|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.02 15:12:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Th3bl4ckr4bbit on 02/04/2011 15:14:12
Originally by: Jena Lindser Although I agree this new anom change is a terrible idea, instead of making a list of why its stupid like the other 79 pages of replies in this thread, I will offer some solutions.
CCP can add an anti AFK cloaker system wide pulse decloaking pos mod. This stops afk cloakers from sitting in the - with the change - only good system for ratting in an entire region.
CCP can allow alliances to pull down stations and refund 3/4's of the cost. This allows 0.0 groups to relocate to better areas with the isk they need to attack but which they cant get anymore in their bad nullsec, AND attackers can invade simply to sell stations off for lol's.
Instead of nerfing anoms to cut profit, CCP can make all super carriers and titans always remain in space, even if their pilot logs off. People can then invade just to attack a titan-super pos,and because they have the password, bump the titan-super out, and steal it or blow it up. Massive isk sink in lost titans-supers + defense fleet losses.
CCP can add a new system upgrade that lowers the truesec of a system. It can be super expensive, 5+ billion for every -.1. Short term thats a huge isk sink. To prevent all 0.0 from being -1.0 truesec, losing sov will reset the true sec to its base state. Alliances can now invade just to bump the -1.0 truesec system down to -.2 for a loss of 40 billion in upgrades.
CCP can rework the truesec of regions, making all constellations have at least 1 system that has potential for 2 sanctums.
CCP can make wormhole inhibitors and wormhole stabilizers that cost billions in fuel to run. Alliance deploys one stabilizer in 0.0 on a good class 6 wormhole, making it perma open. Alliance then deploys wormhole inhibitors in class 6 to prevent any new wormholes from opening, essentially making a back door system under alliance control for isk making.
CCP can rework moon goo, a system tha'ts very old, by adding moon goo to moons that currently have nothing in them, not even hydrocarbons, that produce goods that sell to NPC buyers in highsec, but which have no value in ship construction - aka blue glass marbles loved by caldari children across the galaxy.
CCP can rework asteroid belt ratting to have a much faster respawn, and add more belts to systems. 10+ belts in each system is equilvant to a sanctum, but also much more dangerous to farm as people can warp right to you without scanning you out.
Those are just a few things that can change to make this anom change not become the worst idea CCP ever had. If anyone can think of something else that would make this change - which WILL happen no matter what anyone says - be not so bad, then please post that suggestion here instead of simply calling CCP idiots, as they WONT listen or care.
You just forgot a point : CCP wants 0.0 players to earn less isk.
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.03 11:39:00 -
[2]
I'm just wondering why there is no communication from CCP atm ?
Not enough complaint ?
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.04 11:36:00 -
[3]
Can we get back to topic instead of comparing what is better to be a perfect carebear ?
The topic is about CCP patch not a lesson about isk earnings.
And yes i totally disapprove this PATCH like 88 pages of comments before me.
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.06 09:46:00 -
[4]
Originally by: BinaryData
Originally by: Blackbrock
Originally by: nano bobcat go for better space then if your income is farming sanctums. That easy.
Uh....
I'll finish your sentence..
Uhh.. Dude your stupid.
CCP also did this to combat the botters from NC, Red Alliance, White Noise, etc...
You are 100% wrong let me explain .....
Less isk in a system ? people will farm somewhere else, so system will be empty or close to be. With time, small gangs will avoid empty sytems because of the " no-target = no fun ". We call this the Drone Region Syndroma :) Then it will be empty enough to implement bots... Of course they won't have sanctums Heven or whatever names of top anomalies but they don't care as they farm 23h/7 days a week. So it's just helping the bots to have some space cause Drone Region is already 100% full of bots and they need more space :)
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.06 09:55:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Bill Andrex This is a stupid change on behalf of CCP. CCP Greyscale might be happy at the changes over his morning coffee, but us players are certainly not happy at the changes proposed.
The current system is fine, it works well and does what it intended. Now we are moving to a system that works well but doesn't do what it intended in the first place. The idea was to spread people about in nullsec so that systems could sustain a higher 0.0 population.
CCP have now gone ahead and shot that idea in the foot. It will now be harder for newer up and coming Alliances to carve out a living in 0.0. It won't effect existing 0.0 Alliances as they make their ISK from moon goo, all CCP you have done here is gimp the little guy who is trying to make a living.
The little guy is going to spend less time in fleets and more time trying to scratch out a living to make a little ISK to replace his losses. Why take away the incentive for people to move from empire to 0.0?
CCP you have dropped the ball here.
proposed : no deployed without any discussions so it's not proposed.
The current system is fine :for the 0.0 players but not for ccp.
It won't effect existing 0.0 Alliances: it will, cause Alliances need player to fight, and players need isk.
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.06 10:02:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Th3bl4ckr4bbit on 06/04/2011 10:05:21 You're wrong man, i'am a stupid carebear and a sanctum gives 500M / hour.
So please use my numbers and recalculate.
Edit 98 pages.... well this patch affects a few people, i don't see a 98 pages topic to welcome the incursions or something else.
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.06 10:07:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Jenny d'Orrin I can't believe Liang is actually still talking to you nublets.
If your only reason to want anoms is "cuz it's everyman's FAIR income" then I have news for you: Life/eve isn't and isn't supposed to be.
Good points were made about how the current system allows for a great deal of control, but none of the players demand it from their CEO/fellow players.
I just can LOL on that... What does " life " is doing here ?
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.06 12:13:00 -
[8]
Please remember that we are here to make a game that you all love to play. None of us comes to work thinking of ways to enrage the playerbase. As the Lead Game Designer, I take my responsibility seriously and that includes taking responsibility for any decisions made by our team. To me, EVE is much more than a job, itÆs something IÆm passionate about constantly improving. I promise you I want EVE to thrive just as much as you do.
Thanks for listening CCP Hammerhead Lead Game Designer
Well times are changing ....
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.06 12:19:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Th3bl4ckr4bbit on 06/04/2011 12:20:48 you forgot 1 point :
This numbers are for 1 member as there is not enough valuable anom to farm at 2 people in the same system with 2 caps and chaining anoms....
Edit: and you know that it is really easy to have 1 player by system in eve...
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.06 12:25:00 -
[10]
Cause you think they care about that ?
They have their goals players have different ones. We are on eve to play they are on eve to earn REAL money.
|
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.06 12:30:00 -
[11]
Agree with you, but you need 2 characters to get your isk ....
Then go and try to find a good belting place to rat, then try to farm in belts with 2 characters....
You won't earn the same amount. ou will earn 50% less and remember to change your ship... Farming in belts with carrier or nyx is not a good idea
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.06 12:37:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Lt Pizi
Originally by: Grog Barrel
Originally by: Lt Pizi
Originally by: Patri Andari Imagine how much easier this would have been if CCP had done the following:
Make upgrades and upkeep costs more in bad true sec and less in higher true sec yet leave the spawns somewhat the same in bad true sec and better as true sec improves.
Damn, I am a genius!
no you are not
a sanctum/haven makes 100m/h x4 is 400m ph is around 10b a day is 300b a month
so to achive the same goal (nerving the income by half ) the system cost would be 150b ....
now that would be an outcry =)))
(the 100m/h is not my number it was stated by the carbears that run em in this thread)
since your are adding a multiplication of factor 4 into your ecuation, your whole statement is comparable to <insert anything not serious here>
in case you are not aware that in the current system there are in fact 4 sanctims/havens per any updated system i tell you now ... thats why x4
First go there:
Guristas Sanctum
Then remember it takes time to run them, and when you have 4 anoms in 1 sytem most of time you are not alone. So generally you have time to run 2 anoms/h with 2 accounts.
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.06 12:39:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Torenc
Originally by: Th3bl4ckr4bbit Agree with you, but you need 2 characters to get your isk ....
Then go and try to find a good belting place to rat, then try to farm in belts with 2 characters....
You won't earn the same amount. ou will earn 50% less and remember to change your ship... Farming in belts with carrier or nyx is not a good idea
not ift wil be not 50% less but wil be araund 20% from curent sanctum farming. even with faction spawns with moslty have ****y loot this days.
Don't know where you live but link me some belts system where we can farm :) And remember that A LOT of players will have to change their isk earning method and ccp won't add more belts....
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.06 12:50:00 -
[14]
500M/H was from me and was 100% ironic in response to the most stupid way to calculate isk/H for running anoms...
I could have said 159B/H it would have been the same :)
Anyways, CCP is removing ISK from null sec that is the point... Whatever people say, yes you cn go rat in belt, try to find ded plexs, go WH, run missions etc.... But they are still removing isk from null sec that's all... Less isk less pvp, less pvp less buying demand etc etc.. Sell your trita stock in Jita guys in the next 6 months trita will be back at 1.5 isk.
And yes miner will whine....
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.06 12:59:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Kabars You know with 99 pages of b****ing and complaining at the end of the day and patch it will all be the same because CCP does not give a flying **** about its memebers who have been here for years playing the game. With the new "improvements" and " we know whats best " attuide Its all going to boil dow to we will still be playing and thats all they care about is getting that 15 bucks a month and to hell with there complaints or suggestions.
And ? Even if most of us will keep on playing, i assume a lot of people will cancel 1 alt or leave game. But it doesn't really matters for CCP as it is just a statistic.
Even it hey loose 1000 accounts directly due to this patch they will earn more money. Less isk in game means more plex buying to CCP so they won't loose anything. Removing high anoms in null sec is also a way to fight the bots. The less anoms they have the less isk they have. So even if good and real players are affected, there is no direct impact to CCP RL wallet so.. They don't care for sure. But Eve is a game where there uses to be a dialog between players and CCP that's why we are on this topic. But it seems, that there is a new vision of future that doesn't include dialog.
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.06 13:02:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Red Morbo New t-shirts ready to buy at the eve online shop! "I went to null sec and all i got was this crappy anom"
you are my HERO !!!!!!!!!
Anyways what i most regret is:
No CSM point of view, and no CCP response.
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.06 13:07:00 -
[17]
Edited by: Th3bl4ckr4bbit on 06/04/2011 13:08:09 Well here we are !
100 pages !!!! I want my t-shirt: " I was on the page 100 of complaints "
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 11:44:00 -
[18]
I don't wanna troll but i can't resist....
about anoms : " Please note that these changes will take effect within the first week after deployment and will not all be updated immediately after the patch is deployed. "
Well changes were done already after i logged in.
|
Th3bl4ckr4bbit
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 09:25:00 -
[19]
I just can lol at the troll about 0.0 ....
CCP is currently nerfing all the isk income even in high sec so stop trolling about how happy you are for the 0.0 nerf it is also coming in high sec.
Huge reduce of plex, npc jamm higly reinforced so you can't blitz guristas missions...
It's a general nerf, but a part of it is just easier to see.
|
|
|
|