Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Yusitpeo Meoir
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:10:00 -
[31]
Originally by: Linar Mardolak there are laws against posting the underage pictures
There's also laws that says that the legal guardians are to be aware of the child's activities online. Clearly the legal guardian is at fault here, assuming that person was really underage.
|

Linar Mardolak
Minmatar Phlogiston Absorption
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:12:00 -
[32]
Originally by: diaufop
Originally by: Linar Mardolak
Always a few of the types that think that bullying girls and making sure their underage pictures are as widely distributed as possible is wrong? Yup. Always a few.
Took you all that time to think of such a snappy comeback? You wound me! 
No, I'm sure I don't. Just be proud that you get off on pictures of underage girls, and bullying. Arguing just makes it look like you're embarrassed.
|

diaufop
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:12:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Yusitpeo Meoir
Originally by: Linar Mardolak there are laws against posting the underage pictures
There's also laws that says that the legal guardians are to be aware of the child's activities online. Clearly the legal guardian is at fault here, assuming that person was really underage.
Arguing with the Moral Majority is like pounding sand down a rathole mate. It's best to just troll them and have a laugh - they do love getting riled up.
|

Linar Mardolak
Minmatar Phlogiston Absorption
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:14:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Yusitpeo Meoir
Originally by: Linar Mardolak there are laws against posting the underage pictures
There's also laws that says that the legal guardians are to be aware of the child's activities online. Clearly the legal guardian is at fault here, assuming that person was really underage.
Right.....never the fault of the person posting or bumping. So, you're also going on record as being in favor of looking at pictures of underage girls and making sure they're widely distributed, right? You feel that that's the right thing to do?
|

Linar Mardolak
Minmatar Phlogiston Absorption
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:16:00 -
[35]
Originally by: diaufop
Originally by: Yusitpeo Meoir
Originally by: Linar Mardolak there are laws against posting the underage pictures
There's also laws that says that the legal guardians are to be aware of the child's activities online. Clearly the legal guardian is at fault here, assuming that person was really underage.
Arguing with the Moral Majority is like pounding sand down a rathole mate. It's best to just troll them and have a laugh - they do love getting riled up.
Oh, I'm so far from Moral Majority, heh. However, I don't get off on bullying girls - at least those that aren't consenting adults. You've shown that you do, and you're proud of it.
|

Ultim8Evil
Ministry Of Eternal Disorder
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:17:00 -
[36]
How ironic then, that if IP addresses were logged on each page view (which they might be), it would show that you viewed the thread in question more than anyone else? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|

diaufop
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:19:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Ultim8Evil How ironic then, that if IP addresses were logged on each page view (which they might be), it would show that you viewed the thread in question more than anyone else?

|

Johny Fuckkin Dango
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:20:00 -
[38]
Originally by: Ultim8Evil How ironic then, that if IP addresses were logged on each page view (which they might be), it would show that you viewed the thread in question more than anyone else?
|

Linar Mardolak
Minmatar Phlogiston Absorption
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:21:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Ultim8Evil How ironic then, that if IP addresses were logged on each page view (which they might be), it would show that you viewed the thread in question more than anyone else?
I'm sure they were - with images off, and all the last page in order to collect the names of those bumping the post to make sure that the pictures were most widely seen - like you.
|

Gulliver Rex
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:22:00 -
[40]
Offense is the best defense. And, it is better to err on the side of caution. I'd really appreciate if CCP sent police to do some checking on the OP. We don't need people like that in the community.
|

Pherick Sjang
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:22:00 -
[41]
99% of the images in the thread were ponies.
0% were objectionable content (it was two links to a third-party site)
- Incarnageddon |

Linar Mardolak
Minmatar Phlogiston Absorption
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:23:00 -
[42]
Originally by: diaufop
Originally by: Ultim8Evil How ironic then, that if IP addresses were logged on each page view (which they might be), it would show that you viewed the thread in question more than anyone else?

...or you - by far the most prolific bumper, and proud enough of your actions to come here and brag.
Ironically, if you weren't so busy defending your interest in the pictures of the underage girl, this thread would have fallen off of the front page already.
|

Ultim8Evil
Ministry Of Eternal Disorder
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:23:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Linar Mardolak
Originally by: Ultim8Evil How ironic then, that if IP addresses were logged on each page view (which they might be), it would show that you viewed the thread in question more than anyone else?
I'm sure they were - with images off, and all the last page in order to collect the names of those bumping the post to make sure that the pictures were most widely seen - like you.
Tell it to the FBI.
Gary Glitter alt detected
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|

diaufop
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:24:00 -
[44]
Originally by: Gulliver Rex Offense is the best defense. And, it is better to err on the side of caution. I'd really appreciate if CCP sent police to do some checking on the OP. We don't need people like that in the community.
And I 
|

diaufop
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:27:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Pherick Sjang 99% of the images in the thread were ponies.
0% were objectionable content (it was two links to a third-party site)
Shhhhhhhhhhh! Don't tell him I was posting MLP image macros, he'll stop thinking I'm Ebil.
|

Linar Mardolak
Minmatar Phlogiston Absorption
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:28:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Pherick Sjang 99% of the images in the thread were ponies.
0% were objectionable content (it was two links to a third-party site)
Yes, a third-party site, so nothing directly illegal here. Just naming who bumped and posted it, not the internet police, no party van. The only thing I'm doing is listing who bumped. I'm going back and limiting to people who were insulting her or laughing about bumping, in fact.
While I don't have images turned on, I'm not counting pic posters in the thread as anything other than bumpers, and you'll notice your name's either already off of the list or marked as "just a pony pic". You're not the one that's here posting about how proud you are.
|

Yusitpeo Meoir
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:30:00 -
[47]
Originally by: Linar Mardolak So, you're also going on record as being in favor of looking at pictures of underage girls and making sure they're widely distributed, right? You feel that that's the right thing to do?
I'm going on record and saying you're blowing this way out of proportion.
|

Linar Mardolak
Minmatar Phlogiston Absorption
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:30:00 -
[48]
Originally by: diaufop
Originally by: Pherick Sjang 99% of the images in the thread were ponies.
0% were objectionable content (it was two links to a third-party site)
Shhhhhhhhhhh! Don't tell him I was posting MLP image macros, he'll stop thinking I'm Ebil.
You were doing more than that. Ultim8Evil has a better argument than you, and doesn't look as bad.
You kept bumping, and bumping, and bumping, to keep the thread on the front page and make sure as many as possible saw it. You know what you were doing, and somewhere inside, you know why.
|

diaufop
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:34:00 -
[49]
Edited by: diaufop on 27/06/2011 10:35:00
Originally by: Linar Mardolak
Originally by: diaufop
You kept bumping, and bumping, and bumping, to keep the thread on the front page and make sure as many as possible saw it.
You mean like I am with this one?
|

Nypheas Azurai
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:34:00 -
[50]
posting under-age content. if OP responds to this post, OP adds its pathetic self to pathetic list. --------------------
|

Linar Mardolak
Minmatar Phlogiston Absorption
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:35:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Yusitpeo Meoir
Originally by: Linar Mardolak So, you're also going on record as being in favor of looking at pictures of underage girls and making sure they're widely distributed, right? You feel that that's the right thing to do?
I'm going on record and saying you're blowing this way out of proportion.
Yup, bullying and underage nudity. All a big laugh, hm.
Can you say that in public? In front of a parent? Just say it out loud now, and see how it sounds there all alone in front of your computer. You defend the idea of bullying little girls on the internet and are proud enough to come speak out for it. You go, Yusitpeo. I'm sure someone is mighty proud of who they raised.
|

Muul Udonii
Minmatar Sick Tight BricK sQuAD.
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:37:00 -
[52]
What? I missed out on naked pictured of an underage player???
Was he sexy?
|

diaufop
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:38:00 -
[53]
Edited by: diaufop on 27/06/2011 10:39:21
Originally by: Muul Udonii What? I missed out on naked pictured of an underage player???
Was he sexy?
Was only topless side view, nothing too interesting. Worth calling the Internet Police about and getting trolled for, though, apparently.
|

Fas FapFap
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:41:00 -
[54]
ME! ME! ME! Tell on me as well.
|

Linar Mardolak
Minmatar Phlogiston Absorption
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:44:00 -
[55]
Originally by: Nypheas Azurai trollan...
You're proud of little naked girls being posted too, right? Enjoy it? How does that go over at work?
"How was your weekend, Nypheas?" "Oh, not too bad. Spent it bullying a girl by making sure her underage naked pictures were posted as widely is possible on an internet spaceship forum. How about you?"
You still think what you did was okay, and lulzworthy, and that's up to you. Just notice that there are only a few of you that are proud enough of what you've done to come and defend your actions
Some people saw something, and posted some ponies, BFD. Instead of saying "Oh, crap. You know, that was a real person, and maybe that was a stupid move. Perhaps I should think before doing something for lulz", you were proud enough of bullying by bumping the pictures of the naked underage girl that you came here to stand up for your actions.
|

Linar Mardolak
Minmatar Phlogiston Absorption
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:48:00 -
[56]
Originally by: Fas FapFap ME! ME! ME! Tell on me as well.
You're in the list, laughing at Vo Go for saying that he wasn't going to fap until he found out she was underage. Not a big deal, one bump. It's not like diaufop, repeatedly bumping the thread then coming here to talk about how proud he was.
|

diaufop
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:48:00 -
[57]
In other news......
I stopped bumping this thread long enough to look at some other threads on the forum....it really does look like 4chan's taken over the entire forum. Almost afraid to go to bed now, no idea what this place'll be like when I wake up.
|

Internet Knight
The Kobayashi Maru
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:49:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Linar Mardolak You know what you were doing, and somewhere inside, you know why.
I was mocking the fact that mods aren't awake. If I were a mod, I'd have banned OP straightaway. Unfortunately, I'm not.
I sure am glad we have vigilante warriors like yourself to take care of things though!
The world's not a moral place. You can't expect everyone to sit down and read the WHOLE thread just to pick out that one post that says she's underage all before clicking the links that someone says are to a naked woman. Remember, people get rickrolled all the time. Why? Because they click links before thinking.
And since you're counting who says what, I'll tell you and reiterate what I said earlier in this thread: if she was dumb enough to walk in front of a live webcam, she deserves to have this happen: she was clearly old enough to make decisions about it. It's not a video of her having sex with some dude. Indeed, if it were, I'd have shut it off immediately and wouldn't have posted in it - this is not the place for that irregardless of age. But it's not... it's a boob shot of someone that doesn't look underage, making a mockery of the fact that moderators were not performing their duties in other threads. I don't consider it to be net bullying any more than I would if someone had done the same to me. If someone had shown a naked picture of myself, I'd be curious how they got them, but I wouldn't be upset. ---
|

Fas FapFap
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:51:00 -
[59]
Just out of interest what age is/was she?
|

Nypheas Azurai
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:54:00 -
[60]
Since OP is so pathetic he has to double-bump his own fail topic for it to stay on top, I think we should use this opportunity for anyone who missed the other discussion to get caught up, feel free to contact me and we can swap illegal pictures of ponies. --------------------
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |