| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
kxdan
   |
Posted - 2011.05.10 19:06:00 -
[1]
Now , as some of you may or may not know ccp has decided to change jump bridges , see http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=908&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=update&utm_content=devblog&utm_campaign=eveonline for details
I thought the idea of these buffs was to make them better , not worse . by limiting the amount of jump bridges you can have in a system you are affectively eliminating their use , people use them to jump from one system to another then another , by making the cap at 1 people will have to travel 1 jumpbridge , gate , possible more gates , jump bridge . Have i got it wrong or is this actually happening?
|
Renarla
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 19:22:00 -
[2]
The purpose of jump bridges was not intended to be complete safety while traveling.
|
Holdout
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 19:49:00 -
[3]
Thank god, maybe the carebears will finally go someplace more dangerous, like hi-sec.
|
kxdan
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 20:14:00 -
[4]
theyre not safe , you get bombers camping them all the time , cloaky stuff , the guns do take time to lock you know.
|
Patty Patrick Patterson
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 20:55:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Patty Patrick Patterson on 10/05/2011 20:55:46
 Originally by: kxdan
theyre not safe , you get bombers camping them all the time , cloaky stuff , the guns do take time to lock you know.
You got some bad pos.
Edit: Bored in H-W?
|
Last Wolf
Umbra Wing
|
Posted - 2011.05.10 21:31:00 -
[6]
I thought it was already limited to 2 jb per system?
Oh no you don't!
Incoming witty reply, ETA: 300 seconds! |
Miss Rabblt
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 09:36:00 -
[7]
i'm already preparing to this "event". being training jumps skills right now.
So when JB will be broken i will travel with cyno in my thanatos. great risk you know! 
Well. If it will make fail pirates more happy - i agree with my both hangs. let's maake Eve even better!
|
Debrie
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 11:51:00 -
[8]
lemmy get this all straight in my head
ccp makes high sec as unappealing as possible to get peaple to move to 0.0
then they add WoW like fairytale "Raid" strength stuff
then they nerf 80% of 0.0 into uninhabited wasteland
now there gunna nerf bridges that get you thru the uninhabited wasteland they just created
did CCP recently hire Wow Reject programmers or what ?
|
Wacktopia
Dark Side Of The Womb
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 12:03:00 -
[9]
Quote:
WeÆre currently looking into a long term plan for 0.0. I say long term, not because itÆs planned for 2014
That's *counts on fingers* three+ years away! It's great to know about long term plans but... I don't even know what to make of this.
|
Linda Shadowborn
Gallente
Dark Steel Industries
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 12:56:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Wacktopia
Quote:
WeÆre currently looking into a long term plan for 0.0. I say long term, not because itÆs planned for 2014
That's *counts on fingers* three+ years away! It's great to know about long term plans but... I don't even know what to make of this.
Might want to actually read what is said instead of reading it wrong.
WeÆre currently looking into a long term plan for 0.0. I say long term, not because itÆs planned for 2014, but because the work will begin this winter and hopefully go on for a while.
NOT BECAUSE its planned BUT because the work will BEGIN THIS WINTER.. caps for emphasis. Not 2014 but this winter and from then on for a while.
|
NoNah
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 13:01:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Debrie
lemmy get this all straight in my head
ccp makes high sec as unappealing as possible to get peaple to move to 0.0
Huh? Not sure what this refers to. Do you mean the loot removal of missions(that hurt 0.0 equally much? Or do you mean the coming change of quality removal? Or the increased removal of bots? Because all of that Seems to be improvements of highsec to me.
Quote:
then they add WoW like fairytale "Raid" strength stuff
Having not played wow, I'm not sure what this exactly means. I'm guessing it's about incursions, but that doesn't make much sense with the "fairytale" part. The story behind it is old and unchanged. As for geographical balance it's quite reasonable, roughly the same income with roughly the same risk in high and low, greater of both in 0.0. I would like to alter the balance within incursions as such, but that's a whole other matter.
Quote:
then they nerf 80% of 0.0 into uninhabited wasteland
Granted, what they actually did was to undo a previous change that rendered eve quite static in terms of sov wars. If you fought someone you did it for the sake of it, not because their space was noticeably better. If Delve was still great, it would've been conquered within weeks, not months.
Quote:
now there gunna nerf bridges that get you thru the uninhabited wasteland they just created
As above, it wasn't just created, it was(almost) reverted to how it was. If the systems you decide to live and hunt in force you to slowboat through tons of uninhabited wasteland, move. That's the entire idea.
Parrots, commence!
Postcount: 599736
|
Sutskop
PILSGESCHWADER
Monkey Circus
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 15:09:00 -
[12]
so, you both got it wrong. the jumpbridge change will come next month. read it again.
Originally by: Linda Shadowborn
Originally by: Wacktopia
Quote:
WeÆre currently looking into a long term plan for 0.0. I say long term, not because itÆs planned for 2014
That's *counts on fingers* three+ years away! It's great to know about long term plans but... I don't even know what to make of this.
Might want to actually read what is said instead of reading it wrong.
WeÆre currently looking into a long term plan for 0.0. I say long term, not because itÆs planned for 2014, but because the work will begin this winter and hopefully go on for a while.
NOT BECAUSE its planned BUT because the work will BEGIN THIS WINTER.. caps for emphasis. Not 2014 but this winter and from then on for a while.
|
Liang Nuren
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 15:27:00 -
[13]
What I want to know is what in the **** this has to do with the Ships & Modules forum? Maybe you meant to spam General or the trash heap with this bull**** whining?
--
Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire
On Twitter
|
Linda Shadowborn
Gallente
Dark Steel Industries
|
Posted - 2011.05.11 17:31:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Sutskop
so, you both got it wrong. the jumpbridge change will come next month. read it again.
I never claimed anything about that, just correcting his assumption that the rest will come in 2014
|
Wacktopia
Dark Side Of The Womb
|
Posted - 2011.05.12 12:58:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Sutskop
so, you both got it wrong. the jumpbridge change will come next month. read it again.
Originally by: Linda Shadowborn
Originally by: Wacktopia
Quote:
WeÆre currently looking into a long term plan for 0.0. I say long term, not because itÆs planned for 2014
That's *counts on fingers* three+ years away! It's great to know about long term plans but... I don't even know what to make of this.
Might want to actually read what is said instead of reading it wrong.
WeÆre currently looking into a long term plan for 0.0. I say long term, not because itÆs planned for 2014, but because the work will begin this winter and hopefully go on for a while.
NOT BECAUSE its planned BUT because the work will BEGIN THIS WINTER.. caps for emphasis. Not 2014 but this winter and from then on for a while.
1. I was talking about the 0.0 change, not the jump bridge change
2. LOL yeah CCP always deliver when they say they will. "planned for 2014" = will not be there before 2014.
3. Yes they are making /some/ changes before but if they are planning the big stuff for 2014 then surely there is only so much they can ninja in "this winter" whilst finishing CQ / Incarna, Dust....
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |