EVE Search - Poll - X here is you don't load Station Environment

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Poll - X here is you don't load Station Environment

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Galdor Gallente Khatovar Industries Ltd	Posted - 2011.06.23 08:37:00 - [1] A lot of whining going on for nothing. Are you people actually whining because CCP evolved the game to keep up with modern mmo's and made use of modern technology? Give me a break, go play 'Space Orbit' if you want a cheap, no-brainer space game with no immersion. I like Incarna a lot and I look forward to where CCP is headed with the new features.
Galdor Gallente Khatovar Industries Ltd	Posted - 2011.06.23 08:56:00 - [2] Originally by: Tippia Edited by: Tippia on 23/06/2011 08:47:48 Originally by: Galdor A lot of whining going on for nothing. Are you people actually whining because CCP evolved the game to keep up with modern mmo's and made use of modern technology? "Evolving" does not include the removal of functionality, reduction of choice and options, reduction of immersion, and breaking the established lore. So no, people are not whining for that reason. They're whining because CCP is not evolving the game, but rather moving backwards. Lol, the CQ still has all the functionality of the old stations. Leaving the pods does NOT break the lore. It has always been in the lore before Incarna. It has never said the pilots stay in the pods forever, that is physically impossible. The pew-pew players just have allergic reactions to anything other than pulling a trigger is the problem. Throwing fits solves nothing.
Galdor Gallente Khatovar Industries Ltd	Posted - 2011.06.23 08:59:00 - [3] Originally by: Lexxxii Originally by: Galdor A lot of whining going on for nothing. Are you people actually whining because CCP evolved the game to keep up with modern mmo's and made use of modern technology? Give me a break, go play 'Space Orbit' if you want a cheap, no-brainer space game with no immersion. I like Incarna a lot and I look forward to where CCP is headed with the new features. Anyone who completely misses the point of the concerns everyone has here can't be the sharpest knife in the box Sharp enough to know if you had one, you would have said it instead of wasting a post just to flame.
Galdor Gallente Khatovar Industries Ltd	Posted - 2011.06.23 09:03:00 - [4] Originally by: Furb Killer X, incarna isnt that bad of an idea, but CCPs implementation is. Also want ship spinning (and no not MT for ship spinning) I laugh every time someone tries to use that as a reason. That is like saying "No thanks, I don't want the keys to a fast car, I just want the little model to look at so I can spin it in my hand..." Speaking of fast, if you can't load a simple CQ and have fps problems; then get a better PC and don't whine to reduce the game features just because you're suffering.
Galdor Gallente Khatovar Industries Ltd	Posted - 2011.06.23 09:06:00 - [5] Originally by: Tippia Originally by: Galdor [Lol, the CQ still has all the functionality of the old stations. Incorrect, but if you aren't familiar enough with either station view to know this, I can understand why you think people are whining. Some of the quickest and most immediately accessible ways of managing your ship has been completely removed. They are also going to remove the functionality of not loading station environments to begin with. Quote: Leaving the pods does NOT break the lore. The ability to leave the pods does not; the requirement to leave them does. The ability to do so very quickly does. The idea of walking in the buff, covered in goo, on a metal grating in full view of the world does. Incarna breaks immersion and goes against the lore far more than it improves and follows them. As far as the elements you say break lore goes, it's a game. Like every other game out there, you have to bend certain rules and cut corners in the interest of time and entertainment. No one would want to wait hours for a pilot to remove himself from a pod after docking, you are being unrealistic in not seeing the bigger picture.
Galdor Gallente Khatovar Industries Ltd	Posted - 2011.06.23 09:10:00 - [6] Originally by: Tippia Originally by: Galdor Speaking of fast, if you can't load a simple CQ and have fps problems; then get a better PC and don't whine to reduce the game features just because you're suffering. àor they could just keep the feature with next to no additional work and make more people happy. Why does the idea of people having options scare you so much? Why are you so butthurt over the idea that people aren't interested in loading content they don't intend to use? Because thanks to Moore's Law, technology evolves at an ever increasing rate and with that, technology components inevitably become more inexpensive. Thus, leaving no reason why a gamer can't be surprised that games require more and more technology and likewise require gamers to upgrade along with it.
Galdor Gallente Khatovar Industries Ltd	Posted - 2011.06.23 09:12:00 - [7] Originally by: Tippia Originally by: Galdor As far as the elements you say break lore goes, it's a game. Like every other game out there, you have to bend certain rules and cut corners in the interest of time and entertainment. No one would want to wait hours for a pilot to remove himself from a pod after docking, you are being unrealistic in not seeing the bigger picture. So you agree, then, that they should keep the hangar view. Good. Don't put words in other people's mouths. I said, bend not break rules by having a cheaply designed little model sitting in a hangar so gamers can spin the ship like a 2 yr old with a toy. The old stations are gone, change happens, life goes on. Have a nice day

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.