Sisinnius
   |
Posted - 2011.03.26 15:20:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Sisinnius on 26/03/2011 15:25:31
Edited by: Sisinnius on 26/03/2011 15:21:52
Dear CCP Failscale it is becoming increasingly apparent that CCP has lost touch with what is going on in their own game. Maybe take a longer look at EVE and leave DUST for a bit to find out why...
Since I have been in the game null sec has gone from digital toilet paper to 'where it's at' in EVE terms...There are far more smaller alliances already living in and investing in null sec that there ever was, either directly or through rental ('pet') agreements..
With respect to investment please remember the trillions of ISK that have been invested by alliances in upgrades, this will have the effect of killing smaller alliances who already have a foothold in crap-sec...
Your pathological disregard to fix what is not broken is in stark contrast to your failure to deal what is wrong in EVE ....breathkaing in it's ignorance....
- Reduce genuine player income from grinding versus botting and RMT
- Focus on LAG reduction
On the botting/RMT point - what do you think about CCP being seen to nerf the honest player but not take a single action against botting or RMT. By the way botters dont care what their system is like as they operate on an ISK-over-time basis.....more powah to the botters, eh comrades ???
In terms of your perceived 'benefits':
- Some alliances will immediately start wanting to look for better space
@ Or they wont cos they have good space already
@ They will grab more crap-sec to compensate for their members and in doing so nerfing the the ability of your oh-so-loved fledgling null sec alliances to get a foothold
@ hey will kick out renters or pets from decent space and transplant them to crap-sec or they return to high-sec
- In the longer run, there'll be more conflicts going on, with more localized goals
@ Helllo, we're over here, [whistles], stop fiddling with DUST, remember us, we play EVE....
- Newer alliances will have an easier time getting a foothold in nullsec
@ I think I have pointed out why the contrary will happen (what do you mean by a foothold, less money in crap-sec is not a one-way-ticket to station-ville, ihub-ville, upgrades-ville)
- Coalitions will be marginally less stable
@ I refer the honourable Failscale to my "have you looked at EVE recently" comment
- Alliances will have to choose more carefully what space they develop, where their staging systems are, and so on (low truesec systems generally tend to be in strategically inconvenient places)
@ Rather annoyingly they already spent TRILLIONS upgrading systems only for them to be turned into large floating paper-weights
EVE is currently more vibrant and better than it was a few years back, don't make it crash back, there will be an exodus fom the game if you break whats right with it and ignore what's wrong with it....
|