|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Jaddar
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 21:27:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Jaddar on 15/06/2011 21:28:51 What are you all on about, people? This sounds like a children quarrel, not like a grown-up constructive criticism and negotiation session! "CCP said what?! I'm gonna take my toys and go away, go kill yourself, CCP!"
First of all, you all seem to have missed the part in which they ask for constructive criticism. They said nothing is set in stone. Everything can be changed. "What do you guys think we should change about it and how?" Can we really not have a conversation about it instead of kicking and screaming?
And what's all this bull about CCP wanting to rip off people and get rich off of this?! They make $6M / month! Even if they would get a thousand developers to pay for this license, it would bring an additional 0.2% income!
I propose we try to get a little organized, stop kicking and screaming, and actually compile a list of grievances. What is it about the license as presented that we don't agree with? I for one think that indeed, you should only pay for the license if you make money out of your product. So I propose that we should see a version of the license with this changed. If the change does not look good, we can further amend it. Does this really sound so out of place? |
Jaddar
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 22:39:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Jaddar on 15/06/2011 22:39:38
Originally by: Woodman2 Holy crap, reading through these comments it's clear to me that 99% of you didn't bother to read the dev blog.
+1
|
Jaddar
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 22:52:00 -
[3]
The summary of all these pages of... comments is this:
- we have no problem paying 99$ / year for a license as long as we make real money selling our applications - we do have a problem paying 99$ / year for a license if we don't make real money selling our applications
Where "selling our applications" means earning real money in exchange for giving people access to use the application.
How can the license terms be changed to have everyone happy? Perhaps there could be multiple licenses, each with different terms for different purposes?
|
Jaddar
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 22:56:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Nooto aren't services wich are to be paid by rl cash forbidden by the EULA and TOS?
They are. That's the whole purpose of this license, to allow payment via real life cash.
|
|
|
|