EVE Search - Concerns about the Methodology and Reasoning of PLEX Price Controls

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Concerns about the Methodology and Reasoning of PLEX Price Controls

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Val'Dore Word Bearers of Chaos Word of Chaos Undivided	Posted - 2011.05.31 04:52:00 - [1] I'm not trying to regurgitate the current social expansion curfuffle. My concerns are not related to that or to AURUM. I, and I would assume others, are interested in what exactly CCP has planned to do if the PLEXFlow is not going in the right direction. Are you going to implement NPC market controls? If so, will your accountants be leaving some open job positions? Are you going to directly alter player market trends by directly altering buy and sell orders for PLEX? How are you going to make these control mechanisms work without both destroying the PLEXconomy and the problem they seem to be creating for CCP? How are you going to deal with infuriated PLEXtraders? Or for that matter the general EvE population? How do you respond to concerns that any course of action is going to have an immediate and decisively negative effect on the PLEX market? Are you going to implement price fixing? If so, how are you going to counter the argument that you are locking in an RMT standard exchange rate? How does your accounting department come to the conclusion that something is amiss in the first place? What evidence of a problem are they showcasing? Anyway, any or all of these questions are soon going to be spooged all over this forum, so I thought I'd cap the well before British Petroleum got their hands on it. ~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~ Tiericide
Archbeholder	Posted - 2011.05.31 04:56:00 - [2] A wizard will solve it.
Hecatonis Amarr	Posted - 2011.05.31 05:02:00 - [3] two ways would be the easiest modify the amount of Aurum you get per plex or how much Aurum something costs you __________________________________________________ stop acting like tw*ts and use your brain
Val'Dore Word Bearers of Chaos Word of Chaos Undivided	Posted - 2011.05.31 05:03:00 - [4] Originally by: Hecatonis two ways would be the easiest modify the amount of Aurum you get per plex or how much Aurum something costs you It has been indicated that the PLEX 'problem' exists already, so I'm not sure how AURUM trading can fix it. ~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~ Tiericide
EnslaverOfMinmatar Amarr	Posted - 2011.05.31 05:17:00 - [5] ISK will inflate uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ʎɯ ƃuıpɐǝɹ ǝɹɐ noʎ
Val'Dore Word Bearers of Chaos Word of Chaos Undivided	Posted - 2011.05.31 06:26:00 - [6] Originally by: EnslaverOfMinmatar ISK will inflate Are you sure? ~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~ Tiericide
fgft Athonille	Posted - 2011.05.31 07:28:00 - [7] most likely, they will wait until the number hits their breakpoint, and then seed the market with npc orders at X amount in every region with plex. stupid, but this is ccp. path of least resistance
Lidia Prince Caldari	Posted - 2011.05.31 07:36:00 - [8] Originally by: EnslaverOfMinmatar ISK will inflate Already, and slowly moving further. AUR shop should fix it a bit, if it will work as intended of course. PLEX will probably continue to rise anyway, just like before. Damn, too much people choose to buy their game time via PLEX, why shouldn't it?
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force	Posted - 2011.05.31 07:46:00 - [9] MD has been discussing this ever since Doc.E.G. first blurted out his "we may or may not intervene in the PLEX market" line at the Fanfest presentation. There is not much of a consensus on what he meant, but the general ideas that hold some water are that EITHER he was bluffing in hopes that the mere threat of intervention would stop any sudden fluctuations (yeah, right, as if that's going to happen) OR that CCP is willing to slightly shoot themselves in the foot by actually intervening (in which case, the only non-laughable method of intervention would be to put up CCP-controlled "fake player" orders for PLEX at certain values they wish to be the limits - in which case, for buy orders, they basically sell ISK assisting inflation, or, for sell orders, they are basically giving away free subscription time). _ Make ISK\|\|Build\|\|React\|\|1k papercuts
Surfin's PlunderBunny Minmatar The Python Cartel. The Defenders of Pen Island	Posted - 2011.05.31 08:06:00 - [10] Meh, with PLEX prices going insane I'll either make a ton of isk or not pay for Eve for the next year... either way I'm happy Originally by: Xenuria I don't need a LICENSE to take a photoshooped image and lay it on top of the game client and make pretend my character is naked.
salty Milk	Posted - 2011.05.31 09:50:00 - [11] to control plex prices on market i would create feasible looking fake player accounts for free because i own the servers create some plex for free because i own the servers give the plex to the fake player floodsell the plex on the market driving down prices lol @ realising nobody will ever know
salty Milk	Posted - 2011.05.31 09:53:00 - [12] Originally by: Akita T (they are basically giving away free subscription time). if only they could think of a way of sinking plex into something else that has no inherent value to avoid some of this unfortunate side effect
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force	Posted - 2011.05.31 10:29:00 - [13] Originally by: salty Milk Originally by: Akita T with CCP-controlled "fake player" sell orders for PLEX, they are basically giving away free subscription time if only they could think of a way of sinking plex into something else that has no inherent value to avoid some of this unfortunate side effect Right... because giving away some free subs to a several people in order to lower the price of PLEX which increased because of that other method of sinking PLEX meant to increase their revenue and diminish the amount of PLEX being stockpiled makes oh, so much sense... _ Make ISK\|\|Build\|\|React\|\|1k papercuts
salty Milk	Posted - 2011.05.31 10:31:00 - [14] Originally by: Akita T Originally by: salty Milk Originally by: Akita T with CCP-controlled "fake player" sell orders for PLEX, they are basically giving away free subscription time if only they could think of a way of sinking plex into something else that has no inherent value to avoid some of this unfortunate side effect Right... because giving away some free subs to a several people in order to lower the price of PLEX which increased because of that other method of sinking PLEX meant to increase their revenue and diminish the amount of PLEX being stockpiled makes oh, so much sense... oooh akita eyeroll /emote i win!
Riley Moore Sentinum Research	Posted - 2011.05.31 10:32:00 - [15] NPC stealth buy orders. --- Sentinum Research Store
Grey Stormshadow Starwreck Industries	Posted - 2011.05.31 11:01:00 - [16] As I already suggested in some other thread... As plex really isn't item, but 30 days of game time, special rules should be applied to prevent market manipulation of such product. Most efficient method I can come up with is really simple. Bind the PLEX to account after it has changed hands in game first time. This can happen thru market, trading, contract, looting or by any other available method. No more investing to PLEX. All PLEXes bought by players are converted to game time. CCP sets up fixed low buy order. If demand for game time is low, people sell directly to that. Problem solved. Next task... create more isk sinks. Change current npc driven ship insurance system to contract based player corp controlled one to help with the cause. Introduce progressive sov holding fees/taxes for 0.0 alliances to combat rmt/botting/insane renting fees/isk faucets... and so on .) ------------------------------------------------- Play with the best - die like the rest starwreck.com - support the cause :)
Val'Dore Word Bearers of Chaos Word of Chaos Undivided	Posted - 2011.05.31 14:58:00 - [17] Originally by: Akita T MD has been discussing this ever since Doc.E.G. first blurted out his "we may or may not intervene in the PLEX market" line at the Fanfest presentation. There is not much of a consensus on what he meant, but the general ideas that hold some water are that EITHER he was bluffing in hopes that the mere threat of intervention would stop any sudden fluctuations (yeah, right, as if that's going to happen) OR that CCP is willing to slightly shoot themselves in the foot by actually intervening (in which case, the only non-laughable method of intervention would be to put up CCP-controlled "fake player" orders for PLEX at certain values they wish to be the limits - in which case, for buy orders, they basically sell ISK assisting inflation, or, for sell orders, they are basically giving away free subscription time). Right, I can't imagine that a solution worse than the problem would be their route of choice. Even given CCP's development history. Originally by: salty Milk to control plex prices on market i would create feasible looking fake player accounts for free because i own the servers create some plex for free because i own the servers give the plex to the fake player floodsell the plex on the market driving down prices lol @ realising nobody will ever know The problem with that is the same as if they used NPCs to do it. CCP is either losing actual revenue replaced with a currency sink or directly engaging in fixed RMT pricing allowing anyone to pay a standard rate for a standard amount of ingame currency. Neither would look good for CCP. Originally by: Grey Stormshadow As I already suggested in some other thread... As plex really isn't item, but 30 days of game time, special rules should be applied to prevent market manipulation of such product. Most efficient method I can come up with is really simple. Bind the PLEX to account after it has changed hands in game first time. This can happen thru market, trading, contract, looting or by any other available method. No more investing to PLEX. All PLEXes bought by players are converted to game time. CCP sets up fixed low buy order. If demand for game time is low, people sell directly to that. Problem solved. That wouldn't necessarily solve the problem. It will just drive the prices of PLEX through the roof, since supply will take a major hit. ~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~ Tiericide
Grey Stormshadow Starwreck Industries	Posted - 2011.05.31 15:13:00 - [18] Originally by: Val'Dore Originally by: Grey Stormshadow As plex really isn't item, but 30 days of game time, special rules should be applied to prevent market manipulation of such product. Most efficient method I can come up with is really simple. Bind the PLEX to account after it has changed hands in game first time. This can happen thru market, trading, contract, looting or by any other available method. No more investing to PLEX. All PLEXes bought by players are converted to game time. CCP sets up fixed low buy order. If demand for game time is low, people sell directly to that. Problem solved. That wouldn't necessarily solve the problem. It will just drive the prices of PLEX through the roof, since supply will take a major hit. Hmm why is that? The supply should remain pretty much same. Can't see how this would limit the people who buy the PLEXes from CCP and put them to the market for sale. They still can set the price and sell as many they want. Only the ones who buy the plex from market are pretty much commited to turn it to game time after this. ------------------------------------------------- Play with the best - die like the rest starwreck.com - support the cause :)
Mister Rocknrolla	Posted - 2011.05.31 15:35:00 - [19] Why not just make the price of GTC fluctuate? That way they are not messing with the in-game economy. All PLEX originate with GTC purchases. Given the current price for PLEX, drop the price of GTC to 27,99. Probably won't make the CCP accountants happy, but accounting has never been an Icelandic strongsuit anyway. Of course, you start bumping into one of the original theories behind GTC/PLEX (alternative to RMT). But if the RMT fight is won on the enforcement front (supposed banning of thousands of accounts) then that give some flexibility to GTC pricing. As has been stated in many threads, the current price run-up is probably being driven by PLEX speculators. There are plenty of PLEX in-game, they're just not on the market. The quicker AUR gets on the market to flush some of those out, the better. Right now it's a battle between CCP and the speculators. Making rash decisions prior to implementation of AUR (to see how it shakes up the market) would be unlikely. Also, as I recall Dr. E mentioned that no information about the "unseen hand" tweaking the market would be released until after the fact.
Steve Seninard	Posted - 2011.05.31 15:35:00 - [20] So, basically, everyone living in their mother's basement who hasn't seen a job/daylight in 6 months is getting upset that they have to work harder to earn a free sub. Boo freaking hoo.
Hori To Masuat'aa Matari	Posted - 2011.05.31 15:39:00 - [21] this whole plex - elfmoney thing makes eve feel less like eve imho...
enterprisePSI Unimatrix 0.1	Posted - 2011.05.31 15:42:00 - [22] i dream of plex @ 800mil
Riley Moore Sentinum Research	Posted - 2011.05.31 15:42:00 - [23] Originally by: Steve Seninard So, basically, everyone living in their mother's basement who hasn't seen a job/daylight in 6 months is getting upset that they have to work harder to earn a free sub. Boo freaking hoo. Students saving hard to continue paying university physics and astrology education who are finding it hard to get a job comfortable with their current curriculum time tables? If so, Hi o/
Jaari Val'Dara Caldari Deep Space Nomads Corp	Posted - 2011.05.31 15:44:00 - [24] Originally by: Steve Seninard So, basically, everyone living in their mother's basement who hasn't seen a job/daylight in 6 months is getting upset that they have to work harder to earn a free sub. Boo freaking hoo. People living in 3rd world countries where you can earn more in eve than in real life.
Val'Dore Word Bearers of Chaos Word of Chaos Undivided	Posted - 2011.05.31 16:14:00 - [25] Originally by: Grey Stormshadow Originally by: Val'Dore Originally by: Grey Stormshadow As plex really isn't item, but 30 days of game time, special rules should be applied to prevent market manipulation of such product. Most efficient method I can come up with is really simple. Bind the PLEX to account after it has changed hands in game first time. This can happen thru market, trading, contract, looting or by any other available method. No more investing to PLEX. All PLEXes bought by players are converted to game time. CCP sets up fixed low buy order. If demand for game time is low, people sell directly to that. Problem solved. That wouldn't necessarily solve the problem. It will just drive the prices of PLEX through the roof, since supply will take a major hit. Hmm why is that? The supply should remain pretty much same. Can't see how this would limit the people who buy the PLEXes from CCP and put them to the market for sale. They still can set the price and sell as many they want. Only the ones who buy the plex from market are pretty much commited to turn it to game time after this. The supply will drop, because the 'hoarders' will stop hoarding. I should clarify, the price will drop initially, then skyrocket. Originally by: Steve Seninard So, basically, everyone living in their mother's basement who hasn't seen a job/daylight in 6 months is getting upset that they have to work harder to earn a free sub. Boo freaking hoo. You don't understand the topic of discussion. ~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~ Tiericide
zimboyed	Posted - 2011.05.31 16:37:00 - [26] Originally by: Jaari Val'Dara Originally by: Steve Seninard So, basically, everyone living in their mother's basement who hasn't seen a job/daylight in 6 months is getting upset that they have to work harder to earn a free sub. Boo freaking hoo. People living in 3rd world countries where you can earn more in eve than in real life. you know this is so true
Jaari Val'Dara Caldari Deep Space Nomads Corp	Posted - 2011.05.31 16:54:00 - [27] Originally by: zimboyed Originally by: Jaari Val'Dara Originally by: Steve Seninard So, basically, everyone living in their mother's basement who hasn't seen a job/daylight in 6 months is getting upset that they have to work harder to earn a free sub. Boo freaking hoo. People living in 3rd world countries where you can earn more in eve than in real life. you know this is so true Assuming you earn 50kk isk/h and assuming 40 hour work week, you can earn 104bill per year. Or 8.66bill a month. Plex prices are fluctuating much now, but lets assume them to be 400kk each. You can buy 21 plex each month. Thats 367$ a month. Thats slightly more than minimum wage in my country. Thats not even considering that 50kk can be easily earned farming in null, you can easily increase that with some effort.
Diomedes Calypso	Posted - 2011.05.31 17:08:00 - [28] Originally by: Akita T MD has been discussing this ever since Doc.E.G. first blurted out his "we may or may not intervene in the PLEX market" line at the Fanfest presentation. There is not much of a consensus on what he meant, but the general ideas that hold some water are that EITHER he was bluffing in hopes that the mere threat of intervention would stop any sudden fluctuations (yeah, right, as if that's going to happen) OR that CCP is willing to slightly shoot themselves in the foot by actually intervening (in which case, the only non-laughable method of intervention would be to put up CCP-controlled "fake player" orders for PLEX at certain values they wish to be the limits - in which case, for buy orders, they basically sell ISK assisting inflation, or, for sell orders, they are basically giving away free subscription time). CCP can sell some isk via plex creation without creating inflation with tiny other steps that they take already. CCp can sell some extra plex without costing them real $ doing so. I see the anger over plex market intervention coming from players under some delusion that they create isk by ratting, that their labor has created it, not some arbitrary CCP choice . TheyÆre also under some moral delusion that CCP is required by what is good and right and honest in the world to link game time to isk value and that its not just one other balancing concern like what should drop in a wreck, or how much minerals can come out of a moon monthly, or what the speed of a new ship should be. Separate the moral and the practical arguments. We canÆt talk intelligently about either if combining the twoàit turns into whack-a-mole. We can talk about if it would work. ( I know that you could make it work) We can talk about whether it is something that violates trust of players. (we could differ here but practicality has nothing to do with it)
Diomedes Calypso	Posted - 2011.05.31 17:15:00 - [29] On the MD board there is hardly any consensus with the rabid lassiz-faire group outright rejecting interference more as a matter of philosophy than practicality. Many same people also have huge issues with RL international finance and strongly believe that the world financial crisis would have been avoided had there been no governments rather than believing that the failure was lack of stricter oversight of the banks ala depression era laws by the Federal Reserve. They hold rather extreme views RL, whether right or wrong. In my opinion, theyÆre bringing some extreme views, largely based on something close to a Ayne Rand moral philosophy of government and even if those were to apply in RL, to bring them to a utterly contrived economy where player contribution is far higher than most other games but probably still only 50% of the economy. Spawing of resources, item drops, bounty levels and frequency are all dialed up and down, entirely elective to game balance and are in no way disclosed as fixed game rules and which rates would not change without specific disclosure of the new rates. Back to Akita's points. He says the right thing about possible actions but casts them in negative light implying that they would be unworkable. HeÆs correct that stealth plex purchases would effectively be selling some isk directly to players. But implying that would be unworkable on its face drastically simplifies the issue and approaches the point of being a rhetorical fallacy. Selling isk would only cause inflation to the extent they needed to buy plex to stabilize the price on the downside (I'd estimate a 300 million-ish downside target). I would grant that replacing the entire volume of the $>plex>isk trade would be difficult for them to do without inflation (and hence a good reason for them adopting the entirely un-required option to link free game time to isk transfers). But to stabilize the price of a commodity like plex, they would only need to make purchases of a small fraction of market volume, and likely only during select times where demand varies related to things like holiday/acamemic callender and expansion cycles. Purchases in the %5 of annual volume range, maybe 10 to 15% of volume during those select cycles would be enough. Assuming however that protecting the downside did require purchases of 10% of annual volume .. that ammount could be made up with new isk sinks (selling specialty clothing itmes during special promotion for isk, not aurum would be a good temporary sink û IÆd never buy them but all it would take would be for some players to be interested) Alternatively they could just adjust the isk faucet flow rate at those times .. most easily the isk bounties paid.... just less 1.5 million spawns, replaced with 1.3 million spawns...mission battleships maybe 430k instead of 465k etc . On the other side of the equation, capping plex price, to the extent that they ôresoldö the plex they bought at low parts of the cycle , there would be no impact. That brings us to the other rhetorical flourish, that CCP would suddenly be ôgiving away free game timeö if they introduced more plex to the market.
Diomedes Calypso	Posted - 2011.05.31 17:19:00 - [30] (continued) ..... Hand and hand with the notion that CCP doesnÆt create isk when they pay bounties, that it is somehow created by players killing the ratsà.not just a timing of the ccp creation, people vehemently opposed to intervention have the notion that because players have bought game time with real $ that the average plex activated costs CCP something close to that amount in forgone income . We could all come up with our own seat of the pants estimates, but even the most assumptions based on some good faith pencil to paper consideration could hardly exceed 50% of plex transferred being used for accounts that players would have otherwise paid for. I have 5 accounts, all for free now, but IÆm pretty sure that IÆd only be paying $15 a month and have let the other 4 accounts go if the free game time option didnÆt existàthey are only there for expanding my game play options based on what IÆd earned playing the gameàjust like an epic drop in another game makes my character more powerful. Playing to the game to earn a scout on and second account alt is also and advance based on game grind.. On top of that, A fair number of players wouldnÆt play at all without a free to play option, but those players still have some $ value to CCP as they might occasionally pay a month here or there, or more importantly attract or retain gamer friends of their s who are paying customers. Word of mouth is by far the best advertising. IÆd be surprised if the variable expenses of having even another RL player logging in regurlary would cost them even 1$ a month in extra variable expenses. A 5th account probably doesnÆt even cost them even 20 cents a month more as it wouldnÆt have any net increase in my online time as IÆd never have all of the accounts logged in simultaneously and rarely even 3. TLDR on point intervention on the upside -- plex used for free play cannibalize very few cash sales and have very little financial impact on CCPà if they created enough plex to stabilize markets on the upside, theyÆd cost themselves very little in terms of extra expenses, and IÆve made detailed arguments on the MD board that I suspect they net noticeably fewer $plex sales as the prices rise beyond a certain point as the buyers isk needs are fulfilled with less $ and to a degree, the higher plex/isk prices disgruntle a few percent more players out of the game. My main point: CCP can sell some isk via plex creation without creating inflation with tiny other steps that they take already. CCp can sell some extra plex without costing them real $ doing so.
Ruthless Erection	Posted - 2011.05.31 17:24:00 - [31] ISK Sink: High-Sec: Insurance stays the same. Low-Sec: Insurance returns 50% Null-Sec: No Insurance. Plex's jumped from 405m to 420m over night. People aren't giving away "free" subscription time. CCP had a semi-flawless system until people buy 100+ plex, and ** the market up. Player A buys a ETC for 35$ USD. Player B buys for 405mill. CCP makes the 15$ Sub time for Player B, and Player A earns money in return for spending his real life cash. CCP thought this out thoroughly until Aurum came about. As someone who uses PLEX to pay for his sub time, I'm considering quitting EVE. The prices of PLEX are absurd, they shafted 0.0, they shafted missions, I make 26k less in L5 missions. It's ****ed at how they're doing things now. 6 months from now, what are they going to do next? Make Fighter Bombers only do 2k damage?
Val'Dore Word Bearers of Chaos Word of Chaos Undivided	Posted - 2011.05.31 17:29:00 - [32] Originally by: Diomedes Calypso My main point: CCP can sell some isk via plex creation without creating inflation with tiny other steps that they take already. CCp can sell some extra plex without costing them real $ doing so. Very nice postset. I'll be mulling over it for a bit. ~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~ Tiericide
Val'Dore Word Bearers of Chaos Word of Chaos Undivided	Posted - 2011.05.31 21:58:00 - [33] Now that everything died down a bit... still waiting to see what CCP is going to say about this. ~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~ Tiericide
Aylara	Posted - 2011.06.01 08:18:00 - [34] Originally by: Grey Stormshadow As I already suggested in some other thread... As plex really isn't item, but 30 days of game time, special rules should be applied to prevent market manipulation of such product. Most efficient method I can come up with is really simple. Bind the PLEX to account after it has changed hands in game first time. This can happen thru market, trading, contract, looting or by any other available method. No more investing to PLEX. All PLEXes bought by players are converted to game time. CCP sets up fixed low buy order. If demand for game time is low, people sell directly to that. Problem solved. Next task... create more isk sinks. Change current npc driven ship insurance system to contract based player corp controlled one to help with the cause. Introduce progressive sov holding fees/taxes for 0.0 alliances to combat rmt/botting/insane renting fees/isk faucets... and so on .) Ha ha ha, that would make PLEX hoarders furious Anyway, this is how I thought it's going to be when CCP talked about PLEX a long time ago.
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force	Posted - 2011.06.01 09:01:00 - [35] Originally by: Diomedes Calypso a lot of reasonable stuff with some assumptions Hey, that's why I said they would "SLIGHTLY shoot themselves in the foot". Emphasis on the slightly. I merely said what I said as a statement of fact, if you chose to take it as me expressing any overly negative connotations, that was an assignment of your own creation, reading far too much between the lines. But other than that, I can't really disagree with much else you said For instance, yes, in the short run, CCP covertly selling PLEX to keep PLEX prices from spiraling upwards out of control would mean a short-term "opportunity cost" loss, but in the long run, it might foster a larger stable player base which will end up eating up more PLEX naturally - it's only a matter of just how many PLEX they'd have to "disperse for free" in a stealthy fashion (and for how long) to keep prices within certain limits which would keep enough additional people in play in the long run. If they'd have to keep doing that on a regular basis for the foreseeable future and in non-negligible amounts, then it wouldn't be worth the bother, since, well, what's the point (in fact, it could very well end up as a net loss of income). If instead they'd only need small quantities at widely spaced intervals, then it would be a net gain, a win-win situation. Problem is, it's hard to predict what would actually happen and what it would take to make the more desirable option happen, if at all possible. _ Make ISK\|\|Build\|\|React\|\|1k papercuts
Sisohiv Gallente Center for Advanced Studies	Posted - 2011.06.01 09:37:00 - [36] They have bigger troubles. I had a heck of a time running 2 clients on duality and it was client side, not server. Docking and undocking one while the other one mined. That was on low/ off settings for everything. Alts are going to lose appeal if the game keeps eating ram like it does. It doesnt matter if the second account is free if you can't run it. Think, people wont be able to neutral, RR in Jita no more either
Val'Dore Word Bearers of Chaos Word of Chaos Undivided	Posted - 2011.06.01 15:41:00 - [37] Originally by: Sisohiv They have bigger troubles. I had a heck of a time running 2 clients on duality and it was client side, not server. Docking and undocking one while the other one mined. That was on low/ off settings for everything. Alts are going to lose appeal if the game keeps eating ram like it does. It doesnt matter if the second account is free if you can't run it. Think, people wont be able to neutral, RR in Jita no more either Well I'm not crying over spilt alts. They should almost be considered exploits in a lot of scenarios. ~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~ Tiericide
clixor Celluloid Gurus	Posted - 2011.06.02 10:53:00 - [38] Let go back to the basics. The supply of PLEXes need to be increased, CCP can't do that themselves, we've passed that stage. The ONLY instrument CCP has to persuade people to buy PLEX with cash is to lower the price. Ofcourse CCP is reluctant to do that as they would be effectivelaty reduce subscription fees. So the whole CCP intervening in the PLEX market and monitoring ... is a whole big joke if not just a lie.
Val'Dore Word Bearers of Chaos Word of Chaos Undivided	Posted - 2011.06.03 07:17:00 - [39] I don't think CCP is dumb enough to sell PLEX out of thin air with nothing to show for it on the balance sheet. So they must have something else in mind... ~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~ Tiericide
Medidranda Livoga	Posted - 2011.06.03 07:51:00 - [40] For PLEX availability to expand alot I think sell price of about 500m is where it is at. I would definitely consider selling couple if I could get a billion isk for two timecards. Below that, nope. I`m sure there are plenty of people who have similar threshold.
Florestan Bronstein draketrain Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.06.03 08:16:00 - [41] Edited by: Florestan Bronstein on 03/06/2011 08:23:04 If CCP's hopes for Incarna work out we will get many new players and more newbies means higher PLEX supply (CCP even emails all new accounts a few days after creation to tell them about the ability to buy ISK by selling PLEX). Why start crazy market interventions (and distribute free subscriptions) over a problem that might work itself out over a month's time anyways. You don't intervene in a market if you know that market will face a shock very soon (and are not extremely sure about direction/magnitude of that shock) - you wait for the shock to materialize and then try to respond.
Mnengli Noiliffe	Posted - 2011.06.03 08:23:00 - [42] are you people blind? PLEX prices are ALREADY being controlled! look at them, they used to rise like crazy and now they are actually falling. it used to be 404 on buy order and 414 on sell, now its less than 400 buy orders and less than 410 on sells.
Florestan Bronstein draketrain Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.06.03 08:26:00 - [43] Edited by: Florestan Bronstein on 03/06/2011 08:26:22 Originally by: Mnengli Noiliffe are you people blind? PLEX prices are ALREADY being controlled! look at them, they used to rise like crazy and now they are actually falling. it used to be 404 on buy order and 414 on sell, now its less than 400 buy orders and less than 410 on sells. maybe they are, maybe they are not That's the beauty of expectations... if people feel that PLEX prices may be too high any trader can just start setting up very small quantity orders at lower prices that look somehow artificial and everyone will go into "OMG CCP MARKET CONTROLZ" mode and plex prices fall.
Astroka	Posted - 2011.06.03 09:06:00 - [44] I have concerns about why devs rarely post in threads like this, but will get involved in a threads about, say, putting beer in a soda stream. Originally by: Ioci Welcome to the bustedness of EVE. 1 guy can disband a 2000 man alliance and wipe out trillions, that's cool. Give back a noob 10 mill? No, that's game breaking.
Wyke Mossari Gallente	Posted - 2011.06.03 09:55:00 - [45] Edited by: Wyke Mossari on 03/06/2011 09:57:36 The aghast makes no sense. The price of PLEX is rising because demand is outstripping supply, if they become too expensive demand will fall as will the price. The whiners are clearly the minority otherwise the price would not be rising. QED. The recent extra demand is a direct result of speculation with regard to upcoming Incarna release and vanity items. This is rather ironic, because the concerns about other uses for PLEX was that real life wealth should not result in an in-game advantage. When what seems to be happening is the opposite, in-game wealth looks set to fuel vanity item demand. In regards to intervention, the suggestion it was "blurted out" which implies it was accidental. When it was clearly one of the key objectives made as the culmination of an important part of the presentation. Watch the video on youtube if there is any doubt. There were several important clues as to the mode of intervention. They were seen as an outstanding success because PLEX trading was a growth area in price and volume. Therefore it would make no sense for the intervention to be a CAP. The most like intervention would be price support if there was a price crash. That should not be a cause for concern because we are already suffering from a period of deep deflation, so anything that improves liquidity would be a very good thingÖ. PLEX are a great source of liquidity for the wider player base. They transfer the liquidity from the liquidity trap at the top of the large alliances, which have fat wallets but need PLEX to support the armies of management and logistics alts necessary.
clixor Celluloid Gurus	Posted - 2011.06.03 10:01:00 - [46] Originally by: Wyke Mossari Edited by: Wyke Mossari on 03/06/2011 09:57:36 The aghast makes no sense. The price of PLEX is rising because demand is outstripping supply, if they become too expensive demand will fall as will the price. The whiners are clearly the minority otherwise the price would not be rising. QED. PLEX is like food, people will need to eat, even with higher food prices people need to buy it. Sure, people will stop buying them, if they run out of isk. And after that they probably won't ever activate that account again (most likely will sell the character).
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force	Posted - 2011.06.03 10:38:00 - [47] Originally by: Astroka I have concerns about why devs rarely post in threads like this, but will get involved in a threads about, say, putting beer in a soda stream. Company policy, obviously. You can't have one dev posting something that's only his personal opinion regarding game design/balance choices, even if he clearly states it to be so, you'd only get people riled up like mad even if his proposals would be awesome (or, worse, if his proposals turn out to be awesome but never implemented due to lack of manpower, or any other number of things that can go wrong). To not post personal opinions but official statements, you need to sign the triplicate YTEC534-b form, sign it in blood, present it on a moonless night to your shaman, do 50 backflips in a row and water the azalea growing on the top of the volcano. Then allow 2 weeks for processing. It's no wonder most of the devs will post with their dev characters in threads that are inconsequential, but not in threads where the debate is heated and there is no CCP full consensus yet. When there is, blogs or newsitems appear. _ Make ISK\|\|Build\|\|React\|\|1k papercuts
Val'Dore Word Bearers of Chaos Word of Chaos Undivided	Posted - 2011.06.04 14:33:00 - [48] Originally by: Wyke Mossari The aghast makes no sense. The price of PLEX is rising because demand is outstripping supply, if they become too expensive demand will fall as will the price. The whiners are clearly the minority otherwise the price would not be rising. QED. As far as I am aware, this thread is not about the PLEX market specifically. It is about CCP's own statement that they may or may not be planning to interfere with it. Quote: The recent extra demand is a direct result of speculation with regard to upcoming Incarna release and vanity items. This is rather ironic, because the concerns about other uses for PLEX was that real life wealth should not result in an in-game advantage. When what seems to be happening is the opposite, in-game wealth looks set to fuel vanity item demand. And if CCP is planning to play SEC, then that is just another market that will be affected. You do realize that PLEX price fixing in many forms will create a locked in RMT value for ISK, right? CCP will actually be endorsing it indirectly. Quote: In regards to intervention, the suggestion it was "blurted out" which implies it was accidental. When it was clearly one of the key objectives made as the culmination of an important part of the presentation. Watch the video on youtube if there is any doubt. Blurted or blatant, it makes little difference. CCP must lay out the plan they have in motion. There is a large potential for a player exodus over this and I think most of the other people want to have some idea of what might happen to our 30-50 BN ISK investments. Quote: There were several important clues as to the mode of intervention. They were seen as an outstanding success because PLEX trading was a growth area in price and volume. Therefore it would make no sense for the intervention to be a CAP. The most like intervention would be price support if there was a price crash. That is an assumption. We already know CCP is not as market savvy as they appear to be. So confirmation on what exactly they intend is required. CCP ignoring this issue is tantamount to telling us our worst case scenario is in fact, the route they intend. They give us no alternative until they clarify everything. Quote: That should not be a cause for concern because we are already suffering from a period of deep deflation, so anything that improves liquidity would be a very good thingÖ. Yes and no, while technically the value of ISK does inflate, since the total volume increases exponentially, the market typically shows an opposite effect. Quote: PLEX are a great source of liquidity for the wider player base. They transfer the liquidity from the liquidity trap at the top of the large alliances, which have fat wallets but need PLEX to support the armies of management and logistics alts necessary. Wouldn't they want to know what might happen to their own bottom line? You can't really argue against disclosure on something like this. ~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~ Tiericide

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.