| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Ghazu
153
|
Posted - 2012.09.10 16:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:handige harrie wrote:Goons are doing EVE a favor by removing stupid and restoring the NAV/smarts balance I found the hidden msg you cleverly hid in there. hur hur hur poo booger |

Ghazu
153
|
Posted - 2012.09.10 16:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:Ghazu wrote:Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:handige harrie wrote:Goons are doing EVE a favor by removing stupid and restoring the NAV/smarts balance I found the hidden msg you cleverly hid in there. hur hur hur poo booger That's all I hear when you Goons talk, no matter what you say...just sounds like that. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1903756#post1903756 |

Ghazu
153
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 01:31:00 -
[3] - Quote
Paul Oliver wrote:Ganthrithor wrote:Seriously, you have no god-given right to total diplomatic immunity in highsec. If you can't deal with that reality then why torture yourself paying a monthly fee to inhabit a virtual world that you don't like? Oh come off it Goon, I've only been at this 18 days and even I can see the issue here is your coalition has become so powerful that the only thing left for you guys to do is wreak havoc on highsec. WE ARE DOING GOD'S WORK |

Ghazu
153
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 01:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
Paul Oliver wrote:Nah you got it all wrong Goon, I actually agree to a point with you when it comes to freighters and such, it's your self rightous elitist attitude that seems so common among you and your peers that I'm allergic to. christ go back to that like and get liked thread, this aint a nice place for you. |

Ghazu
157
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 03:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:Powers Sa wrote:Paul Oliver wrote:Powers Sa wrote:Paul Oliver wrote:Nah you got it all wrong Goon, I actually agree to a point with you when it comes to freighters and such, it's your self rightous elitist attitude that seems so common among you and your peers that I'm allergic to. I'm roleplaying, holy cow. Maybe you got "Intergalactic Summit" and "General Discussion" mixed up?  It is a little fun leaving a swath of staggering destruction in your wake. Role playing a jerk, while pointing out the methodology for target selection, while trying to help people might seem arrogant, I know, but this is unprecedented destruction doled out by a small group of bored goons. We surpassed burn jita destruction, which was only 515bil by my record. A certain aura of smug is really hard to shake, so a few guys will probably come off as over the top. I wouldn't read into it too much. They probably were stuck scanning freighters for 3 hours at a time. A little forum bitching keeps them going. Every time we talk about some goofy thing we do outside of nullsec, CCP swoops in and murders the parties involved. This time we picked something that plenty of people have done on a small scale, without being exploity. Space Thug means never havin' to say you are sorry, I guess. Role playing a jerk? Is that what goonswarm is doing? Never found you guys to be jerks... more like...acting out because mommy and daddy are not home to supervise you right now. You guys seem more childish and annoying than you do jerks. Edit: As for your ingame actions... honestly I find you quite boring. Your "burn jita" event wasn't very exciting. Ganking AFK ships isn't very exciting. You guys should try to be more exciting. You might play the jerk role ingame...but you play the whine like children role on the forums. tell us about mining in rookie systems |

Ghazu
157
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 03:17:00 -
[6] - Quote
Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:Ghazu wrote:Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:Ghazu wrote:Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:Is griefing/harassing players in rookie systems allowed? There is a guy who's been harassing rookies in a system I mine in. Are you trying to exploit rookie protection? Get out and leave the system for the rookies. I mine there to help the rookies, I give them bonuses, answer questions, and I even give away most the isk I earn to help them out. I am not doing them any harm nor am I hiding out in a rookie system for protection. Are you mining the roids there while you 'help out' I am a miner, of course I mine there. But I don't take all my accounts there to mine all their ore. Wouldn't be helping at that point now would it. But between giving away isk, ships, chasing away exhumers, reporting bots, and trying to answer any questions I might be able to answer, my tiny amount of occasional mining there isn't really an issue. Most of the time local is dead quiet, hard to get people to talk there. Was giving away isk a while back and it took almost an hour before someone finally noticed in local and said something lol. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1872878#post1872878
why of course he mines there because he's a miner and of course it's from the like and get liked thread where dudes go like each other. no because this guy is a joke and like to stroke his epeen in front of wide-eyed new players.
just leave the rookie systems no ifs and buts. |

Ghazu
157
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 03:37:00 -
[7] - Quote
Gizznitt Malikite wrote:[quote=Paul Oliver]It does seem kind of strange that a ship capable of hauling that much cargo which aligns and warps as slowly as a freighter does would not have the ability to fit any sort of defensive modules or atleast a method to avoid being tackled. Also the fact that a ship type that didn't even exist when freighters were introduced is being used exclusively to do the ganking implies that an imbalance exists and should be corrected, after all it's only logical that when a weapon is created that gives one side an advantage over another that a counter is also created.
Tier 3 BCs trade off firepower for weak tank. You don't get to have everything in one ship, if you want tanking power use properly fitted orcas or transport ships or take 2 trips with the freighter. |

Ghazu
157
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 04:26:00 -
[8] - Quote
I think the Maelstrom's bullshit shield boosting bonus should be rebalanced to 10% shield resist or 10% hp per level. |

Ghazu
159
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 07:05:00 -
[9] - Quote
Mars Theran wrote:Malcanis wrote:Paul Oliver wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Mars Theran wrote:I'm still firmly of the opinion that anything without guns to defend itself, flying through any space that has potential hostiles should have been designed to survive most attacks until support arrives. how many tens of thousands of EHP should shuttles have exactly? Moot point, shuttles don't need lots of hitpoints because warp almost instantly. Doesn't help them when they're outpiloting though. Honestly all this "a bloo hoo Freighters can't fight back" is bullshit, because it would matter if you gave freighters 8 doomsdays each, they'll still die because PEOPLE AUTOPILOT THEM. Maybe they autopilot them because there isn't anything else you could do with them. What are you going to do, cycle a module? Read what you wrote again and tell me if it sounds stupid. |

