EVE Search - Captain's Quarters Farce

All Channels

Market Discussions

Captain's Quarters Farce

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Chevy Prefectus	Posted - 2011.06.23 16:50:00 - [1] What a lot of effort devoted to bloatware! The long walk into the Captain's Quarters the memory it consumes, make it a nogo for me. I turned it off after a few minutes. Perhaps .001% of the effort could have been used to rid the annoying trait of Acceleration Gates to ensnare ships upon arrival. Thanks for nothing CCP!
Hi Cholesterol	Posted - 2011.06.23 17:01:00 - [2] Plus three updates in three days, it appears the code was not sufficiently tested. CCP released beta at best.
Ray McCormack Nordar Innovations.	Posted - 2011.06.23 17:05:00 - [3] I like it. But you sir, GTFOOMD. Walking In Stations I Pretty Cool, Thanks.
Dretzle Omega Caldari Ozeki Corp.	Posted - 2011.06.23 17:06:00 - [4] Originally by: Hi Cholesterol Plus three updates in three days, it appears the code was not sufficiently tested. CCP released beta at best. Not even close. You either don't work in development or don't understand your industry. Originally by: Akita T BTW, if you see God when you're clutching for your chest due to sudden realization you have no chance to get out of this with your wallet intact tell him he still owes me money
Ray McCormack Nordar Innovations.	Posted - 2011.06.23 17:10:00 - [5] Originally by: Dretzle Omega Not even close. You either don't work in development or don't understand your industry. Release early, release often? Walking In Stations I Pretty Cool, Thanks.
Dretzle Omega Caldari Ozeki Corp.	Posted - 2011.06.23 17:16:00 - [6] Edited by: Dretzle Omega on 23/06/2011 17:16:36 Originally by: Ray McCormack Originally by: Dretzle Omega Not even close. You either don't work in development or don't understand your industry. Release early, release often? More that just the understanding that with a release, especially a large one, on a system this complicated, you're not going to always (read: ever) get it exactly right the first time. It's not because they're fail developers, didn't test, etc. But yes, I like your mantra, too. Originally by: Akita T BTW, if you see God when you're clutching for your chest due to sudden realization you have no chance to get out of this with your wallet intact tell him he still owes me money
Hexxx Minmatar	Posted - 2011.06.23 17:18:00 - [7] Originally by: Chevy Prefectus What a lot of effort devoted to bloatware! The long walk into the Captain's Quarters the memory it consumes, make it a nogo for me. I turned it off after a few minutes. Perhaps .001% of the effort could have been used to rid the annoying trait of Acceleration Gates to ensnare ships upon arrival. Thanks for nothing CCP! Your opinion is important and valued, and obviously correct even when faced with dissent by those who actually do enjoy CQ and are annoyed by whiners like yourself.
Calypsa Aeurelieus	Posted - 2011.06.23 17:33:00 - [8] I honestly am indifferent. I like the idea and the concept, and am intrigued to see what the future holds and how interactive they make stations both player to station and player to player. However, at the same time I can understand the bitterness some might have because of the extra stresses this puts onto older systems. To be honest EVE has done a good job of keeping the older systems in the chain, but from the sounds of the future of walking in stations my take the requirements up a slight notch.. start saving for your upgrades. Note: As of right now you can turn the function off, but from what I've heard (Have no sources other than forum-fail, but I'm assuming it was mentioned somewhere by someone in CCP) that eventually this function will be phased out.
Dretzle Omega Caldari Ozeki Corp.	Posted - 2011.06.23 18:04:00 - [9] Who'd of thunk it? A modern gaming company upgrading their game to be in line with average modern computers and average standards of the industry. Huh, guess I should emoquit. Originally by: Akita T BTW, if you see God when you're clutching for your chest due to sudden realization you have no chance to get out of this with your wallet intact tell him he still owes me money
Hexxx Minmatar	Posted - 2011.06.23 18:06:00 - [10] Originally by: Dretzle Omega Who'd of thunk it? A modern gaming company upgrading their game to be in line with average modern computers and average standards of the industry. Huh, guess I should emoquit. Emoragequit while weeping tears of bitterness you mean.
Calypsa Aeurelieus	Posted - 2011.06.23 18:11:00 - [11] Edited by: Calypsa Aeurelieus on 23/06/2011 18:11:52 Just like any other investment in a capitalist world. Got to go where the majority of the money is. I have no problem with the changes and no worries about my computer running them though I do feel bad that some people simply can't afford to upgrade their hardware... but hopefully since they know "it's coming" they will try to allocate funds for such.
Amarr Citizen 155 Nordar Innovations.	Posted - 2011.06.23 19:10:00 - [12] Originally by: Ray McCormack Originally by: Dretzle Omega Not even close. You either don't work in development or don't understand your industry. Release early, release often? That's my motto!
Bluebeard Minmatar LoneStar Industries Comatose Alliance	Posted - 2011.06.23 19:18:00 - [13] Originally by: Amarr Citizen 155 Originally by: Ray McCormack Originally by: Dretzle Omega Not even close. You either don't work in development or don't understand your industry. Release early, release often? That's my motto! I bet the girls just love you
Scorpii Zenith Minmatar Ancient Heat	Posted - 2011.06.23 19:40:00 - [14] Originally by: Chevy Prefectus What a lot of effort devoted to bloatware! The long walk into the Captain's Quarters the memory it consumes, make it a nogo for me. I turned it off after a few minutes. Perhaps .001% of the effort could have been used to rid the annoying trait of Acceleration Gates to ensnare ships upon arrival. Thanks for nothing CCP! Buy more ram, noob!
SencneS Rebellion Against Big Irreversible Dinks	Posted - 2011.06.23 20:11:00 - [15] People who have issues with running EVE need to upgrade their machines period... why... I have a machine that was purchased back in 2006... 1x - AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Manchester 2.4GHz Socket 939 Dual-Core Processor 2x - EVGA 256-P2-N553-AX GeForce 7600GT 256MB 128-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16 SLI Support Video Card 1x - GIGABYTE GA-K8N Pro-SLI 939 NVIDIA nForce4 SLI ATX AMD Motherboard with 1394b 1x - COOLMAX CW-650T 650W ATX12V / EPS12V SLI Certified CrossFire Ready Active PFC Aluminum Power Supply 2x - CORSAIR ValueSelect 1GB (1 x 1024MB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 533 (PC2 4200) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory That runs Captain's Quarters just fine.... 2006, FIVE YEARS AGO.. No problem.. It runs at 1280x1024, full screen Windows XP SP3 OS. I'm sorry to say, if you have a problem running EVE and Incarna, you're using something OLDER then a machine built back in 2006.. Time to suck it up and spend $400 on the cheapest machine you can find, because that will out-perform this thing. By the way, you're in the wrong forum... Amarr for Life
Raz Xym	Posted - 2011.06.23 20:17:00 - [16] Originally by: Bluebeard Originally by: Amarr Citizen 155 Originally by: Ray McCormack Originally by: Dretzle Omega Not even close. You either don't work in development or don't understand your industry. Release early, release often? That's my motto! I bet the girls just love you Okay this quote was the best part of Incarna so far.
Nak hak	Posted - 2011.06.23 20:33:00 - [17] Originally by: Bluebeard Originally by: Amarr Citizen 155 Originally by: Ray McCormack Originally by: Dretzle Omega Not even close. You either don't work in development or don't understand your industry. Release early, release often? That's my motto! I bet the girls just love you Yes best post.
Cheeba Don Fusion Enterprises Ltd Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2011.06.23 20:37:00 - [18] Originally by: SencneS I'm sorry to say, if you have a problem running EVE and Incarna, you're using something OLDER then a machine built back in 2006.. Time to suck it up and spend $400 on the cheapest machine you can find, because that will out-perform this thing. Im sorry but thats not the point. The issue is that the new useless captains quarters suck up system resources. I use a 2009 super powerful machine, but I often have 3 eve clients runnings plus all the other programs in the background. A huge part of the eve clientbase is multiboxers and even on a sweet system, the performance goes to **. Maybe you dont agree with having multiple accounts, but as the is the md forums, I would presume everyone would be **ed at how ccp is stuedly alienating their best customers. --------- oOk!
Dretzle Omega Caldari Ozeki Corp.	Posted - 2011.06.23 20:45:00 - [19] Originally by: Cheeba Don Originally by: SencneS I'm sorry to say, if you have a problem running EVE and Incarna, you're using something OLDER then a machine built back in 2006.. Time to suck it up and spend $400 on the cheapest machine you can find, because that will out-perform this thing. Im sorry but thats not the point. The issue is that the new useless captains quarters suck up system resources. I use a 2009 super powerful machine, but I often have 3 eve clients runnings plus all the other programs in the background. A huge part of the eve clientbase is multiboxers and even on a sweet system, the performance goes to **. Maybe you dont agree with having multiple accounts, but as the is the md forums, I would presume everyone would be ed at how ccp is stuedly alienating their best customers. 5 players running 1 account is better than 1 player running 5 accounts any day of the week. Originally by:** Akita T BTW, if you see God when you're clutching for your chest due to sudden realization you have no chance to get out of this with your wallet intact tell him he still owes me money
knanid volatar	Posted - 2011.06.23 20:53:00 - [20] Originally by: SencneS People who have issues with running EVE need to upgrade their machines period... why... I have a machine that was purchased back in 2006... 1x - AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Manchester 2.4GHz Socket 939 Dual-Core Processor 2x - EVGA 256-P2-N553-AX GeForce 7600GT 256MB 128-bit GDDR3 PCI Express x16 SLI Support Video Card 1x - GIGABYTE GA-K8N Pro-SLI 939 NVIDIA nForce4 SLI ATX AMD Motherboard with 1394b 1x - COOLMAX CW-650T 650W ATX12V / EPS12V SLI Certified CrossFire Ready Active PFC Aluminum Power Supply 2x - CORSAIR ValueSelect 1GB (1 x 1024MB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 533 (PC2 4200) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory That runs Captain's Quarters just fine.... 2006, FIVE YEARS AGO.. No problem.. It runs at 1280x1024, full screen Windows XP SP3 OS. I'm sorry to say, if you have a problem running EVE and Incarna, you're using something OLDER then a machine built back in 2006.. Time to suck it up and spend $400 on the cheapest machine you can find, because that will out-perform this thing. By the way, you're in the wrong forum... Are you really that surpised that a dual SLI setup works for CQ? REALLY? Personally I think you have got to be either trolling or mentally deficient if you think that is the case...
Cheeba Don Fusion Enterprises Ltd Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2011.06.23 21:16:00 - [21] Originally by: Dretzle Omega Originally by: Cheeba Don Originally by: SencneS I'm sorry to say, if you have a problem running EVE and Incarna, you're using something OLDER then a machine built back in 2006.. Time to suck it up and spend $400 on the cheapest machine you can find, because that will out-perform this thing. Im sorry but thats not the point. The issue is that the new useless captains quarters suck up system resources. I use a 2009 super powerful machine, but I often have 3 eve clients runnings plus all the other programs in the background. A huge part of the eve clientbase is multiboxers and even on a sweet system, the performance goes to **. Maybe you dont agree with having multiple accounts, but as the is the md forums, I would presume everyone would be **ed at how ccp is stuedly alienating their best customers. 5 players running 1 account is better than 1 player running 5 accounts any day of the week. But before this patch both types of customer were happy...? --------- oOk!
Breaker77 Gallente Reclamation Industries	Posted - 2011.06.23 23:44:00 - [22] Edited by: Breaker77 on 23/06/2011 23:45:07 Originally by: Dretzle Omega 5 players running 1 account is better than 1 player running 5 accounts any day of the week. 5115 = 1515 How is 5 players running 1 account better than 1 player running 5 accounts? After all CCP is a money grubbing corporation. All that matters is the bottom line, and both add the same amount to it. fakedit: Yes I know that 5 different people is much better than 1 person with 5 accounts. However CCP really doesn't care as long as the money keeps coming in. Not to mention that CCP has actively encouraged people to have more than 1 account with all the Power of 2 promotions and the way you can run multiple instances each with their own settings all from 1 install.

CCP Fallout	Posted - 2011.06.23 23:47:00 - [23] Off-topic. Locked. There are plenty of threads in General Discussion that you can post to regarding Captain's Quarters. Fallout Associate Community Manager CCP Hf, EVE Online Contact us


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.