Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Katrina Cortez
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:13:00 -
[31]
Edited by: Katrina Cortez on 29/06/2011 04:14:10 They did consult with the CSM on a lot of things... CCP just chose to ignore most of it.
Ambulation... because spaceships don't have wallets. |

Terminal Insanity
Minmatar Convex Enterprises
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:15:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Ban Doga
Originally by: Terminal Insanity In short, Give us our NeX! We want more! Let these whiners cancel their subscriptions because for each quitter, theres 5 monocle-wearing New Eden citizens who are intelligent enough to know you wont intentionally destroy the game, even for short-term profits.
So if all is fine and dandy, why is the CSM being rushed to Iceland? If people quitting is not a problem why even bother to react to the current situation?
CSM is being rushed to iceland because CCP understands the players dont listen to CCP, and they're hoping that when the CSM says the exact same thing, people will listen this time.
Originally by: Discrodia That slide is from battlefield heros.
Battlefield heros is a match-based multiplayer game. Not an MMO.
Therefor, because players are not involved in maintaining a persistent universe, forum participation is minimal.
Therefor your argument is moot.
Oh, i'll agree with you that a slide from EA games about Battlefield Heros has absolutly nothing to do with CCP/EVE. Its silly that people even posted the EA slide to try and make their point against NeX. My use of the slide screenshot against the anti-nex people was also equally invalid as it does not represent eve/ccp in any way. I thought the fact the anti-nex people were using that slide, combined with the numbers included on the slide were funny.
Originally by: Katrina Cortez Edited by: Katrina Cortez on 29/06/2011 03:49:15 If non-vanity items was still there stance then they would have just come out and said it.
Have you watched this? Incarnageddon
CSM blogs - CSM Seleene's Blog(Seleene is an ex-CCP employee as well) Meissa Anunthiel
Yes, and im aware of CCP's lack of MT plans in the past. Did you read the same youtube video that you linked? They said they had "no plans at this time" etc. Meaning, they were focused on whatever current expansion was, patching bugs, etc etc, business as usual. Im sure if you asked them in 2006 they would have told you there were no plans for tech3 ships and Incarna also.
And as for the blog, all i see is raging over vanity items and the same old bs. i see no CCP quotes stating they would have non-vanity items, or that they had no intention on fixing incarna bugs.
|

Ayieka
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:16:00 -
[33]
confirming that all 52 monocle users are trolls.
|

MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:17:00 -
[34]
the CSM told the palyerbase this.
: Quote: This we have done after months of research by a group of highly competent professionals, soliciting input and perspective from thought leaders and experts in and around our industry.
And yet, a few weeks before release, they still didn't have a pricing plan to communicate to the CSM. I repeat, not that they didn't do it, they didn't HAVE it.
We went out with a decisive strategy on pricing and we will stay the course and not flip flop around or knee jerk react to the predictable.
Sooo, in essence, that says "**** you guys, you can shout all you want, we won't budge". This explains Zulu's devblog, and paints a bleak picture as far as negociation is concerned
|

Pure Tabasco
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:19:00 -
[35]
The personal thread of a monocle guy. 5/10 |

GeneralMartok
Caldari the united
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:19:00 -
[36]
Edited by: GeneralMartok on 29/06/2011 04:19:37 I love CCP/Incarna and I bought 2 quafe shirts and a monocle to support it
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:19:00 -
[37]
I agree with OP, ignore the people who aren't cancelling their accounts (the assclowns.) Because they'll stand by you no matter how many times you 'make love' to their skulls.
|

Katrina Cortez
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:23:00 -
[38]
sorry that should have said vanity items... not non-vanity items.
Ambulation... because spaceships don't have wallets. |

Terminal Insanity
Minmatar Convex Enterprises
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:28:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Le Sabre
Originally by: Terminal Insanity I've bolded the part that the 'sensible' protesters are questioning, this is directly from the link you provided.
Quote:
So this thing is vanity items only?
Yes. We will start out with a rather limited number of items initially, carefully measuring the demand and how it impacts the economy. As time progresses, we'll gradually introduce new items and revise our strategy. We've also discussed this issue in depth with the Council of Stellar Management and will both consult with them and keep them up to date every step of the way.
So you can see how their answer to their own question is sort of a non-answer. Personally, I couldn't care less about the vanity stuff since the game is about internet spaceships and not the dollies CCP have added. I want a definitive "No, we will never sell direct advantages for real world cash" and that's why I show up for the protests.
Well, look at the bible, and how many ways people have interpreted its words to mean completely opposite things. You can pick apart words and twist them around, re-frame them to suit your own beliefs, and theres nothing CCP or really anyone can do to cure that.
When i read that paragraph, i see that they have agreed its vanity only, and they'll be adding new products to it. The last bit about revising their strategy? Could mean they're shutting it down. Adding completely new side to the NeX store such as paint jobs, or even removing AUR in exchange for another system etc... it could mean a million things. You've chosen to believe it means non-vanity items, and thats not really CCP's fault.
|

Arias Dren
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:29:00 -
[40]
Edited by: Arias Dren on 29/06/2011 04:30:05
Originally by: Terminal Insanity
Wheres the problem here? You admit it was an opinion of one employee. There are open socialists in the Canadian government, it doesn't make our whole country a socialist country. It doesn't even mean that we're headed 'down that road'.
It simply means that they are open to listening, open to ideas and suggestions, of any kind. I applaud them for allowing their employees the freedom to express themselves and their ideas so openly. The only problem is that players got hold of it and screamed bloody murder.
Terminal Dumba$$, Seleene (ex-CCP employee current member of the CSM) stated on EVE radio when the Fearless stuff leaked, that it is a company memo basically intended to get all employees on the same page about upcoming content. It is not really what Zulu said, a newsletter to encourage debate. It is merely an late-stage orientation tool to easily disseminate the Flavour of the Month mission statement employees need to psyche themselves to.
"You guys know you do this, as a company. There is no divide between strategic direction and internal messaging. The Fearless newsletter is internal 'kool-aid' that most people swallow without even a second thought. Because it's an official internal newsletter, large numbers of CCP employees assume that whatever in it is written by smart people that are in touch with the players. If 'Fearless' says something, it's obviously backed up by lots of research and must be true, right?" - Seleene.
So stop keep trolling with that old hackneyed argument you wheeling out. 
|

Sisohiv
Gallente Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:35:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Katrina Cortez Edited by: Katrina Cortez on 29/06/2011 04:14:10 They did consult with the CSM on a lot of things... CCP just chose to ignore most of it.
CSMs were ass clowns too?
|

Skex Relbore
Gallente Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:35:00 -
[42]
I sure would love to have eyes and ears in that CSM meeting, I suspect it may end up being a tad heated.
Say what you like but people like Seleena and The Mittani don't seem like the sorts to go quietly along, and people who've been made to look like fools and pawns aren't generally particularly forgiving.
|

Montevius Williams
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:47:00 -
[43]
Originally by: MotherMoon Edited by: MotherMoon on 29/06/2011 04:15:07 Two Step is your CSM member is is in daily talks with CSM. You don't get to talk face to face to CCP, they do.
It was NOT on the test server. I am a test server regular. don't make **** up.
If an army general says "in my opinion I'd rather not have to follow the presidents order and just start a war for fun" it's ok becuase it's just his opinion? seriously?
The issue is they just had a huge meeting with the CSM. where they told them lots of NDA stuff. That can't tell us about. Yet they didn't tell them about a feature, not on the test server, that shouldn't of NDA anyways. It's like we didn't have a CSM.
In my opinion, cp shouldn't have to talk one on one with each player. that's a stupid idea. but if they give the player base the CSM, then they should talk to them. it's 6 people. And oddly... they do! everyday! yet it just.. happen.. to not be mentioned!
and yeah they were not talked about with the CSM over the last year. That's the whole reasons for the tipping point of rage. Do you follow anything? http://meissaanunthiel.blogspot.com/
the CSM wasn't told anything. AT ALL. everything they were told, ended up as a lie. The CSM is upset.
and yes there are a ton of asshats that are just mad, and making useless noise. But that does not mean all of the reasonable people that are upset don't have a good point.
Don't let the asshats blind you.
Actually, it was on the test server - I was there. There was actually MORE items for sale with Aur.
|

Arias Dren
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:49:00 -
[44]
Couldn't you just quote the bit you wanted to refute...?
I apologize for calling you this in advance. Idiot. 
|

Pure Tabasco
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:49:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Skex Relbore I sure would love to have eyes and ears in that CSM meeting, I suspect it may end up being a tad heated.
Say what you like but people like Seleena and The Mittani don't seem like the sorts to go quietly along, and people who've been made to look like fools and pawns aren't generally particularly forgiving.
I wish they could record all of it. Hearing it would be awesome, but could make more anger even if the ending seems good.
Until CSM tells me a good change coming from CCP. |

MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:52:00 -
[46]
Note I agree with you, ignore the asshats. yelling super loud doesn't help. taking the opposite doesn't either.
|

Terminal Insanity
Minmatar Convex Enterprises
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:52:00 -
[47]
Originally by: Arias Dren Edited by: Arias Dren on 29/06/2011 04:30:05
Originally by: Terminal Insanity
Wheres the problem here? You admit it was an opinion of one employee. There are open socialists in the Canadian government, it doesn't make our whole country a socialist country. It doesn't even mean that we're headed 'down that road'.
It simply means that they are open to listening, open to ideas and suggestions, of any kind. I applaud them for allowing their employees the freedom to express themselves and their ideas so openly. The only problem is that players got hold of it and screamed bloody murder.
Terminal Dumba$$, Seleene (ex-CCP employee current member of the CSM) stated on EVE radio when the Fearless stuff leaked, that it is a company memo basically intended to get all employees on the same page about upcoming content. It is not really what Zulu said, a newsletter to encourage debate. It is merely an late-stage orientation tool to easily disseminate the Flavour of the Month mission statement employees need to psyche themselves to.
"You guys know you do this, as a company. There is no divide between strategic direction and internal messaging. The Fearless newsletter is internal 'kool-aid' that most people swallow without even a second thought. Because it's an official internal newsletter, large numbers of CCP employees assume that whatever in it is written by smart people that are in touch with the players. If 'Fearless' says something, it's obviously backed up by lots of research and must be true, right?" - Seleene.
So stop keep trolling with that old hackneyed argument you wheeling out. 
Because ex-employees is a good source for un-biased opinions.
So if the Fearless newsletter is only about getting everyone on the same page...
Quote: No pair of pants, no matter how cool, should cost the same as a new Maserati; similarly, it would be silly to buy sunglasses for my avatar and pay the same price that i would for a faction battleship.
I guess the CCP employee didnt read the memo when setting prices in NeX... My point being, this newsletter is not company policy, it is suggestions, ideas, floating around to spark debate and opinions. Obviously the opinion about eyeware not costing the same as a faction battleship was ignored =P
|

Arias Dren
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:53:00 -
[48]
Edited by: Arias Dren on 29/06/2011 04:55:39 Edited by: Arias Dren on 29/06/2011 04:54:50 Edited by: Arias Dren on 29/06/2011 04:54:36 The -denial- is strong with this one. 
PS: Point is, he knows more the content and actual company -role- of the document than you do. Sorry kiddo. 
|

MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 04:58:00 -
[49]
Originally by: Montevius Williams
Originally by: MotherMoon Edited by: MotherMoon on 29/06/2011 04:15:07 Two Step is your CSM member is is in daily talks with CSM. You don't get to talk face to face to CCP, they do.
It was NOT on the test server. I am a test server regular. don't make **** up.
If an army general says "in my opinion I'd rather not have to follow the presidents order and just start a war for fun" it's ok becuase it's just his opinion? seriously?
The issue is they just had a huge meeting with the CSM. where they told them lots of NDA stuff. That can't tell us about. Yet they didn't tell them about a feature, not on the test server, that shouldn't of NDA anyways. It's like we didn't have a CSM.
In my opinion, cp shouldn't have to talk one on one with each player. that's a stupid idea. but if they give the player base the CSM, then they should talk to them. it's 6 people. And oddly... they do! everyday! yet it just.. happen.. to not be mentioned!
and yeah they were not talked about with the CSM over the last year. That's the whole reasons for the tipping point of rage. Do you follow anything? http://meissaanunthiel.blogspot.com/
the CSM wasn't told anything. AT ALL. everything they were told, ended up as a lie. The CSM is upset.
and yes there are a ton of asshats that are just mad, and making useless noise. But that does not mean all of the reasonable people that are upset don't have a good point.
Don't let the asshats blind you.
Actually, it was on the test server - I was there. There was actually MORE items for sale with Aur.
really? I remember everything costing 1 - 3 arurm and everyone asking what the plan was, and ccp keeping their mouth shut. but worse according to the CSM it wasn't that they were hiding it. it wasn't planned yet.
they wee even asked about it 2 days before release on live tv.
|

RougeOperator
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 05:04:00 -
[50]
Micro trans only made sense if EvE online was losing money.
But its very much the opposite. EvE online is making enough money that CCP felt they could field developing two other games.
EvE is a money maker under its sub based plan. No reason for MT other then pure greed.
This is now just them blatantly sticking it to the loyal player base and trying to bilk them for more money.
This is pure abuse of the players. If the sub model wasn't profitable I might understand the move to add MT. But This is complete crap on ever level.
Those that go along with this like its fine or that are trying to logically bargain their way out of it are rather sad as people. Only a step above the ones that simply accept it even when they know its poison.
|

Crellion
Parental Control HELL4S
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 05:05:00 -
[51]
Monocle wearers are so ridiculus that I suspect that the next expansion (after some odd 3 years of dedicated development) will bring as main feature 'monocle removal cosmetic surgery' at a mere 150k Aurum...
real bargain brosef...
Arguably my opinions represent to an extent the opinions of my alliance and in particular circumstances give rise to a valid "casus belli" claim. |

Doc Fury
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 05:05:00 -
[52]
Did the OP say ass-pennies?
We're not upset that you lied to us CCP, we're upset that from now on we can't believe you.
/I am not a Golden Goose /I am not a Cash Cow
|

MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 05:10:00 -
[53]
Originally by: Terminal Insanity
Originally by: Arias Dren Edited by: Arias Dren on 29/06/2011 04:30:05
Originally by: Terminal Insanity
Wheres the problem here? You admit it was an opinion of one employee. There are open socialists in the Canadian government, it doesn't make our whole country a socialist country. It doesn't even mean that we're headed 'down that road'.
It simply means that they are open to listening, open to ideas and suggestions, of any kind. I applaud them for allowing their employees the freedom to express themselves and their ideas so openly. The only problem is that players got hold of it and screamed bloody murder.
Terminal Dumba$$, Seleene (ex-CCP employee current member of the CSM) stated on EVE radio when the Fearless stuff leaked, that it is a company memo basically intended to get all employees on the same page about upcoming content. It is not really what Zulu said, a newsletter to encourage debate. It is merely an late-stage orientation tool to easily disseminate the Flavour of the Month mission statement employees need to psyche themselves to.
"You guys know you do this, as a company. There is no divide between strategic direction and internal messaging. The Fearless newsletter is internal 'kool-aid' that most people swallow without even a second thought. Because it's an official internal newsletter, large numbers of CCP employees assume that whatever in it is written by smart people that are in touch with the players. If 'Fearless' says something, it's obviously backed up by lots of research and must be true, right?" - Seleene.
So stop keep trolling with that old hackneyed argument you wheeling out. 
Because ex-employees is a good source for un-biased opinions.
So if the Fearless newsletter is only about getting everyone on the same page...
Quote: No pair of pants, no matter how cool, should cost the same as a new Maserati; similarly, it would be silly to buy sunglasses for my avatar and pay the same price that i would for a faction battleship.
I guess the CCP employee didnt read the memo when setting prices in NeX... My point being, this newsletter is not company policy, it is suggestions, ideas, floating around to spark debate and opinions. Obviously the opinion about eyeware not costing the same as a faction battleship was ignored =P
you never commented on my point.
If someone at a mcdonals in private says "I think we should serve hamburgers with spit in them"
and then it's leaked, is it ok becuase it was just his opinion to put spit in customers food?
but yeah I agree with you there was no reason to get mad over that newsletter other than the fact that it pointed out to people what the lead designer thought of the players. it could of been about any change. the fact the article was about MT was of no consequence.
|

Arias Dren
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 05:11:00 -
[54]
Originally by: RougeOperator Micro trans only made sense if EvE online was losing money.
But its very much the opposite. EvE online is making enough money that CCP felt they could field developing two other games.
EvE is a money maker under its sub based plan. No reason for MT other then pure greed.
This is now just them blatantly sticking it to the loyal player base and trying to bilk them for more money.
This is pure abuse of the players. If the sub model wasn't profitable I might understand the move to add MT. But This is complete crap on ever level.
Those that go along with this like its fine or that are trying to logically bargain their way out of it are rather sad as people. Only a step above the ones that simply accept it even when they know its poison.
Dude, it just -easier- for them to believe we're all wrong. After all, if they couldn't believe that, they would have to believe the 'alternative'. What alternative? That the developers, the caretakers of their (probably) favourite game... are committed to finding as many ways to take large amounts of their cash, and get out of having to work on ANY content that doesn't end with an increase in revenue.
I mean, come on. That may -actually- be scary to some people. Or at the very least, unpleasant to think about.
Much easier to just believe the rest of us are being "crazy".
Us crazy people. 
|

RougeOperator
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 05:13:00 -
[55]
Edited by: RougeOperator on 29/06/2011 05:13:42
Originally by: Arias Dren
Originally by: RougeOperator Micro trans only made sense if EvE online was losing money.
But its very much the opposite. EvE online is making enough money that CCP felt they could field developing two other games.
EvE is a money maker under its sub based plan. No reason for MT other then pure greed.
This is now just them blatantly sticking it to the loyal player base and trying to bilk them for more money.
This is pure abuse of the players. If the sub model wasn't profitable I might understand the move to add MT. But This is complete crap on ever level.
Those that go along with this like its fine or that are trying to logically bargain their way out of it are rather sad as people. Only a step above the ones that simply accept it even when they know its poison.
Dude, it just -easier- for them to believe we're all wrong. After all, if they couldn't believe that, they would have to believe the 'alternative'. What alternative? That the developers, the caretakers of their (probably) favourite game... are committed to finding as many ways to take large amounts of their cash, and get out of having to work on ANY content that doesn't end with an increase in revenue.
I mean, come on. That may -actually- be scary to some people. Or at the very least, unpleasant to think about.
Much easier to just believe the rest of us are being "crazy".
Us crazy people. 
Well the thing is if EvE is already profitable they could make it more so by ADDING content we want. Not trying to nickel and dime us for stuff we technically already paid for with crap no one really was dying for.
|

Val'Dore
Word Bearers of Chaos Word of Chaos Undivided
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 05:16:00 -
[56]
Confirming the OP has no idea that forum participation has zero to do with the statistics about who does or does not like something in the game. All that graph is proving is that most players are uninformed, and even fewer still provide much in the way of feedback at all.
Frankly, if you aren't willing to speak up, you don't deserve to be heard.
~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~
Tiericide |

Viking Sven
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 05:20:00 -
[57]
Originally by: RougeOperator
Well the thing is if EvE is already profitable they could make it more so by ADDING content we want. Not trying to nickel and dime us for stuff we technically already paid for with crap no one really was dying for.
Technically, we already pay for that. One of the things CCP promises with Eve is content expansions every x many months (2 per year? 3 per year? I dont really know or care). Thing is CCP just adds content they feel like adding, not what the players request. They honestly believe we should be perfectly happy walking around in our closet right now.
|

Terminal Insanity
Minmatar Convex Enterprises
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 05:34:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Arias Dren
The -denial- is strong with this one. 
PS: Point is, he knows more the content and actual company -role- of the document than you do. Sorry kiddo. 
PS2: PLUS, how you can be cynical about one guy who -used- to work for CCP, yet, not be cynical about a corporation, which you dumba$$es are always saying are a money making enterprise... is hilarious. Hilarious and dumb.
I can be cynical towards Seleen because she was forced out of her job. How would you feel about your former employer who fired you?
Im more trusting of CCP because they've been an excellent game company from the day i heard about them. They've created the CSM, which no other game on the planet has an equivalent of. They release regular devblogs detailing technical issues and how they fix them, they openly talk with the players on the forums, and ever joke around with them. I get a sense that CCP is a company at its heart, but have been extremely open to their customers. At least, much more then any other videogame company in the industry.
Look at valve... players pay to fly Gabe Newell to them... CCP flies its players to an icelandic vacation instead =)
About the Hilmar email... you must realize that he IS a boss of a company, and what do bosses do? They ether chew you out or pat you on the back, for the smallest of things. The opening line about how smoothly Incarna came, is partially true. If you consider how much technology was developed to make Incarna possible, compaired to the previous expansions, Incarna came out EXTREMELY smooth. It was a -massive- step, and the bugs were about the same as any other patch.
And yeah, the bugs are annoying and in some cases preventable, but hey, thats CCP, they've been like that forever lol.
|

Montevius Williams
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 05:39:00 -
[59]
Originally by: MotherMoon
Originally by: Montevius Williams
Originally by: MotherMoon Edited by: MotherMoon on 29/06/2011 04:15:07 Two Step is your CSM member is is in daily talks with CSM. You don't get to talk face to face to CCP, they do.
It was NOT on the test server. I am a test server regular. don't make **** up.
If an army general says "in my opinion I'd rather not have to follow the presidents order and just start a war for fun" it's ok becuase it's just his opinion? seriously?
The issue is they just had a huge meeting with the CSM. where they told them lots of NDA stuff. That can't tell us about. Yet they didn't tell them about a feature, not on the test server, that shouldn't of NDA anyways. It's like we didn't have a CSM.
In my opinion, cp shouldn't have to talk one on one with each player. that's a stupid idea. but if they give the player base the CSM, then they should talk to them. it's 6 people. And oddly... they do! everyday! yet it just.. happen.. to not be mentioned!
and yeah they were not talked about with the CSM over the last year. That's the whole reasons for the tipping point of rage. Do you follow anything? http://meissaanunthiel.blogspot.com/
the CSM wasn't told anything. AT ALL. everything they were told, ended up as a lie. The CSM is upset.
and yes there are a ton of asshats that are just mad, and making useless noise. But that does not mean all of the reasonable people that are upset don't have a good point.
Don't let the asshats blind you.
Actually, it was on the test server - I was there. There was actually MORE items for sale with Aur.
really? I remember everything costing 1 - 3 arurm and everyone asking what the plan was, and ccp keeping their mouth shut. but worse according to the CSM it wasn't that they were hiding it. it wasn't planned yet.
they wee even asked about it 2 days before release on live tv.
If the question is was it on the test server?: Yes, I tested muliple times buying a plex, converting Plex to Aur and buying a couple of shirts.
If the question is, did we think shirts and monocles were going to cost this much and was the cost communicated to the players?: No, test server prices were not high compared to what was rolled out in the live environment so in essense, people that tested the Noble Exchange were just as suprised as people that did not test and saw it for the first time. Prices were dirt cheap in testing and skyrocketed in game.
|

Tippia
Caldari Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.06.29 05:41:00 -
[60]
Why is it that when people refer to the Fearless newsletter to show that it was "only discussion" (which, btw, raises the question "if it's never going to happen, why are they discussing it?") they only focus on the pro/con spread and completely ignore the spread after it? ùùù ôWe want to try this thing called micro-transactions, but we don't know what it is. Can anyone explainà aw screw it, let's just do it! What could go wrong?ö ù ÇÇP |
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |