EVE Search - 76 BOTS Detected in Jita area

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

76 BOTS Detected in Jita area

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Mutnin Amarr Mutineers	Posted - 2011.05.12 19:53:00 - [61] I bet nothing is done.. Chib posted a review of all the trade hub spammers quite some time ago proving there was no way most were human.. Yet I bet those same names he posted are likely still spamming away.
E man Industries	Posted - 2011.05.12 20:09:00 - [62] good work. Good job to the player "testing" the bot and reporting it as a test. (am amazed it was not someone just saying they had but they actually had) We need to see and force CCP to take this serously(more than they are) Botters should be banned There corps should be dispanded Alliances that support botting should crumble and Ip's should be locked. This NEEDS to happen...to many bots. ______ Hello WoW players. Look at your toon, now back to me. Sadly it isn't me, but if it wasn't simplistic pre scripted linear mono dimensional game you could look like me. I'm in a Paladin
UberDeathDealer Steel Fleet Important Internet Spaceship League	Posted - 2011.05.13 01:37:00 - [63] The Offerer, This is an awesome job. If something is not done bots will destroy this game. Just like with the sanctum nerf CCP will continue to fight the artificial inflation of isk which is caused by bots. This only hurts non botters. I really could care less what alliances funds their 0.0 wars with bots nor do I care what accounts get banned. What I care about is a fun game and bots subtract from that by making it harder for the regular non botting player fund what they want to fund. CCP: Instead of concentrating on stupid and nerfs and dumb features why not do something about people that are knowingly and willingly breaking rules. Should the regular paying customers take things in their own hands like the OP has done? Feel free to add us to your payroll when we do.
The Offerer Minmatar	Posted - 2011.05.13 13:45:00 - [64] Post #6 updated with 18 more characters from Waskisen solar system for 99 characters total.
Komen Gallente The Night Crew	Posted - 2011.05.13 16:22:00 - [65] Edited by: Komen on 13/05/2011 16:24:45 Originally by: Bumblefck Edited by: Bumblefck on 12/05/2011 08:39:09 Originally by: The Offerer Originally by: Bumblefck Well, for all of your blustering, table formatting and fancy fonts, you haven't actually proved that these characters that you listed are bots. Only CCP can do that. Find some new windmills to tilt at. No, they are just a bunch of cool guys carebearing. - Same naming method; - Same corp creation method; - Approximately the same dates of creation; - Behaviour patterns; - Agent and NPC corp standings that a human simply can not achieve during the amount of time they were active; - A group of characters following the same patterns of 50+ characters have been reported earlier and all of them banned; - And... they look pretty cool, don't they: http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/1105/2011.05.12.07.35.24.jpg My point is simply that, ultimately, it's not the preserve of players to be investigating and confirming beyond a shadow of a doubt that someone is indeed using a bot (though of course there are always dedicated individual sleuths like yourself!) - that is CCP's job, and only they can say categorically one way or the other. Besides, why would you want to do their job for them, without getting paid for it? Also: Quote: Uh oh, someone seems ****ed! Did he find your army? lol I sat in a belt last night, not mining, watching a suspected bot when some other players interacted. Turned out to either not be a bot or the player came to the keyboard after the cans were popped. The point of this is, there's a lot of player concern for this game which we enjoy. And because we enjoy it, we're willing to put in some slight effort (some mouse clicks, some typing, some investigation on the part of the OP). My question is, what so bothers you about someone putting some effort towards protecting something they enjoy? Because that's what makes you look like you have a vested interest otherwise. Personally I think you just don't care and are in it for the lolz - you're just not butthurt enough to be involved, or you're hiding it well. Also - to the OP: Thank you for checking these out and forwarding them to CCP. I'm sure they'll be investigating. Cheers, and thanks for your efforts.
Adrie Atticus Tactical Vendor of Services and Goods Partners of Industrial Service and Salvage	Posted - 2011.05.13 17:14:00 - [66] 3rd page and Whitehound hasn't still arrived to defend botters. He must be getting old.
Leeluvv The Black Ops	Posted - 2011.05.13 17:26:00 - [67] Rather than banning bots, couldn't CCP change their security to -10.0, remove 'all' clones, so they perma die when killed, and put a reward on their heads? Originally by: Doctor Mabuse A wife is just a T2 GF. They're more expensive and their resists are higher
Multimedia Carl	Posted - 2011.05.13 19:54:00 - [68] CCP, you guys should really start actually taking action wihtin your own damn game, and not let it be on A '' to do'' list. Sick and tired of waiting for bug fixes and ect. for years, only to have you guys give us new material in hope of us forgetting. Warn a botter, does it not answer, BAN how hard can it be?
Maverick2011 Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.	Posted - 2011.05.13 19:59:00 - [69] Edited by: Maverick2011 on 13/05/2011 19:59:25 They could come up with a Hall of Shame in Incarna. Like a Museum inside stations that you could visit to check impaled heads of botters and have a good laugh and/or inspire fear to those tempted to bot.
Mister Rocknrolla	Posted - 2011.05.13 22:19:00 - [70] Originally by: Adrie Atticus 3rd page and Whitehound hasn't still arrived to defend botters. He must be getting old. Perhaps he's waiting out a ban?

NinjaSpud	Posted - 2011.05.13 22:29:00 - [71] Nice Glad to know I'm not alone. +1 to The Offerer for this great find and effort. You've done good. I was about to post something like "for the sake of being objective they may not all be bots....." ahh who am I kidding right? It's this simple, if they're bots, thanks to your petition, CCP will find and ban them. If they aren't bots, then...uhh.... lets go blow them up for having un-original corp names
Puck Rodgers	Posted - 2011.05.13 22:52:00 - [72] Edited by: Puck Rodgers on 13/05/2011 22:55:47 bots aren't ruining the game. Eve sucks to begin with, its a ** game that consist off logging in training a skill and logging off. who cares about bots? no-one with a life is gonna keep interested in this game for longer then 2 months, its boring as hell. and before u can do anything thats remotely interesting you need to train skills for 2 years. ** eve. ps: i think there should be more bots, so new players can buy a character thats doesn't require to log on and log off for 2 years before you can do anything.
Guillame Herschel Gallente NME1	Posted - 2011.05.13 22:58:00 - [73] Ninety-nine bots in Jita Floating in the summer sky Panic bells, it's red alert There's something here from somewhere else The war machine springs to life Opens up one eager eye Focusing it on the sky As ninety-nine bots in Jita go by
Corina's Bodyguard	Posted - 2011.05.13 23:01:00 - [74] Originally by: Puck Rodgers Edited by: Puck Rodgers on 13/05/2011 22:55:47 bots aren't ruining the game. Eve sucks to begin with, its a ** game that consist off logging in training a skill and logging off. who cares about bots? no-one with a life is gonna keep interested in this game for longer then 2 months, its boring as hell. and before u can do anything thats remotely interesting you need to train skills for 2 years. ** eve. ps: i think there should be more bots, so new players can buy a character thats doesn't require to log on and log off for 2 years before you can do anything. Sorry that you are a moron, but someone has to be. I only "log in, set training, log out" now because I no longer have time to play anything (finals and all). When I started playing, I spent all of my EVE time flying around, trying to get myself killed (why is it that people will hesitate to shoot at a noob in low sec...). Very fun. Got a little boring after 2 months solo. Biomassed that character and decided to start over with my current main. Learning a new weapons system was fun too. Met my current corp almost a year ago, and haven't been bored since.
NinjaSpud	Posted - 2011.05.13 23:19:00 - [75] Hey guys, I just created an in-game channel called Bot Grief Feel free to join it to discuss the current bot problem.
Kern Hotha	Posted - 2011.05.14 00:57:00 - [76] It's been stated many times before but here it is again: CCP makes more money by having bots in the game than by banning them. It's just that simple. --- "The data does not support that polished quality sells better than new features." -Nathan Richardsson, Senior Producer at CCP
Corina's Bodyguard	Posted - 2011.05.14 01:02:00 - [77] Originally by: Kern Hotha It's been stated many times before but here it is again: CCP makes more money by having bots in the game than by banning them. It's just that simple. Then why do they actively ban them? And where is this proof that they make more form the botters than they do from the people who have quit because of botters?
Mister Rocknrolla	Posted - 2011.05.14 12:41:00 - [78] Originally by: Kern Hotha It's been stated many times before but here it is again: CCP makes more money by having bots in the game than by banning them. It's just that simple. No, they don't. People say a lot of things. You don't have to believe everything you read. Only a child believes everything they read.
Jaari Val'Dara Caldari Atomic Zeppelins	Posted - 2011.05.15 07:48:00 - [79] Originally by: Leeluvv Rather than banning bots, couldn't CCP change their security to -10.0, remove 'all' clones, so they perma die when killed, and put a reward on their heads? Want this so much!!! Plus they should be denied access to all the stations or poses. :D
Tobias Sjodin Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2011.05.15 07:54:00 - [80] In most cases bots are a symtom of a defunct mechanic. HABIT

clixor Celluloid Gurus	Posted - 2011.05.15 11:19:00 - [81] Originally by: Mister Rocknrolla Originally by: Kern Hotha It's been stated many times before but here it is again: CCP makes more money by having bots in the game than by banning them. It's just that simple. No, they don't. People say a lot of things. You don't have to believe everything you read. Only a child believes everything they read. Replace the word People with Botters. I don't think i heard this argument from anyone ELSE than botters. I'm to hungover now to look it up but it's some psychological effect of justifying action which you know that are bad.
Joe Astor Gallente Federal Navy Academy	Posted - 2011.05.15 11:58:00 - [82] Originally by: Leeluvv Rather than banning bots, couldn't CCP change their security to -10.0, remove 'all' clones, so they perma die when killed, and put a reward on their heads? I like this idea! :D Then all players, new and old, could make income bot hunting! :)
TauTut The Union Of The Snake	Posted - 2011.05.15 16:14:00 - [83] Originally by: Joe Astor Originally by: Leeluvv Rather than banning bots, couldn't CCP change their security to -10.0, remove 'all' clones, so they perma die when killed, and put a reward on their heads? I like this idea! :D Then all players, new and old, could make income bot hunting! :) That is an awesome idea as long as it can't be exploited. -TT / Peace Sells - But Who's Buying The Union of the Snake [SNAKE]
Peregrine	Posted - 2011.05.15 18:24:00 - [84] Originally by: Jyana Petrovskaya Originally by: Sentinel 7 I generally find that precise and complete descriptions combined with clarity of language and ease of reading are directly proportional to CCP response times. Current record to a concise and complete report: three minutes. You failed to mention where or when the bot was active. "i saw a bad thing, go look for it urself" in a such a vast gameworld generating immense data traffic by the second isn't very helpful. By the way, hope your "friend" never wants to play EVE again, since you just got all his accounts banned if this report of yours goes through... those details have been submittet via named petition. the mail was some sort lets give it a try this way. and yes hes been fully aware of what i'v been doing as its been a joint project of both of us So are we to understand that you and your friend purposely got a bot and set it up botting for the purpose of complaining about the use of said bot and ccp's reaction to the information. I wonder if that is bannable and if it were I suspect your "confession" may be all that is required to ban you. Just wondering of course.
Wa'roun Quantum Cats Syndicate	Posted - 2011.05.15 18:30:00 - [85] 99 BOTS Detected in Jita area... 99 BOTS detected here... take one down, pass the loot around... 98 BOTS detected now... EVERYBODY!... Join channel: "Eve University" or read here
Bumblefck Kerensky Initiatives	Posted - 2011.05.15 18:49:00 - [86] Originally by: Maverick2011 Originally by: Bumblefck Well, for all of your blustering, table formatting and fancy fonts, you haven't actually proved that these characters that you listed are bots. Only CCP can do that. Find some new windmills to tilt at. Only a bot user will defend possible bots to try to avoid being discovered or keep the word that theres no such thing as bots and hacking in online games. I never defended bots, just the fact that it is really only CCP who can determine people who's been using bots and act appropriately. I just don't care as much as other people about the existence of bots. Look, we know that they exist, not only in this game but wherever people play together and the potential for artificially inflating one's stats. To deny it would be not only pointless, but also rathe ridiculous. -------------- Fix the game's last broken weapon system - support if you care!
HyperZerg	Posted - 2011.05.15 19:41:00 - [87] Originally by: CCP Sreegs Suffice to say I did receive your email and I apologize that I don't respond to every single one I get. I can't discuss specific actions related to a specific bot or botter. This makes the security inbox appear to be a black hole but we're working on some ways to rectify that. Okay, let's say you really ban all bots [even if they don't have a RMT connetion]. Last dev-blog I remember you talked hours only about RMT. The bot discribed here had no RMT-connection. So It seems you don't care. All CCP does is talking about RMT, not bots. I hope you know boting without RMT ist bad for the game too.
Mithrasith	Posted - 2011.05.16 18:26:00 - [88] Originally by: Tobias Sjodin In most cases bots are a symtom of a defunct mechanic. Or, as is more likely the case, a symptom of how lazy and/or greedy some people are. Nice representing PL there and their philosophy on botting.
Justice Comes	Posted - 2011.05.16 23:53:00 - [89] I struggle with the fact that botting is so rampant that increasing numbers of players are taking up "bot hunting" as a primary career choice.
Sarulin Farii	Posted - 2011.06.09 04:00:00 - [90] CCP, give this man a WELL payed jobb.



Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.