Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

PHDeve
|
Posted - 2011.05.30 11:15:00 -
[1]
Dear new eve player,
come to ORE sec.. There are level one missions..clone bays and PVP
If some one kills you in ORE space you loose nothing... you get a free ship to unite with friends and do 0.0 missions... nothing can stop you... you make bank in isk on mission in 0.0 space...They can used up there isk on killing you.. maybe sometime they'll learn.. stuff isn't cheap in 0.0 space...LOL
plus you don't get bad rep from other main factions besides pirates..good money there two... so come join me...in numbers we'll retake ORE space for what it was mad for...
|

Miss Mish
|
Posted - 2011.05.30 12:30:00 -
[2]
Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
|

Centus Commander
|
Posted - 2011.05.30 14:44:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Miss Mish Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Well if they want really to like more even go use then they might would
|

Amalger
|
Posted - 2011.05.30 18:13:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Centus Commander
Originally by: Miss Mish Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Well if they want really to like more even go use then they might would
I think to that if when they might would it maybe get docked
|

Angus Thermopollye
|
Posted - 2011.05.30 21:14:00 -
[5]
All my implants just blew and popped out of my nose in brain fluid.
|

Darcy D'Spledide
|
Posted - 2011.06.03 10:40:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Amalger
Originally by: Centus Commander
Originally by: Miss Mish Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Well if they want really to like more even go use then they might would
I think to that if when they might would it maybe get docked
Long fitting end backwards but never mind how about in tomorrow around the dock?
|

Adelain Niska
Minmatar Pator Tech School
|
Posted - 2011.06.03 20:03:00 -
[7]
This suggests that the systematic use of complex symbols cannot be arbitrary in the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. However, this assumption is not correct, since this selectionally introduced contextual feature delimits problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. ---- My reputation is not solid. |

Renownedwolf
|
Posted - 2011.06.03 22:02:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Adelain Niska This suggests that the systematic use of complex symbols cannot be arbitrary in the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. However, this assumption is not correct, since this selectionally introduced contextual feature delimits problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.
that made more sense then everything else posted here
|

Adelain Niska
Minmatar Pator Tech School
|
Posted - 2011.06.03 22:15:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Renownedwolf
Originally by: Adelain Niska This suggests that the systematic use of complex symbols cannot be arbitrary in the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. However, this assumption is not correct, since this selectionally introduced contextual feature delimits problems of phonemic and morphological analysis.
that made more sense then everything else posted here
That is due to the theory of syntactic features developed years ago and is not quite equivalent to an important distinction in language use henceforth. Conversely, a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is not subject to a general convention regarding the forms grammar thusly. ---- My reputation is not solid. |

Keven
|
Posted - 2011.06.04 19:41:00 -
[10]
Edited by: Keven on 04/06/2011 19:40:43 ah.... southerners....
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |