EVE Search - [Proposal] Change the way sec status is gained.

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Assembly Hall

[Proposal] Change the way sec status is gained.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Sepheir Sepheron Between Ordeals	Posted - 2011.03.02 00:31:00 - [31] Yeah.
Lykouleon Bad Kitty Inc.	Posted - 2011.03.02 01:51:00 - [32] Edited by: Lykouleon on 02/03/2011 01:51:35 Real men just smart-bomb Raven outside of Jita 4-4 and then live the rest of their life in null vOv +1 Don't click on this. No, really, don't, it'll make your eyes bleed.
Omara Otawan	Posted - 2011.03.02 02:08:00 - [33] Edited by: Omara Otawan on 02/03/2011 02:09:13 Not sure if it should go to these extremes. Maybe something like restricting to belt rats only, and giving 100% sec status update in hisec (or even 125%, only small fish there in belts anyway), 75% in lowsec, and 25% in nullsec? In general worth exploring though, sec status loss is too easy to regain currently.
Bossy Lady	Posted - 2011.03.02 11:27:00 - [34] Originally by: Bagehi Originally by: Ephemeron It is a reasonable request, considering that those who PvP in 0.0 get no sec penalties. So for pure 0.0 alliance people, it doesn't matter at all. Those that choose to kill in empire should deal with the consequences in empire. Have you considered that we can farm a low sec system for sec status the same way we can a null sec system? My corp controlled (dominated) a low sec system for about a month when we were between alliances, and we are mostly industrials. That is what would happen to fairly big chunks of low sec. Null sec pilots have resources and manpower to throw at such things. No one is pure 0.0 PVP anymore with Tech moons in low sec. You will end up with piles of cap pilots needing sec, which means you'll end up with systems populated by a bunch of caps and super caps grinding standings back up after a weekend of unpleasant POS bashes. Sounds pretty good to me. How soon could we make this start happening?
Mashie Saldana Minmatar Veto Corp	Posted - 2011.03.07 09:02:00 - [35] Originally by: Bossy Lady Originally by: Bagehi Originally by: Ephemeron It is a reasonable request, considering that those who PvP in 0.0 get no sec penalties. So for pure 0.0 alliance people, it doesn't matter at all. Those that choose to kill in empire should deal with the consequences in empire. Have you considered that we can farm a low sec system for sec status the same way we can a null sec system? My corp controlled (dominated) a low sec system for about a month when we were between alliances, and we are mostly industrials. That is what would happen to fairly big chunks of low sec. Null sec pilots have resources and manpower to throw at such things. No one is pure 0.0 PVP anymore with Tech moons in low sec. You will end up with piles of cap pilots needing sec, which means you'll end up with systems populated by a bunch of caps and super caps grinding standings back up after a weekend of unpleasant POS bashes. Sounds pretty good to me. How soon could we make this start happening? ASAP would be fine for me.
Marconus Orion Global Criminal Countdown	Posted - 2011.03.07 09:42:00 - [36] I agree. The only time you gain a sec status increase should be while in low sec.
Dibsi Dei Salamyhkaisten kilta	Posted - 2011.03.07 15:31:00 - [37] Originally by: Bagehi No one is pure 0.0 PVP anymore with Tech moons in low sec. You will end up with piles of cap pilots needing sec, which means you'll end up with systems populated by a bunch of caps and super caps grinding standings back up after a weekend of unpleasant POS bashes. why do capital pilots need standings
Dream Nine	Posted - 2011.03.08 07:31:00 - [38] Originally by: klyeme I would like to be able to trade sec status Example: A character with some excess (above 0.0) sec status could trade another player for isk (sec status for isk). Create alt. Trade security for 0 isk. Terminate alt.
The Djego Minmatar Hellequin Inc.	Posted - 2011.03.08 09:04:00 - [39] Originally by: Dream Nine Originally by: klyeme I would like to be able to trade sec status Example: A character with some excess (above 0.0) sec status could trade another player for isk (sec status for isk). Create alt. Trade security for 0 isk. Terminate alt. This is actually considered as exploit: Linkage ---- Nerf Tank - Boost Gank! Originally by: Amantus Real men don't need to get into blaster range.
The Djego Minmatar Hellequin Inc.	Posted - 2011.03.14 09:49:00 - [40] bump ---- Nerf Tank - Boost Gank! Originally by: Amantus Real men don't need to get into blaster range.

Pinky Denmark The Cursed Navy Important Internet Spaceship League	Posted - 2011.03.14 13:14:00 - [41] Security status need to be easier. If Im not allowed to gank people easier in hi-sec the economy will be going nuts... Maybe I should just be regenerating sec status pr hour instead of having to kill rats. Low Sec pirates shouldn't be able to just camp all day - come to 0.0 and work for your fun... - I'm a nice guy!! But plz hook me up with some pew pew...
The Djego Minmatar Hellequin Inc.	Posted - 2011.03.15 11:56:00 - [42] Originally by: Pinky Denmark ...come to 0.0 and work for your fun... If you now replace "0.0" with "low sec", I could agree with you. ---- Nerf Tank - Boost Gank! Originally by: Amantus Real men don't need to get into blaster range.
Maz3r Rakum The Imperial Fedaykin	Posted - 2011.03.15 15:25:00 - [43] Great idea. If you can't loose sec status in 0.0 why should you gain it.
Pinky Denmark The Cursed Navy Important Internet Spaceship League	Posted - 2011.03.15 15:28:00 - [44] I do agree people in hi-sec should have stronger incentives to go to lowsec - but low sec pirates should be challenged too... Like having sentry guns damage multiplier be multiplied by the amount of people engaging in criminal activities hehe... And not being able to dock with GCC :p Enjoy being a pirate... Shouldn't be as comfotable as it is - I'm a nice guy!! But plz hook me up with some pew pew...
Bagehi Association of Commonwealth Enterprises R.A.G.E	Posted - 2011.03.15 15:59:00 - [45] Originally by: Dibsi Dei Originally by: Bagehi No one is pure 0.0 PVP anymore with Tech moons in low sec. You will end up with piles of cap pilots needing sec, which means you'll end up with systems populated by a bunch of caps and super caps grinding standings back up after a weekend of unpleasant POS bashes. why do capital pilots need standings Because no one does only one thing in Eve. Super cap pilots are a bit different, but even they need to get out of ships from time to time for implants. The characters who stay out of high sec are almost exclusively the low sec pirates who wear their -10s like badges of honor. Everyone else needs to be able to get into high sec from time to time, requiring sec status. This signature is useless, but it is red.
MatrixSkye Mk2	Posted - 2011.03.15 16:29:00 - [46] Originally by: Sofaking Weetawded Not supported at all. What a ridiculous case of self-interest. "CCP, bring me more targets to play with, please!" It is bad enough that the 0.0 alliance leaders' main interest is forcing more people into their arena, now the lowsec pirates are at it, too? Oh wait...did I just fall for a troll? Oh well. The targets he's asking CCP bring him are the scum that already belong there in the first place (pirates that watch their sec status like anorexics watch their weight). This idea gets two thumbs up. I'm pleasantly surprised this idea is coming from a pirate . Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today!
Bagehi Association of Commonwealth Enterprises R.A.G.E	Posted - 2011.03.15 17:21:00 - [47] Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 Originally by: Sofaking Weetawded Not supported at all. What a ridiculous case of self-interest. "CCP, bring me more targets to play with, please!" It is bad enough that the 0.0 alliance leaders' main interest is forcing more people into their arena, now the lowsec pirates are at it, too? Oh wait...did I just fall for a troll? Oh well. The targets he's asking CCP bring him are the scum that already belong there in the first place (pirates that watch their sec status like anorexics watch their weight). This idea gets two thumbs up. I'm pleasantly surprised this idea is coming from a pirate . VETO are low sec pirates. Not high sec war deccers, or suicide gankers. They definitely do not watch their sec status other than to say collectively "we have -10 sec status" so I think you're thinking of a different group of people. Incidentally, neither would get dragged to low sec from this change. Suicide gankers are train, gank, dispose characters more often than not. High sec war deccers don't lose sec status because they use war dec mechanics. The characters this targets are almost exclusively null seccers who kill stuff in low sec occasionally. This is generally in the form of POS bashes, but occasionally targets on the low sec side of null sec entry points. This signature is useless, but it is red.
MatrixSkye Mk2 Minmatar	Posted - 2011.03.15 20:45:00 - [48] Originally by: Bagehi VETO are low sec pirates. Not high sec war deccers, or suicide gankers. They definitely do not watch their sec status other than to say collectively "we have -10 sec status" so I think you're thinking of a different group of people. Incidentally, neither would get dragged to low sec from this change. Suicide gankers are train, gank, dispose characters more often than not. High sec war deccers don't lose sec status because they use war dec mechanics. The characters this targets are almost exclusively null seccers who kill stuff in low sec occasionally. This is generally in the form of POS bashes, but occasionally targets on the low sec side of null sec entry points. You misunderstood my post. I never implied Veto watches its sec status. I know they don't and don't care for it. However, the pirates that DO watch their sec status would be forced to lo sec to get it fixed, and thus, it would theoretically translate to more targets for Veto and company. I think that's what the OP is referring to. And that I'm more than OK with. Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today!
ezthumper	Posted - 2011.03.15 21:08:00 - [49] Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 Originally by: Bagehi However, the pirates that DO watch their sec status would be forced to lo sec to get it fixed, and thus, it would theoretically translate to more targets for Veto and company. I think that's what the OP is referring to. And that I'm more than OK with. Wait, are you saying they want to pass something to force targets to them? HAHAHA, fantastic. No, get off your lazy ****s.
Don Pellegrino Pod Liberation Authority	Posted - 2011.03.16 03:59:00 - [50] Excellent idea. ____________________________________________

Mashie Saldana Minmatar Veto Corp	Posted - 2011.03.17 00:58:00 - [51] Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 You misunderstood my post. I never implied Veto watches its sec status. I know they don't and don't care for it. However, the pirates that DO watch their sec status would be forced to lo sec to get it fixed, and thus, it would theoretically translate to more targets for Veto and company. I think that's what the OP is referring to. And that I'm more than OK with. And that would be spot on, innocent people aren't going to have their sec status go down in the first place.
Johnny Lou	Posted - 2011.03.18 19:17:00 - [52] sounds good
Bagehi Association of Commonwealth Enterprises R.A.G.E	Posted - 2011.03.18 19:24:00 - [53] Originally by: Mashie Saldana Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 You misunderstood my post. I never implied Veto watches its sec status. I know they don't and don't care for it. However, the pirates that DO watch their sec status would be forced to lo sec to get it fixed, and thus, it would theoretically translate to more targets for Veto and company. I think that's what the OP is referring to. And that I'm more than OK with. And that would be spot on, innocent people aren't going to have their sec status go down in the first place. That is true. However, my point still remains that low sec will become more infested with null sec power blocks and that will lead to a rise in hot drops and large fleet warfare in low sec. I don't think that would be a good thing. This signature is useless, but it is red.
Baaldor Igneus Auctorita Gentlemen's Agreement	Posted - 2011.03.18 20:28:00 - [54] Originally by: Bagehi Originally by: Mashie Saldana Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 You misunderstood my post. I never implied Veto watches its sec status. I know they don't and don't care for it. However, the pirates that DO watch their sec status would be forced to lo sec to get it fixed, and thus, it would theoretically translate to more targets for Veto and company. I think that's what the OP is referring to. And that I'm more than OK with. And that would be spot on, innocent people aren't going to have their sec status go down in the first place. That is true. However, my point still remains that low sec will become more infested with null sec power blocks and that will lead to a rise in hot drops and large fleet warfare in low sec. I don't think that would be a good thing. Hey, targets are targets. Let them role with it. It might turn out to be a lot of fun.
Ophelia Ursus	Posted - 2011.03.18 21:40:00 - [55] Originally by: Bagehi You know the null sec cyno systems in low sec. They are pretty obvious to anyone as they are highlighted on the map when you select "recent cynos" and you never attack. You know where we are now, don't act like the only reason you don't attack is because we're hiding 20 jumps away. We're in your space already. Multiply that several times and you will have the situation you will be facing if this change goes through. Just FYI, you're in R.A.G.E. Ain't no one scared of you, bub. Signature removed.
Alias 6322A	Posted - 2011.03.19 22:02:00 - [56] This idea has some merit... Lowsec population would definitely spike if it was the only place to gain security status (or it and hisec). Nullsec shouldn't give sec status since it is...well...0 security. I wouldn't screw with bounties though...the lower you go the higher the pay is fine. Pirates would certainly see more prey (which is always good imo) there and it'd probably boost PvP in lowsec as well. I don't mind Incursions increasing sec status since in low/null there can be competition for them. More Incursions in low (with higher sec gains) would increase traffic too. +1, research a little more but it has merit. The main thing to remember is this only slows down gankers (real pirates have better things to do...) but doesn't seriously deter it. It does however place a time value on whether or not to gank.
Laechyd Eldgorn Caldari draketrain Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.03.20 10:09:00 - [57] Originally by: Pinky Denmark I do agree people in hi-sec should have stronger incentives to go to lowsec - but low sec pirates should be challenged too... Like having sentry guns damage multiplier be multiplied by the amount of people engaging in criminal activities hehe... And not being able to dock with GCC :p Enjoy being a pirate... Shouldn't be as comfotable as it is Being flashy is not comfortable in long term. People get big advantage being able to aggress you anywhere without being fired by sentries themselves, i.e. they can just aggress you with rifters at the gate. This docking you're talking about is somewhat meaningless, there's docking delay for everyone aggressing. If something needs adjustment, it's that one.
Bagehi Association of Commonwealth Enterprises R.A.G.E	Posted - 2011.03.24 00:14:00 - [58] Edited by: Bagehi on 24/03/2011 00:14:12 Originally by: Ophelia Ursus Originally by: Bagehi You know the null sec cyno systems in low sec. They are pretty obvious to anyone as they are highlighted on the map when you select "recent cynos" and you never attack. You know where we are now, don't act like the only reason you don't attack is because we're hiding 20 jumps away. We're in your space already. Multiply that several times and you will have the situation you will be facing if this change goes through. Just FYI, you're in R.A.G.E. Ain't no one scared of you, bub. That's a lot of bravado coming from an alt sitting in an NPC corp. This signature is useless, but it is red.
eliminator2	Posted - 2011.03.24 18:06:00 - [59] got my count ----------------------------------------------- I met Eliminator1..... I chewed it up, and spat it out. Now, he is my minion. I kill miners and mission runners people say, I call them target pra
The Djego Minmatar Hellequin Inc.	Posted - 2011.03.29 10:14:00 - [60] bump ---- Nerf Tank - Boost Gank! Originally by: Amantus Real men don't need to get into blaster range.



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.