|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 31 post(s) |
Carcusian
Global Criminal Countdown
   |
Posted - 2011.05.11 17:03:00 -
[1]
So you'll have to actually take one gate to get to your next jump bridge?
O the horror.
Changes like this are long overdue.
Now let's see cool-own periods on capital jump drives as well, and maybe we'll continue to get rid of instant-mega-fleets all over the damn map.
Somebody said this change is the end game that kills pvp. Been hearing that since '05. It wasn't true then, won't be true now.
GG CCP.
|
Carcusian
Global Criminal Countdown
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 21:35:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Bagehi
It only looks instant to people who are horrible at Eve and don't have spies.
fleet formation =/= fleet travel time to dest
also spies are a metagame; jumbridges are not
I think your fail logic is what's horrible, here. 
|
Carcusian
Global Criminal Countdown
|
Posted - 2011.05.13 02:39:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Ben Derindar
[ ] adapt
[ ] die
QFT.
If CCP never changed anything in EVE, we'd still have torp launching nano rifters and 40km/s multi MWD ships. You do have a sandbox, but it's refereed by CCP.
I'm taking up a collection on Your Stuffs if you can't deal with it.
While we're at it... CCP please to bring rats back on hisec gates? TIA.
|
Carcusian
Global Criminal Countdown
|
Posted - 2011.05.13 14:16:00 -
[4]
Originally by: davet517
This isn't CCP moving away from the "sandbox" concept, at all. They just recognize that passive defenses are a little too good right now, and the balance needs to move back toward requiring players to put up an active defense.
Couldn't have said it better. Give this guy a beer, it's friday.
|
Carcusian
Global Criminal Countdown
|
Posted - 2011.05.14 15:24:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Rothana Haldane
Okay without all the sarcastic and stupid answers, Answer this.....Why are alliances like Ncdot and PL all for this change?
That line of questioning is as illuminating as asking why all those against it are against it. Careful, you'll hurt yourself chasing your own tail.
Originally by: Rothana Haldane
What People are more upset about I think is that CCP is not focusing on whats broke and focusing on something that really isn't broken.
What's broke for one player working as intended for another. The final arbiter is CCP.
Originally by: Rothana Haldane
have not really seen many reasons why this change is a good thing from you guys
You should probably spend some time reading the last 70 pages. It's usually a good idea to read the posts in the thread you are posting in.
Originally by: Rothana Haldane
You seem to do allot of that.
|
|
|
| |
|