| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Souisa
WESCORP 2.0
2
   |
Posted - 2012.09.10 10:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hello,
Im a casual player, a loner. I like to do things my way, at my own speed :) Ive played eve for some time now and ive tried a bit of it all. I currently live in low-sec.
Apparantly there are some myths regarding it. First of all its not more dangerous than 0.0, specifcally because there are no warp bubbles. However there are still certain chokepoints that you have to be aware of, and check, to avoid being smartbombed. To earn money in low-sec you can arrange a POS empire, because no-one bothers to shoot POS'es- possibly a failed mechanic tho - you can do exploration, even faction warfare. Its not hard to earn money, and it opens up to so many other areas of gameplay. Add to that the most awesome players seem to be in low-sec, at least there is a more relaxed atmosphere. Maybe someone can explain what exactly the problem with low-sec is? I think its fine as it is |
Souisa
WESCORP 2.0
2
|
Posted - 2012.09.10 10:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
No i have flown POS parts through amamake the past few days. If you have someone to scout you are alright |
Souisa
WESCORP 2.0
2
|
Posted - 2012.09.10 10:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Haha i went to rancer as well to check it out, because it sounded like the shithole of eve. Wasnt very busy tho, but there were evidence of recent ganks and what not |
Souisa
WESCORP 2.0
2
|
Posted - 2012.09.10 11:01:00 -
[4] - Quote
Heh :) Im more of the amamake type tho |
Souisa
WESCORP 2.0
2
|
Posted - 2012.09.10 11:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
Actually it was a response to people saying low-sec is broken. Its not, and it doesent need a unique mineral only found there. Then the big organisations will take over, and go out of their way to force everyone else out |
Souisa
WESCORP 2.0
2
|
Posted - 2012.09.10 11:20:00 -
[6] - Quote
I find it amusing how basically every 0.0 alliance is recruiting. It didnt always use to be like this. If someone wants 0.0 they can basically pick any alliance they want and gogo |
Souisa
WESCORP 2.0
6
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 01:11:00 -
[7] - Quote
null sec and low sec are two completely different things imo, low sec is the land of oppertunity, plenty of space and if your doing it right you are never more than a few jumps away from the trade hubs. 0.0 relies on logistics, pos refueling, and somewhat tedius crap. low sec also has this, but its easier on smaller groups and even lone types |
Souisa
WESCORP 2.0
7
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 10:08:00 -
[8] - Quote
Just go to 0.0 if you dont like sec status loss |
Souisa
WESCORP 2.0
7
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 10:14:00 -
[9] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:Souisa wrote:Just go to 0.0 if you dont like sec status loss Quite a stupid reasoning. Sec loss doesn't actually add anything nor does it actually prevent anything in regards to lowsec, it actually prevents some from PVPing in Lowsec. So if it actually has no effect in low sec then why is it gained in there? Saying just go to 0.0 is a lazy rebuttal. Try harder.
There should be consequences for attacking someone in low-sec. If you want PVP with no strings attached just go to 0.0 |
Souisa
WESCORP 2.0
8
|
Posted - 2012.09.15 12:02:00 -
[10] - Quote
I dont know if low-sec is empty. At least you have to be near a trude-hub in order to profit well from it, else you would be just as well off in 0.0. Other people seem to agree on this, and the system i currently moved to have alot of activity in the neighbouring system which i coincidentally have to go through if i want to get to the trade hub. However its much safer than amamake or rancer and the trade hub is not Rens or Jita quality, but that only makes it better for me, as i can help develop it and make some easy ISK as well. Oh, and Rens is not far away anyway so i can still go and dslfjdlgjlagjsklgj if i want |
Souisa
WESCORP 2.0
8
|
Posted - 2012.09.15 15:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
Merovee wrote:Brooks Puuntai wrote:Its lowsec anyone you don't know should be considered a target, regardless of FW standings.
Which reminds me sec loss is another bad idea for lowsec. If concord is too lazy to patrol lowsec then wtf are they doing removing security status. Keep sec loss for highsec criminal actions only. This above all else is the major reason why people don't go to low-sec, just remove the sec loss and lets see what happens, it could be that this simple little fix is all that is needed to buff low-sec. 
If that is implemented then no-one will think twice about shooting anyone, and you wont be able to distingush hostile players from neutral ones which means low sec will be even less stable |
| |
|