Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
KANE ORI0N
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 14:57:00 -
[1]
If you feel this action is uncalled for please reply and say ''Unerf it'' see if we can get most of the eve population on this thanks
CCP shouid know that this nerf will severely decrease their stock and sales
thanks for any support
|
utbugg
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 15:03:00 -
[2]
They should never have gone with the anomaly nerf and I'm not too sure what drove that decision other than either jealousy or short-sightedness.
|
Kevinhol
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 15:03:00 -
[3]
Unerf it
|
Edras VonSparta
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 15:10:00 -
[4]
CCP has successfully created another waasteland like the drone regions. Un-nerf this. Bad call CCP, bad call...
|
Maorio
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 15:19:00 -
[5]
the change was way to drastic, ccp made basicly all the 0,0 systems about more or less worthless and this will only make the rest of 0,0 like the drone regions a ****load of botters running killing everything in sight becauseit will be the only way to make even remotly the same amount of isk as you used to or turn to empire mission running
|
Denna Amnell
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 15:34:00 -
[6]
unerf it
|
Ceaddil
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 15:36:00 -
[7]
Unerf it
|
Elena Stormbringer
hirr Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 15:37:00 -
[8]
They have made the upgrades worthless. Unerf it.
|
Meridia eclipse
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 15:37:00 -
[9]
Risk vs. reward is not balanced now. Unerf it
|
NoNah
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 15:40:00 -
[10]
Dislike how you spam this message around to get people to post, and disagree to the thread.
This has been one of the best changes to 0.0 for ages, if anything more should be changed it's a moongoo-mechanic fix or a de-dominionation. Parrots, commence!
Postcount: 527220
|
|
Rothana Haldane
Minmatar Multiplex Gaming SpaceMonkey's Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 15:50:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Rothana Haldane on 16/04/2011 15:50:53 Put it back, Put it back, put it back. errr unferf it
|
reccos
Multiplex Gaming
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 15:58:00 -
[12]
The idea seems to have been that the large coalitions will self implode because others would want thier space. This idea was just ignorant of CCP. It will not make it easier for little alliances to gain sov. Now with this nerf, system ihub modules are worthless to put in because there is no hope to "upgrade" crappy systems. I was in an NPC system that has better ratting and mining than a fully upgraded system, with sov. Tell me how this helped CCP. Your totally out of touch with your null sec residents!
|
Zack1023
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 16:01:00 -
[13]
UNNERF IT!!!!
|
soulangeljunior
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 16:02:00 -
[14]
unerf it..
|
RD Hooker
Metalworks Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 16:05:00 -
[15]
Un-nerf this ****, man. Please resize your signature to the maximum allowed of 400 x 120 pixels with a maximum file size of 24000 bytes. Adida |
Shadow XII
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 16:13:00 -
[16]
Keep the nerf.
|
death orion
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 16:21:00 -
[17]
UNNERF IT!!!
|
Ann Meza
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 16:39:00 -
[18]
Unerf it!
|
Captain Vostroyan
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 16:42:00 -
[19]
unerf it
|
Paxton Brimstone
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 17:24:00 -
[20]
either un-nerf it or rethink your nerf and try a more fair method to improve game play. Nul sec should allways pay better than empire space..allways..
|
|
Sirus Prime
Caldari Xero Corporation SpaceMonkey's Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 17:25:00 -
[21]
Unnerf this bs. I used to be a highsec missioner before I moved to null, and for awhile I was pulling about even on net profit. Now with anoms nerfed if I lose a ship its a solid week of *trying* to find enough active sanctums (in a fully upgraded system) to get the isk to replace it.
|
Jake Wendigo
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 17:36:00 -
[22]
it sucks...un nerf it
|
Arnakoz
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 17:38:00 -
[23]
signed.
|
Brynhilda
Amarr Gun Metal Hit Sqaud
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 17:47:00 -
[24]
While I rarely ran anoms in null sec (and those that I did were Ports), unnerf it. It drives up the competition for exploration which is my main source of income in Null Sec.
|
Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 17:51:00 -
[25]
Null got what in the real world would be similar to a tax-credit, it did not have the desired effect and has thus been revoked ..
There has been no nerf, but rather a removal of a buff.
|
Lita james
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 18:02:00 -
[26]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icCM3MvlXks&feature=related <<<<<<<< that's what thay have done to nullsec
UNNERF IT
|
Marzipanius
Gallente Metalworks
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 18:54:00 -
[27]
I'd like to see the change undone. It has resulted in a way too heavy impact on nullsec players' ways of acquiring an income.
|
Icikurbt
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 19:01:00 -
[28]
unneft it / TY
|
King Arillious
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 19:17:00 -
[29]
UN NERF it!
This makes upgrades useless and it even more impossible for new alliances to get into 0.0
|
zyon12
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 19:19:00 -
[30]
Unnerf please... It took me long enough to make money before. Now it takes me twice as long. Ratting sucks, I don't want to have to do it for days just to fund a few simple PVP ships.
|
|
DeepNIKE
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 19:33:00 -
[31]
Unnerf it. Think of the carebears!
|
Funk Doobious
Red Ochre Mining and Exploration SpaceMonkey's Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 19:52:00 -
[32]
why did you do this?????? Unerf it please
|
Zarzaria
Caldari Priory of Empire SpaceMonkey's Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 19:53:00 -
[33]
Unerf it
|
Zaruaz Zar
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 19:54:00 -
[34]
Unerf it
|
1337fknThor
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:03:00 -
[35]
Fix what you broke and please stop being stupid!
unnerf our space please / TY !
|
Sephiroth CloneVII
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:38:00 -
[36]
Edited by: Sephiroth CloneVII on 16/04/2011 20:40:02 Edited by: Sephiroth CloneVII on 16/04/2011 20:38:35 Un-nerf it and or nerf things in empire.
Bad move on CCP's part to suddenly bring in a stupid idea no one asked for. People who probably never entered 0.0 or play the game period think up the stupidest ideas.
|
amarrian clone
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:41:00 -
[37]
SEVERLY UN-NERF IT !
|
WharGoulian
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:41:00 -
[38]
UNNERF IT!!!
|
Wunnestou
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:42:00 -
[39]
Unerf it! Befor I have to go to high sec and Kill noobs. Just to loot the Trit
|
marinko26210
Gallente 4S Corporation Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:42:00 -
[40]
Unerf it
|
|
MuppetsSlayed
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:42:00 -
[41]
unnerf it
|
clone667
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:43:00 -
[42]
un-nerf it, now.
|
Vincent Jarjadian
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:45:00 -
[43]
Unerf if.
they should have kept the old system as the crappiest one.... then make lower sec better than that... maybe some upgrades for larger groups or caps... Give us back ISK to afford more PVP ships.
besides.... other than the conflict between the russians and NC... has there really been more fighting over areas with good anoms...
|
Count Hoth
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:45:00 -
[44]
Unerf Pls
|
Pistolero Quevedo
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:45:00 -
[45]
As Before pls, thank you. Making more iskies in High Sec than Nullsec kinda missed the point of Nullsec home bases.
|
X'Gallente Soldier'X
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:45:00 -
[46]
be smart, do the right thing, fix it, unerf it.
|
Renan Ruivo
Caldari Hipernova Tribal Conclave
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:50:00 -
[47]
Unerf it! ____________
I like woman because breasts |
Guilliman R
Northstar Cabal R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:53:00 -
[48]
Great way to once again **** on the little guy ccp. un-nerf thanks.
|
Osyrix
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:56:00 -
[49]
Unerf it
|
shozzle
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 20:58:00 -
[50]
unnerf it |
|
DdAY852
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 21:40:00 -
[51]
unerf it
|
Fernandus Porsche
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 21:47:00 -
[52]
unnerf it
|
Lojik
Priory of Empire SpaceMonkey's Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 21:54:00 -
[53]
This Nerf is uncalled for, and goes against the whole spirit of nul sec, higher rewards for higher risk.
Unnerf it!
|
KANE ORI0N
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:00:00 -
[54]
Thanks guys keep going and spreading this. We have CCp intrest in this matter now
|
Kantrip
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:03:00 -
[55]
Edited by: Kantrip on 16/04/2011 22:07:21 Unerf it !!!! |
PDP Kordal
Metalworks Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:06:00 -
[56]
Unerf it...
|
Vangari Dei
Metalworks Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:09:00 -
[57]
Edited by: Vangari Dei on 16/04/2011 22:08:45 Unerf it
|
Grassa Motore
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:11:00 -
[58]
Unerf it
|
Hammersmashed face
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:11:00 -
[59]
Unerf it
|
Michaela Uchonela
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:12:00 -
[60]
Unnerfit!!!
|
|
Kaos Soldier
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:13:00 -
[61]
Risk vs reward is one of the staples of this game. Unerf it
|
Krasavice
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:16:00 -
[62]
+1 unnerf it..
|
Azran Zala
Fleet of the Damned OWN Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:18:00 -
[63]
Un-CCP it
|
Alana Darkan
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:19:00 -
[64]
unnerf it
|
Drazi1
Minmatar The Knights Templar R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:20:00 -
[65]
what was u thinking ccp,
Unerf it
|
SONOFABEECH
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:21:00 -
[66]
UNNERF IT NOW
|
Dark Stress
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:21:00 -
[67]
unerf it
|
piphus2
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:23:00 -
[68]
dont no what the intent was for the nerfing of null sec but it was not thought out at all. You need to unnerf this
|
Wrong paradox
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:23:00 -
[69]
ccp fail if i wanted to make 5mill an hour i would live in empire.
|
Batelle
do you
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:26:00 -
[70]
NOPE
--------------------------------------------- EC-P8R... You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. |
|
Proats
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:30:00 -
[71]
Edited by: Proats on 16/04/2011 22:32:36 Unnerf it
|
Admiral Trask
freelancers inc -Mostly Harmless-
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:33:00 -
[72]
Edited by: Admiral Trask on 16/04/2011 22:33:27 Unnerf it. It takes me two weeks now to get back the isk I lose if one of my ships blows up.
You broke it you fix it
|
Dartonias Sirion
KINGS OF EDEN Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:46:00 -
[73]
I believe the change is not producing the intended consequences, and as such needs to be looked at for revision.
|
Jikei Wajo
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:48:00 -
[74]
Originally by: Dartonias Sirion I believe the change is not producing the intended consequences, and as such needs to be looked at for revision.
THIS ^^^^^
|
KANE ORI0N
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:55:00 -
[75]
Send mails to all your alliances/corps lets try and get this petition sorted and signed
|
Dixie Norrmous
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 22:57:00 -
[76]
Do it, Do it noooooooooow!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GET BACK TO DA SANCTUM!!!!!!!
|
Purloiner
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 23:03:00 -
[77]
Unerf it.
No doubt belt rats will be nerfed next.
Surely there has to be an easier way to hurt the botters, I'd agree to CCP checking for 'bot software only' as eve is running.
|
The Slayer
Caldari GoonWaffe
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 23:04:00 -
[78]
Long term 0.0 player and I am heavily AGAINST removing this change, but FOR adjusting Level 4 missions to bring them more in line with the risk/reward structure enjoyed in lowsec.
|
Zamiq
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 23:10:00 -
[79]
Un-nerf now.
|
equief
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 23:11:00 -
[80]
Unerf it
ps: asap !!!
|
|
Just fearless
Phantom Squad En Garde
|
Posted - 2011.04.16 23:45:00 -
[81]
OMFG im agreeing with a goon
this nerff is ****. and ONLY hurts small alliances
|
John Caffeine
Initium Malum
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 01:12:00 -
[82]
Nerf it.
And nerf jumpbridges too.
|
Tyrr Anach
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 02:19:00 -
[83]
UNERF IT !!!! How are some of us to make ISK when you nerfed it. I think what you ( CCP ) did sucks !!!!
|
Megy Feel
V.L.A.S.T. V.L.A.S.T
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 03:24:00 -
[84]
Originally by: John Caffeine Nerf it.
And nerf jumpbridges too.
Drakes too :P
|
Roger d'Moulins
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 04:09:00 -
[85]
Unnerf it.
|
IronGoldenEagle
The New Era C0NVICTED
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 04:56:00 -
[86]
Unnerf it
Reluctant cuz I like the idea behind it, but ruins any chance for smaller alliances to build themselves up in null sec (and make renting system more CCPized) WHICH WAS THE WHOLE REASON BEHIND DOMINION __________________________________
|
Klausan
GK inc. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 05:18:00 -
[87]
Exellent change, keep it.
|
Dvomayn
SniggWaffe FREE KARTTOON NOW
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 06:47:00 -
[88]
Keep the changes, people have become too used to being spoon fed.
|
Myz Toyou
APOCALYPSE LEGION
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 06:52:00 -
[89]
After seeing already a major shrink in NC fleet sizes I say to you dear CCP:
Awsum patch, keep up the good work \o/
|
Blind Brother
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 07:10:00 -
[90]
To everyone who agrees with the nerf: Go make your own thread - this thread is for people who DISAGREE with the nerf.
Un-nerf it. Was a poor decision made for even worse reasons.
|
|
Kearl
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 07:12:00 -
[91]
Good change.. if the space you have blows now move somewhere better.
|
Therroxx
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 07:34:00 -
[92]
Unerf it!, ALL Null Sec is dangerous and should be equally profitable!
|
wellletssee
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 08:14:00 -
[93]
make outpost stations destructable so the carebears have to fight for their stuffs
|
Talas Dir
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 09:25:00 -
[94]
agreed, this is the worst change that has happened all year. the point of eve is to have billions of isk and be successful, but that's impossible with the sanctum nerf. 0.0 was fine as it was, the sanctums need to return so that people can continue to make lots of isk to fill the huge fleet amount demands.
unnerf it.
|
Majid Al'Amarr
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 10:06:00 -
[95]
Think I need a bigger bucket to collect the nullbear tears.
|
KANE ORI0N
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 11:26:00 -
[96]
Edited by: KANE ORI0N on 17/04/2011 11:27:05 People who say keep the nerf make your own forumn this is a precise forumn
btw if we stop making money in Null sec industry will go down which will mean more high sec prices for you hulks won't be 200 mil anymore they'll be 500 again. just expect a rise in prices
|
Thanael
4S Corporation Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 11:39:00 -
[97]
Unnerf it, the change was incredibly short-sighted, ******ed and just horribly bad.
|
Naomi Knight
Amarr
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 13:02:00 -
[98]
nerf it moar
rly these ppl cant even check to support their topic ,they are clearly unable to decide what is good for them or not--> nerf it more pls
|
elkillo
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 13:42:00 -
[99]
Unerf it
|
Miso Hawnee
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 15:30:00 -
[100]
The nerf was a good start, while you are at it, remove level 4 missions from empire. Nobody should be able to farm that kind of ISK hiding under CONCORD's skirt.
|
|
Kai lun
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 16:16:00 -
[101]
Unerf it
|
Diego Jinsei
Minmatar Viper Nine
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 18:25:00 -
[102]
Unnerf it
|
Spazz21
Angha
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 19:29:00 -
[103]
Unerf it please
|
Mark Wolf
Deorbit Burners SpaceMonkey's Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 19:41:00 -
[104]
Unerf it! If an alliance can raise the isk involved, and logistically manage to get i-hubs and upgrades out here, then they damn well deserve a decent reward from doing so. It still doesnt make your space safe at the end of the day, usually more attractive to the enemy in most cases.
|
FishermansFriend
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 19:46:00 -
[105]
You people disagreeing with this are stupid. It's like if CCP decided your mission tengu's were way to good at lvl 4's and just removed them from the game without compensation. People are ****ed that their upgrades are worthless now. Having to haul them in a freighter is a MAJOR PITA and all that work is lost with this nerf. Also, without being able to farm sanctums the potential isk/hr for 0.0 drops significantly. Sure theres still exploration, PI, mining, belt ratting, all that crap but none of it compares to having unlimited personal missions in the complete safety of highsec (suicide gankers blablabla fly a cheaper ship). It shouldnt be mandatory for everyone in 0.0 to either jump clone to highsec or have an alt that can run lvl 4's in highsec.
Either
A. Move lvl 4's to null and low quality lvl 4's to lowsec. Highsec gets 1's and 2's, lowsec gets 3's and low quality 4's, 0.0 gets 4's and 5's. This isnt "forcing" anyone to nullsec, you simply just have to run crappier missions or move to lower security space, following the risk/reward balance EVE is based on. Also nerf un-probeable tengu's buy raising the probing strength not nerfing sensor strength.
B. Keep all the carebears happy and undo the changes. Sure its just as stupid as it was before but whatev's it kinda worked.
Now CCP, if you want to break up coalitions then get rid of jump bridges and presto, no more 1500 man fleet fights, more of a trickle of ships comming in to defend an area. It forces allainces to focus forces and allows a lot of crappy space to be open and free for potential small allainces to take to and grow in.
BOOM, you guys should hire me and all your problems would be gone with this game. Lets let the carebear whining commence about how unfair this is and threats about how many people will leave EVE if you nerf highsec. How about you try out 0.0 before knocking it. PvP isnt much different than PvE, you just click on red squares. Not that many people will quite eve and the people that will quite were not going to stick with the game anyway.
|
Naomi Knight
Amarr
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 19:48:00 -
[106]
Originally by: FishermansFriend You people disagreeing with this are stupid. It's like if CCP decided your mission tengu's were way to good at lvl 4's and just removed them from the game without compensation. People are ****ed that their upgrades are worthless now. Having to haul them in a freighter is a MAJOR PITA and all that work is lost with this nerf. Also, without being able to farm sanctums the potential isk/hr for 0.0 drops significantly. Sure theres still exploration, PI, mining, belt ratting, all that crap but none of it compares to having unlimited personal missions in the complete safety of highsec (suicide gankers blablabla fly a cheaper ship). It shouldnt be mandatory for everyone in 0.0 to either jump clone to highsec or have an alt that can run lvl 4's in highsec.
Either
A. Move lvl 4's to null and low quality lvl 4's to lowsec. Highsec gets 1's and 2's, lowsec gets 3's and low quality 4's, 0.0 gets 4's and 5's. This isnt "forcing" anyone to nullsec, you simply just have to run crappier missions or move to lower security space, following the risk/reward balance EVE is based on. Also nerf un-probeable tengu's buy raising the probing strength not nerfing sensor strength.
B. Keep all the carebears happy and undo the changes. Sure its just as stupid as it was before but whatev's it kinda worked.
Now CCP, if you want to break up coalitions then get rid of jump bridges and presto, no more 1500 man fleet fights, more of a trickle of ships comming in to defend an area. It forces allainces to focus forces and allows a lot of crappy space to be open and free for potential small allainces to take to and grow in.
BOOM, you guys should hire me and all your problems would be gone with this game. Lets let the carebear whining commence about how unfair this is and threats about how many people will leave EVE if you nerf highsec. How about you try out 0.0 before knocking it. PvP isnt much different than PvE, you just click on red squares. Not that many people will quite eve and the people that will quite were not going to stick with the game anyway.
ccp did this with my whole caldari race... :( poor caldari only left is the noobish drake and falcon :( now everybody fliest op matar:=
|
FishermansFriend
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 20:23:00 -
[107]
Tengu, Falcon, Drake, Raven, Gila, Crow, Hawk, Caracal (sometimes), Kitsune,
ok maybe you got a point but
Gallente: Ishtar, dominix, taranis, Myrm(maybe), Proteus.
Caldari is pretty sweet in that they are rather versitle. Most of their ships can both active and passive tank, can be nanoed and missiles always hit. Not to mention the ungodly range of ECM and heavy missiles.
|
Naomi Knight
Amarr
|
Posted - 2011.04.17 20:38:00 -
[108]
Originally by: FishermansFriend Tengu, Falcon, Drake, Raven, Gila, Crow, Hawk, Caracal (sometimes), Kitsune,
ok maybe you got a point but
Gallente: Ishtar, dominix, taranis, Myrm(maybe), Proteus.
Caldari is pretty sweet in that they are rather versitle. Most of their ships can both active and passive tank, can be nanoed and missiles always hit. Not to mention the ungodly range of ECM and heavy missiles.
rly crow?? rly?? caracal omg ??? gila ?:O , hawk no no more jokes pls , kitsune? yeah EA-s are crap, tengu cool another pve ship ... oh and the raven is there anybody still using that ****?:O
|
Xune
Body Count Inc. Cascade Imminent
|
Posted - 2011.04.18 14:57:00 -
[109]
Unerf it !
|
Kiev Duran
Alpha Empire ROMANIAN-LEGION
|
Posted - 2011.04.18 15:03:00 -
[110]
Unnerf it
Originally by: Adaera Caldari special ops "If a problem can't be solved with missiles - you're just not using enough!"
|
|
Rika Jones
|
Posted - 2011.04.18 15:24:00 -
[111]
Originally by: Mark Wolf Unerf it! If an alliance can raise the isk involved, and logistically manage to get i-hubs and upgrades out here, then they damn well deserve a decent reward from doing so. It still doesnt make your space safe at the end of the day, usually more attractive to the enemy in most cases.
You mean the iHub, that must be destroyed (along with any upgrades in it) before they can take the system? Yeah, sure.. attractive.
One question for posterity: Is there any physical pain involved in being as wrong as you are in the statement I quoted above?
|
Germanicus Xenophon
Multiplex Gaming SpaceMonkey's Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.04.18 15:50:00 -
[112]
I will have to concur with the others. I also request to un-nerf the current system in place.
|
Alb Blastardo
|
Posted - 2011.04.18 16:54:00 -
[113]
For the love of null (and hate of missioning) - unerf it
|
Mahasil Regyri
|
Posted - 2011.04.18 17:02:00 -
[114]
Bad change. Instead of bringing more people to nulsec this is driving many of them back to empire.
I don't know that a complete reversal is needed, I like the basic premise that some space is better than others, but they've taken way too much out of the lower end. It really is a pay-cut to move from SOLO MISSION RUNNING to move out to nulsec and join in an alliance.
As has been mentioned before, this change doesn't really have much effect on the power bloc alliances and completely screws the little guy.
UN-NERF and try again.
|
Mctana
Caldari Dead's Prostitutes White Angels.
|
Posted - 2011.04.18 17:56:00 -
[115]
Originally by: Mahasil Regyri Bad change. Instead of bringing more people to nulsec this is driving many of them back to empire.
I was ambviolent towards the change. But, seeing the results, it's obvious this was a ****-up. Solar systems are being abandoned and I've watched the military indexes on adjoining systems go from 5 to 1 or 0. It's a ghost town out there now and the thrill of being in nullsec is wearing off... rare pvp... and then nerfed isks when you do something else out of boredom.
For pepople who invested in carriers, losing the sanctums is a huge hit in their isk/hour.
|
Gil Warden
Priory of Empire SpaceMonkey's Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.04.18 19:20:00 -
[116]
It needs to be unnerfed. When making omelets, don't crack MY Egg. |
TommyMc88
Macabre Votum Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2011.04.18 19:20:00 -
[117]
Unerf.
Poor ideas executed even more poorly. -1 CCP.
|
Vertisce Soritenshi
O.W.N. Corp OWN Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.04.18 19:22:00 -
[118]
Originally by: Mctana
Originally by: Mahasil Regyri Bad change. Instead of bringing more people to nulsec this is driving many of them back to empire.
I was ambviolent towards the change. But, seeing the results, it's obvious this was a ****-up. Solar systems are being abandoned and I've watched the military indexes on adjoining systems go from 5 to 1 or 0. It's a ghost town out there now and the thrill of being in nullsec is wearing off... rare pvp... and then nerfed isks when you do something else out of boredom.
For pepople who invested in carriers, losing the sanctums is a huge hit in their isk/hour.
What he said. Big mistake CCP...but...I think thats already been said about a million times before you went ahead and did it anyway. Question is...have you learned your lesson yet? NO BOOBIES LEFT BEHIND! |
Domina Santa
|
Posted - 2011.04.18 19:22:00 -
[119]
All the risk, and no more reward
Nul sec is void
UNNERF!
|
LeBeau
QuanNet Evolved
|
Posted - 2011.04.18 19:58:00 -
[120]
Unerf it
Lebeau Director - HR & Recruitment QuanNET Evolved Corporate To be the best you need to fly with the best |
|
Comodore John
Gallente Shattered Star Exiles SpaceMonkey's Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.04.18 21:17:00 -
[121]
Keep it
|
Cutslawn2
|
Posted - 2011.04.18 22:17:00 -
[122]
Give the changes time.
|
Tiger Prince
Democracy of Klingon Brothers R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2011.04.18 22:25:00 -
[123]
Edited by: Tiger Prince on 18/04/2011 22:25:03 CCP took a stick, shoved it up where the sun doesn't shine and broke it off then twisted it.
I thought CCP wanted more fighting but with these changes it takes 2 to 3 times the time to make the isk for the loss of a ship.
In all it wasn't a bad idea to give systems with lower true sec more anoms but the execution of of the plan completely failed.
Un-Nerf 0.0 please
|
Petronious Archeoptrix
|
Posted - 2011.04.19 14:25:00 -
[124]
Edited by: Petronious Archeoptrix on 19/04/2011 14:26:47 Unerf it, allows concentration of cloaky Douches, ie station or true sec concentrations of cloaky douches as they don't have to cover as many systems, before I would just move system, now I cant because the risk isn't worth the reward. has stopped mining totally in my area,due to the cloaky douches concentration has made industry totally stop in my area, no minerals means no ships or anything being made is not allowing me to replace PvP losses, how does this encourage PvP combat?? Gives the botters an unprecedented advantage, why because I won't lower myself to bot to make enough isk to replace those PvP losses, realistically CCP you have just made the game far more profitable for the boters, isk farmers etc, I don't know what you were thinking but this plan of action needs to be revised and scrapped
|
Marconus Orion
S.E.G.W.A.Y.
|
Posted - 2011.04.19 14:33:00 -
[125]
This thread is still bringing in tears?
|
Linder6
|
Posted - 2011.04.19 21:51:00 -
[126]
Unerf it!!
|
phantomshura
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 00:22:00 -
[127]
un nerf 0.0!! or nerf highsec
|
Joane Wilder
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 02:41:00 -
[128]
change it back already ffs
|
Goose99
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 04:20:00 -
[129]
Originally by: KANE ORI0N whine
Nerf it moar
|
Kandarus
Lyonesse. Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 06:13:00 -
[130]
Edited by: Kandarus on 20/04/2011 06:13:53 Nerf high-sec! I thought lev 4's were supposed to move to low-sec. What happened with that?
(That should shut those empire carebears up, and bring balance to the "force") ... whatever this game is getting ghey. World of Tanks is out of beta!
|
|
Doug Drafto
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 06:18:00 -
[131]
Keep it. 0.0 is not supposed to be some huge isk making factory with no feel of being killed. Go rat in the belts. You can still make 40 mil/hour easily... you just have to pay attention. Thats how it is supposed to be. The dynamic was ruined with so many people doing sanctums.
|
CommmanderInChief
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 10:09:00 -
[132]
DO NOT UN NERF IT EVER! Stop whining cos you cant fleece your renters for billions a month for crappy systems...
|
Haul Hauler
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 10:24:00 -
[133]
unnerf it
|
freils
|
Posted - 2011.04.21 10:15:00 -
[134]
Unerf It.
Moving back to Hi-sec is the better option for our small casual 14 man corp, Than trying to live in tru-sec anymore.
I hope there are changes on the cards for currently... It's looking very bleak.
|
Augustina Maxima
|
Posted - 2011.04.21 11:48:00 -
[135]
Well Space should have different value on that I agree with CCP but the way they have gone about it is just wrong. So instad just flaming them to take it back etc here a sugguestion as to how to change it.
Each System with Military 5 gets 2 Havens 1 Sanctum base. Should the system have a Station +1 Haven +1 Sanctum.
And now the catch.. Bountys in anomalies will depend on sec status right now for the most part lowest bounty(BS) in sanctum is 9xxK max 1,2m .. so this would mean that in 0.00 to 0.2 you get max bounty bs of about 600k to 950k, 0.3-0.4 800k to 1.25m.. 0.5-0.6 950k to 1.4m, 0.7-0.8 1.1m to 1.6m, 0.9-1.0 1.2m to 1.8m
This would be a boost instad of a nerf but it would still make space different.
|
Jita Rich
|
Posted - 2011.04.21 21:29:00 -
[136]
un nerf.
please dont make huge changes like this without consulting... someone. it seems like no thought was given and changes were made.
|
Kevinhol
|
Posted - 2011.04.22 23:14:00 -
[137]
The only people saying keep the nerf are the ones that sit in Jita scamming to make their ISK. What is the point to live in null sec anymore... the only thing that goes on are fleet battles, but without space to fight because of the nerf, you mine aswell live in high-sec :p
|
Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
|
Posted - 2011.04.23 08:51:00 -
[138]
Originally by: Kevinhol The only people saying ...
No, the people saying keep it (and expand upon it ) is the 89% of the playerbase that is not in null but is still affected through sky-rocketing prices on everything due to inflation.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |