| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
323
   |
Posted - 2012.09.05 04:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Nah. Vote Tippia for Highsec CSM8. 
I nominate both James & Tippia to CSM8 on one condition: we have a new eletion system that allows two -1 votes per account or one +1 vote   
=========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
323
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 04:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
Paul Oliver wrote:Is "emergent gameplay" a politically correct term for harassment? 
Yep except then it is allowed under the EULA
=========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
323
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 07:10:00 -
[3] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Gogela wrote:Wow. What a lame thread. ...and highsec bears wonder why they get no respect.
I have an idea... how about random toolbag who actually got enough votes for official CSM representative?
Otherwise, I nominate myself for unofficial representative of the don't give a f*** party.
Gogela 2012 There is no "official" hisec CSM representative, as CSM seats are not divided by region. Just as Hans Jagerblitzen is the "unofficial" FW representative, James 315 can be the unofficial hisec representative.
I think it is time we have 'official' representatives instead of a popular vote lets spit the CSM's into regional electorate districts based on population distribution from Dr E's last fanfest statistics of where characters live total of 10 CSM's:
2 NULL 1WH 1Lo 6 HI SEC
=========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
325
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 10:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
Anunzi wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:Gogela wrote:Wow. What a lame thread. ...and highsec bears wonder why they get no respect.
I have an idea... how about random toolbag who actually got enough votes for official CSM representative?
Otherwise, I nominate myself for unofficial representative of the don't give a f*** party.
Gogela 2012 There is no "official" hisec CSM representative, as CSM seats are not divided by region. Just as Hans Jagerblitzen is the "unofficial" FW representative, James 315 can be the unofficial hisec representative. I think it is time we have 'official' representatives instead of a popular vote lets spit the CSM's into regional electorate districts based on population distribution from Dr E's last fanfest statistics of where characters live total of 10 CSM's: 2 NULL 1WH 1Lo 6 HI SEC Just curious about your post. Please correct me if I am wrong, but isnGÇÖt the current CSM election system based on a democratic voting method?
It is a purely Democratic voting method which no sane nation has. A PURE POPULAR VOTE IS ALWAYS BAD. Just looks at all the Prom King & Queen votes across america The USA's founding fathers realized it and created our perfect electoral collegevoting method 
The best purely democratic popular votes of course are still done in Cuba where there is 1 person on the ballot for each post.
=========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
325
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 12:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:I would choose Mittens as a hi-sec rep over James and Tippia.
James and his 315 pages of tedious anti-miner tosh.
Tippia, who really does understand the mechanics of Eve etc, but would probably argue with, (correct) every one else on the CSM, just because, well, it's what Tippia does.
Mittens, on the other hand, seems to know the game well, was a very creditable CSM chairman, and has (with the goons) provided some of the best player driven content ever seen in Eve.
He also seems to want all of Eve to prosper and do well.
Burn Jita was fun, but ultimately just that.
The Ice interdiction was, for me, the best player driven event I have ever known in Eve. Great fun, and with a serious player driven purpose.
I feel left out no one has nominated me yet to represent Worm Hole Space  especially after I was OP of this GREAT THREAD: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=96286
=========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
325
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 12:38:00 -
[6] - Quote
Anunzi wrote:
This means you actually get a true representation of who cares about what goes on in eve.
If you call the current CSM true representation of who cares about EVE I got a jump bridge to sell you in Delve for a 500 million ISK deposit
=========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
325
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 12:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
Rellik B00n wrote:James 315 the goon? Dont we already have goons on the csm?
No they got thrown under a bus the last I heard
=========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
325
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 13:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Nah !!
Vote me for CSM 8!!
I will not be candidate.
I know nothing about this game but I pretend to.
I'm the perfect candidate because I said so.
Because I'm better than you despite you moms telling you differently.
Because I said so.
Vote me.
yOU SOUND BETTER THEN jAMES315 
=========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
325
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 13:33:00 -
[9] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Tippia wrote:Nah. Vote Tippia for Highsec CSM8. A cold, cold day in hell. Anyway, posting in a James315 alt thread. I wish I had trolls electing me to CSM :(
I'd nominate you but the last nomination thread I started got threadlocked by the very same guy Inominated
So here have a cookie I nominate you in thread
=========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
325
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 13:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:James 315 wrote:"Be not afraid of greatness: some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them." William Shakespeare, Twelfth Night. I am humbled by this spontaneous outpouring of grassroots support.  True merit, like a river, the deeper it is, the less noise it makes. ~Edward Frederick Halifax "Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something." - Plato Seriously +1 vote for James for High Sec rep. Maybe then we will shake the automatic assumption that High Sec player = Best representation for what High Sec players want.
I say go ahead & vote for him it'dshow jus how unrepresnative the CSM is of the rank & filewhile we all share a laugh at the CSM office
=========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
327
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 14:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
Arguing that there NEEDS to be a High Sec rep, or arguing that there should be some easier way for a High Sec rep to be elected is daft in the extreme for many reasons, one of them being that you might get someone like James315 who is more radical and care less about High Sec players then 99% of the people in null. That is an opinion I don't respect, because it is completely illogical.
Using the same argument Iput forth that the state of Texas does not need its 2 Senators to represent them in Congress as long as California then usurps thier representation so they have 4 Senators... its still the same number and therefore Congress is properly filled up & the USA as a whole is represented
=========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
328
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 15:34:00 -
[12] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:
Using the same argument Iput forth that the state of Texas does not need its 2 Senators to represent them in Congress as long as California then usurps thier representation so they have 4 Senators... its still the same number and therefore Congress is properly filled up & the USA as a whole is represented
Considering I feel that assigning 2 senators per state regardless of population size and density is a moronic way to run your upper chamber I would argue both systems are equally as bad. By your logic you need 50 presidents too.
Its better then a popular vote for an entire council/ Senate/House... then only NYC seaboard, LA /SF, chicago would rule the USA ( at least then we wouldn'thave dumb Texan Presidents starting wars every other Presidency at least I guess )
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:The question is, how well would a CSM candidtae, whose campaign amounted to, 'bump a miner a day' do?
Real question is if HI SEC miners saw James315 running as a CSM would they get off thier bums and vote against him?
=========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
330
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:59:00 -
[13] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:This thread has taken an unexpectedly awesome turn.
Gank all CSM nominee turn yet?
/me looks for suicide alt /sarcasmoff
=========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
330
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 20:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
Anslo wrote:[quote=Petrus Blackshell]
Oh I saw his article. If he plans to do that, then why not a mission fee, more trading fees, a PvP license fee, an industrial fee on top of the existing fees, a fleet fee, a PoS anchorage fee beyond fuel charters etc? He talks in circles he flip flops, he's worse than Mitt Romney.
Yep & the fees will all go to the CSM space rich bittervet PLEX fund 
=========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
| |
|