Ghazu
160
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 10:55:00 -
[10] - Quote
Mohamad Transporte wrote:nice to see all the rational and non-rational full of hate posts..
however, majority of post are not realizing the issue here... ganking can't be prevented by having an alt scout or not carrying too much (because this is what freighter supposed to do) and having escort for your frieghter is 90% not feasible practicle
Having an alt scout in high sec is not usefull... u can have ur ganking team sitting in a tactical and aligned to target gate with a cloacky warpin scout, that will give u a direct warp in and u keep bumping the freighter so that he can't align and warp (and also he can't crash gate as well due to his slow movement..)
so practically, freighter is a dump ship with no mean of defense
My suggestion: A- Freighter and jump freighter cant be bumped (that eliminate the cheap cost of blaster ganking ships, however, doesnt solve the alfa-nado kinda ganking)
B- Concorded ships receive 0 isk from insurance due to violation of inter-galactic Laws of high sec ;=)
this means ... ganking will remain possible, however, at high cost, and more isk on stake if nothing drops........
A- If titans can be bumped why can't freighters? Make it so you people are magically protected? You want protection and countermeasures? Use transport ships and orcas, because roles what are they for?
B- Already in effect genius. |

Ghazu
164
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 15:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:Tippia wrote:Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:Freighters deserve slots for fitting tank. How much cargo space are you willing to give up? None. There is no need to reduce the cargo space to fit tank. Fit a tank at the cost of what? Painfully foregoing cargo expander IIs? |

Ghazu
164
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 15:18:00 -
[12] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Yokai Mitsuhide wrote: So simply don't allow cargo expanders to be able to be fit to freighters. Though they will make themselves even slower and more easy of a target so...that only hurts the ones who choose not to fit a tank.
GǪor, much simpler, just accept that the tank is inherent in the ship and that it doesn't particularly need any more. If you have to start changing things that aren't related to the problem you're trying to solve, chances are that the problem is more invented than real. Freighters have a massive tank as it is. The solution is to make use of it and not strain it by trying to protect more than it can protect. Theory crafting with dumb people is futile and not recommended. |

Ghazu
164
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 15:35:00 -
[13] - Quote
Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Yokai mines in rookie systems, there is no level of safety powerful enough for him I rarely undock, I hang out in rookie systems to help rookies by giving away isk/ships. Perhaps you should get your information correct instead of just going by what that one obsessed goon says. :) You do mine there. Leave. Also putting forth your opinions anecdotal analogies and emotes without any coherent arguments is well, dumb. |

Ghazu
164
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 15:42:00 -
[14] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Samahiel Sotken wrote:this is why we all joined after watching all those trailers Then why not go and do something nobody has done before: gank fully tanked Damnation in 1.0 system. I've been trying but can't seem to scan any that's blinged out enough to worth the :effort: |

Ghazu
164
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 15:55:00 -
[15] - Quote
Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:Ghazu wrote:Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Yokai mines in rookie systems, there is no level of safety powerful enough for him I rarely undock, I hang out in rookie systems to help rookies by giving away isk/ships. Perhaps you should get your information correct instead of just going by what that one obsessed goon says. :) You do mine there. Leave. Also putting forth your opinions anecdotal analogies and emotes without any coherent arguments is well, dumb. Come to the system and see how often I mine... getting tired of listening to how wrong your information is. I expected more from you...but you've let me down :( Your obsession with me is flattering though :) Yeah, your posting is that bad, but fascinating. Stay out of the rookie systems do you understand? |

Ghazu
173
|
Posted - 2012.09.12 12:08:00 -
[16] - Quote
Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:Buck Futz wrote:Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:Buck Futz wrote:So, let me get this straight. Miners were getting ganked, so they cried. CCP gave them a one-size-fits all Exhumer that is unprofitable to gank.
So gankers do what they always do, adapt (yet again), organize and....
LOL!!!!! AHHHHHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!! Good one man..."gankers adapt" Perhaps you've forgotten the Barge fairy tale thread already where you guys have done nothing but whine and cry for hundreds of pages, I am sure it just slipped your mind. Thank you though for the laugh :) What, did you think that gankers are going to stop ganking, simply because solo ganking miners is now impossible? Sorry, thats not happening. They simply find the path of least resistance. Convincing CCP that they screwed up is hard. Killing freighters is relatively easy. Too bad for the freighter pilots. No, I don't expect gankers to stop ganking nor would I want them to. It's just your reply in comparison to how a lot of you gankers reacted to the mining changes... you didn't adapt, you just whined...lol. And here we are again with another whine thread. |

Ghazu
173
|
Posted - 2012.09.12 12:19:00 -
[17] - Quote
uh read the op again? |

Ghazu
173
|
Posted - 2012.09.12 12:22:00 -
[18] - Quote
please? |

Ghazu
178
|
Posted - 2012.09.12 14:47:00 -
[19] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Tippia wrote:Since cost is not a balancing factor, a bunch of cheap ships ruining the day of a much more expensive one is working just as intended. Why I can't find killmail you destroying 2B isk Damnation in 1.0 system? By your logic, it should be easy kill with 60M isk Tornado. Fill the cargo to the brim with 215 plexes and we'll give that dice a roll. |
| |
|