EVE Search - Remake Caldari Drake and Raven textures

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Remake Caldari Drake and Raven textures

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Jayrendo Karr	Posted - 2011.06.12 22:28:00 - [1] Both are widely used ships with absolutely terrible textures. They could look fantastic but they don't with such low res textures.
Tom Gerard Caldari RPS holdings Auctorita Alliance	Posted - 2011.06.12 22:35:00 - [2] Originally by: Jayrendo Karr Both are widely used ships with absolutely terrible textures. They could look fantastic but they don't with such low res textures. No no no no no never ever a million times OMFG NO! Buffing Caldari in any way is a slippery slope back to cavalry ravens and cruise kestrels. Caldari should be removed completely or left abandoned as they are. Three PVP viable races is already two too many.
BLACK-STAR	Posted - 2011.06.12 23:52:00 - [3] Originally by: Tom Gerard No no no no no never ever a million times OMFG NO! Buffing Caldari in any way is a slippery slope back to cavalry ravens and cruise kestrels. Caldari should be removed completely or left abandoned as they are. Three PVP viable races is already two too many. how about you just go play a different game then.
Generals4	Posted - 2011.06.13 00:00:00 - [4] Originally by: BLACK-STAR Originally by: Tom Gerard No no no no no never ever a million times OMFG NO! Buffing Caldari in any way is a slippery slope back to cavalry ravens and cruise kestrels. Caldari should be removed completely or left abandoned as they are. Three PVP viable races is already two too many. how about you just go play a different game then. He already is. It's called: "trolling the hell out of the forums"
Westmarch Caldari	Posted - 2011.06.13 00:19:00 - [5] Edited by: Westmarch on 13/06/2011 00:19:23 .
Bexar Yang	Posted - 2011.06.13 00:31:00 - [6] If they are going to do the Caldari Drake and Raven, I think they should also do the Gallente Drake and Raven.
Burhtun	Posted - 2011.06.13 00:55:00 - [7] Raven needs a hell of a lot more than a simple re-skin.
Tel'Kar'Tir	Posted - 2011.06.13 01:04:00 - [8] Basically they need to make raven and drake equivalent ships better looking too but drake looks like its texture took an acid bath.
OverlordY	Posted - 2011.06.13 02:12:00 - [9] Most of the ships in eve have textures so bad i think they used windows paint to make them. They badly need updated.r
Katrina Oniseki Caldari 0rizen 0rizen Nation	Posted - 2011.06.13 04:32:00 - [10] In case you have not yet noticed with the Scorpion and Maller redesigns, as well as a full devblog detailing how they -are- upgrading all the textures in the game.... Here you go. READ IT. CCP has already stated they intend to rework most if not all ships in the game. Some ships will be redesigned (Scorpion, Maller), and some ships will just get a fresh set of textures. afaik, the Drake has already been said to be on the list for a redesign, along with other ships that have 'fake launchers' on them. This is presumably to make room for visible launcher turrets in the future. Whether CCP will actually do this or not remains to be seen, but ALL ships will receive fresh textures thanks to the new project mentioned in the devblog.
Katrina Oniseki Caldari 0rizen 0rizen Nation	Posted - 2011.06.13 04:39:00 - [11] Originally by: CCP Hammer Yes we were spying on you when you were playing Wing Commander and we have the VHS tapes to prove it. As far as ship skins weÆre working on it. Each ship needs to be upgraded to the new shader version as mentioned in this blog: http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=732 Taken from HERE.
Nova Fox Gallente Novafox Shipyards	Posted - 2011.06.13 07:25:00 - [12] Raven is probably the last caldari battleship to get a major overhaul. The drake however will not get a redesign, they'll just rip out the missile launchers in place of real launchers models if they ever get to it. Pre-order your Sisters of ≡v≡ Exploration ship today, Updated 3APR11
Lidia Prince Caldari	Posted - 2011.06.13 08:14:00 - [13] Yup. Tho we won't get a new Drake until new missile launchers will be done, and that's quite a time to wait. Year at least. Raven is probably the only thing I don't quite understand, I have no idea how CCP manages to keep it's model and textures so blurry and outdated, even though it's one of the most popular PVE ships. And Rokh needs a new sexy dark texture too, maybe then someone will actually use it somewhere. I know I will. But you know, no matter how hard I want to see some ships redesigned/reskinned, they should start with rookie ships. A lot of people complaining about their look, even CSM (UAxDEATH and Mittani both said it in their CSM6 podcasts) . ****ing Ibis...
impli Singularity. Talon Alliance	Posted - 2011.06.13 09:28:00 - [14] Vexor needs really a tex update .. raven needs new design like the now pretty scorpion :D or in incarna the maler .. Nice done ..
Le Meistars	Posted - 2011.06.13 09:37:00 - [15] Originally by: Katrina Oniseki In case you have not yet noticed with the Scorpion and Maller redesigns, as well as a full devblog detailing how they -are- upgrading all the textures in the game.... Here you go. READ IT. CCP has already stated they intend to rework most if not all ships in the game. Some ships will be redesigned (Scorpion, Maller), and some ships will just get a fresh set of textures. afaik, the Drake has already been said to be on the list for a redesign, along with other ships that have 'fake launchers' on them. This is presumably to make room for visible launcher turrets in the future. Whether CCP will actually do this or not remains to be seen, but ALL ships will receive fresh textures thanks to the new project mentioned in the devblog. yeah right... like in the next 8 years
Jayrendo Karr	Posted - 2011.06.13 13:00:00 - [16] Edited by: Jayrendo Karr on 13/06/2011 13:04:59 Edited by: Jayrendo Karr on 13/06/2011 13:02:18 Wow a reskin of a completely remade ship? they already remade the scorpion. Lets remake ships that are extremely common ie Megathron Raven Cane Myrm etc. EDIT:noone uses rookie ships for more than 20 minutes they should never be reskinned. Rookie ships should be ugly to promote advancing out of them ASAP. EDIT:I just want conformation that launchers will be made or not made. No post has said yes or no directly.
Rolare Amarr	Posted - 2011.06.13 13:12:00 - [17] Originally by: Jayrendo Karr Edited by: Jayrendo Karr on 13/06/2011 13:04:59 Edited by: Jayrendo Karr on 13/06/2011 13:02:18 Wow a reskin of a completely remade ship? they already remade the scorpion. Lets remake ships that are extremely common ie Megathron Raven Cane Myrm etc. EDIT:noone uses rookie ships for more than 20 minutes they should never be reskinned. Rookie ships should be ugly to promote advancing out of them ASAP. EDIT:I just want conformation that launchers will be made or not made. No post has said yes or no directly. Missiles will be left out because lasers are the way to go! :D Actually been explained by a dev somewhere in that other thread about turret animations and all, and why there's no missile turret love.
Zagam	Posted - 2011.06.13 13:29:00 - [18] Originally by: Lidia Prince And Rokh needs a new sexy dark texture too, maybe then someone will actually use it somewhere. I know I will. I'll start using the Rokh when railguns don't suck as hard. ---------.oOo.---------- Chaos, Madness, and Destruction. My work here is done.
Grimpak Gallente The Whitehound Corporation Frontline Assembly Point	Posted - 2011.06.13 13:33:00 - [19] Originally by: Jayrendo Karr EDIT:I just want conformation that launchers will be made or not made. No post has said yes or no directly. the devs said it will be a freakin' pain in the ass to made launcher turrets because: 1 - they need to be build from scratch, unlike the turrets; 2 - you need to strip every missile-capable ship of their launcher modules (crapton of them, really); 3 - you need to fiddle with the physics engine if you want the turrets to move, and even if you don't want them to move you need to fiddle with it because... 4 - the missiles need to get out of the tubes instead of a central location, which also requires fiddling with with the physics engine. so yes, that's actually a **ton of work to be done. Even if you don't want to go with step 3 to 4 and just have the models there and the missiles spawning like today it's still a ton of work. I guess it compares (or even surpasses) the ammount of work that was needed to actually have blueprint copies different from blueprint originals. --- Quote:** The more I know about humans, the more I love animals. ain't that right.
Metal Icarus Caldari	Posted - 2011.06.13 14:37:00 - [20] Originally by: Grimpak Originally by: Jayrendo Karr EDIT:I just want conformation that launchers will be made or not made. No post has said yes or no directly. the devs said it will be a freakin' pain in the ass to made launcher turrets because: 1 - they need to be build from scratch, unlike the turrets; 2 - you need to strip every missile-capable ship of their launcher modules (crapton of them, really); 3 - you need to fiddle with the physics engine if you want the turrets to move, and even if you don't want them to move you need to fiddle with it because... 4 - the missiles need to get out of the tubes instead of a central location, which also requires fiddling with with the physics engine. so yes, that's actually a **ton of work to be done. Even if you don't want to go with step 3 to 4 and just have the models there and the missiles spawning like today it's still a **ton of work. I guess it compares (or even surpasses) the ammount of work that was needed to actually have blueprint copies different from blueprint originals. even if it is a lot of work, that is definitely worth doing.
Ripley Nostromo	Posted - 2011.06.13 14:57:00 - [21] Edited by: Ripley Nostromo on 13/06/2011 14:58:10 Originally by: Tom Gerard Originally by: Jayrendo Karr Both are widely used ships with absolutely terrible textures. They could look fantastic but they don't with such low res textures. No no no no no never ever a million times OMFG NO! Buffing Caldari in any way is a slippery slope back to cavalry ravens and cruise kestrels. Caldari should be removed completely or left abandoned as they are. Three PVP viable races is already two too many. Geez, you're a loser...
Katrina Oniseki Caldari 0rizen 0rizen Nation	Posted - 2011.06.13 20:11:00 - [22] Originally by: Ripley Nostromo Edited by: Ripley Nostromo on 13/06/2011 14:58:10 Originally by: Tom Gerard Originally by: Jayrendo Karr Both are widely used ships with absolutely terrible textures. They could look fantastic but they don't with such low res textures. No no no no no never ever a million times OMFG NO! Buffing Caldari in any way is a slippery slope back to cavalry ravens and cruise kestrels. Caldari should be removed completely or left abandoned as they are. Three PVP viable races is already two too many. Geez, you're a loser... No, he's a troll.
Sig Sour	Posted - 2011.06.13 20:15:00 - [23] DOMINIX
Murev Vorchilde Caldari End Game.	Posted - 2011.06.13 20:20:00 - [24] Originally by: Katrina Oniseki Originally by: Ripley Nostromo Edited by: Ripley Nostromo on 13/06/2011 14:58:10 Originally by: Tom Gerard Originally by: Jayrendo Karr Both are widely used ships with absolutely terrible textures. They could look fantastic but they don't with such low res textures. No no no no no never ever a million times OMFG NO! Buffing Caldari in any way is a slippery slope back to cavalry ravens and cruise kestrels. Caldari should be removed completely or left abandoned as they are. Three PVP viable races is already two too many. Geez, you're a loser... No, he's a troll. is there a difference? - How Id Fix

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.