|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Shivalla
Gallente Financial Removal THE SPACE P0LICE
|
Posted - 2011.03.27 13:29:00 -
[1]
Changes are good. Need more conflicts. 0.0 has more than 1 way of making isk. Remember times when there was no anomalies at all. People still used to live well in 0.0.
Stop whining.
Just saying.
|
Shivalla
Gallente Financial Removal THE SPACE P0LICE
|
Posted - 2011.03.27 13:56:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Camios Edited by: Camios on 27/03/2011 13:51:10 It is striking the fact that when you talk about change, the player affected always cry as it was a nerf.
Is it a nerf for sure? No, it might be.
Let the Grayscale team do their work, and push them to do the changes and to monitor the outcome.
A wise attitude for the playerbase would be te stop whining, te read carefully devblogs and minutes before complaining and to begin being constructive.
But the devs should do 2 things:
1. Motivate better the changes with data and graps in order to reduce player concerns. 2. FOLLOW the outcomes and react accordingly, always explaining to the playerbase why they do what they do.
TL;DR: CCP go ahead but monitor the outcomes.
This, and I would also want to point out, that there has been outcry for long time that there should be something done on the powerblocks and the general direction of game.
And when there is a attempt to do this, playerbase just starts to shed its tears and cry like babies.
CCP wants to do changes, but playerbase dont want the changes to affect themselves.
|
Shivalla
Gallente Financial Removal THE SPACE P0LICE
|
Posted - 2011.03.27 14:38:00 -
[3]
To all the whiners and crying nubcakes.
HTFU!
|
Shivalla
Gallente Financial Removal THE SPACE P0LICE
|
Posted - 2011.03.27 16:34:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Trina Forrest The most amazing part of this is how disconnected CCP is with their game. This only hurts average players who rely on ratting to maintain their pvp ships/ gain isk for new ships. If this is a factor of creating "isk sink" that ccp was so concerned about then get rid of lvl 4 missions too.
this will have negative side effects, not positive.
1) alt accounts will shrink, CCP openly admitted at their fan fest that more plex are entering the game then leaving. 2) New alliances will NOT BE ABLE TO MAKE IT in 0.0 as they will not have moon goo support themselves, the alternative WAS RATTING HELLO! 3) This will not destablize the north, as tech is what we give a **** about, the only ones who care about rats are the people who never see the benifits directly from tech.
So yet again CCP has convinced so many they should start looking for a new MMO to play. Although I dont think the dev will be fired for being the messenger right away. I do think the loss of revenue will cause lay offs as people start to exit eve. Long term, I think he will eventually be one of the people to be let go as he was the escape goat for this massive piece of **** which is a dev blog.
BTW there are like 3000+ more bugs in the game that could use decoding, how about you start there before ever mentioning another expansion, added content, or possible side projects again.
Just to name 100+ you can start on you should refer to the unity patch notes. Those players actually KNOW whats wrong with your game, how about you hire them to make good decisions so your executives can continue to be clueless and collect pay checks.
Dear lord what amount of tears you managed to pack into single post.
Dude seriously, pull your head out of your ***, and look at the big picture.
A) Change B) Conflicts C) Eve is dying D) Has been for past 7 years. E) NC is crap. F) U mad?
|
Shivalla
Gallente Financial Removal THE SPACE P0LICE
|
Posted - 2011.03.27 17:27:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Super Whopper
Originally by: Shivalla Dear lord what amount of tears you managed to pack into single post.
Dude seriously, pull your head out of your ***, and look at the big picture.
A) Change B) Conflicts C) Eve is dying D) Has been for past 7 years. E) NC is crap. F) U mad?
You are mad, and so are CCP, literally.
I used to have 6 accounts. Now I have three. If this change is implemented I will drop another one or two.
So, there's one you missed: G) Lose subscribers.
Did you look at the graph I linked or too busy trolling?
The Space P0lice on Dotlan: 0 Systems. Empire alliance whining about changes that won't affect them.
Keep trolling, though.
No no, I am not whining at all. I support this change completely. And I think you should indeed cancel your subscriptions. And sell all the chars aswell, to support your ISK making.
Trolling, well, that might be
|
Shivalla
Gallente Financial Removal THE SPACE P0LICE
|
Posted - 2011.03.27 17:46:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Cyrus Doul Link to spreadsheet form of scrapheap chart
For those of you that don't mind clicking links, here's the graph in a Google spreadsheet.
To get the numbers i took: <-.2 at -4 sites as that removed all havens and sanctums -.3 to -.4 at -2 sites which leaves havens but no sanctums -.5 to -.6 at -1 for 2 havens and 1 sanctum -.7 to -.8 at +1 for 2 haven 2 sanctums and the extra -.9 to -1.0 at +2 for 3 and 3
If my numbers are off on those if someone wants to tell me what the proper numbers more likely are per field I can change it pretty fast
TLDR with that system losses of high end sites are DRF 30% loss across 15 regions PL 26% loss on one region NC 57% loss across seven regions CAAASEROL 50% loss across seven regions Nulli Secunda 33$ loss on one region DC 48% loss across 3 regions Ev0ke 93 percent loss on one region
Very good math! Awesome!
And now we all know why NC is so ****ed. Suprisingly nobody from Evoke has been cryin that much.
|
|
|
|