| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Katyusha Zaraza
   |
Posted - 2011.03.24 03:08:00 -
[1]
Say I scan down a wormhole in k-space, warp to it, see the good ol k-162 and go in. Say that from the locus signature I see that it's a C3. Is there a way to figure out if the w-space system has a static exit without having to chill there for several days, scanning down wormhole exits and attempting to infer the presence of a static based on exit classification? I didn't notice any indications of whether an exit is a static in exit classifications. Just info about what the mass threshold is and what system type/security awaits on the other side, plus longevity of the exit. Am I missing something obvious here?  Thanks for any help!
|
Vjorn Angannon
Fleet Escort Services
|
Posted - 2011.03.24 03:20:00 -
[2]
There are several nifty little tools out there that can help you determine the probable static of a w-space system.
One such tool I've been using lately is here.
You can also google staticmapper.
Remember tho, these give you the probable static (info was provided by other peeps in wormholes). Tho the tools are pretty accurate as far as I've seen, the only way to be absolutely 110% sure is to spend a few days in there.
Hope this helps.
Vj
|
Khiijan Araal
|
Posted - 2011.03.24 04:00:00 -
[3]
If a wormhole is a k-162, that means it came from somewhere else. If you see a wormhole that has a designation other than k-162, that means that it is a static of the system you are currently in.
|
Vjorn Angannon
Fleet Escort Services
|
Posted - 2011.03.24 04:23:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Khiijan Araal
If you see a wormhole that has a designation other than k-162, that means that it is a static of the system you are currently in.
The above statement is NOT true. Just because a wormhole has a designator other than K162 does not automatically make it a static wormhole to that system. For example, I live in a C3 system. It has a static wormhole D845 that respawns daily. However, occasionally I also get random wormholes N968 to a C3, T405 to a C4, and N770(?) to a C5. Tho they don't have the K162 designator....they are NOT static (spawn daily) to my C3.
|
khazak mokl
Amarr
Black Viper Nomads
|
Posted - 2011.03.24 07:25:00 -
[5]
Edited by: khazak mokl on 24/03/2011 07:26:19
Splodgers site is 100% accurate.
Shameless bump.
|
Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.03.24 11:42:00 -
[6]
every wormhole system in the game has at least one static exit, hope that helps.
http://staticmapper.com
.
|
Substantia Nigra
|
Posted - 2011.03.25 03:20:00 -
[7]
Every w-space system has one or more 'static' wormholes. They may also have a selection of K162 wormholes and other de novo (not static and not K162) wormholes.
The only way to be absolutely certain re a system's static wormhole complement is to do your time ... camp and check over time.
However there are a number of online tools you can use to be pretty sure. So far I have not found a system where these tools have been incorrect, but I guess that is possible.
- Static Mapper (http://www.staticmapper.com/) - Works fine.
- Eve Eye (http://eveeye.com/ips_search.asp?opt=48NVM) - Works fine, and I like the additional info such as PI ... reducing the need to cross check with dotlan or jove labs sites.
- Worm Nav (http://www.wormnav.com/) - Recent addition. Some forum concerns raised re possible abuse of information. Doesn't provide the additional info that eve eye does. Seems to work fine.
Cheers
Subs
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |