| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cheekyhoe
   |
Posted - 2011.06.13 14:36:00 -
[31]
Yes because freighter pilots need an extra set of fear every time they see sieged dreads out side of 4-4-
|
Val'Dore
Word Bearers of Chaos
Word of Chaos Undivided
|
Posted - 2011.06.13 15:14:00 -
[32]
 Originally by: salty Milk
think about all those third rate alliances that are funded by 3 man "invite only" corps
how would they every survive if dreads were popping off their untouchaposes in hisec?
No idea, I don't know of any of those.
~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~
Tiericide |
Mars Theran
Caldari
EVE Rogues
EVE Rogues Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.06.13 23:21:00 -
[33]
Edited by: Mars Theran on 13/06/2011 23:22:22
Originally by: Naomi Knight
Originally by: Val'Dore
Originally by: Naomi Knight
Stupid idea ,if you want to take down a pos gather a fleet then.
This change would make it impossible to any small corp to hold a pos at all.
Hardly, there are countless POSes in low sec that have nothing to fear. Why would hi sec be so much more dangerous?
Quote:
Tell me what could a 10 or less member corps could do vs 10+ dreads+support , like nothing,as only they could fight due to concord would def the dread fleet vs anybody who isnt wardecked.
Well, it isn't impossible to defeat that. But if someone is going to run a POS valuable enough to be a target, you better be able to defend it yourself. I have no pity for people who deliberately avoid taking responsibility for their own safety.
In low-sec most pos are in big alliances alt posession , and anybody can counter drop a dread fleet anytime without a need for wardec --> ppl dont attack pos just to kill it / small money income.
With your idea ,in high sec nothing could threaten the dread fleet due to wardec is needed , I'm sure you would be a pussiest player fielding your alli dreads in high sec when you are wardecked by a larger alli, who could easily counterdrop you.
You would just wardec small corps and kill their posses knowing that they cant do anything at all to save it. If they want help their friends have to wardec you first-> plenty time to ***** hide your dreads ,what is that if not the biggest deliberately avoidance taking any kind of risk?
I know you are just another "pirate" wannabe who wants to blow things up without any risk involved. Hiding it behing some capital balance+ RP thing...
Actually, I know plenty of bored Privateers that attack POS for no other reason than to kill it. I've also seen Pirates from lowsec temporarily set up a POS in a wormhole for logistics just to destroy a POS or two that was already there, and I've seen evidence of people who simply Wardec just to destroy a POS for griefing purposes. It's not exactly uncommon.
Edit: If I supported the idea of Dreads in Highsec, it would be conditional on Siege Mod's not being useable there.
|
LordElfa
Golden Lyon Warriors
|
Posted - 2011.06.14 00:31:00 -
[34]
Edited by: LordElfa on 14/06/2011 00:34:11
I'm not against any kind of sub-super capital in high sec. They aren't capable of spreading more firepower than a fleet of BS's and using them as devices of ganking would be dumb given the cost.
Also, they would add an interesting aspect to high sec wars. I personally would love to see some of the kinds of wars you seen in null take place in high sec with dreads standing in for titans and carriers for super carriers.
Also, since High Sec is a training ground, it would let new cap pilots learn how to jump and use their caps in battles without being sprung upon by a huge pirate nest or null sec blob gang.
ттттттт
CSM6-Hated by fools for who they are; Loved by the knowledgeable for what they will do. |
DrysonBennington
Eagle's Talon's
|
Posted - 2011.06.14 02:12:00 -
[35]
I think that all capitol ship's should be allowed to freely come in an out of high sector given their security status. They would not however be able to fire on any target, provide any type of drone or ship based repair as well as all bonuses being reduced to zero.
....If however the capitol should be attacked by an aggressor then the ship's weapon's system's would be released by Concord in order for the capitol ship to defend itself. Once the aggro timer had returned to zero the ship's defensive and offensive system's would return to a state of zero use.
The capitol ship would only be allowed to stay in any high sector system for 24 hours after which Concord would locked the capitol ship into the station hangar that would cost the owner no less than one billion ISK to have Concord release the ship into the owners hand's.
|
Echo Mande
|
Posted - 2011.06.14 12:46:00 -
[36]
No. Capitals do not belong in highsec.
I would much rather ban supercaps from 0.4 and maybe 0.3.
Allowing covert cynos in highsec (even just 0.5-0.6) is something I really could live with.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |