| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
317
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 18:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
As mission runners, do you actively vote for CSM's when candidates campaign? Do you tell your non-forum counterparts to vote? Do you even care? I'm curious to know because, as CSM 8 is coming up, I see people screaming death to high sec and miners and just about no one on the other side shouting back.
Like...no one. No one to defend PvE, missioning, high sec life, high sec mining, etc. All I see are people like James315 and Tippia touting either risk v rewards rants or simple hate mongering against people like miners.
So, do you lot care much at all and try to get others involved? |

Sexy Cakes
Poasting
91
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:19:00 -
[2] - Quote
Anslo wrote:As mission runners, do you actively vote for CSM's when candidates campaign? Do you tell your non-forum counterparts to vote? Do you even care? I'm curious to know because, as CSM 8 is coming up, I see people screaming death to high sec and miners and just about no one on the other side shouting back.
Like...no one. No one to defend PvE, missioning, high sec life, high sec mining, etc. All I see are people like James315 and Tippia touting either risk v rewards rants or simple hate mongering against people like miners.
So, do you lot care much at all and try to get others involved?
If not well, I guess the others are right, and you all get what you deserve sadly; being walked on by the "l33t" crowd.
I'm sorry is there something wrong with missions?
Seems to be easy solo ISK close to if not on par with other activities in eve when done correctly.
Mining just got buffed. I'm not a miner but I've nothing but rave reviews about the new Mackinaw.
High sec life is fine and dandy. Not today spaghetti. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
318
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
Yes, it is. Would you like to keep it that way is my question. You've seen GD and gods know how many other threads regarding nerfing highsec. My question is if the actual nerfing of highsec has ever really gotten high sec people to want to vote to ensure their play style remains their play style and is not interfered with. |

Sexy Cakes
Poasting
91
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Yes, it is. Would you like to keep it that way is my question. You've seen GD and gods know how many other threads regarding nerfing highsec. My question is if the actual nerfing of highsec has ever really gotten high sec people to want to vote to ensure their play style remains their play style and is not interfered with.
Oh gotcha.
I always figured a good portion of highsec were the 'married with children' crowd and not really into the CSM stuff or forums either for that matter. Nullsec/lowsec has been whining so long about being fixed I'm not sure many people listen to it anymore, I sure don't  Not today spaghetti. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
318
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Sexy Cakes wrote:Anslo wrote:Yes, it is. Would you like to keep it that way is my question. You've seen GD and gods know how many other threads regarding nerfing highsec. My question is if the actual nerfing of highsec has ever really gotten high sec people to want to vote to ensure their play style remains their play style and is not interfered with. Oh gotcha. I always figured a good portion of highsec were the 'married with children' crowd and not really into the CSM stuff or forums either for that matter. Nullsec/lowsec has been whining so long about being fixed I'm not sure many people listen to it anymore, I sure don't 
The problem is they do. They scream eve is pure PvP, pure hardcore, etc, etc. They refuse to acknowledge that people should be able to play Eve casually. Instead, they go out of their way to, well, ruin the experience for them. I'm surprised no one has noticed the pure hate for high sec players. Hell, even after Mittani gate happened I doubt we'll see a lot more high sec people voting. I really wish that, even though they are more casual gamers, highsec players would vote, en masse.
Mittens always tauted his 10,058 votes, why can't high sec people do the same? Sad man.. |

Dazarus Ataru
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:52:00 -
[6] - Quote
My take (full of opinions and what-not):
Though there's lots of chest-beating and verbal hatred spewed toward denizens of highsec, the actual threat feels pretty minimal. Sure, every once in a while something like Hulkageddon happens, but even then, it's usually pretty easy to avoid if you're willing to adapt a bit.
CSM is good for sanity-checking some of the stuff CCP proposes, but I don't really think they're a huge threat to highsec life, even if each and every one of them came out and said they wanted to see highsec flat-out removed. CCP is going to do what is best for CCP, and even though I'm sure they want to gently guide people out into the scarier parts of the universe, they wouldn't dare kill the viability of highsec life entirely, as that would drive away a significant income base.
tl;dr Adapt and carry on with whatever playstyle you prefer. Don't worry so much about who hates you. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
319
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:58:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dazarus Ataru wrote: Though there's lots of chest-beating and verbal hatred spewed toward denizens of highsec, the actual threat feels pretty minimal. Sure, every once in a while something like Hulkageddon happens, but even then, it's usually pretty easy to avoid if you're willing to adapt a bit.
And what happens if it continues? What happens if CSM members keep pushing for events like that and continue to push for high sec nerfs and suddenly, those threats become tangible? I'm not whining or asking for high sec to be made safer, I'm more concerned with the status quo and the CSM having a representative that has lived in low/nul, resides in high and has a balanced view of the game (pro for PvP AND PvE), sees the relationship is needed between the two, and adds to the CSM.
Dazarus Ataru wrote: CSM is good for sanity-checking some of the stuff CCP proposes, but I don't really think they're a huge threat to highsec life, even if each and every one of them came out and said they wanted to see highsec flat-out removed. CCP is going to do what is best for CCP, and even though I'm sure they want to gently guide people out into the scarier parts of the universe, they wouldn't dare kill the viability of highsec life entirely, as that would drive away a significant income base.
I'm sure nothing DRAMATIC like high sec removal would happen. As I said, I'm concerned more with the slow chipping at high sec and the containment of a virulent and unwarranted hatred towards high sec players, despite economic ramifications CCP may endure going anti-highsec. I'm not saying they would, but then again a vote here and there for a highsec person wouldn't hurt.
Dazarus Ataru wrote:tl;dr Adapt and carry on with whatever playstyle you prefer. Don't worry so much about who hates you.
I wouldn't worry about the hatred if it did not have the potential threat to the playstyles of highsec casuals.
|

Dazarus Ataru
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 20:12:00 -
[8] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Dazarus Ataru wrote: Though there's lots of chest-beating and verbal hatred spewed toward denizens of highsec, the actual threat feels pretty minimal. Sure, every once in a while something like Hulkageddon happens, but even then, it's usually pretty easy to avoid if you're willing to adapt a bit. And what happens if it continues? What happens if CSM members keep pushing for events like that and continue to push for high sec nerfs and suddenly, those threats become tangible?
Then the game will become boring and tedious for me and I will vote with my wallet and go find something else to play. Many others will probably do the same. In numbers, that's going to be a much more effective message than any CSM member could deliver.
Would it be nice to have a highsec representative on the CSM? Sure, I guess. Problem is, there aren't a lot of highsec players widely enough known to garner the support needed. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
322
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 20:15:00 -
[9] - Quote
Dazarus Ataru wrote:Anslo wrote:Dazarus Ataru wrote: Though there's lots of chest-beating and verbal hatred spewed toward denizens of highsec, the actual threat feels pretty minimal. Sure, every once in a while something like Hulkageddon happens, but even then, it's usually pretty easy to avoid if you're willing to adapt a bit. And what happens if it continues? What happens if CSM members keep pushing for events like that and continue to push for high sec nerfs and suddenly, those threats become tangible? Then the game will become boring and tedious for me and I will vote with my wallet and go find something else to play. Many others will probably do the same. In numbers, that's going to be a much more effective message than any CSM member could deliver. Would it be nice to have a highsec representative on the CSM? Sure, I guess. Problem is, there aren't a lot of highsec players widely enough known to garner the support needed.
Most politicians aren't widely known prior to election to major office. They run a campaign. If ONE high sec person was aggressive enough to speak out against nul/low full representation on the CSM, it would be enough. I like Eve, a lot. I've been on it since 2007. I'd rather people not need to vote with their wallet and simply leave. |

serras bang
Lucien Coven
16
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 20:17:00 -
[10] - Quote
ill run for csm |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
322
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 20:19:00 -
[11] - Quote
serras bang wrote:ill run for csm
lol, on what platform :P |

Calfis
The Dark Tribe Against ALL Authorities
128
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 20:23:00 -
[12] - Quote
Anslo wrote: Most politicians aren't widely known prior to election to major office. They run a campaign. If ONE high sec person was aggressive enough to speak out against nul/low full representation on the CSM, it would be enough. I like Eve, a lot. I've been on it since 2007. I'd rather people not need to vote with their wallet and simply leave.
If highsec had any real organization to it then it would probably have a viable candidate, sadly most alliances in highsec don't do anything more than simply exist. |

serras bang
Lucien Coven
16
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 20:23:00 -
[13] - Quote
Anslo wrote:serras bang wrote:ill run for csm lol, on what platform :P
how you mean what platform ? what am i going to try pushing for in that if i can work out a decent plan to present ?
|

Jack Miton
Bite Me inc Elysian Empire
539
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 20:35:00 -
[14] - Quote
carebears dont need representation on CSM, CCP represents them directly. |

serras bang
Lucien Coven
16
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 20:42:00 -
[15] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:carebears dont need representation on CSM, CCP represents them directly.
ah hi sec vocal representation may well give a fresh veiw and som ideas that null and low sec player might not have considerd before. |

Dazarus Ataru
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 20:48:00 -
[16] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Most politicians aren't widely known prior to election to major office. They run a campaign. If ONE high sec person was aggressive enough to speak out against nul/low full representation on the CSM, it would be enough. I like Eve, a lot. I've been on it since 2007. I'd rather people not need to vote with their wallet and simply leave.
You're going to have a hard time rallying support for an unknown candidate no matter how well the campaign is run. Anyone who's played this game for a while has learned not to trust people they don't know. I'm not going to throw a vote at someone just because he spews rainbows and warm fuzzies.
I still just think you're overestimating the threat. The forum population is not an accurate representation of the whole of the game. (Edit: Nor, for that matter, is the CSM, and I'm pretty sure CCP knows that.) |

Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
638
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 20:51:00 -
[17] - Quote
Anslo wrote:I wouldn't worry about the hatred if it did not have the potential threat to the playstyles of highsec casuals.
Could you describe the nature of the threat you perceive? Because I'm having trouble imagining it.
|

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
323
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 21:10:00 -
[18] - Quote
Zhilia Mann wrote:Anslo wrote:I wouldn't worry about the hatred if it did not have the potential threat to the playstyles of highsec casuals. Could you describe the nature of the threat you perceive? Because I'm having trouble imagining it.
In general just increased polarization between nul/low and high, pvp vs pve. It's gone from acceptance and occasional poking fun at to blatant hostility and hatred.
Like a poster before said, the forum is not by any means the majority of Eve opinion. It's a vocal minority spewing hate. I'm concerned that the trend of hate spewing will continue to spread and that vocal minority becomes a vocal majority after a year or two. Hell maybe it'll never happen and I'm worried for nothing. I hope it doesn't. I really do. |

Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
638
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 21:20:00 -
[19] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Zhilia Mann wrote:Anslo wrote:I wouldn't worry about the hatred if it did not have the potential threat to the playstyles of highsec casuals. Could you describe the nature of the threat you perceive? Because I'm having trouble imagining it. In general just increased polarization between nul/low and high, pvp vs pve. It's gone from acceptance and occasional poking fun at to blatant hostility and hatred. Like a poster before said, the forum is not by any means the majority of Eve opinion. It's a vocal minority spewing hate. I'm concerned that the trend of hate spewing will continue to spread and that vocal minority becomes a vocal majority after a year or two. Hell maybe it'll never happen and I'm worried for nothing. I hope it doesn't. I really do.
Actually, it doesn't seem as bad to me as it's been in the past. These things definitely go in waves.
But then I don't read GD. Ever. As a rule. But here and in Ships and Mods everyone seems to be getting along, possibly better than usual and definitely better than a few years ago. |

Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
317
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 23:45:00 -
[20] - Quote
if highsec is removed this is what will happen: 1. a major shitstorm on the forums. think incarna debacle x3 2. 50-60% of eve players leave for greener pastures, including your humble servant 3. eve economy collapses and small corps slowly die out, leading to another exodus 4. ccp realizes their mistake and may or may not be able to keep the game running 5a. ccp goes bankrupt 5b. hisec is brought back into the game, and is slowly but surely repopulated until ~10 years from now, everything is back to the current state.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
324
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 23:52:00 -
[21] - Quote
But I'm not saying that the threat would be that high sec is simply gotten rid of. I'm concerned about things like moving the majority of missions to lowsec, removing most ores from highsec save for worthless kinds, removing ice belts, forcing people out of NPC corps at certain times or limiting what they could do IN an NPC corp, etc.
THOSE are my concerns. Not eliminating highsec, but lobbying for its nerfing. |

Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
639
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 00:06:00 -
[22] - Quote
Anslo wrote:But I'm not saying that the threat would be that high sec is simply gotten rid of. I'm concerned about things like moving the majority of missions to lowsec, removing most ores from highsec save for worthless kinds, removing ice belts, forcing people out of NPC corps at certain times or limiting what they could do IN an NPC corp, etc.
THOSE are my concerns. Not eliminating highsec, but lobbying for its nerfing.
I think you're overblowing things. I haven't seen or heard any rumblings about L4s changing for better or for worse. High sec already has the theoretical worst ores, though low is actually worse off. Ice belts already saw their change years ago. And NPC corps are already silly things with restrictions on them.
High second life is alive and well and appeals to a major segment of the paying populace of Eve. I can't see that changing even if it were made somewhat less appealing. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
324
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 00:11:00 -
[23] - Quote
Then I seriously hope the CSM doesn't **** things up as the years continue. |

Tragedy
The Creepshow
21
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 05:29:00 -
[24] - Quote
Daniel Plain wrote:if highsec is removed this is what will happen: 1. a major shitstorm on the forums. think incarna debacle x3 2. 50-60% of eve players leave for greener pastures, including your humble servant 3. eve economy collapses and small corps slowly die out, leading to another exodus 4. ccp realizes their mistake and may or may not be able to keep the game running 5a. ccp goes bankrupt 5b. hisec is brought back into the game, and is slowly but surely repopulated until ~10 years from now, everything is back to the current state. HOLY ****!!! The sky! It's falling!
So much paranoia regarding high sec, so little common sense. |

Sturmwolke
273
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 08:05:00 -
[25] - Quote
I actually abstained on the votes for CSM 7 (and probably CSM 6 as well, can't remember). None of the candidates really stand out as independents, plus the internal politics drama/maneuvering with some of the veteran CSMs is a complete put off.
So it was rather annoying that CCP decided not to publish the percentage that "Abstained" during the last CSM voting (as I recall). If you're reading this CCP, please publish the numbers that abstained for the next CSM voting. I'm curious to see the trending. |

Matriarch Prime
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
58
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 08:06:00 -
[26] - Quote
The devs know the purpose of high sec, or they wouldn't have put it into the game and continued to support it over the years. They aren't loons, they understand that forum whining should be taken with a rather large grain of salt, and to focus on the the core issue that players trouble with and not what they think is the issue.
I'll use an example. I know that for whatever reason much of the community hates WoW, but the game has struggled with this community divide over risk vs rewards and prestige vs accessibility since inception, and given that the developers can sometimes put on a display of Big Brass Balls (tm) from time to time and make sweeeping changes to some things that some players think are core gameplay experience.
In the Wrath of the Lich King expansion, raid mechanics such as raid size, progression , difficulty and lockouts were changed. Also the dungeon finder was introduced which drasticly lowered the amount of work and frustration players had to put into playing the content. WotLK saw explosive growth in subscriptions as a result, and also saw a much larger percentage of players completing raid content which was previously considered largely for the "elite" players only.
There was push back though, and the developers did sympathize a bit and thought maybe things had gotten too easy. In the next expansion, Cataclysm, the developers decided to make the dungeons much harder, so that preorganized groups would be the preferable option, they also bumped up the entry level difficulty for the first tier of raids. It is unclear if that was just bugs or purposeful, but the result was more difficult content initially.
What happened as a result is a mass exodus from the game. And while the game is still going strong, you can't lose millions of subscribers without learning a lesson. And hopefully the right one. In Mist, dungeons will be tuned more like the last batch of dungeons that were released in Cata, and they will continue to offer the new raid finder difficulty for very casual players or guilds to run.
I think they learned their lesson. You have to have both types of content. You have to have content that is easy and players can just log in and have a little bit of fun or work incementally towards a goal. And you need those hard challenges. The people running exclusively the hardest content are always going to comlain about not enough content or that the easier content is too rewarding. It is both a presige/epeen thing, or a simple lack of understanding that not everyone plays the way they do, and they deserve to have rewarding content to do as well.
Those hardcore elite are quick to point out that easy content is more rewarding, yet they forget that they too enjoy the benefits usually either personally or a result of having a larger community of players to play with...players that may one day become "hardcore" too.
In single players games, difficulty is a game option, so for MMos to provide similar functionality does mean explicitly that some players will be rewarded for doing less risky/difficult challenges. And thats ok, because not every player is the same, but you do what everyone the chance to play together because that is the whole point of MMOs.
CCP has some very smart people. They know what their core gameplay is, and it has nothing to do with difficulty, its spaceships, politics, and technobabble. Its scifi, and everything scifi that they can fit in, not who can make x isk/hr doing y activity. They do enough to make sure that the economy doesn't explode, try to provide as many different ways to make the game system interact across multiple domains and weave a tight core of experience based on lasers, robots, wormholes and whatever else they can squeeze in.
Haters gonna hate, no matter way. Your happy players are largely too busy playing the game than making passionate conclusive arguements about how high security or whatever else is the new hotness is destroying the game.. I like big guns. I can not lie. You other suckas can't deny. When I warp in, with an itty bity sig, with an arty in your face, you get sprung. You want to pull out your debuffs, 'cause you want to loot my stuff...deep, in a worm with nary, an escape but you can't stop staring. 'Cause, Oh crap!, Baby's got Point! |

Chimpy B
The Philosophy Of Two
11
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 09:50:00 -
[27] - Quote
CCP won't do anything which causes players to leave.
I can't see high-sec getting anything new in the future because the majority of players are PVPers and it's better use of CCP's time to add PVP content, but I don't think anything in high-sec will be nerfed either.
As an aside I think low-sec needs to be made more accessible to high-sec players, cos it's too dead at the moment. There's not enough difference between low-sec and and null-sec from a PVE player's perspective. |

Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
319
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 10:16:00 -
[28] - Quote
Tragedy wrote:Daniel Plain wrote:if highsec is removed this is what will happen: 1. a major shitstorm on the forums. think incarna debacle x3 2. 50-60% of eve players leave for greener pastures, including your humble servant 3. eve economy collapses and small corps slowly die out, leading to another exodus 4. ccp realizes their mistake and may or may not be able to keep the game running 5a. ccp goes bankrupt 5b. hisec is brought back into the game, and is slowly but surely repopulated until ~10 years from now, everything is back to the current state. HOLY ****!!! The sky! It's falling! So much paranoia regarding high sec, so little common sense.
do you understand what the word 'if' means? in case you don't, i'll gladly explain it to you.
i was speaking in hypotheticals; this means i assumed a fictional premise and mused on its implications and consequences as though it were real. if anything, my post would be an argument for the claim that hisec will never be removed (and people who demand this are either trolling or just incredibly stupid).
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |

Elinarien
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 10:34:00 -
[29] - Quote
I trust the accountants / suits / bean counters etc in CCP to protect my high sec / carebear / mission runner interests. The CSM can whine / lobby / pressure all they want for high sec to be nerfed into the ground but CCP won't sacrifice the current equilibrium.
|

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
113
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 10:51:00 -
[30] - Quote
OP says that hisec is for casual players. I would like to know what is preventing people to play casually in lowsec for example? There are missions with better rewards, exploration has better sites, belts have better rocks, even belt rats are better as bounties are concerned. So you have basically everything casual hisec inhabitants has for better ISK (not way much better but still better). Player corp, NPC corp - doesn't matter, you can be casual as much as you want it. Log in, undock, do your thing, dock, logout.
But of course there is no CONCORD so beside parking your shiny PVE ship at mission pocket and watching tv you have to click that damn d-scan button every few seconds if you are not alone in system. Or by 'casual' you simply mean AFK?
I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |