cheap: IF the wardec corp/alliance is actually fighting the target where they live. IE: in the case of a 0.0 alliace or corp you must register kills IN 0.0 (not just in Jita, Rens, Amarr, etc) or the cost of maintenance increases exponentially and rapidly to the point of ridiculousness.
A war should be, well, a WAR, it should be fought to dislodge the target from wherever they actually are.
What about the concept of Total War? Why can't you hit the enemy in their soft spots?
Agreed - attacking their logistics chain is a very traditional way of dealing with an enemy force.
-Liang
Implying null alliances don't use alt corps for their JFs.
|

Orbit Uranus
Minmatar Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 20:58:00 -
[21]
this so called 'nerf' happened years ago and has not stopped or slowed us at all...
|

Quemist
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 20:58:00 -
[22]
LOL at the cheeky noobs who don't know what this is and are saying it will backfire.
|

Quemist
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 21:04:00 -
[23]
Privateer's decced all of highsec p much and CCP ****ed their pants worse than when they saw an animated bra.
|

Liang Nuren
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 21:10:00 -
[24]
Edited by: Liang Nuren on 28/01/2011 21:11:18
Originally by: Aessoroz Edited by: Aessoroz on 28/01/2011 20:57:32
Originally by: Liang Nuren
Originally by: Boltorano
Originally by: Jack Gilligan I think a wardec should start cheap and stay cheap: IF the wardec corp/alliance is actually fighting the target where they live. IE: in the case of a 0.0 alliace or corp you must register kills IN 0.0 (not just in Jita, Rens, Amarr, etc) or the cost of maintenance increases exponentially and rapidly to the point of ridiculousness.
A war should be, well, a WAR, it should be fought to dislodge the target from wherever they actually are.
What about the concept of Total War? Why can't you hit the enemy in their soft spots?
Agreed - attacking their logistics chain is a very traditional way of dealing with an enemy force.
-Liang
Implying null alliances don't use alt corps for their JFs.
The funny thing is that they actually don't ... at least not all of them. 
-Liang
Ed:
Originally by: Orbit Uranus this so called 'nerf' happened years ago and has not stopped or slowed us at all...
Uh. See, I was there back in the heyday of the Privateers. It has definitely slowed you down.
-Liang
-- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter
|

Quemist
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 21:15:00 -
[25]
Privs has like 5 active players now don't they
|

Yuki Kulotsuki
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 21:27:00 -
[26]
I was never around for those heady days of destruction. But I wish I was. Bring it back!
Originally by: CCP Lemur THIS IS GOD: ... IF YOU HAVE ANY MORE REQUESTS I'M AVAILABLE SUNDAY FROM 10:30 TO 12:00 TO RECEIVE YOUR PRAYERS.
|

Sophia Amelia Stone
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 22:25:00 -
[27]
Originally by: HeliosGal CCP to reinvigorate the game what is needed is a return time long past
50m per war dec max and unlimited war decs bring back the privateers
Definetly not, I've seen tactics when it was cheap, where the war-decs were constant, for the sole purpose of getting the effected corp to disband.
Maybe they should make war-decs cost twice as much to see what happens.
|

Orbit Uranus
Minmatar Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 22:27:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Quemist Privs has like 5 active players now don't they
more like 7 <- Recruitment is open!
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Gallente Sigma Special Tactics Group Fleet Coordination Coalition
|
Posted - 2011.01.29 02:09:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Chribba plus engine trails and the north star!
WTF? Chribba, you have a neck!!!
|

Templar Dane
Amarrian Retribution
|
Posted - 2011.01.29 02:45:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Liang Nuren
Originally by: HeliosGal CCP to reinvigorate the game what is needed is a return time long past
50m per war dec max and unlimited war decs bring back the privateers
Ex Privateer reporting in.
/signed
-Liang
/ditto
|

Murev Vorchilde
Caldari End Game.
|
Posted - 2011.01.29 02:51:00 -
[31]
1st year of privs was best year in eve so far fun times -
|

Infinity Ziona
Minmatar Cloakers
|
Posted - 2011.01.29 06:00:00 -
[32]
It was a pretty sad episode in EvE history when CCP caved to the whining over Privateers.
Primary reason why I do not consider EvE to be a sandbox game.
When players create something from the tools and mechanics CCP have provided, which brings pleasure and a new dimension to the game (at least to the 800 people who were in Privateers at the time of the nerf) and the developer who promotes their game as a sandbox game kills that and returns the game to its linear 0.0 blob fest path you have to question the reality of the sandbox.
The irony of the whole thing was that I got the idea of Privateers while arguing about alliance pandering by CCP and had quite a few alliance people in that thread saying things like 'HTFU if you don't like it declare war on us' etc etc. And when I brought up the idea of Privateers they laughed.
6 months later those same people we're on the forums whining to CCP to save them from the evil griefers in empire... and true to form CCP did.
Go figure.
--------------------------------------------- I AM BETTER THAN YOU. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |