| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
575
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 18:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote: I think some of the old school Amarr became a bit obsessed with moaning to be quite honest. To many of its groups became very restricted in their tactics and gameplay outlook and simply failed to adapt to the demands of the warzone. Sure everyone can complain and grumble about gunless-farming-alts or whatnot but they don't really matter. ...

Actually they are all that matter for the plexing game. The actual pvpers and results of their battles, have very little impact on the occupancy war. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
575
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 10:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Cearain wrote:Jade Constantine wrote: I think some of the old school Amarr became a bit obsessed with moaning to be quite honest. To many of its groups became very restricted in their tactics and gameplay outlook and simply failed to adapt to the demands of the warzone. Sure everyone can complain and grumble about gunless-farming-alts or whatnot but they don't really matter. ...
 Actually they are all that matter for the plexing game. The actual pvpers and results of their battles, have very little impact on the occupancy war. I don't buy it Cearain really. I think all this talk of mobs of plexing alts is completely overblown. The reality is that you guys collectively (The amarr militia) just didn't want to defensive plex or risk basing in the warzone post Inferno.) .
Defensive plex? In the 36 hourse after we flipped those 40 ssytems they were already on average over 50% contested. Defensive plexing against that army of alts is crazy.
Base in the warzone? With station lockouts that is just stupid. We base in egg which is just one jump from the warzone. This allows us to actually play the game without being saddled with defensive plexing - which just feeds your alts and is clearly not as effective as offensive plexing.
You say its not alts in pve ships. Ok I will ask you the same things I have been asking other minmatar who claim this has something to do with pvp. I fully expect you will avoid answering these questions just like they did. Here are the questions many minmatar cheerleaders don't want to answer:
I will ask you the same thing I asked vordak (and now Ezzra). What percent of plexes do you think were capped by t1 frigates?
I mean we can keep using relative terms all we want. I can say "too much" of it is farm alts. You can say things like "the real war was won with pvp."
But what are the actual numbers?
Post inferno what sort of ships capped what sort of plexes for each faction. How many majors did amarr capture using a single frigate? How many majors did minmatar capture using this? Etc. I would Love to see a break down of this. Because I think it will show that over seventy percent of plexes minmatar captured were in frigates.
But before we get these actual numbers what do you think a legitimate spread would be?
I think a legitimate spread would be that minors are run by frigates and destroyers and account for at least 1/3 of the total plexes. Mediums would be run by cruisers fifty percent of the time and by afs about thirty percent and the rest can be frigate destroyers. Mediums should account for about 1/3 of plexes run. Majors Run by BSes bcs or hacs about fifty percent of the time thirty percent by cruisers and the rest smaller ships the 2 types of majors will account for about the remaining 1/3 of pelxes. I also think there should be somone scrammed or blown up in at least every other plex run if we want to call this a pvp mechanic.
That is what I think is a legitimate win. Instead I think we will find that the minmatar ran many more majors in frigates than amarr did. I think we will find that no one fought in eighty percent of the plexes run. Most plexing involves hiding from the enemy and orbiting the button. I think we will find that Minmatar ran at least seventy percent of their plexes in frigates and destroyers. Winning at this is not something to be proud of unless you are proud of your carebearing,
There now please answer some of those questions then we can talk about this being pvp. And perhaps we can talk to CCP Diagoras to see if he can give us the real numbers regarding your big win. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
575
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 10:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Those who complain about not getting what they didn't want anyways is what is interesting to me. Amarr on the whole, except for perhaps Ms. Yoshida who left FW a long time ago, didn't want to participate in occupancy warfare anyways. And now they complain about losing all their systems. If you want pvp, it's in FW.
The inconvenience of you having to move two jumps to a non-FW system is small compared to the significant increase in pew for the rest of us. Sorry.
Ill ask you the same questions I will ask the other minmatar cheerleaders who try to claim this has anything to do with pvp. See my post above. I'm sure you will ignore it like they do. Because anything close to honest answers shows that winning occupancy has almost nothing to do with pvp. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
576
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 12:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Sorry Cearain - I think you are a decent guy - but you are WAY too fixated on the alt-plexing farming stuff and I think your strategy of staking all on a vulnerability exploit (small "e") for a grand tier 5 cashout against an undefeated Matari militia with its staging systems intact was extremely poor. .
I'm sorry I can't tell if you are serious.
The strategy was working perfectly. The problem came when nulli abandoned the strategy and flipped systems early. Surely you are not so uninformed that you are not aware of this. They also started farming vulnerable systems instead of moving on to systems that were still contested.
I do believe the reason the stopped early was due to the bloody nose in pvp minmatar was giving them up in metro. But that really had nothing to do with whether they could continue plexing in their gunless merlins. Both sides can continue to do this and its impossible to stop unless you have a huge numerical advantage.
I appreciate your advice to base in fw space so we can be saddled with d plexing and feed your militia lp. I also appreciate your advice to never use the strategy that was working well. But I tend not to take advise from my enemies.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
576
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 13:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:Ill ask you the same questions I will ask the other minmatar cheerleaders who try to claim this has anything to do with pvp. See my post above. I'm sure you will ignore it like they do. Because anything close to honest answers shows that winning occupancy has almost nothing to do with pvp. In any case you are completely right. Occupancy warfare involves zero pvp when one side decides to not fight. In the hinterlands it's the gunless frigates running plexes....
Thank you for agreeing on this obvious point. I think most minmatar can see this as its obvious, but they don't want to break rank with the cheerleaders. the hinterlands are the vast majority of systems by the way. There might be 4 base systems on each side. The rest is hinterlands.
X Gallentius wrote: If you don't want to fully particpate in the occupancy warfare that's your choice. And guess what, nobody is forcing you to. I am just amazed at how much complaining there is from people who don't care about occupancy warfare to begin with. ..
I participate pretty well. But I don't plex as efficiently as I could. I don't multibox 3 alts in pve ships and run everytime an enemy comes in. But I am in a plex or looking for one about 80% of the time I am active.
You know I care about occupancy warfare.
X Gallentius wrote: My theory is that the real complaint is all about access to easy isk, not pvp, and how plexing alts are disrupting that access for Amarr FW. However, nobody wants to say it directly so they start complaining about lack of pvp, station lockouts, whatever even though PVP in FW is the best it has ever been. ..
You know that is not true of me. I have been posting for years that adding rewards will not fix the occupancy plexing system. I want changes that make plexing pvp. I am not against getting lp for plexing - in fact I think its good. But I was one of the few voices who repeatedly said simply adding rewards would not fix faction war.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
576
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 13:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote: The point Jade and these other guys are trying to make is that if the alt plexing situation were straighted out, Amarr would still lose. ..
Well then lets admit this is a pve mechanic so ccp will fix it. Then we can see who will win. But by keeping up this obvious lie that it is already a pvp mechanic ccp might never fix it.
X Gallentius wrote: They - Electus Matari, Star Fraction, Murietor Tribe, sasawong, are doing occupancy warfare for system control, not isk. They'll be doing occupancy warfare whether or not they are at Tier 1 or Tier 5. They aren't going to failcascade when things go **** up. ..
If they are happy to do pve thats fine for them. Others want pvp and want occupancy to be a pvp mechanic.
X Gallentius wrote: Most of the Amarr will only do occupancy warfare if they have a chance at a higher tier payout because all they care about is easy isk. Fweddit, Nulli, WBR were in Amarr FW for other reasons and have since bailed once the prospects of easy Amarr FW isk have dried up. My guess is that Iron Oxide and Late Night are in FW mostly for pvp, but they are rooted in Minmatar FW forever since they all "grew up" in FW. So they're staying too.
Who are the Amarr equivalents of these alliances and corporations?
Fweddit wasn't in for the isk - at least not originally. Nulli was in it for the isk. WBR I am notreally sure. They were in fw before the big inferno farmville started. I would imagine each of their members had their own reasons to be in fw.
My corp TMFED are 2 of the older amarr militia corps. Others left due to the station lock out rule change. (whcih didn't really effect minmatar) Others left for caldari like amarrian retribution.
But really when you have a system that is a pve system pretty much everyone will farm it. "No amarr were killed in the farming of the minmatar lp. " Make the system pvp and this will change.
We used to have a hard and fast rule no plexing for the enemy that is no plexing for minmatar and no plexing for gallente. Perhaps we were one of the last hold outs I'm not sure. But then after our 40 systems that we flipped became about 50% contested in 36 hours after the flip, even I lost all faith in this system.
Jade says we should ahve gone up there and started defensive plexing the metro area. LOL how long do you think that would work for? how much more isk would minmatar earn from us letting them continue to farm these systems? How fun is it to just run into a plex and watch the enemy warp to a different plex again and again and again. If I had recomended that people would rightly think I was crazy. I don't want to be the guy who recomends we do the most boring pve gameplay- all the time. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
576
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 13:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
BolsterBomb wrote:
However the main problem is Amar dont care about the new way FW mechanics work, until they care they will just be the same old Amar....
Nulli is not old amarr.
The old amarr care. Nulli is the one who decided to leave before tier 5. The old amarr couldn't do anything about that. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
576
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 14:24:00 -
[8] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Cearain wrote:Jade says we should ahve gone up there and started defensive plexing the metro area. LOL how long do you think that would work for? how much more isk would minmatar earn from us letting them continue to farm these systems? How fun is it to just run into a plex and watch the enemy warp to a different plex again and again and again. If I had recomended that people would rightly think I was crazy. I don't want to be the guy who recomends we do the most boring pve gameplay- all the time. I'll get to some other responses later on (lunch break now) but just want to bring you up on this point. I certainly didn't suggest that you should be defensive plexing metro in the wake of your tier 4 spike. In fact the only kind of defensive plexing I'd advise anyone to do in good conscience is defensive plexing in a critical staging system where the enemy is interested in fighting to kick you out. The thrust of my critique on your strategy Cearain is that you fixated on ISK through the infinite vulnerability situation as an extremely short term tactic that immediately vanished in smoke when you achieved it, rather than using the numerical advantage you had for a time to remove critical minmatar staging systems in order to throw us back 10 jumps to our hisec.
First you woudlnt' have to go 10 systems back to high sec. You can go to egg or gratesier or several other places including amarr high sec. The navy is not that big of a deal. You can put plexing ships there.
That said I do think taking huola would have been a worthy goal and disruptive to the minmatar. I was never against taking huola and in fact plexed huola auga dal and kourm more than any other system. So I don't know what you mean.
When you say we outnumbered you I can only assume you included nulli. And would you beleive they didn't actually take orders from the other amarr corps?
As far as fixated on isk through infinite vulnerability that had nothing to do with "my strategy." "My strategy" was simple. Offensive plex instead of defensive plex, and don't flip vulnerable systems until we can cash out. I put "my strategy" in quotes because it wasn't really my strategy. It is just an obvious strategy to anyone who looks at the mechanics.
When I saw that nulli was just farming vulnerable systems up in metro I actually advised my corp and told them to start plexing in systems that were not yet vulnerable. Here are the actual posts I made in my corp forum:
Cearain wrote: "I don't think there is much we can do about this, but there are a ton of people farming vulnerable systems. That is why we are not at tier 5 already. I am not sure how long these larger groups want to farm.
I have no idea what this will do to the market. I really don't. Certainly the lp market can bear some amount of farming because of the sheer number of items. But there seems to be 3 merlins in every system.....
I think we may want to move things along and start focusing on getting the remaining systems vulnerable. Or by the time we do flip the systems there will litterally be trillions of lp people are cashing in. But really I don't know what to make of it."
And:
Cearain wrote: "I had my alt plexing systems that are not vulnerable. I had him doing majors in ebolifer sirekur and ontorn. Not in eszur but around there its pretty peaceful and you are helping amarr much more than just milking an already vulnerable system."
Then shortly after this I heard nulli was going to cash out at tier 4! I was amazed at this. The areas I mention above easilly could have been added to our cashout. It was just taking some time because nulli wasn't even trying to plex there. They were just plexing vulnerable systems. But these systems were easy to plex in a merlin as there was no resistance.
So really you are criticizing the old amarr for not being able to control nulli. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
576
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 14:31:00 -
[9] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote: If they are happy to do pve thats fine for them. Others want pvp and want occupancy to be a pvp mechanic.
Just read what Jade said about Huola or any FW low sec home system.
Each faction has at most 7 systems as home base systems. Flipping these is not going to bring about tier 5. The minmatar were riding tier 5 for ages without ever flipping the 2 base systems of kamela or sahtogas.
People who talk of "core systems" or the importance of basing in fw systems are those who don't really understand the plexing mechanic or tier system.
People who are smart realize that if you base in a fw system that just means you are going to have to waste time defensive plexing it. It becomes a tar baby that sucks your pilots time. Time that would be better spent offensive plexing or fighting enemy plexers trying to plex your own systems. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
576
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 14:40:00 -
[10] - Quote
Ezra Tair wrote:Cearain wrote:
Defensive plex? In the 36 hourse after we flipped those 40 ssytems they were already on average over 50% contested. Defensive plexing against that army of alts is crazy.
I will ask you the same thing I asked vordak (and now Ezzra). What percent of plexes do you think were capped by t1 frigates?
I mean we can keep using relative terms all we want. I can say "too much" of it is farm alts. You can say things like "the real war was won with pvp."
For 5 hours after the systems flipped, myself, and at lest 10 others you were in the Aset pocket contesting the systems to pull Amarr out of T4 as fast as possible. My Navy Caracal had missiles. (and I also lost it to a Pirate Talos grrrrr). I don't know how many were by t1 frigs. I'll give you 90%. You feel better? It does not change what happened.*
It doesn't change what happened but it does prove mechanic has more to do with hiding in sytems while orbiting a button in a frigate than it does with pvp. Should the armarr continue to chase after these frigates forever? Come on even you know that is foolish.
You may have been out in a caracal but you had very little impact. You would have helped your militia hit tier 5 much faster if you would have opened all your alt accounts got them in frigates and started them all speed tanking plexes and running when enemies came. That is what the other 90% did and that is how minmatar got to where you are. I'm glad you admit it.
Ezra Tair wrote: About the only argument I can see for why things are the way they are is that a majority of Amarr elements decided that they did not want to employ themselves in elements they deemed unworthy of their time and effort. Even after being made to understand how that would impact the parts they did care about.*
Yes I did decide I am not going to spend all my time in my alt accounts in back end systems hiding from the enemy orbitting buttons. The fact that the current mechanics make this the most effective way to win occupancy means it is broken. I care about plexing and want it to be fixed. That is why I don't want people to be able to "hide and plex" anymore.
Ezra Tair wrote: Alts did not make choices for those people. Those people made their choices with alts. Beside, Saswong won the FW for us, remember that. *Saswong is overpowered and needs nerfed*
The vp totals don't lie.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
576
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 15:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote: If they are happy to do pve thats fine for them. Others want pvp and want occupancy to be a pvp mechanic.
Just read what Jade said about Huola or any FW low sec home system. Each faction has at most 7 systems as home base systems. Flipping these is not going to bring about tier 5. I see you are more concerned about making isk than winning a war. /thread 
For me a clear goal of winning the war is hitting tier 5. But there are other indicators. How exactly does one win the war in your book? Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
576
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 15:05:00 -
[12] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:For me a clear goal of winning the war is hitting tier 5. But there are other indicators. How exactly does one win the war in your book? How does one win any war in Eve? Break the will of the opposing force.
Will to what? Orbit buttons with an army of alts? That will was never there to begin with. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
576
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 15:10:00 -
[13] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:It's only important because we choose to make it important. .... It's only important if you make it important. ..
On that view fw was always fine. I realize that is your view. But most people recognize it was broken in that it could be much much better.
CCP tried to give some structure and goals to fw with inferno. The gameplay involved achieving those goals (alts playing "hide and plex") is horrible. The game should be fixed.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
576
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 17:15:00 -
[14] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:For me a clear goal of winning the war is hitting tier 5. But there are other indicators. How exactly does one win the war in your book? How does one win any war in Eve? Break the will of the opposing force. This a thousand times.
Again break my will to multibox alts hiding in systems orbiting buttons? No such will ever existed to be broken.
Jade Constantine wrote: Tier 5 is just a victory boon - its not the victory. There is no victory unless the enemy force is broken, disrupted, scattered and shattered of its morale and internal camaraderie.
What Inferno FW 2.0 actually brought to the table was a reason to utterly annihilate the enemy militia (reliable tier 5 riches) but that reason should not become the whole of your strategy. You Cearain appear to have forgotten that you need to defeat the enemy in detail before you can take his castle, drink his wine cellar and sleep with his wenches in peace.
Or so you imagine it - until you actually look at the rules of fw.
Jade I respect your opinion but so many things you are saying are pretty far seperated from the actual mechanics of this game.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
576
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 17:43:00 -
[15] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Cearain wrote: Then shortly after this I heard nulli was going to cash out at tier 4! I was amazed at this. The areas I mention above easilly could have been added to our cashout. It was just taking some time because nulli wasn't even trying to plex there. They were just plexing vulnerable systems. But these systems were easy to plex in a merlin as there was no resistance. So really you are criticizing the old amarr for not being able to control nulli. I'll be blunt Cearain ... a child could control Nulli knowing what you did about their intentions. When they started leaving systems vulnerable pending a push to tier 5 in a single night strategy you guys should simply have flipped those systems to prevent Nulli approaching their goal and told their leadership that you were prepared to go along with their plan only after they eradicated the minmatar stronghold systems.
Its funny you say a child would figure this out because I think this is really a childish strategy.
Ok I think this is not really clear thinking. So you think ILaw or fweddit or moar tears could have basically held nulli at gun point and forced their pilots to get in ships and plex a system some 12 or so jumps away from their home system? "Either you do what I say or I will **** all over our common goals!" This sort of tactic would have just ended poorly for everyone. You guys can give it a try if another null sec entity joins minmatar. But again I am not really sure if you are just trying to steer us wrong with more bad ideas.
I wanted to hit tier 5. I didn't want to start flipping systems early.
Plus you can't actually eradicate a system in faction war. You can make it so the minmatar cant' dock there until the hordes of pve ships come to plex it back up. But that only takes the minmafarm a few days.
I am not saying that taking houla wouldn't have been great. It would have been. But it wouldn't have crushed the minmafarm.
It wouldn't have changed anythign that happened after we flipped the systems. All those alts would have still hit metro after we flipped the systems regardless of who held huola at the time we flipped them.
Jade Constantine wrote: There is nothing Nulli can do to stop you messing with their plan and eventually they'd either have to do what you asked or leave FW on a disappointing tier 2-3 outcome.
Same goes for any interfering nullsec power really.
I really didn't see nulli as an interfering power until they decided to cash out early. If they wanted to farm vulnerable systems I didn't mind they did work up in metro.
My plan was somewhat similar to yours. We were willing to move things along to be able to hit tier 5 even though they kept farming todifraun. We were hitting the center systems around frerstorn trying to get them vulnerable. After they became vulnerable and we had enough to hit tier 5 then we could have forced thier hand by starting to flip systems.
I don't think anyone was expecting them to quit at tier 4. I know I was really surprised. It didn't make any sense.
Really we learned what was happening and took action as best we could. Minmatar with their huge head start of isk being shot at them through a firehose on day one of inferno, always like to pretend they are winning because of superior tactics/strategies. But there it is I gave you the inside story of what happened and core amarr militia did the best we could.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
576
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 17:46:00 -
[16] - Quote
Machiavelli's Nemesis wrote:confirming that the horde of AFK plexers was new to inferno.
Before that, we ALL had to sit and watch the timer constantly.
Funny, amarrians didn't seem to be whining back in the day when PERVS flipped most of metro using plexing alts and exploits. Shoe, other foot, sadface, hypocrisy. Lulz
I have been arguing that plexing should be pvp centered for years. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
587
|
Posted - 2012.08.22 21:52:00 -
[17] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Dynast wrote: And liable to end up unhappy, like notable chunks of Amarr Militia. Sadly, the 'notable chunks of the Amarr Militia' are the people to busy to literally do anything of any consequence except shoot at each other on an undock or to criticize the actions and effectiveness of fellow militia mates; The most bitter of bitter justify this by swinging around wild excuses about Link Alts, Online Titan Pilots and whatever they spout off in any attempt to not look like chumps by station spinning. They also love to spout off at length about how whatever group they lost an argument in Militia chat with hasn't had any impact on the warzone. Fweddit & Friends Leave... didn't want Kourmonen, Kamela or Sosala anyway. Gee Eff Minmatar Bros.
My experience with the amarr militia was not the same as yours. But then I dont talk in militia chat very much.
Anyway what the minmatar do is what is most important to me. Because whether or not they are online decides whether I get fights. I don't have allot of complaints in that department so I am glad my corp is staying here.
I don't do allot of fleet stuff but it was fun fighting with fweddit and more tears, the few times I did. Good luck to you. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
587
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 03:34:00 -
[18] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Cearain wrote:
My experience with the amarr militia was not the same as yours. But then I dont talk in militia chat very much.
Anyway what the minmatar do is what is most important to me. Because whether or not they are online decides whether I get fights. I don't have allot of complaints in that department so I am glad my corp is staying here.
Getting fights wasn't really the issue, and to be quite honest, I don't think I've ever engaged in a single conversation in Militia chat operating even in a realm remotely close to informative or helpful. Amarr Militia chat was literally the Special Olympics of Bads going out of the way to feel special by arguing the finer points of split weapon system Cormorants and how to not **** fit thrashers. Met quite a few decent Minmatar folks, and had good times in comms with a few (Vordak, Trans, The ALWAYS Happy Ninlarr, and Poetic)- getting fights wasn't the issue; the quality of life for newbro's was rough. They just didn't have the same ISK making oppurtunities, not to mention a half-assed warzone and even at t4 with 3 months of accumulated loyalty points a sub-par LP store. After we cashed out and whored on some cap kills, we just had absolutely no incentive to stay. It was good times, but were back to thriving under the Caldari Banner. Fweddit will probably make skirmishes into Minmatar Space, and we still have an office quite full of ships out there so it's only a matter of time before we go back and welp gloriously.
I'm sure the decision to move was done for different reasons for different people. Pinky Feldman said they were moving due to lack of fights.
Perhaps for allot in fweddit it was the lack of an ability to make isk. I completely agree that it is much harder for new players to keep up with pvp in fw than it is for older players who likely have multiple incomes sources.
I agree that the minmatar are a decent bunch. I think we tend not to take it so seriously as the caldari/gallente, but really I don't have much experience there other than what i see on the forums. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
| |
|