| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 13 post(s) |
MeBiatch
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
550
   |
Posted - 2012.09.13 22:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Word on the street is that the Cane and (Drake or HML) will be seeing some downward adjustments. I wouldn't count these cruisers out just yet.
-Liang
something tells me the cane will loose those two utility high slots...
and heavy missiles will get thier range reduced...
and for the myrm i hope it looses the repping bonus gets a sentry drone damage bonus and looses a high slot for a low slot or two... plus increased drone bay and up the activation amount to 4 sentries so thats 100 mb
Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point?
-áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |
MeBiatch
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
550
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 01:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
I'm Down wrote:4 dev replies and 0 answers later, still waiting to hear how the pure DPS Belicose is somehow a disruptor cruiser that out dps's both Amarr Cruisers maxed out on dps even if the Maller gets a 5% damage bonus
Exactly what about painters disrupts anything?
well out of 4 ships minnie needed a missile ship... and amarr use tracking distrupers so having the belly being a missile ships that gets a bonus to TP works nice for me...
Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point?
-áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |
MeBiatch
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
550
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 04:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ashera Yune wrote:Another thing to consider is buffing the rigs for sensor dampening strength.
The Tech 1 rsd rig is a mere 5% increase. The tech 2 is a 7.5% increase.
The rigs were nerfed when damps were nerfed.
i really think the answer has to be in ship bonus... we dont want a rsd on every ship like before the nerf...
10% per level and 20% to optimal range would make this a sick ship!
Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point?
-áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |
MeBiatch
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
551
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 18:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
How about for ecm they work against missiles reducing their flight time and ex velocity... So turn ecm in to td but for missiles...
Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point?
-áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |
MeBiatch
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
551
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 20:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote: lots of truth.
unfortuantly lian is correct...
what we really need is for tracking compes and tracking enhacnes to also work on missiles... have a flight time bonus and speed bonus (for optimal range and fall off) and then a ex velocity bonus eq to tracking....
though tbh the condor is op untill the updated tristan comes around to kill it...
Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point?
-áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |
MeBiatch
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
551
|
Posted - 2012.09.15 13:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
i wish velocity bonus for missiles included a ex velocity bonus...
Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point?
-áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |
| |
|