Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

HyperFaggas
The Official Hyperdallas Fanclub
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 17:08:00 -
[1]
Minmatar can pick damage type that they do and gallante is not. This way it nullifies the blaster "more damage" argument. This is exacly why minmatar is so preferd in pvp combined with more range,
Discuss!
|

Otocinclus
Minmatar Project Nemesis WE FORM VOLTRON
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 17:09:00 -
[2]
das real cool mang
|

Dograzor
The Black Rabbits The Gurlstas Associates
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 17:11:00 -
[3]
God not this thread again. -
"We don't gank, we just apply force in a disproportionate manner during an uneven tactical combat situation to maximize revenue and increase shareholder value" |

Cronus Zontanos
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 17:12:00 -
[4]
That may be somewhat true, but the gallente setup was designed to take down a kiting team. Damp down the tengus to get them close then pound them into oblivion with the vindis. Even if they had brought machs instead of vindis they would have lost outright as well.
|

savage308
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 17:13:00 -
[5]
Gallente ships can dish out ALOT of DPS but this is the sacrifice to have that type of DPS, not that great of range. I mean there are hyperions I believe with a t2 fit that dish 2k dps. (I think im not sure I can't remember)
|

Deja Thoris
Invicta. Rooks and Kings
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 17:13:00 -
[6]
Or Bane just got the calling wrong.
It's not a case of gall is underpowered.
|

Lilith Velkor
Minmatar Heretic Army B A N E
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 17:32:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Lilith Velkor on 19/06/2011 17:32:21
Expected rock, got scissors.
This is what is wrong with gallente, people do what we just did, trying to counter scissors with paper.
GL Voltron, we had our fun nonetheless.
|

Lucius Voltar
Gallente The ArchAngel Vanguard
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 17:34:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Hyper***gas Minmatar can pick damage type that they do and gallante is not. This way it nullifies the blaster "more damage" argument. This is exacly why minmatar is so preferd in pvp combined with more range,
Discuss!
You missed that minmatar is more agile, faster, more efficient forms of reps and remote reps, their ranged weapon (arts) are not broken like rails and the list goes on. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Time will tell, sooner or later, time will tell.
The Divine Dominion |

Blubber Bubba
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 17:34:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Hyper***gas Minmatar can pick damage type that they do and gallante is not. This way it nullifies the blaster "more damage" argument. This is exacly why minmatar is so preferd in pvp combined with more range,
Discuss!
You want Omni-damage?
|

Jaigar
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 17:37:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Hyper***gas Minmatar can pick damage type that they do and gallante is not. This way it nullifies the blaster "more damage" argument. This is exacly why minmatar is so preferd in pvp combined with more range,
Discuss!
First off, blasters are incredibly damaging to the typical kinetic/thermal holes in sleipnir's resists.
How can u call 5 damage battlecrusiers beating out 2 faction battleships unbalanced? It was just a poor team.
|
|

HyperFaggas
The Official Hyperdallas Fanclub
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 17:37:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Blubber Bubba
Originally by: Hyper***gas Minmatar can pick damage type that they do and gallante is not. This way it nullifies the blaster "more damage" argument. This is exacly why minmatar is so preferd in pvp combined with more range,
Discuss!
You want Omni-damage?
interesting, why not?
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |