Originally by: Black Dranzer

---

Edited by: Black Dranzer on 25/06/2011 03:50:50
God damn it Navigator, you should've just kept your head down, but you didn't, did you?

Originally by: CCP Navigator

---

Guys and girls,

The forum rules are quite explicit and our job, on the Community team, is to enforce those rules. Rule number nine states:

'Private communication between the Game Masters, Eve Team members, moderators and administrators of the forum and the forum users is not to be made public on these forums or by any other venue. You are not permitted to publicize any private correspondence (including petitions) received from any of the aforementioned.'

The rules are clear, posting any private communication from any member of CCP is not permitted on ths forums.

---

---

Originally by: Khamelean

---

You do realise that rule number 9 would also apply if the communication in question was fake?

---

Originally by: CCP Navigator

---

Guys and girls,

The forum rules are quite explicit and our job, on the Community team, is to enforce those rules. Rule number nine states:

'Private communication between the Game Masters, Eve Team members, moderators and administrators of the forum and the forum users is not to be made public on these forums or by any other venue. You are not permitted to publicize any private correspondence (including petitions) received from any of the aforementioned.'

The rules are clear, posting any private communication from any member of CCP is not permitted on ths forums.

---

Originally by: Steph Wing

---

Edited by: Steph Wing on 25/06/2011 04:29:52
Guys.

Look at the wording of Navi's post.

He's throwing us a bone the only way he can; by citing that rule and giving us de facto confirmation of the email's legitimacy.

---

Originally by: Steph Wing

---

Edited by: Steph Wing on 25/06/2011 04:29:52
Guys.

Look at the wording of Navi's post.

He's throwing us a bone the only way he can; by citing that rule and giving us de facto confirmation of the email's legitimacy.

I for one thank him for doing his job so dilligently.

---

Originally by: Black Dranzer

---

Edited by: Black Dranzer on 25/06/2011 03:50:50
God damn it Navigator, you should've just kept your head down, but you didn't, did you?

Originally by: CCP Navigator

---

Guys and girls,

The forum rules are quite explicit and our job, on the Community team, is to enforce those rules. Rule number nine states:

'Private communication between the Game Masters, Eve Team members, moderators and administrators of the forum and the forum users is not to be made public on these forums or by any other venue. You are not permitted to publicize any private correspondence (including petitions) received from any of the aforementioned.'

The rules are clear, posting any private communication from any member of CCP is not permitted on ths forums.

---

---

Originally by: Steph Wing

---

Edited by: Steph Wing on 25/06/2011 05:04:24
If anything has become apparent these last 24 hours, it's that CCP's ground-level employees, the GMs, the moderators, the devs, are not the problem. They can see the writing on the wall, they're just unable to do anything about it because upper management won't listen.

Navi has just, as I said, thrown us a bone the only way he can.

---

Originally by: Ishtanchuk Fazmarai

---

Obviously someone at CCP is not happy with the official stance and is leaking info.

THX to whoever corresponds and for the rest, have my signature:

---

Originally by: larry hotter bigpants

---

Originally by: Iamien

---

Edited by: Iamien on 25/06/2011 03:59:18

Originally by: Black Dranzer

---

In retrospect I have some sympathy for him. He's probably going to get chewed out for this, and he's only doing his job. Ugh.

---

Noone chews out a CEO. He is CEO and owner of most of the company.

---

Not entirely true. CCP is a publicly funded corporation. Ultimitly he answers to his shareholders.

---

Originally by: CCP Fallout

---

This is not the booze you are looking for.

---

Originally by: Takumi Shinano

---

This sounds frighteningly plausible. I've run into something similar in the past, where Corporate culture is local and there's a big disconnect between the local admin/management/support staff and the hired in 'games' talent.

Because said company's don't have much competition within their own country (and changing country every other year is tiresome in the extreme) salaries are lower than industry average and what little pressure there is to develop functional processes tends to be driven by whatever management techniques are fashionable outside the industry within the host country.

Obviously the US office has to compete with the US industry and doesn't suffer from this.

---