Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Herr Ronin
42 LVL's of Infinity SQUEE.
297
|
Posted - 2013.01.03 19:03:00 -
[91] - Quote
Kinis Deren wrote:Herr Ronin,
I notice you are a member of SQUEE, a null sec sov holding alliance, so how do you feel that you will truly be a hi sec CSM representative when your current interests (by employment choice) appear to be elsewhere? The apparent bias I allude to would seem to be supported by those posting in your favour in this thread.
Would you not, in fact, just be another HBC/CFC nullbear CSM representative?
How very true, Considering I joined this corporation before i took a X-Mas break, It does look like they have joined a Null Sec Alliance, I understand that a simple thing like this can confuse people like yourself, but if you digged a little bit more you will see i have 0% Interest in SQUEE and i have been dormant in a High Sec.
Regards. |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Air The Unthinkables
2395
|
Posted - 2013.01.03 19:27:00 -
[92] - Quote
lol |
Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
1068
|
Posted - 2013.01.08 19:45:00 -
[93] - Quote
Daily (not really) bump.
|
Unit CA108AF
Unit Commune Celestial Imperative
30
|
Posted - 2013.01.16 15:54:00 -
[94] - Quote
Bump. |
Zimmy Zeta
RvB - RED Federation
5862
|
Posted - 2013.01.16 19:24:00 -
[95] - Quote
Mr Piranha, since you seem to have a clear vision and sound knowledgeable about every aspect of the game... why not run for CSM yourself and let the voters decide? Please vote for Malcanis in the 2013 CSM elections, unless you were going to vote for Mangala Solaris, wich would be awesome, too. |
Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
1114
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 13:45:00 -
[96] - Quote
Bump because Herr Ronin>Malcanis
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
415
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 14:41:00 -
[97] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Herr Ronin>Malcanis
This should be good. Do explian. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7318
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 15:14:00 -
[98] - Quote
Herr Ronin is a much better candidate to represent Anslo than I am. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1653
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 15:21:00 -
[99] - Quote
I will admit I do have a few questions for this incursion representative? What alterations do you feel need to be made to hi-sec to allow more dangerous parts of space to be more viable? What time frame do you feel POSs and Sovereignty need to be fixed in?
How would you suggest sovereignty is fixed?
Do you agree with moon mining in its current form? If not how would you fix it?
How would you make mining and industry better?
Thank you for your time. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread
|
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
752
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 17:38:00 -
[100] - Quote
Hi there. You mention fixing wardecs in your OP. what, specifically, needs fixing, and how would you go about it?
|
|
Callduron
171
|
Posted - 2013.01.24 01:06:00 -
[101] - Quote
Herr Ronin, I had a look at your employment history. You seem to change corps every other week and to have mostly been in high sec war dec corps. Is it fair to say you're a pvper/wardeccer/griefer? If so, why do you feel you represent high sec Eve players? |
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
765
|
Posted - 2013.01.24 11:55:00 -
[102] - Quote
Callduron wrote:Herr Ronin, I had a look at your employment history. You seem to change corps every other week and to have mostly been in high sec war dec corps. Is it fair to say you're a pvper/wardeccer/griefer? If so, why do you feel you represent high sec Eve players? Wouldn't you say that people who spend time in highsec, wardeccing other highsec corps, are highsec players?
|
Callduron
171
|
Posted - 2013.01.24 16:10:00 -
[103] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Callduron wrote:Herr Ronin, I had a look at your employment history. You seem to change corps every other week and to have mostly been in high sec war dec corps. Is it fair to say you're a pvper/wardeccer/griefer? If so, why do you feel you represent high sec Eve players? Wouldn't you say that people who spend time in highsec, wardeccing other highsec corps, are highsec players?
Highsec players - Yes. Highsec representatives - No.
I think it's misleading to put yourself forward as a high sec candidate when you support a playstyle that's actively counter to how the vast majority of players in high sec enjoy the game. |
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
768
|
Posted - 2013.01.24 16:36:00 -
[104] - Quote
Callduron wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Callduron wrote:Herr Ronin, I had a look at your employment history. You seem to change corps every other week and to have mostly been in high sec war dec corps. Is it fair to say you're a pvper/wardeccer/griefer? If so, why do you feel you represent high sec Eve players? Wouldn't you say that people who spend time in highsec, wardeccing other highsec corps, are highsec players? Highsec players - Yes. Highsec representatives - No. I think it's misleading to put yourself forward as a high sec candidate when you support a playstyle that's actively counter to how the vast majority of players in high sec enjoy the game. So if Mynnna runs as nullsec representative when in fact he only represents Goonswarm and not Solar Fleet/Test/PL/Nulli Secunda, does that mean he's being misleading?
If Hans ran as faction warfare candidate when he fights for the Minmatar (correct me if I'm wrong, I think he's Minmatar) and not the Amarr or Fweddit or whatever, does that mean he's being misleading?
No, if this man ran as 'carebear representative' when in fact he is a wardeccer and awoxer, that would be misleading. If he runs as highsec representative, that's fine.
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |
Singular Snowflake
New Order Logistics CODE.
72
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 00:14:00 -
[105] - Quote
Herr Ronin wrote:Change's How would you be different from Issler? |
Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
1127
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 19:57:00 -
[106] - Quote
Bump.
|
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
783
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 21:41:00 -
[107] - Quote
A bump when it's on the front page?
In addition,
Quote:Spamming, bumping and pyramid quoting are prohibited.
Spam is defined as the repetitive posting of the same topic or text or nonsensical posts that have no substance and are often designed to annoy other forum users. This includes GÇ£firstGÇ¥ and GÇ£go back to another gameGÇ¥ posts. Bumping posts in order to keep them near the top of the list is also prohibited. Petitions or "/signed" posts are a version of bumping and likewise are not permitted. Pyramid quoting is a response to a forum thread that contains the quotes of four or more previous posters, sometimes with additional spaces added unnecessarily. Posts of this nature are not conducive to community spirit and are unwelcome.
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |
Lipbite
Express Hauler
601
|
Posted - 2013.01.27 09:45:00 -
[108] - Quote
During site blocking crisis your well-thought and constructive comments
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2438945#post2438945
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2429878#post2429878
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2400170#post2400170
helped to solve situation by adding few bumps to the thread. You clearly demonstrated your thinking ability, great personality, problem solving skills so I believe you'll be as useful as any of present CSM members. So - why not?
+1 from me. |
Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
1129
|
Posted - 2013.01.31 19:12:00 -
[109] - Quote
Still bumping
|
ry ry
Snuff Box
179
|
Posted - 2013.01.31 19:30:00 -
[110] - Quote
A lot of talk of 'fixing' hisec griefing, a smart move - the risk adverse entitlement platform will bring a lot of votes.
That said, how do you plan to help ccp integrate hisec more fully into the rest of Eve if your focus is one of protectionism? |
|
Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
1131
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 13:39:00 -
[111] - Quote
And another daily bump.
|
Ya Huei
Imperial Collective
99
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 15:18:00 -
[112] - Quote
Yay.. D3 Reloaded candidate..
|
Poetic Stanziel
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1693
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 22:21:00 -
[113] - Quote
Get yourself interviewed:
http://crossingzebras.com/post/40699271518/electioninterviews Amarr Militia - Fweddit - http://fweddit.com Poetic Discourse - http://poeticstanziel.blogspot.com |
Winchester Steele
87
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 05:42:00 -
[114] - Quote
Callduron wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Callduron wrote:Herr Ronin, I had a look at your employment history. You seem to change corps every other week and to have mostly been in high sec war dec corps. Is it fair to say you're a pvper/wardeccer/griefer? If so, why do you feel you represent high sec Eve players? Wouldn't you say that people who spend time in highsec, wardeccing other highsec corps, are highsec players? Highsec players - Yes. Highsec representatives - No. I think it's misleading to put yourself forward as a high sec candidate when you support a playstyle that's actively counter to how the vast majority of players in high sec enjoy the game.
Citation please. Hi-Sec needs a CSM rep with Courage, Dignity and Conviction. In these dark and trying times we need a man of action to represent our interests and protect the sanctity of our sandbox. That man is James 315 and his time is now. 315 for CSM 8! |
Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
1279
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 20:43:00 -
[115] - Quote
bampin
|
Endeavour Starfleet
843
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 19:42:00 -
[116] - Quote
Hello there! I am glad to see people from the Incursion community as candidates.
I would like to name several situations that I feel are detrimental to the game. Give a solution and ask you for your stance on both. I do need answers to all the situations for my vote(s)
POS those three letters bring nightmares to just about anyone having the misfortune of having to operate one. The solution in the long term is obviously modular POS. Yet CCP seems to be backpedaling on implementing this despite the MANY benefits. What is your stance on the possibility of a near term bandage of a form of player POS that is only designed to be the equilivant of a Secure Container for ships until modular POS is ready?
Overpowered passive cloaking. It is now to the point where people are now beyond AFK cloaking but running Twitch.tv streams of enemy stations and systems! Would you support balancing cloaking to punish those who go AFK (Eventually able to be scanned down for decloak) while maintaining the benefits to people actively cloaking (Remaining at their keyboard)
Lack of Ring Mining. Again with the CCP backpedaling despite the many benefits for nullsec and other areas for the game. What is your stand on the crap that is moon mining?
The silly push by some in the community to end or delay "Local" or any effective means for those in a nullsec system to determine if a hostile or unknown is in system in them. This obviously needs no solution but I want your thoughts.
The horrible state of missions in hisec. The solution in my opinion is a complete rewrite to allow for a more incursion like approach that rewards those who want to train up logistic frigs and cruisers or be a specific role in a fleet. Also providing a way for newer players to experience group play in EVE.
Incursion suckage. With the nerfs to Incursions fleets have slowed to a trickle and it was sad to see CCP willing to spend more development time nerfing entire expansions instead of doing what was right being making other aspects of EVE better. Modular POS and Ring mining need dev time sooner so I will admit this ought to be looked at later however I wanted to get your views on them and have this to be some context to the next aspect of Logi.
Logi suckage. Logis do not have the tools to do their job. They need to be able to tell who is locked and taking damage and in large fleets the watchlist can't handle that leading to dependence on broadcasts that most of EVE seems to not know or refuse to use right. Look at any average HQ incursion fleet where people don't broadcast right stressing out logi or in fleet fights where following FCs orders makes it harder to broadcast properly. A solution is a logi only screen that is completely configurable to show who is taking the most DPS and who has the most locks in fleet.
Logi Suckage #2 Reps don't get you on mails? Wut? Solution obviously is to have repping those in fleet land you on killmails generated from fleet. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |