EVE Search - What game feature would u rather have had fixed?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

What game feature would u rather have had fixed?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Cannonfodder1982	Posted - 2011.06.24 17:34:00 - [1] Edited by: Cannonfodder1982 on 24/06/2011 17:34:37 with all the time/money that has gone into incarna (a waste imo) what bug/feature would u have rather had fixed instead pick only one.
Herping yourDerp	Posted - 2011.06.24 17:37:00 - [2] hmm... this is a tough call, i think they should redo the security zones, highsec should have little pvp, lowsec should have some security, but pvp would happen NPC nullsec should have very very very little security but still some, empty nullsec should be hey ur not blue your dead now :D i guess i want to see lowsec have the possibility to have solo/small group industrial/mission activities.
Cannonfodder1982	Posted - 2011.06.24 17:40:00 - [3] I myself would like faction warfare to have more about it. its a great idea poorly executed, owning systems has no real value capping plex's has no real rewards. id like it to be better
Alias 6322A	Posted - 2011.06.24 17:52:00 - [4] I have for a long time wanted a full expansion for Faction Warfare revamped - introducing solo PvP, gang PvP, as well as staged fleet PvP. Basically a permanent set of 'arenas' to spice up the combat. Naturally the whole system needs a look at as far as how FW is rewarding and penalizing as a career, the rank system had a lot of potential (can you imagine a ladder system ingame as opposed to the KB's online?) I personally advocated the FW LP store having items only FW pilots could purchase AND use - i.e. you had to be a licensed and trained militant to utilize the gear. It wouldn't be OP like tourney ships, but have slightly improved values, or maybe even just look different allowing RP pilots to really distinguish their ship as a militia ship. As much as I want FW...it won't be revised anytime soon I'm sure and, truth be told, Nullsec really does need more attention than FW relative to the players affected and the fact SC's are so messed up.
Phollocks Gallente Before the Dawn	Posted - 2011.06.24 18:00:00 - [5] FW for me too. I have a bizarre attachment to the ideals of the Gallente Federation, but as it stands... why bother?
Aqriue	Posted - 2011.06.24 18:01:00 - [6] The new ship graphics they said they would work on since the scorpion remodel. During past 1.5 year, we got the Zephyr (just prior to scorpion but there was someone working in the art department), scorpion released (awesome looking), primea, reskined noctis, and Echelon. Somewhere in between and now there was a contest for a minmatar battleship ship they said they would use in game (ETA; infinity), incursion ships? (assuming there was some work on ships because they created the SC for it), new character art, and 5 months worth of sub for Monocles, a useless 3D interface in CQ that shortcut commands work just as well (seriously, roll out walking in stations all at once or stop hyping half ass work as a completed expansion) and stupid crappy turrets that no one asked let alone see unless you zoom in really close that look like they come from Last Starfighter/Tron 1 era special effects. Best artwork to date is the Maller amarr cruiser, which if they spent any time on ship graphics like they did for the Maller where 99% of the interaction takes place in game they would be at least half done since the scorpion remodel.
Eolithic WithaTwist Caldari Science and Trade Institute	Posted - 2011.06.24 18:02:00 - [7] Originally by: Cannonfodder1982 Edited by: Cannonfodder1982 on 24/06/2011 17:34:37 with all the time/money that has gone into incarna (a waste imo) what bug/feature would u have rather had fixed instead pick only one. If you could fix CCP i think that would make many players happy. ------------------------------------------- We Are Internet Spaceship Pilots. We do not forgive, we do not forget.
Fakespace	Posted - 2011.06.24 18:12:00 - [8] Edited by: Fakespace on 24/06/2011 18:14:24 As you say, a problem is that alot of us see way to many bad/broken/outdated stuff in EVE that need fixing. What you see is that there seems to be realy realy slow progress right now on anything thats not directly CARBON based, but "only" EVE spesific (like theres a difference anymore). The last patch seems so focused toward carbon, that ppl like you question the sanity of the overall strategy. Dont misunderstand, I'm only for re-use of code WHERE ITS MERITED, but i'm still for it. Peronally i like alot of the stuff they HAVE managed to do, mainly iterate away alot of small everyday fubars. Also the the carbon ui has potential, the future plans they have for this in EVE is an good example of stuff they should try to communicate better. So, imhu its not as bad as seems (hopefully well start to see changes now that the basic framework is inn). Ppl would probably better tollerate carbon if they also touched/iterated on at least one MAJOR EVE-spesific issue in such a big patch, or even if they only were BETTER at telling how the (GAMEPLAY?) issues in EVE will (magically:) be fixed by the new shiny carbon. However, you are also right, microtransaction in EVE is just not what most ppl consider a merited use of resources. Makeing the FIRST sandbox based things alot ppl try out in EVE a bitt more interesting would probably give more staying customers i.e mining, normal belt ratting, fw and so on in that order... you know, the BASICS of the sandbox, the stuff that leads to ppl staying long enough to finally grouping up in 1000 man fleets and get hooked :)
Karash Amerius Sutoka	Posted - 2011.06.24 18:18:00 - [9] Factional Warfare Expansion / Fixing Wormhole Space Expansion / Fixing New ship classes ========================= Karash Amerius - Operative - Sutoka Fighting Broke - A Eve Online Blog =========================
HeIIfire11	Posted - 2011.06.24 18:20:00 - [10] Gallente/hybrids
Anna Maziarczyk	Posted - 2011.06.24 18:23:00 - [11] Edited by: Anna Maziarczyk on 24/06/2011 18:22:52 Personaly i would rather have new stuff. New ships, new variants of ships. New modules, equiptment, things i can use in the field. Whats more, new Ore types, new crafting things low level people can get into. I know some people are satisfied with the amount of things as it is now. I just like a constant stream of new items and stuff. In game, not in some cash shop. Whats more, if they really want to attract new players, they should start working on more things low level people can do besides get ganked and join a corp.
Tengu Skunkworks	Posted - 2011.06.24 18:26:00 - [12] Missile launchers that work.
Cannonfodder1982	Posted - 2011.06.24 19:28:00 - [13] i cant really comment on 0.0 space etc as i dont really go there, but it does seam like alot of people are crying out for his to be fixed. however this is not a new problem its been around for aslong as i have (2008) but since then we have had worm holes added, incursions carbon toons and now that CQ thing its theproblem as a whole really add something new patch a few small bugs in it, leave it generally unfinished and badly thought out and move onto something new, rinse and repeat. i for one just like things to be finished, i know everything wont be perfect but just do a better job of it. and i cannt fathom a good reason why CCP feel the need to change things that allready work. even little things like where the wallet balance is the capacitor colour FFS why bother? think back to the accell gate electricity it looked pretty cool and seamed relevent, why would they feel its a good idea and change it to like a wind type "thing" really? why? im gonna stop now as i dont really want this to be a rant thread so in short CCP finish something before u move on to the next bit!
HaRDOuSeK Ghostbusters Co.	Posted - 2011.06.24 19:37:00 - [14] I would like to fix: - fleet lag (and also that good idea with slow motion - search forum for more info)
Murashu Liberal Frontier Enterprises BricK sQuAD.	Posted - 2011.06.24 19:49:00 - [15] As someone who has been strung along for years waiting to finally have my own avatar I ♥ walking in stations and wouldn't trade it for any other feature. I would have had no complaints though if they had sc**d the dominion expansion and fixed faction warfare though. I'm still **ed about the cruise-torp fiasco in dominion. _______ Murashu Agony's End

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.